Mindanao Bus V. Assessor

  • Uploaded by: Julie Ann
  • 0
  • 0
  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Mindanao Bus V. Assessor as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 381
  • Pages: 1
Mindanao Bus v. City Assessor

Facts: Mindanao Bus Company is a public utility engaged in transporting passengers and cargoes by motor trucks in Mindanao has its main offices in Cagayan de Oro. The company is also owner to the land where it maintains and operates a garage, a repair shop, blacksmith and carpentry shops; the machineries are place on wooden and cement platforms. The City Assessor of Cagayan de Oro City assessed at P4,400 said maintenance and repair equipment. The company appealed the assessment to the Board of Tax Appeals on the ground that the same are not realty. The Board of Tax Appeals of the City sustained the city assessor, so the company filed with the Court of Tax Appeals a petition for the review of the assessment. The CTA held that the Company was liable to the payment of the realty tax on its maintenance and repair equipment. Hence, the company filed a petition for review with the Supreme Court. Issue: Whether or not the machineries assessed by the respondent are real properties? Held: Paragraph 5 of Article 415 of the New Civil which provides machinery, receptacles, instruments or implements intended by the owner of the tenement for an industry or works which may be carried on in a building or on a piece of land, and which tend directly to meet the needs of the said industry or works are immovable properties. Movable equipments to be immobilized in contemplation of the law must first be "essential and principal elements" of an industry or works without which such industry or works would be "unable to function or carry on the industrial purpose for which it was established." The tools and equipments in question in this instant case are, by their nature, not essential and principal elements of petitioner's business of transporting passengers and cargoes by motor trucks. They are merely incidentals-acquired as movables and used only for expediency to facilitate and/or improve its service. Even without such tools and equipments, its business may he carried on. the equipments in question are destined only to repair or service the transportation business, which is not carried On in a building or permanently on a piece of land, as demanded by the law. Said equipments may not, therefore, be deemed real property.

Related Documents

Mindanao
November 2019 9
Mindanao Uprising
October 2019 11
Mindanao Peace
October 2019 13
Bus
May 2020 35

More Documents from ""

Miranda Vs Arizona
May 2020 9
People Vs. Mahinay
May 2020 10
May 2020 17
Macasiano V. Diokno
May 2020 4
Roxas Vs. Ca
June 2020 2