Mcps Gt Global Screening 2008
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Mcps Gt Global Screening 2008 as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 8,345
- Pages: 20
Testing Brief November 2008
Office of Shared Accountability Division of Accelerated and Enriched Instruction
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008 E. Grace Chesney and Kay Williams Committee used multiple criteria to identify students as gifted and talented. According to guidelines established by the Division of AEI, no single criterion could be used to exclude a student from identification. Additionally, decisions not to identify could not bar any student from receiving accelerated and enriched instruction. All students were either identified as “gifted and talented”, recommended for rescreening, or not identified. At the end of the process, parents received a report and explanation of their child’s test scores (MCPS 2007).
Background The Montgomery County Board of Education Policy IOA, Gifted and Talented Education, sets as one of its purposes, “To extend each child’s intellectual boundaries and help all students achieve their highest potential.” Additionally, Criteria for Excellence: Gifted and Talented Program Guidelines, published by the Maryland State Department of Education, indicates that “An identification process should ensure that all gifted and talented students are recognized so they can be appropriately served.” In the spring of each year, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) conducts a screening of all Grade 2 students in order to meet these expectations. MCPS refers to this process as “global screening.”
In collaboration with staff in the Office of School Performance (OSP) and the Office of Shared Accountability (OSA), staff in the Division of AEI monitored the global screening process, analyzing student identification and performance by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 subgroups within the district and also by school.
Methodology Student demographic data, as well as identification status and recommendations for rescreening were reviewed, analyzed, and reported.
All Grade 2 students participated in the global screening process during spring 2008. As part of the process, a variety of student data were collected including parent, teacher, and staff surveys; students’ reading and mathematics instructional levels; and results of cognitive assessments including the Raven Test of Standard Progressive Matrices and the Analogies and Quantitative Reasoning subtests of the CTB/McGraw-Hill In View. Parent surveys were mailed home to all families of Grade 2 students and collected by schools. Translations of surveys were available in the five most commonly spoken languages in MCPS.
Results Students Screened and Identified A total of 3,940 students (40.9%) were identified as gifted and talented in 2007–2008, compared with 3,688 (39.4%) in 2006–2007 and 3,866 (39.5%) students in 2005–2006. Analysis of the data disaggregated by students’ race/ethnicity shows that in 2007–2008, African American and Hispanic students continue to be identified at a disproportionately lower rate than their Asian American or White peers (Appendix Tables 1–3).
Following the collection of data, each school’s Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Committee, chaired by an administrator, analyzed the data to make recommendations for instructional services for each student. After making recommendations for instruction, the Accelerated and Enriched Instruction (AEI)
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 1 in the Appendix shows the results of the spring 2008 Grade 2 global screening in percentage of students identified (40.9%), students recommended for rescreening (14.8%) and students not identified (44.3%). These data are disaggregated
1
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
2007–2008 (10 out of 37 students identified in 2007; 11 out of 22 students identified in 2008).
by students’ race/ethnicity and services provided, with a further breakdown by gender within each subgroup. The percentage of each student subgroup is represented relative to the number of students within the subgroup.
Table 4 in the Appendix shows the number and percentage of Grade 2 students identified as gifted and talented by individual school.
Table 2 in the Appendix shows the percentage of each student subgroup screened and identified in relationship to the total number of students in the county screened or identified. While African American students represent 22.4% of all the students screened in 2007–2008, they account for 13.6% of the total number of students identified, an increase from the 12.7% in 2006– 2007. Similarly, Hispanic students represent 21.6% of all students screened, and they account for 11.8% of the students identified, a slight decrease from the 11.9% in 2006–2007. Students who received Free and Reduced-price Meals System (FARMS), special education, and limited English proficiency (LEP) services also are underrepresented in the percentage identified, although the percent identified for all these three subgroups increased. Identified students who received FARMS services increased from 14.2% in 2006–2007 to 14.7% in 2007–2008. Similarly, identified students who received special education services increased from 3.8% to 4.6%, and identified students who received LEP services increased from 6.9% to 7.3%.
Tables 5 and 6 in the Appendix provide school-level data disaggregated by race/ethnicity and services provided. The number of students screened and the number and percent of students identified for each student subgroup are displayed. Students Recommended for Rescreening Of the 9,632 students screened, 14.8% (or 1,429 students) were recommended to be rescreened in spring 2009. This is a slight decrease from the 15.6% in 2006–2007.
Discussion The essential outcome of the global screening process is to ensure that the gifts of all students are revealed, documented, and developed throughout their years in MCPS. Multiyear data indicate that among students identified as gifted and talented, African American and Hispanic students continue to be underrepresented while White and Asian American students continue to be overrepresented. This pattern suggests that additional steps must be taken to reach equitable identification results. However, the data collected for the report are limited in their ability to inform specific reasons for the discrepancies and remedies to eliminate the gaps. The data from the Grade 2 global screening do not inform the system of the extent to which accelerated and enriched instructional programming is available among schools. To analyze equity in delivery of advanced instructional programming, MCPS would need more detailed data on services instead of analyzing only identification. Steps have been made in this direction with the collection of data for Math 6 in Grade 5 and Algebra 1 in Grade 8, and the documentation on the Student End-of-Year Record of the services recommended during global screening. Additional data points are necessary to form a more comprehensive analysis.
Table 3 in the Appendix shows the proportion of identified students within each student subgroup as a percentage of the number of students screened within the subgroup. For example, while 40.9% of all students screened are identified, only 24.8% of Grade 2 African American students and 22.2% of Hispanic students are identified. Table 3 in the Appendix shows an increase in the percentage of students identified for all subgroups with the exception of Hispanic students which remained stable (22.2%). For example, the percentage of African American students identified increased from 22.3% to 24.8%, Asian American students increased from 59.4% to 59.6%, and White students increased from 50.4% to 52.5%. The percent of identified students who received FARMS services increased from 19.5% to 20.5%. For students receiving special education and LEP services, the percent identified increased, respectively, from 17.4% to 20.2% and 16.9% to 17.0%. The American Indian subgroup had the largest increase in the percent identified, from 27.0% in 2006–2007 to 55.0% in
Office of Shared Accountability
Recommendations 1.
2
Staff in OSP, OSA, and the Division of AEI should continue to closely monitor the process and examine the issues of access to
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
2009. Professional development on the strategies that support primary talent development should be provided as a part of the curriculum rollout. Data should be collected and analyzed to determine consistent implementation of the model as well as the effectiveness in reducing the pattern of disproportionate identification.
rigorous and challenging instruction prior to and after Grade 2. 2.
Drawing from recommendations of the Deputy Superintendent’s Global Screening Project Team and the AEI Advisory Committee, AEI staff should prepare for the Board of Education a proposal for restructuring global screening, moving to a more continuous process that includes ongoing assessment of student achievement and cognitive abilities. The Grade 2 Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Committee meetings should become yearly articulation meetings that include analysis of individual student data to monitor each student’s participation and performance in designated accelerated and enriched services and to make recommendations for advanced level services for the next year.
3.
MCPS should continue to address the variance among schools in expectations, instruction, and services provided to students. To reach this goal, MCPS should expand the current collection of data in mathematics to reading language arts and other content areas to develop a system that documents and communicates enrollment and performance in accelerated and enriched instruction. Professional development on equitable teaching practices and on uncovering the gifts and talents of students should be provided to all staff members and especially staff in schools with high populations of students who are traditionally underrepresented in advanced level instruction. MCPS should encourage teachers to participate in graduate programs such as the Master's Degree Program in Elementary Education, with an Emphasis on Gifted Education offered by Towson University or the Graduate Certificate Program in Gifted Education offered by Johns Hopkins University.
4.
The primary talent development model which helps to reveal, nurture, develop, and document student strengths and is included in the revised kindergarten curriculum will be implemented as the curriculum is piloted in fiscal year
Office of Shared Accountability
References Montgomery County Public Schools. (2007). Procedures for recognition of elementary students for gifted and talented service. Rockville, MD: Author
3
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
THIS PAGE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Office of Shared Accountability
4
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008 Appendixes
Office of Shared Accountability
5
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 1 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified, Recommended to be Rescreened, or Not Identified in 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to number of students in subgroup)
All Students Females Males Race/Ethnicity African American Females Males American Indian Females Males Asian American Females Males Hispanic Females Males White Females Males Services Provided FARMS Females Males Special Education Females Males ELL Females Males
Identified
Recommended to be Rescreened N % 1,429 14.8 686 14.3 743 15.4
Screened N 9,632 4,802 4,830
N 3,940 1,988 1,952
% 40.9 41.4 40.4
Not Identified N % 4,263 44.3 2,128 44.3 2,135 44.2
2,155 1,037 1,118 20 13 7 1,568 783 785 2,083 1,060 1,023 3,806 1,909 1,897
535 288 247 11 6 5 934 481 453 463 246 217 1,997 967 1,030
24.8 27.8 22.1 55.0 46.2 71.4 59.6 61.4 57.7 22.2 23.2 21.2 52.5 50.7 54.3
349 158 191 2 1 1 233 111 122 346 165 181 499 251 248
16.2 15.2 17.1 10.0 7.7 14.3 14.9 14.2 15.5 16.6 15.6 17.7 13.1 13.1 13.1
1,271 591 680 7 6 1 401 191 210 1,274 649 625 1,310 691 619
59.0 57.0 60.8 35.0 46.2 14.3 25.6 24.4 26.8 61.2 61.2 61.1 34.4 36.2 32.6
2,835 1,429 1,406 898 286 612 1,698 827 871
581 318 263 181 51 130 288 146 142
20.5 22.3 18.7 20.2 17.8 21.2 17.0 17.7 16.3
477 226 251 93 17 76 295 134 161
16.8 15.8 17.9 10.4 5.9 12.4 17.4 16.2 18.5
1,777 885 892 624 218 406 1,115 547 568
62.7 61.9 63.4 69.5 76.2 66.3 65.7 66.1 65.2
Note. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Office of Shared Accountability
6
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 2 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to screened or identified for the entire county)
All Students Race/Ethnicity African American American Indian Asian American Hispanic White Services Provided FARMS Special Education ELL
2005–2006 Screened Identified N % n % 9,782 3,866
2006–2007 Screened Identified N % n % 9,364 3,688
2007–2008 Screened Identified N % n % 9,632 3,940
2,213 n/a 1,454 2,011 4,072
22.6 n/a 14.9 20.6 41.6
506 n/a 830 439 2,090
13.1 n/a 21.5 11.4 54.1
2,111 37 1,442 1,978 3,796
22.5 0.4 15.4 21.1 40.5
470 10 857 439 1,912
12.7 0.3 23.2 11.9 51.8
2,155 20 1,568 2,083 3,806
22.4 0.2 16.3 21.6 39.5
535 11 934 463 1,997
13.6 0.3 23.7 11.8 50.7
2,432 876 1,015
24.9 9.0 10.4
557 159 217
14.4 4.1 5.6
2,685 803 1,497
28.7 8.6 16.0
524 140 253
14.2 3.8 6.9
2,835 898 1,698
29.4 9.3 17.6
581 181 288
14.7 4.6 7.3
Note. Due to small numbers, data for American Indian students were not reported prior to 2006–2007, so column totals and percentages may not sum. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Table 3 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to number of students in subgroup)
All Students Race/Ethnicity African American American Indian Asian American Hispanic White Services Provided FARMS Special Education ELL
2005–2006 Screened Identified N n % 9,782 3,866 39.5
2006–2007 Screened Identified N n % 9,364 3,688 39.4
2007–2008 Screened Identified N n % 9,632 3,940 40.9
2,213 n/a 1,454 2,011 4,072
506 n/a 830 439 2,090
22.9 n/a 57.1 21.8 51.3
2,111 37 1,442 1,978 3,796
470 10 857 439 1,912
22.3 27.0 59.4 22.2 50.4
2,155 20 1,568 2,083 3,806
535 11 934 463 1,997
24.8 55.0 59.6 22.2 52.5
2,432 876 1,015
557 159 217
22.9 18.2 21.4
2,685 803 1,497
524 140 253
19.5 17.4 16.9
2,835 898 1,698
581 181 288
20.5 20.2 17.0
Note. Due to small numbers, data for American Indian students were not reported prior to 2006–2007. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Office of Shared Accountability
7
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burning Tree * Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill Cloverly Cold Spring College Gardens Cresthaven Capt. James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road
N n/a 87 49 61 103 132 78 66 67 99 66 64 55 51 50 94 76 98 50 61 64 121 44 92 117 69 50 85 71 74 98 74 47 64 67 66 85 56 91 94 97 78
Office of Shared Accountability
2006–2007
Identified
n n/a 32 34 24 46 54 33 24 41 47 41 14 17 19 15 n/a 18 25 16 18 37 46 22 35 49 24 23 26 39 38 29 19 20 30 33 20 51 31 26 57 60 30
% n/a 36.8 69.4 39.3 44.7 40.9 42.3 36.4 61.2 47.5 62.1 21.9 30.9 37.3 30.0 n/a 23.7 25.5 32.0 29.5 57.8 38.0 50.0 38.0 41.9 34.8 46.0 30.6 54.9 51.4 29.6 25.7 42.6 46.9 49.3 30.3 60.0 55.4 28.6 60.6 61.9 38.5
Screened
N n/a 86 60 72 89 137 72 79 66 101 62 64 65 56 52 89 53 88 54 63 52 111 45 102 55 68 59 74 50 100 n/a 78 42 74 73 63 75 60 78 72 97 73 (continued)
8
2007–2008
Identified
n n/a 36 38 27 41 38 40 21 35 53 52 20 23 15 10 n/a 15 23 25 23 30 64 21 33 18 15 19 27 27 45 n/a 13 9 34 34 15 32 32 13 46 59 30
% n/a 41.9 63.3 37.5 46.1 27.7 55.6 26.6 53.0 52.5 83.9 31.3 35.4 26.8 19.2 n/a 28.3 26.1 46.3 36.5 57.7 57.7 46.7 32.4 32.7 22.1 32.2 36.5 54.0 45.0 n/a 16.7 21.4 45.9 46.6 23.8 42.7 53.3 16.7 63.9 60.8 41.1
Screened
N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 67 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61 75 48 95 n/a 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62
Identified
n 16 48 42 35 46 39 36 18 49 55 40 20 17 25 10 n/a 13 25 22 17 31 58 21 34 13 36 10 30 33 46 n/a 23 18 25 44 10 35 33 35 46 55 20
% 32.0 56.5 72.4 41.2 46.0 28.7 53.7 33.3 51.0 55.0 63.5 33.3 29.3 42.4 19.2 n/a 26.0 23.6 31.9 25.8 58.5 43.0 50.0 42.5 24.5 41.9 16.4 40.0 68.8 48.4 n/a 27.7 40.9 34.7 55.0 22.2 59.3 50.0 36.8 51.7 65.5 32.3
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Georgian Forest * Germantown Glen Haven Glenallan Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood Harmony Hills Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates
Roscoe R. Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville
N 88 78 85 81 60 103 75 70 87 77 64 122 n/a 90 99 81 95 48 91 80 82 72 61 88 74 n/a 58 69 97 204 91 126 59 77 39 79 74 n/a 118 106 64 73
Office of Shared Accountability
2006–2007
Identified
n 26 36 37 20 18 30 41 n/a 20 22 24 32 n/a 32 59 28 24 19 48 39 25 38 22 50 28 n/a 36 27 39 99 16 49 18 27 12 31 33 n/a 57 41 16 14
% 29.5 46.2 43.5 24.7 30.0 29.1 54.7 n/a 23.0 28.6 37.5 26.2 n./a 35.6 59.6 34.6 25.3 39.6 52.7 48.7 30.5 52.8 36.1 56.8 37.8 n/a 62.1 39.1 40.2 48.5 17.6 38.9 30.5 35.1 30.8 39.2 44.6 n/a 48.3 38.7 25.0 19.2
Screened
N 66 57 88 71 72 112 76 69 46 72 54 90 92 93 96 81 90 50 75 87 85 74 40 105 77 111 57 85 91 147 108 108 57 73 37 83 91 98 101 100 63 69 (continued)
9
2007–2008
Identified
n 23 24 38 17 15 23 46 n/a 13 21 17 30 39 23 40 14 20 30 31 38 22 31 16 57 37 33 33 27 50 85 26 29 22 22 14 44 24 26 34 37 27 22
% 34.8 42.1 43.2 23.9 20.8 20.5 60.5 n/a 28.3 29.2 31.5 33.3 42.4 24.7 41.7 17.3 22.2 60.0 41.3 43.7 25.9 41.9 40.0 54.3 48.1 29.7 57.9 31.8 54.9 57.8 24.1 26.9 38.6 30.1 37.8 53.0 26.4 26.5 33.7 37.0 42.9 31.9
Screened
N 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 67 40 97 66 100 117 82 98 60 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67
Identified
n 19 23 29 16 21 29 45 n/a 16 21 19 46 42 15 44 16 11 18 31 41 25 43 15 57 44 48 30 36 38 90 26 39 16 18 20 46 37 34 56 44 28 19
% 25.3 25.6 34.9 23.2 32.8 25.9 60.0 n/a 40.0 21.6 28.8 46.0 35.9 18.3 44.9 26.7 18.3 37.5 42.5 49.4 35.2 45.3 26.8 52.8 50.6 35.0 56.6 45.6 38.4 59.2 27.1 34.5 33.3 26.9 54.1 48.4 41.6 28.8 47.9 47.8 53.8 28.4
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Potomac Judith A. Resnik Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing Watkins Mill Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
N 89 92 86 68 84 59 86 73 91 163 88 82 46 89 n/a 111 58 81 75 104 64 72 66 135 76 82 95 67 118 108 112 85 51 40 109 92 97 71 93 86
2006–2007
Identified
n 50 18 27 33 40 20 37 22 42 97 20 28 31 33 n/a 53 44 19 25 65 24 19 12 70 43 40 23 21 31 23 64 12 41 27 53 31 38 30 54 40
Screened
% 56.2 19.6 31.4 48.5 47.6 33.9 43.0 30.1 46.2 59.5 22.7 34.1 67.4 37.1 n/a 47.7 75.9 23.5 33.3 62.5 37.5 26.4 18.2 51.9 56.6 48.8 24.2 31.3 26.3 21.3 57.1 14.1 80.4 67.5 48.6 33.7 39.2 42.3 39.8 46.5
N 97 84 81 81 84 54 73 53 88 189 89 70 48 85 79 105 63 79 87 99 81 73 69 139 77 68 53 45 104 73 92 63 52 57 51 78 115 74 66 98
2007–2008
Identified
n 50 15 27 41 37 17 22 18 44 110 33 18 25 27 30 32 43 19 27 46 35 15 12 77 44 22 16 14 27 13 58 27 45 28 21 23 55 22 25 57
% 51.5 17.9 33.3 50.6 44.0 31.5 30.1 34.0 50.0 58.2 37.1 25.7 52.1 31.8 38.0 30.5 68.3 24.1 31.0 46.5 43.2 20.5 17.4 55.4 57.1 32.4 30.2 31.1 26.0 17.8 63.0 42.9 86.5 49.1 41.2 29.5 47.8 29.7 37.9 58.2
Screened
N 104 82 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89 90 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
Identified
n 60 23 35 43 32 22 30 21 53 92 30 23 23 38 27 56 50 19 26 54 31 16 14 85 45 30 24 23 19 12 50 23 33 20 16 27 46 30 42 57
% 57.7 28.0 40.2 58.1 39.5 38.6 40.0 31.8 48.6 48.7 42.3 34.8 52.3 46.3 30.7 51.4 70.4 25.0 28.0 50.5 47.0 25.4 17.7 62.0 62.5 42.3 32.4 46.0 21.3 13.3 53.2 36.5 57.9 52.6 21.1 31.4 44.2 37.5 56.8 58.8
* Burning Tree and Georgian Forest elementary schools are participating in a pilot program. In these schools, the multiple pieces of data collected during the global screening process are used solely to recommend appropriate accelerated and enriched instruction, and not to assign a label. All other schools use the multiple pieces of data collected during the global screening process both to recommend appropriate accelerated and enriched instruction and to assign a label.
Office of Shared Accountability
10
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
11 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill Cloverly
Screened N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61 75
All Identified n % 16 32.0 48 56.5 42 72.4 35 41.2 46 46.0 39 28.7 36 53.7 18 33.3 49 51.0 55 55.0 40 63.5 20 33.3 17 29.3 25 42.4 10 19.2 13 26.0 25 23.6 22 31.9 17 25.8 31 58.5 58 43.0 21 50.0 34 42.5 13 24.5 36 41.9 10 16.4 30 40.0
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 11 3 27.3 6 4 66.7 14 4 28.6 14 10 71.4 ** ** ** 7 5 71.4 10 2 20.0 12 9 75.0 18 7 38.9 30 17 56.7 68 15 22.1 16 9 56.3 6 1 16.7 14 12 85.7 6 1 16.7 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 11 6 54.5 7 1 14.3 29 20 69.0 ** ** ** 9 7 77.8 13 6 46.2 12 7 58.3 15 0 0.0 7 3 42.9 18 8 44.4 7 5 71.4 25 4 16.0 7 2 28.6 30 10 33.3 ** ** ** 66 14 21.2 18 8 44.4 11 1 9.1 14 3 21.4 26 5 19.2 17 8 47.1 ** ** ** 6 4 66.7 9 1 11.1 16 8 50.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 12 2 16.7 22 11 50.0 ** ** ** 18 5 27.8 16 3 18.8 9 8 88.9 25 3 12.0 5 3 60.0 10 2 20.0 11 4 36.4 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 29 8 27.6 11 4 36.4 6 4 66.7 28 3 10.7 9 0 0.0 38 8 21.1 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 8 1 12.5 7 1 14.3 ** ** ** 34 6 17.6 7 3 42.9 30 11 36.7 15 1 6.7 13 2 15.4 9 0 0.0 11 2 18.2 18 3 16.7 ** ** ** 15 4 26.7 6 2 33.3 8 3 37.5 6 2 33.3 14 4 28.6 23 3 13.0 8 1 12.5
White Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** 46 30 65.2 44 32 72.7 35 21 60.0 43 22 51.2 14 7 50.0 40 20 50.0 44 16 36.4 72 41 56.9 57 33 57.9 46 28 60.9 ** ** ** 29 11 37.9 ** ** ** 5 3 60.0 7 1 14.3 13 3 23.1 32 16 50.0 5 1 20.0 46 26 56.5 95 45 47.4 29 16 55.2 38 18 47.4 26 6 23.1 47 21 44.7 8 1 12.5 46 23 50.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
12 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Cold Spring College Gardens Captain James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Germantown Glen Haven Glenallen Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood Harmony Hills
Screened N 48 95 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 40 97 66 100 117 82 98 60
All Identified n % 33 68.8 46 48.4 23 27.7 18 40.9 25 34.7 44 55.0 10 22.2 35 59.3 33 50.0 35 36.8 46 51.7 55 65.5 20 32.3 19 25.3 23 25.6 29 34.9 16 23.2 21 32.8 29 25.9 45 60.0 16 40.0 21 21.6 19 28.8 46 46.0 42 35.9 15 18.3 44 44.9 16 26.7
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % ** ** ** 8 8 100.0 18 3 16.7 25 16 64.0 32 9 28.1 9 5 55.6 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 6 3 50.0 13 2 15.4 21 14 66.7 27 2 7.4 6 3 50.0 ** ** ** 24 16 66.7 33 15 45.5 8 6 75.0 56 12 21.4 13 10 76.9 8 2 25.0 30 20 66.7 ** ** ** 33 27 81.8 14 3 21.4 8 4 50.0 25 7 28.0 10 5 50.0 14 1 7.1 7 3 42.9 10 1 10.0 15 7 46.7 21 4 19.0 14 10 71.4 22 8 36.4 ** ** ** 63 16 25.4 20 9 45.0 6 2 33.3 12 10 83.3 13 4 30.8 ** ** ** 36 7 19.4 11 3 27.3 27 9 33.3 10 4 40.0 27 10 37.0 18 11 61.1 25 7 28.0 33 17 51.5 60 11 18.3 8 3 37.5 8 1 12.5 12 4 33.3 21 5 23.8 ** ** ** (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** 28 3 10.7 10 3 30.0 7 2 28.6 13 5 38.5 ** ** ** ** ** ** 16 5 31.3 11 3 27.3 ** ** ** 7 1 14.3 15 2 13.3 33 4 12.1 13 1 7.7 33 4 12.1 26 1 3.8 32 6 18.8 17 1 5.9 13 2 15.4 6 1 16.7 33 5 15.2 21 3 14.3 23 4 17.4 13 3 23.1 11 1 9.1 ** ** ** 33 8 24.2
White Screened Identified N n % 36 22 61.1 49 25 51.0 14 6 42.9 29 12 41.4 56 19 33.9 33 23 69.7 8 5 62.5 33 17 51.5 9 7 77.8 15 10 66.7 47 23 48.9 40 27 67.5 25 11 44.0 7 3 42.9 56 18 32.1 25 17 68.0 8 1 12.5 7 4 57.1 12 3 25.0 44 31 70.5 17 8 47.1 17 6 35.3 8 3 37.5 32 21 65.6 46 15 32.6 ** ** ** 74 37 50.0 6 3 50.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
13 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates Roscoe Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville Potomac Judith A. Resnik
Screened N 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67 104 82
All Identified n % 11 18.3 18 37.5 31 42.5 41 49.4 25 35.2 43 45.3 15 26.8 57 52.8 44 50.6 48 35.0 30 56.6 36 45.6 38 38.4 90 59.2 26 27.1 39 34.5 16 33.3 18 26.9 20 54.1 46 48.4 37 41.6 34 28.8 56 47.9 44 47.8 28 53.8 19 28.4 60 57.7 23 28.0
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** 10 3 30.0 ** ** ** 31 11 35.5 14 7 50.0 12 5 41.7 16 10 62.5 26 8 30.8 ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 ** ** ** 22 3 13.6 8 4 50.0 6 2 33.3 39 28 71.8 13 5 38.5 7 3 42.9 30 4 13.3 40 19 47.5 6 3 50.0 15 8 53.3 14 2 14.3 21 15 71.4 31 8 25.8 11 8 72.7 25 7 28.0 58 45 77.6 38 8 21.1 10 3 30.0 33 4 12.1 25 14 56.0 10 1 10.0 6 2 33.3 16 0 0.0 6 5 83.3 ** ** ** ** ** ** 22 9 40.9 23 14 60.9 22 6 27.3 7 5 71.4 39 7 17.9 15 8 53.3 24 10 41.7 12 4 33.3 13 3 23.1 9 7 77.8 31 14 45.2 11 9 81.8 5 0 0.0 ** ** ** 9 3 33.3 26 20 76.9 16 5 31.3 17 8 47.1 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 45 9 20.0 14 3 21.4 18 6 33.3 12 3 25.0 31 8 25.8 6 3 50.0 6 1 16.7 7 2 28.6 8 2 25.0 14 2 14.3 5 1 20.0 9 1 11.1 27 7 25.9 15 7 46.7 25 3 12.0 21 5 23.8 15 4 26.7 22 2 9.1 ** ** ** 33 8 24.2 52 19 36.5 49 9 18.4 33 8 24.2 17 2 11.8 8 4 50.0 7 0 0.0 ** ** ** 32 3 9.4
White Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** 22 11 50.0 10 7 70.0 43 23 53.5 11 7 63.6 78 35 44.9 20 7 35.0 56 25 44.6 59 34 57.6 53 23 43.4 27 18 66.7 34 18 52.9 30 15 50.0 54 31 57.4 22 11 50.0 34 16 47.1 16 8 50.0 23 11 47.8 34 19 55.9 17 15 88.2 8 7 87.5 15 10 66.7 48 34 70.8 53 32 60.4 ** ** ** 51 17 33.3 64 35 54.7 17 7 41.2
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
14 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing Watkins Mill
Screened N 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89 90
All Identified n % 35 40.2 43 58.1 32 39.5 22 38.6 30 40.0 21 31.8 53 48.6 92 48.7 30 42.3 23 34.8 23 52.3 38 46.3 27 30.7 56 51.4 50 70.4 19 25.0 26 28.0 54 50.5 31 47.0 16 25.4 14 17.7 85 62.0 45 62.5 30 42.3 24 32.4 23 46.0 19 21.3 12 13.3
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 25 7 28.0 24 14 58.3 11 3 27.3 20 15 75.0 17 3 17.6 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 6 4 66.7 10 3 30.0 12 6 50.0 7 2 28.6 5 3 60.0 25 12 48.0 7 4 57.1 33 8 24.2 12 7 58.3 20 5 25.0 11 8 72.7 17 2 11.8 13 9 69.2 ** ** ** 8 6 75.0 18 5 27.8 8 4 50.0 10 3 30.0 9 5 55.6 37 12 32.4 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 17 11 64.7 24 5 20.8 15 6 40.0 37 10 27.0 11 3 27.3 7 1 14.3 53 29 54.7 20 9 45.0 11 5 45.5 23 5 21.7 8 4 50.0 25 2 8.0 ** ** ** 46 17 37.0 11 9 81.8 ** ** ** 31 23 74.2 12 2 16.7 9 6 66.7 10 3 30.0 9 4 44.4 7 1 14.3 7 5 71.4 24 2 8.3 16 7 43.8 30 0 0.0 17 7 41.2 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 14 4 28.6 6 2 33.3 8 0 0.0 20 2 10.0 28 9 32.1 10 0 0.0 59 22 37.3 20 5 25.0 28 9 32.1 17 2 11.8 ** ** ** 8 3 37.5 61 14 23.0 16 5 31.3 6 3 50.0 29 4 13.8 21 4 19.0 5 2 40.0 5 0 0.0 18 0 0.0 46 9 19.6 14 4 28.6 6 2 33.3 32 13 40.6 40 9 22.5 23 9 39.1 22 0 0.0 30 3 10.0
White Screened Identified N n % 23 10 43.5 37 23 62.2 53 26 49.1 26 15 57.7 24 11 45.8 44 16 36.4 17 14 82.4 122 70 57.4 12 8 66.7 19 10 52.6 33 16 48.5 48 26 54.2 8 5 62.5 49 36 73.5 46 35 76.1 8 4 50.0 24 9 37.5 42 22 52.4 30 17 56.7 14 7 50.0 ** ** ** 66 55 83.3 33 19 57.6 15 7 46.7 14 8 57.1 13 8 61.5 27 10 37.0 13 2 15.4
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
Elementary School Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
Screened N 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
All Identified n % 50 53.2 23 36.5 33 57.9 20 52.6 16 21.1 27 31.4 46 44.2 30 37.5 42 56.8 57 58.8
African American Screened Identified N n % 7 0 0.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 13 2 15.4 15 5 33.3 27 5 18.5 ** ** ** 9 3 33.3 22 7 31.8 ** ** **
Asian American Screened Identified N n % 28 21 75.0 9 7 77.8 6 4 66.7 7 4 57.1 8 3 37.5 9 3 33.3 10 7 70.0 ** ** ** 9 5 55.6 15 10 66.7
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 6 2 33.3 43 11 25.6 ** ** ** 5 4 80.0 45 5 11.1 27 5 18.5 ** ** ** ** ** ** 9 4 44.4 6 2 33.3
White Screened Identified N n % 53 27 50.9 7 3 42.9 47 28 59.6 12 10 83.3 8 3 37.5 22 13 59.1 87 34 39.1 65 23 35.4 34 26 76.5 72 42 58.3
15 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
16 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill
Screened N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 16 32.0 37 10 27.0 48 56.5 14 3 21.4 42 72.4 ** ** ** 35 41.2 23 3 13.0 46 46.0 24 4 16.7 39 28.7 69 19 27.5 36 53.7 ** ** ** 18 33.3 ** ** ** 49 51.0 ** ** ** 55 55.0 5 0 0.0 40 63.5 ** ** ** 20 33.3 46 15 32.6 17 29.3 7 1 14.3 25 42.4 38 16 42.1 10 19.2 25 2 8.0 13 26.0 28 6 21.4 25 23.6 32 2 6.3 22 31.9 9 0 0.0 17 25.8 42 7 16.7 31 58.5 ** ** ** 58 43.0 12 2 16.7 21 50.0 ** ** ** 34 42.5 7 2 28.6 13 24.5 11 1 9.1 36 41.9 19 3 15.8 10 16.4 37 7 18.9 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 11 4 36.4 11 0 0.0 20 3 15.0 ** ** ** 12 2 16.7 14 4 28.6 16 5 31.3 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 5 0 0.0 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 5 0 0.0 6 1 16.7 7 2 28.6 9 0 0.0 ** ** ** 22 5 22.7 ** ** ** 6 0 0.0 8 1 12.5 11 5 45.5 7 1 14.3
ELL Screened Identified N n % 25 4 16.0 10 4 40.0 ** ** ** 19 6 31.6 6 0 0.0 18 1 5.6 ** ** ** ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 10 2 20.0 ** ** ** 25 2 8.0 5 1 20.0 28 8 28.6 11 1 9.1 12 2 16.7 15 2 13.3 6 2 33.3 13 1 7.7 ** ** ** 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 20 3 15.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
17 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Cloverly Cold Spring College Gardens Captain James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Germantown Glen Haven Glenallen Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood
Screened N 75 48 95 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 40 97 66 100 117 82 98
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 30 40.0 8 0 0.0 33 68.8 ** ** ** 46 48.4 11 0 0.0 23 27.7 38 7 18.4 18 40.9 10 2 20.0 25 34.7 5 2 40.0 44 55.0 18 4 22.2 10 22.2 16 2 12.5 35 59.3 ** ** ** 33 50.0 31 16 51.6 35 36.8 42 12 28.6 46 51.7 5 1 20.0 55 65.5 7 2 28.6 20 32.3 17 2 11.8 19 25.3 40 7 17.5 23 25.6 11 0 0.0 29 34.9 30 2 6.7 16 23.2 40 4 10.0 21 32.8 46 10 21.7 29 25.9 49 9 18.4 45 60.0 10 2 20.0 16 40.0 12 4 33.3 21 21.6 57 6 10.5 19 28.8 29 4 13.8 46 46.0 33 4 12.1 42 35.9 26 4 15.4 15 18.3 54 9 16.7 44 44.9 5 0 0.0 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 12 5 41.7 8 1 12.5 5 2 40.0 12 2 16.7 8 1 12.5 14 3 21.4 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 15 2 13.3 12 3 25.0 10 4 40.0 ** ** ** 7 0 0.0 15 0 0.0 5 2 40.0 ** ** ** 8 0 0.0 7 0 0.0 12 1 8.3 5 1 20.0 5 0 0.0 6 1 16.7
ELL Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 ** ** ** 18 2 11.1 22 0 0.0 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 11 6 54.5 8 1 12.5 5 3 60.0 11 4 36.4 18 7 38.9 10 4 40.0 22 11 50.0 8 0 0.0 24 1 4.2 7 0 0.0 27 2 7.4 26 1 3.8 22 1 4.5 29 5 17.2 12 3 25.0 5 0 0.0 25 1 4.0 24 1 4.2 30 4 13.3 14 1 7.1 10 0 0.0 ** ** **
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
18 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Harmony Hills Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates Roscoe Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville Potomac
Screened N 60 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67 104
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 16 26.7 51 13 25.5 11 18.3 45 8 17.8 18 37.5 21 3 14.3 31 42.5 39 11 28.2 41 49.4 20 6 30.0 25 35.2 45 11 24.4 43 45.3 ** ** ** 15 26.8 17 2 11.8 57 52.8 ** ** ** 44 50.6 8 2 25.0 48 35.0 23 1 4.3 30 56.6 7 1 14.3 36 45.6 11 0 0.0 38 38.4 39 11 28.2 90 59.2 13 3 23.1 26 27.1 39 8 20.5 39 34.5 16 2 12.5 16 33.3 22 5 22.7 18 26.9 25 2 8.0 20 54.1 ** ** ** 46 48.4 57 17 29.8 37 41.6 64 25 39.1 34 28.8 70 11 15.7 56 47.9 35 11 31.4 44 47.8 11 2 18.2 28 53.8 18 8 44.4 19 28.4 8 1 12.5 60 57.7 ** ** ** (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 5 1 20.0 15 4 26.7 10 4 40.0 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 8 2 25.0 10 1 10.0 5 2 40.0 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 8 1 12.5 5 0 0.0 9 3 33.3 10 1 10.0 8 0 0.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 8 0 0.0 10 2 20.0 9 1 11.1 8 4 50.0 ** ** ** 11 2 18.2 ** ** **
ELL Screened Identified N n % 31 9 29.0 43 6 14.0 10 1 10.0 17 6 35.3 6 1 16.7 20 5 25.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 6 3 50.0 6 1 16.7 9 0 0.0 12 4 33.3 ** ** ** 18 5 27.8 5 1 20.0 31 3 9.7 10 0 0.0 7 1 14.3 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 33 11 33.3 40 12 30.0 30 2 6.7 18 3 16.7 5 1 20.0 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** ** ** **
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
19 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Judith A. Resnik Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing
Screened N 82 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 23 28.0 32 3 9.4 35 40.2 22 4 18.2 43 58.1 10 3 30.0 32 39.5 15 3 20.0 22 38.6 17 2 11.8 30 40.0 27 8 29.6 21 31.8 12 0 0.0 53 48.6 68 25 36.8 92 48.7 29 4 13.8 30 42.3 30 6 20.0 23 34.8 31 5 16.1 23 52.3 ** ** ** 38 46.3 7 1 14.3 27 30.7 64 15 23.4 56 51.4 28 6 21.4 50 70.4 5 4 80.0 19 25.0 53 7 13.2 26 28.0 41 5 12.2 54 50.5 6 1 16.7 31 47.0 7 1 14.3 16 25.4 22 1 4.5 14 17.7 59 9 15.3 85 62.0 34 7 20.6 45 62.5 ** ** ** 30 42.3 40 14 35.0 24 32.4 46 9 19.6 23 46.0 21 9 42.9 19 21.3 29 0 0.0 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 14 2 14.3 5 2 40.0 8 2 25.0 5 1 20.0 5 1 20.0 11 2 18.2 5 2 40.0 12 1 8.3 8 1 12.5 17 3 17.6 5 2 40.0 12 4 33.3 10 2 20.0 8 1 12.5 5 2 40.0 7 2 28.6 5 2 40.0 5 3 60.0 8 2 25.0 5 1 20.0 11 0 0.0 7 1 14.3 6 1 16.7 8 3 37.5 11 1 9.1 ** ** ** 10 0 0.0
ELL Screened Identified N n % 22 1 4.5 11 1 9.1 9 4 44.4 ** ** ** 16 2 12.5 10 4 40.0 10 0 0.0 43 9 20.9 27 3 11.1 18 2 11.1 19 3 15.8 ** ** ** ** ** ** 44 3 6.8 8 0 0.0 10 5 50.0 20 1 5.0 24 2 8.3 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** 16 0 0.0 33 4 12.1 18 4 22.2 5 1 20.0 27 10 37.0 26 3 11.5 21 4 19.0 19 1 5.3
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
20
Elementary School Watkins Mill Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
Screened N 90 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
Identified n % 12 13.3 50 53.2 23 36.5 33 57.9 20 52.6 16 21.1 27 31.4 46 44.2 30 37.5 42 56.8 57 58.8
FARMS Screened Identified N n % 48 3 6.3 5 1 20.0 38 13 34.2 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 53 9 17.0 44 8 18.2 ** ** ** ** ** ** 15 5 33.3 ** ** **
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 5 3 60.0 ** ** ** 5 0 0.0 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 6 2 33.3 6 2 33.3 6 1 16.7
ELL Screened Identified N n % 34 3 8.8 7 2 28.6 36 7 19.4 ** ** ** ** ** ** 29 1 3.4 22 2 9.1 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 7 0 0.0 ** ** **
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Office of Shared Accountability Division of Accelerated and Enriched Instruction
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008 E. Grace Chesney and Kay Williams Committee used multiple criteria to identify students as gifted and talented. According to guidelines established by the Division of AEI, no single criterion could be used to exclude a student from identification. Additionally, decisions not to identify could not bar any student from receiving accelerated and enriched instruction. All students were either identified as “gifted and talented”, recommended for rescreening, or not identified. At the end of the process, parents received a report and explanation of their child’s test scores (MCPS 2007).
Background The Montgomery County Board of Education Policy IOA, Gifted and Talented Education, sets as one of its purposes, “To extend each child’s intellectual boundaries and help all students achieve their highest potential.” Additionally, Criteria for Excellence: Gifted and Talented Program Guidelines, published by the Maryland State Department of Education, indicates that “An identification process should ensure that all gifted and talented students are recognized so they can be appropriately served.” In the spring of each year, Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) conducts a screening of all Grade 2 students in order to meet these expectations. MCPS refers to this process as “global screening.”
In collaboration with staff in the Office of School Performance (OSP) and the Office of Shared Accountability (OSA), staff in the Division of AEI monitored the global screening process, analyzing student identification and performance by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 subgroups within the district and also by school.
Methodology Student demographic data, as well as identification status and recommendations for rescreening were reviewed, analyzed, and reported.
All Grade 2 students participated in the global screening process during spring 2008. As part of the process, a variety of student data were collected including parent, teacher, and staff surveys; students’ reading and mathematics instructional levels; and results of cognitive assessments including the Raven Test of Standard Progressive Matrices and the Analogies and Quantitative Reasoning subtests of the CTB/McGraw-Hill In View. Parent surveys were mailed home to all families of Grade 2 students and collected by schools. Translations of surveys were available in the five most commonly spoken languages in MCPS.
Results Students Screened and Identified A total of 3,940 students (40.9%) were identified as gifted and talented in 2007–2008, compared with 3,688 (39.4%) in 2006–2007 and 3,866 (39.5%) students in 2005–2006. Analysis of the data disaggregated by students’ race/ethnicity shows that in 2007–2008, African American and Hispanic students continue to be identified at a disproportionately lower rate than their Asian American or White peers (Appendix Tables 1–3).
Following the collection of data, each school’s Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Committee, chaired by an administrator, analyzed the data to make recommendations for instructional services for each student. After making recommendations for instruction, the Accelerated and Enriched Instruction (AEI)
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 1 in the Appendix shows the results of the spring 2008 Grade 2 global screening in percentage of students identified (40.9%), students recommended for rescreening (14.8%) and students not identified (44.3%). These data are disaggregated
1
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
2007–2008 (10 out of 37 students identified in 2007; 11 out of 22 students identified in 2008).
by students’ race/ethnicity and services provided, with a further breakdown by gender within each subgroup. The percentage of each student subgroup is represented relative to the number of students within the subgroup.
Table 4 in the Appendix shows the number and percentage of Grade 2 students identified as gifted and talented by individual school.
Table 2 in the Appendix shows the percentage of each student subgroup screened and identified in relationship to the total number of students in the county screened or identified. While African American students represent 22.4% of all the students screened in 2007–2008, they account for 13.6% of the total number of students identified, an increase from the 12.7% in 2006– 2007. Similarly, Hispanic students represent 21.6% of all students screened, and they account for 11.8% of the students identified, a slight decrease from the 11.9% in 2006–2007. Students who received Free and Reduced-price Meals System (FARMS), special education, and limited English proficiency (LEP) services also are underrepresented in the percentage identified, although the percent identified for all these three subgroups increased. Identified students who received FARMS services increased from 14.2% in 2006–2007 to 14.7% in 2007–2008. Similarly, identified students who received special education services increased from 3.8% to 4.6%, and identified students who received LEP services increased from 6.9% to 7.3%.
Tables 5 and 6 in the Appendix provide school-level data disaggregated by race/ethnicity and services provided. The number of students screened and the number and percent of students identified for each student subgroup are displayed. Students Recommended for Rescreening Of the 9,632 students screened, 14.8% (or 1,429 students) were recommended to be rescreened in spring 2009. This is a slight decrease from the 15.6% in 2006–2007.
Discussion The essential outcome of the global screening process is to ensure that the gifts of all students are revealed, documented, and developed throughout their years in MCPS. Multiyear data indicate that among students identified as gifted and talented, African American and Hispanic students continue to be underrepresented while White and Asian American students continue to be overrepresented. This pattern suggests that additional steps must be taken to reach equitable identification results. However, the data collected for the report are limited in their ability to inform specific reasons for the discrepancies and remedies to eliminate the gaps. The data from the Grade 2 global screening do not inform the system of the extent to which accelerated and enriched instructional programming is available among schools. To analyze equity in delivery of advanced instructional programming, MCPS would need more detailed data on services instead of analyzing only identification. Steps have been made in this direction with the collection of data for Math 6 in Grade 5 and Algebra 1 in Grade 8, and the documentation on the Student End-of-Year Record of the services recommended during global screening. Additional data points are necessary to form a more comprehensive analysis.
Table 3 in the Appendix shows the proportion of identified students within each student subgroup as a percentage of the number of students screened within the subgroup. For example, while 40.9% of all students screened are identified, only 24.8% of Grade 2 African American students and 22.2% of Hispanic students are identified. Table 3 in the Appendix shows an increase in the percentage of students identified for all subgroups with the exception of Hispanic students which remained stable (22.2%). For example, the percentage of African American students identified increased from 22.3% to 24.8%, Asian American students increased from 59.4% to 59.6%, and White students increased from 50.4% to 52.5%. The percent of identified students who received FARMS services increased from 19.5% to 20.5%. For students receiving special education and LEP services, the percent identified increased, respectively, from 17.4% to 20.2% and 16.9% to 17.0%. The American Indian subgroup had the largest increase in the percent identified, from 27.0% in 2006–2007 to 55.0% in
Office of Shared Accountability
Recommendations 1.
2
Staff in OSP, OSA, and the Division of AEI should continue to closely monitor the process and examine the issues of access to
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
2009. Professional development on the strategies that support primary talent development should be provided as a part of the curriculum rollout. Data should be collected and analyzed to determine consistent implementation of the model as well as the effectiveness in reducing the pattern of disproportionate identification.
rigorous and challenging instruction prior to and after Grade 2. 2.
Drawing from recommendations of the Deputy Superintendent’s Global Screening Project Team and the AEI Advisory Committee, AEI staff should prepare for the Board of Education a proposal for restructuring global screening, moving to a more continuous process that includes ongoing assessment of student achievement and cognitive abilities. The Grade 2 Accelerated and Enriched Instruction Committee meetings should become yearly articulation meetings that include analysis of individual student data to monitor each student’s participation and performance in designated accelerated and enriched services and to make recommendations for advanced level services for the next year.
3.
MCPS should continue to address the variance among schools in expectations, instruction, and services provided to students. To reach this goal, MCPS should expand the current collection of data in mathematics to reading language arts and other content areas to develop a system that documents and communicates enrollment and performance in accelerated and enriched instruction. Professional development on equitable teaching practices and on uncovering the gifts and talents of students should be provided to all staff members and especially staff in schools with high populations of students who are traditionally underrepresented in advanced level instruction. MCPS should encourage teachers to participate in graduate programs such as the Master's Degree Program in Elementary Education, with an Emphasis on Gifted Education offered by Towson University or the Graduate Certificate Program in Gifted Education offered by Johns Hopkins University.
4.
The primary talent development model which helps to reveal, nurture, develop, and document student strengths and is included in the revised kindergarten curriculum will be implemented as the curriculum is piloted in fiscal year
Office of Shared Accountability
References Montgomery County Public Schools. (2007). Procedures for recognition of elementary students for gifted and talented service. Rockville, MD: Author
3
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
THIS PAGE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
Office of Shared Accountability
4
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008 Appendixes
Office of Shared Accountability
5
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 1 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified, Recommended to be Rescreened, or Not Identified in 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to number of students in subgroup)
All Students Females Males Race/Ethnicity African American Females Males American Indian Females Males Asian American Females Males Hispanic Females Males White Females Males Services Provided FARMS Females Males Special Education Females Males ELL Females Males
Identified
Recommended to be Rescreened N % 1,429 14.8 686 14.3 743 15.4
Screened N 9,632 4,802 4,830
N 3,940 1,988 1,952
% 40.9 41.4 40.4
Not Identified N % 4,263 44.3 2,128 44.3 2,135 44.2
2,155 1,037 1,118 20 13 7 1,568 783 785 2,083 1,060 1,023 3,806 1,909 1,897
535 288 247 11 6 5 934 481 453 463 246 217 1,997 967 1,030
24.8 27.8 22.1 55.0 46.2 71.4 59.6 61.4 57.7 22.2 23.2 21.2 52.5 50.7 54.3
349 158 191 2 1 1 233 111 122 346 165 181 499 251 248
16.2 15.2 17.1 10.0 7.7 14.3 14.9 14.2 15.5 16.6 15.6 17.7 13.1 13.1 13.1
1,271 591 680 7 6 1 401 191 210 1,274 649 625 1,310 691 619
59.0 57.0 60.8 35.0 46.2 14.3 25.6 24.4 26.8 61.2 61.2 61.1 34.4 36.2 32.6
2,835 1,429 1,406 898 286 612 1,698 827 871
581 318 263 181 51 130 288 146 142
20.5 22.3 18.7 20.2 17.8 21.2 17.0 17.7 16.3
477 226 251 93 17 76 295 134 161
16.8 15.8 17.9 10.4 5.9 12.4 17.4 16.2 18.5
1,777 885 892 624 218 406 1,115 547 568
62.7 61.9 63.4 69.5 76.2 66.3 65.7 66.1 65.2
Note. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Office of Shared Accountability
6
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 2 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to screened or identified for the entire county)
All Students Race/Ethnicity African American American Indian Asian American Hispanic White Services Provided FARMS Special Education ELL
2005–2006 Screened Identified N % n % 9,782 3,866
2006–2007 Screened Identified N % n % 9,364 3,688
2007–2008 Screened Identified N % n % 9,632 3,940
2,213 n/a 1,454 2,011 4,072
22.6 n/a 14.9 20.6 41.6
506 n/a 830 439 2,090
13.1 n/a 21.5 11.4 54.1
2,111 37 1,442 1,978 3,796
22.5 0.4 15.4 21.1 40.5
470 10 857 439 1,912
12.7 0.3 23.2 11.9 51.8
2,155 20 1,568 2,083 3,806
22.4 0.2 16.3 21.6 39.5
535 11 934 463 1,997
13.6 0.3 23.7 11.8 50.7
2,432 876 1,015
24.9 9.0 10.4
557 159 217
14.4 4.1 5.6
2,685 803 1,497
28.7 8.6 16.0
524 140 253
14.2 3.8 6.9
2,835 898 1,698
29.4 9.3 17.6
581 181 288
14.7 4.6 7.3
Note. Due to small numbers, data for American Indian students were not reported prior to 2006–2007, so column totals and percentages may not sum. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Table 3 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Screened and Identified in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 by Race/Ethnicity and Services Provided (Percentage relative to number of students in subgroup)
All Students Race/Ethnicity African American American Indian Asian American Hispanic White Services Provided FARMS Special Education ELL
2005–2006 Screened Identified N n % 9,782 3,866 39.5
2006–2007 Screened Identified N n % 9,364 3,688 39.4
2007–2008 Screened Identified N n % 9,632 3,940 40.9
2,213 n/a 1,454 2,011 4,072
506 n/a 830 439 2,090
22.9 n/a 57.1 21.8 51.3
2,111 37 1,442 1,978 3,796
470 10 857 439 1,912
22.3 27.0 59.4 22.2 50.4
2,155 20 1,568 2,083 3,806
535 11 934 463 1,997
24.8 55.0 59.6 22.2 52.5
2,432 876 1,015
557 159 217
22.9 18.2 21.4
2,685 803 1,497
524 140 253
19.5 17.4 16.9
2,835 898 1,698
581 181 288
20.5 20.2 17.0
Note. Due to small numbers, data for American Indian students were not reported prior to 2006–2007. FARMS = Free and Reduced-price Meals System ELL = English Language Learners
Office of Shared Accountability
7
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burning Tree * Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill Cloverly Cold Spring College Gardens Cresthaven Capt. James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road
N n/a 87 49 61 103 132 78 66 67 99 66 64 55 51 50 94 76 98 50 61 64 121 44 92 117 69 50 85 71 74 98 74 47 64 67 66 85 56 91 94 97 78
Office of Shared Accountability
2006–2007
Identified
n n/a 32 34 24 46 54 33 24 41 47 41 14 17 19 15 n/a 18 25 16 18 37 46 22 35 49 24 23 26 39 38 29 19 20 30 33 20 51 31 26 57 60 30
% n/a 36.8 69.4 39.3 44.7 40.9 42.3 36.4 61.2 47.5 62.1 21.9 30.9 37.3 30.0 n/a 23.7 25.5 32.0 29.5 57.8 38.0 50.0 38.0 41.9 34.8 46.0 30.6 54.9 51.4 29.6 25.7 42.6 46.9 49.3 30.3 60.0 55.4 28.6 60.6 61.9 38.5
Screened
N n/a 86 60 72 89 137 72 79 66 101 62 64 65 56 52 89 53 88 54 63 52 111 45 102 55 68 59 74 50 100 n/a 78 42 74 73 63 75 60 78 72 97 73 (continued)
8
2007–2008
Identified
n n/a 36 38 27 41 38 40 21 35 53 52 20 23 15 10 n/a 15 23 25 23 30 64 21 33 18 15 19 27 27 45 n/a 13 9 34 34 15 32 32 13 46 59 30
% n/a 41.9 63.3 37.5 46.1 27.7 55.6 26.6 53.0 52.5 83.9 31.3 35.4 26.8 19.2 n/a 28.3 26.1 46.3 36.5 57.7 57.7 46.7 32.4 32.7 22.1 32.2 36.5 54.0 45.0 n/a 16.7 21.4 45.9 46.6 23.8 42.7 53.3 16.7 63.9 60.8 41.1
Screened
N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 67 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61 75 48 95 n/a 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62
Identified
n 16 48 42 35 46 39 36 18 49 55 40 20 17 25 10 n/a 13 25 22 17 31 58 21 34 13 36 10 30 33 46 n/a 23 18 25 44 10 35 33 35 46 55 20
% 32.0 56.5 72.4 41.2 46.0 28.7 53.7 33.3 51.0 55.0 63.5 33.3 29.3 42.4 19.2 n/a 26.0 23.6 31.9 25.8 58.5 43.0 50.0 42.5 24.5 41.9 16.4 40.0 68.8 48.4 n/a 27.7 40.9 34.7 55.0 22.2 59.3 50.0 36.8 51.7 65.5 32.3
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Georgian Forest * Germantown Glen Haven Glenallan Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood Harmony Hills Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates
Roscoe R. Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville
N 88 78 85 81 60 103 75 70 87 77 64 122 n/a 90 99 81 95 48 91 80 82 72 61 88 74 n/a 58 69 97 204 91 126 59 77 39 79 74 n/a 118 106 64 73
Office of Shared Accountability
2006–2007
Identified
n 26 36 37 20 18 30 41 n/a 20 22 24 32 n/a 32 59 28 24 19 48 39 25 38 22 50 28 n/a 36 27 39 99 16 49 18 27 12 31 33 n/a 57 41 16 14
% 29.5 46.2 43.5 24.7 30.0 29.1 54.7 n/a 23.0 28.6 37.5 26.2 n./a 35.6 59.6 34.6 25.3 39.6 52.7 48.7 30.5 52.8 36.1 56.8 37.8 n/a 62.1 39.1 40.2 48.5 17.6 38.9 30.5 35.1 30.8 39.2 44.6 n/a 48.3 38.7 25.0 19.2
Screened
N 66 57 88 71 72 112 76 69 46 72 54 90 92 93 96 81 90 50 75 87 85 74 40 105 77 111 57 85 91 147 108 108 57 73 37 83 91 98 101 100 63 69 (continued)
9
2007–2008
Identified
n 23 24 38 17 15 23 46 n/a 13 21 17 30 39 23 40 14 20 30 31 38 22 31 16 57 37 33 33 27 50 85 26 29 22 22 14 44 24 26 34 37 27 22
% 34.8 42.1 43.2 23.9 20.8 20.5 60.5 n/a 28.3 29.2 31.5 33.3 42.4 24.7 41.7 17.3 22.2 60.0 41.3 43.7 25.9 41.9 40.0 54.3 48.1 29.7 57.9 31.8 54.9 57.8 24.1 26.9 38.6 30.1 37.8 53.0 26.4 26.5 33.7 37.0 42.9 31.9
Screened
N 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 67 40 97 66 100 117 82 98 60 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67
Identified
n 19 23 29 16 21 29 45 n/a 16 21 19 46 42 15 44 16 11 18 31 41 25 43 15 57 44 48 30 36 38 90 26 39 16 18 20 46 37 34 56 44 28 19
% 25.3 25.6 34.9 23.2 32.8 25.9 60.0 n/a 40.0 21.6 28.8 46.0 35.9 18.3 44.9 26.7 18.3 37.5 42.5 49.4 35.2 45.3 26.8 52.8 50.6 35.0 56.6 45.6 38.4 59.2 27.1 34.5 33.3 26.9 54.1 48.4 41.6 28.8 47.9 47.8 53.8 28.4
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Table 4 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented by School in 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 2005–2006 Screened
Elementary School Potomac Judith A. Resnik Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing Watkins Mill Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
N 89 92 86 68 84 59 86 73 91 163 88 82 46 89 n/a 111 58 81 75 104 64 72 66 135 76 82 95 67 118 108 112 85 51 40 109 92 97 71 93 86
2006–2007
Identified
n 50 18 27 33 40 20 37 22 42 97 20 28 31 33 n/a 53 44 19 25 65 24 19 12 70 43 40 23 21 31 23 64 12 41 27 53 31 38 30 54 40
Screened
% 56.2 19.6 31.4 48.5 47.6 33.9 43.0 30.1 46.2 59.5 22.7 34.1 67.4 37.1 n/a 47.7 75.9 23.5 33.3 62.5 37.5 26.4 18.2 51.9 56.6 48.8 24.2 31.3 26.3 21.3 57.1 14.1 80.4 67.5 48.6 33.7 39.2 42.3 39.8 46.5
N 97 84 81 81 84 54 73 53 88 189 89 70 48 85 79 105 63 79 87 99 81 73 69 139 77 68 53 45 104 73 92 63 52 57 51 78 115 74 66 98
2007–2008
Identified
n 50 15 27 41 37 17 22 18 44 110 33 18 25 27 30 32 43 19 27 46 35 15 12 77 44 22 16 14 27 13 58 27 45 28 21 23 55 22 25 57
% 51.5 17.9 33.3 50.6 44.0 31.5 30.1 34.0 50.0 58.2 37.1 25.7 52.1 31.8 38.0 30.5 68.3 24.1 31.0 46.5 43.2 20.5 17.4 55.4 57.1 32.4 30.2 31.1 26.0 17.8 63.0 42.9 86.5 49.1 41.2 29.5 47.8 29.7 37.9 58.2
Screened
N 104 82 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89 90 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
Identified
n 60 23 35 43 32 22 30 21 53 92 30 23 23 38 27 56 50 19 26 54 31 16 14 85 45 30 24 23 19 12 50 23 33 20 16 27 46 30 42 57
% 57.7 28.0 40.2 58.1 39.5 38.6 40.0 31.8 48.6 48.7 42.3 34.8 52.3 46.3 30.7 51.4 70.4 25.0 28.0 50.5 47.0 25.4 17.7 62.0 62.5 42.3 32.4 46.0 21.3 13.3 53.2 36.5 57.9 52.6 21.1 31.4 44.2 37.5 56.8 58.8
* Burning Tree and Georgian Forest elementary schools are participating in a pilot program. In these schools, the multiple pieces of data collected during the global screening process are used solely to recommend appropriate accelerated and enriched instruction, and not to assign a label. All other schools use the multiple pieces of data collected during the global screening process both to recommend appropriate accelerated and enriched instruction and to assign a label.
Office of Shared Accountability
10
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
11 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill Cloverly
Screened N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61 75
All Identified n % 16 32.0 48 56.5 42 72.4 35 41.2 46 46.0 39 28.7 36 53.7 18 33.3 49 51.0 55 55.0 40 63.5 20 33.3 17 29.3 25 42.4 10 19.2 13 26.0 25 23.6 22 31.9 17 25.8 31 58.5 58 43.0 21 50.0 34 42.5 13 24.5 36 41.9 10 16.4 30 40.0
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 11 3 27.3 6 4 66.7 14 4 28.6 14 10 71.4 ** ** ** 7 5 71.4 10 2 20.0 12 9 75.0 18 7 38.9 30 17 56.7 68 15 22.1 16 9 56.3 6 1 16.7 14 12 85.7 6 1 16.7 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 11 6 54.5 7 1 14.3 29 20 69.0 ** ** ** 9 7 77.8 13 6 46.2 12 7 58.3 15 0 0.0 7 3 42.9 18 8 44.4 7 5 71.4 25 4 16.0 7 2 28.6 30 10 33.3 ** ** ** 66 14 21.2 18 8 44.4 11 1 9.1 14 3 21.4 26 5 19.2 17 8 47.1 ** ** ** 6 4 66.7 9 1 11.1 16 8 50.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 12 2 16.7 22 11 50.0 ** ** ** 18 5 27.8 16 3 18.8 9 8 88.9 25 3 12.0 5 3 60.0 10 2 20.0 11 4 36.4 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 29 8 27.6 11 4 36.4 6 4 66.7 28 3 10.7 9 0 0.0 38 8 21.1 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 8 1 12.5 7 1 14.3 ** ** ** 34 6 17.6 7 3 42.9 30 11 36.7 15 1 6.7 13 2 15.4 9 0 0.0 11 2 18.2 18 3 16.7 ** ** ** 15 4 26.7 6 2 33.3 8 3 37.5 6 2 33.3 14 4 28.6 23 3 13.0 8 1 12.5
White Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** 46 30 65.2 44 32 72.7 35 21 60.0 43 22 51.2 14 7 50.0 40 20 50.0 44 16 36.4 72 41 56.9 57 33 57.9 46 28 60.9 ** ** ** 29 11 37.9 ** ** ** 5 3 60.0 7 1 14.3 13 3 23.1 32 16 50.0 5 1 20.0 46 26 56.5 95 45 47.4 29 16 55.2 38 18 47.4 26 6 23.1 47 21 44.7 8 1 12.5 46 23 50.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
12 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Cold Spring College Gardens Captain James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Germantown Glen Haven Glenallen Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood Harmony Hills
Screened N 48 95 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 40 97 66 100 117 82 98 60
All Identified n % 33 68.8 46 48.4 23 27.7 18 40.9 25 34.7 44 55.0 10 22.2 35 59.3 33 50.0 35 36.8 46 51.7 55 65.5 20 32.3 19 25.3 23 25.6 29 34.9 16 23.2 21 32.8 29 25.9 45 60.0 16 40.0 21 21.6 19 28.8 46 46.0 42 35.9 15 18.3 44 44.9 16 26.7
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % ** ** ** 8 8 100.0 18 3 16.7 25 16 64.0 32 9 28.1 9 5 55.6 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 6 3 50.0 13 2 15.4 21 14 66.7 27 2 7.4 6 3 50.0 ** ** ** 24 16 66.7 33 15 45.5 8 6 75.0 56 12 21.4 13 10 76.9 8 2 25.0 30 20 66.7 ** ** ** 33 27 81.8 14 3 21.4 8 4 50.0 25 7 28.0 10 5 50.0 14 1 7.1 7 3 42.9 10 1 10.0 15 7 46.7 21 4 19.0 14 10 71.4 22 8 36.4 ** ** ** 63 16 25.4 20 9 45.0 6 2 33.3 12 10 83.3 13 4 30.8 ** ** ** 36 7 19.4 11 3 27.3 27 9 33.3 10 4 40.0 27 10 37.0 18 11 61.1 25 7 28.0 33 17 51.5 60 11 18.3 8 3 37.5 8 1 12.5 12 4 33.3 21 5 23.8 ** ** ** (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** 28 3 10.7 10 3 30.0 7 2 28.6 13 5 38.5 ** ** ** ** ** ** 16 5 31.3 11 3 27.3 ** ** ** 7 1 14.3 15 2 13.3 33 4 12.1 13 1 7.7 33 4 12.1 26 1 3.8 32 6 18.8 17 1 5.9 13 2 15.4 6 1 16.7 33 5 15.2 21 3 14.3 23 4 17.4 13 3 23.1 11 1 9.1 ** ** ** 33 8 24.2
White Screened Identified N n % 36 22 61.1 49 25 51.0 14 6 42.9 29 12 41.4 56 19 33.9 33 23 69.7 8 5 62.5 33 17 51.5 9 7 77.8 15 10 66.7 47 23 48.9 40 27 67.5 25 11 44.0 7 3 42.9 56 18 32.1 25 17 68.0 8 1 12.5 7 4 57.1 12 3 25.0 44 31 70.5 17 8 47.1 17 6 35.3 8 3 37.5 32 21 65.6 46 15 32.6 ** ** ** 74 37 50.0 6 3 50.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
13 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates Roscoe Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville Potomac Judith A. Resnik
Screened N 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67 104 82
All Identified n % 11 18.3 18 37.5 31 42.5 41 49.4 25 35.2 43 45.3 15 26.8 57 52.8 44 50.6 48 35.0 30 56.6 36 45.6 38 38.4 90 59.2 26 27.1 39 34.5 16 33.3 18 26.9 20 54.1 46 48.4 37 41.6 34 28.8 56 47.9 44 47.8 28 53.8 19 28.4 60 57.7 23 28.0
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** 10 3 30.0 ** ** ** 31 11 35.5 14 7 50.0 12 5 41.7 16 10 62.5 26 8 30.8 ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 ** ** ** 22 3 13.6 8 4 50.0 6 2 33.3 39 28 71.8 13 5 38.5 7 3 42.9 30 4 13.3 40 19 47.5 6 3 50.0 15 8 53.3 14 2 14.3 21 15 71.4 31 8 25.8 11 8 72.7 25 7 28.0 58 45 77.6 38 8 21.1 10 3 30.0 33 4 12.1 25 14 56.0 10 1 10.0 6 2 33.3 16 0 0.0 6 5 83.3 ** ** ** ** ** ** 22 9 40.9 23 14 60.9 22 6 27.3 7 5 71.4 39 7 17.9 15 8 53.3 24 10 41.7 12 4 33.3 13 3 23.1 9 7 77.8 31 14 45.2 11 9 81.8 5 0 0.0 ** ** ** 9 3 33.3 26 20 76.9 16 5 31.3 17 8 47.1 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 45 9 20.0 14 3 21.4 18 6 33.3 12 3 25.0 31 8 25.8 6 3 50.0 6 1 16.7 7 2 28.6 8 2 25.0 14 2 14.3 5 1 20.0 9 1 11.1 27 7 25.9 15 7 46.7 25 3 12.0 21 5 23.8 15 4 26.7 22 2 9.1 ** ** ** 33 8 24.2 52 19 36.5 49 9 18.4 33 8 24.2 17 2 11.8 8 4 50.0 7 0 0.0 ** ** ** 32 3 9.4
White Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** 22 11 50.0 10 7 70.0 43 23 53.5 11 7 63.6 78 35 44.9 20 7 35.0 56 25 44.6 59 34 57.6 53 23 43.4 27 18 66.7 34 18 52.9 30 15 50.0 54 31 57.4 22 11 50.0 34 16 47.1 16 8 50.0 23 11 47.8 34 19 55.9 17 15 88.2 8 7 87.5 15 10 66.7 48 34 70.8 53 32 60.4 ** ** ** 51 17 33.3 64 35 54.7 17 7 41.2
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
14 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing Watkins Mill
Screened N 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89 90
All Identified n % 35 40.2 43 58.1 32 39.5 22 38.6 30 40.0 21 31.8 53 48.6 92 48.7 30 42.3 23 34.8 23 52.3 38 46.3 27 30.7 56 51.4 50 70.4 19 25.0 26 28.0 54 50.5 31 47.0 16 25.4 14 17.7 85 62.0 45 62.5 30 42.3 24 32.4 23 46.0 19 21.3 12 13.3
African American Asian American Screened Identified Screened Identified N n % N n % 25 7 28.0 24 14 58.3 11 3 27.3 20 15 75.0 17 3 17.6 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 6 4 66.7 10 3 30.0 12 6 50.0 7 2 28.6 5 3 60.0 25 12 48.0 7 4 57.1 33 8 24.2 12 7 58.3 20 5 25.0 11 8 72.7 17 2 11.8 13 9 69.2 ** ** ** 8 6 75.0 18 5 27.8 8 4 50.0 10 3 30.0 9 5 55.6 37 12 32.4 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 17 11 64.7 24 5 20.8 15 6 40.0 37 10 27.0 11 3 27.3 7 1 14.3 53 29 54.7 20 9 45.0 11 5 45.5 23 5 21.7 8 4 50.0 25 2 8.0 ** ** ** 46 17 37.0 11 9 81.8 ** ** ** 31 23 74.2 12 2 16.7 9 6 66.7 10 3 30.0 9 4 44.4 7 1 14.3 7 5 71.4 24 2 8.3 16 7 43.8 30 0 0.0 17 7 41.2 (continued)
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 14 4 28.6 6 2 33.3 8 0 0.0 20 2 10.0 28 9 32.1 10 0 0.0 59 22 37.3 20 5 25.0 28 9 32.1 17 2 11.8 ** ** ** 8 3 37.5 61 14 23.0 16 5 31.3 6 3 50.0 29 4 13.8 21 4 19.0 5 2 40.0 5 0 0.0 18 0 0.0 46 9 19.6 14 4 28.6 6 2 33.3 32 13 40.6 40 9 22.5 23 9 39.1 22 0 0.0 30 3 10.0
White Screened Identified N n % 23 10 43.5 37 23 62.2 53 26 49.1 26 15 57.7 24 11 45.8 44 16 36.4 17 14 82.4 122 70 57.4 12 8 66.7 19 10 52.6 33 16 48.5 48 26 54.2 8 5 62.5 49 36 73.5 46 35 76.1 8 4 50.0 24 9 37.5 42 22 52.4 30 17 56.7 14 7 50.0 ** ** ** 66 55 83.3 33 19 57.6 15 7 46.7 14 8 57.1 13 8 61.5 27 10 37.0 13 2 15.4
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 5 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Race/Ethnicity Group (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5)
Elementary School Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
Screened N 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
All Identified n % 50 53.2 23 36.5 33 57.9 20 52.6 16 21.1 27 31.4 46 44.2 30 37.5 42 56.8 57 58.8
African American Screened Identified N n % 7 0 0.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 13 2 15.4 15 5 33.3 27 5 18.5 ** ** ** 9 3 33.3 22 7 31.8 ** ** **
Asian American Screened Identified N n % 28 21 75.0 9 7 77.8 6 4 66.7 7 4 57.1 8 3 37.5 9 3 33.3 10 7 70.0 ** ** ** 9 5 55.6 15 10 66.7
Hispanic Screened Identified N n % 6 2 33.3 43 11 25.6 ** ** ** 5 4 80.0 45 5 11.1 27 5 18.5 ** ** ** ** ** ** 9 4 44.4 6 2 33.3
White Screened Identified N n % 53 27 50.9 7 3 42.9 47 28 59.6 12 10 83.3 8 3 37.5 22 13 59.1 87 34 39.1 65 23 35.4 34 26 76.5 72 42 58.3
15 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
16 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Arcola Ashburton Bannockburn Lucy V. Barnsley Beall Bel Pre Bells Mill Belmont Bethesda Beverly Farms Bradley Hills Broad Acres Brooke Grove Brookhaven Brown Station Burnt Mills Burtonsville Candlewood Cannon Road Carderock Springs Rachel Carson Cashell Cedar Grove Clarksburg Clearspring Clopper Mill
Screened N 50 85 58 85 100 136 67 54 96 100 63 60 58 59 52 50 106 69 66 53 135 42 80 53 86 61
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 16 32.0 37 10 27.0 48 56.5 14 3 21.4 42 72.4 ** ** ** 35 41.2 23 3 13.0 46 46.0 24 4 16.7 39 28.7 69 19 27.5 36 53.7 ** ** ** 18 33.3 ** ** ** 49 51.0 ** ** ** 55 55.0 5 0 0.0 40 63.5 ** ** ** 20 33.3 46 15 32.6 17 29.3 7 1 14.3 25 42.4 38 16 42.1 10 19.2 25 2 8.0 13 26.0 28 6 21.4 25 23.6 32 2 6.3 22 31.9 9 0 0.0 17 25.8 42 7 16.7 31 58.5 ** ** ** 58 43.0 12 2 16.7 21 50.0 ** ** ** 34 42.5 7 2 28.6 13 24.5 11 1 9.1 36 41.9 19 3 15.8 10 16.4 37 7 18.9 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 11 4 36.4 11 0 0.0 20 3 15.0 ** ** ** 12 2 16.7 14 4 28.6 16 5 31.3 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 5 0 0.0 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 5 0 0.0 6 1 16.7 7 2 28.6 9 0 0.0 ** ** ** 22 5 22.7 ** ** ** 6 0 0.0 8 1 12.5 11 5 45.5 7 1 14.3
ELL Screened Identified N n % 25 4 16.0 10 4 40.0 ** ** ** 19 6 31.6 6 0 0.0 18 1 5.6 ** ** ** ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 10 2 20.0 ** ** ** 25 2 8.0 5 1 20.0 28 8 28.6 11 1 9.1 12 2 16.7 15 2 13.3 6 2 33.3 13 1 7.7 ** ** ** 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 20 3 15.0
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
17 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Cloverly Cold Spring College Gardens Captain James E. Daly Damascus Darnestown Diamond Dr. Charles R. Drew DuFief East Silver Spring Fairland Fallsmead Farmland Fields Road Flower Hill Flower Valley Forest Knolls Fox Chapel Gaithersburg Galway Garrett Park Germantown Glen Haven Glenallen Goshen Great Seneca Creek Greencastle Greenwood
Screened N 75 48 95 83 44 72 80 45 59 66 95 89 84 62 75 90 83 69 64 112 75 40 97 66 100 117 82 98
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 30 40.0 8 0 0.0 33 68.8 ** ** ** 46 48.4 11 0 0.0 23 27.7 38 7 18.4 18 40.9 10 2 20.0 25 34.7 5 2 40.0 44 55.0 18 4 22.2 10 22.2 16 2 12.5 35 59.3 ** ** ** 33 50.0 31 16 51.6 35 36.8 42 12 28.6 46 51.7 5 1 20.0 55 65.5 7 2 28.6 20 32.3 17 2 11.8 19 25.3 40 7 17.5 23 25.6 11 0 0.0 29 34.9 30 2 6.7 16 23.2 40 4 10.0 21 32.8 46 10 21.7 29 25.9 49 9 18.4 45 60.0 10 2 20.0 16 40.0 12 4 33.3 21 21.6 57 6 10.5 19 28.8 29 4 13.8 46 46.0 33 4 12.1 42 35.9 26 4 15.4 15 18.3 54 9 16.7 44 44.9 5 0 0.0 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % ** ** ** ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 7 2 28.6 12 5 41.7 8 1 12.5 5 2 40.0 12 2 16.7 8 1 12.5 14 3 21.4 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 15 2 13.3 12 3 25.0 10 4 40.0 ** ** ** 7 0 0.0 15 0 0.0 5 2 40.0 ** ** ** 8 0 0.0 7 0 0.0 12 1 8.3 5 1 20.0 5 0 0.0 6 1 16.7
ELL Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 ** ** ** 18 2 11.1 22 0 0.0 8 2 25.0 ** ** ** 11 6 54.5 8 1 12.5 5 3 60.0 11 4 36.4 18 7 38.9 10 4 40.0 22 11 50.0 8 0 0.0 24 1 4.2 7 0 0.0 27 2 7.4 26 1 3.8 22 1 4.5 29 5 17.2 12 3 25.0 5 0 0.0 25 1 4.0 24 1 4.2 30 4 13.3 14 1 7.1 10 0 0.0 ** ** **
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
18 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Harmony Hills Highland Highland View Jackson Road Jones Lane Kemp Mill Kensington Parkwood Lake Seneca Lakewood Laytonsville Little Bennett Luxmanor Thurgood Marshall Maryvale Spark M. Matsunaga S. Christa McAuliffe Ronald McNair Meadow Hall Mill Creek Towne Monocacy Montgomery Knolls New Hampshire Estates Roscoe Nix Oakland Terrace Olney William Tyler Page Poolesville Potomac
Screened N 60 60 48 73 83 71 95 56 108 87 137 53 79 99 152 96 113 48 67 37 95 89 118 117 92 52 67 104
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 16 26.7 51 13 25.5 11 18.3 45 8 17.8 18 37.5 21 3 14.3 31 42.5 39 11 28.2 41 49.4 20 6 30.0 25 35.2 45 11 24.4 43 45.3 ** ** ** 15 26.8 17 2 11.8 57 52.8 ** ** ** 44 50.6 8 2 25.0 48 35.0 23 1 4.3 30 56.6 7 1 14.3 36 45.6 11 0 0.0 38 38.4 39 11 28.2 90 59.2 13 3 23.1 26 27.1 39 8 20.5 39 34.5 16 2 12.5 16 33.3 22 5 22.7 18 26.9 25 2 8.0 20 54.1 ** ** ** 46 48.4 57 17 29.8 37 41.6 64 25 39.1 34 28.8 70 11 15.7 56 47.9 35 11 31.4 44 47.8 11 2 18.2 28 53.8 18 8 44.4 19 28.4 8 1 12.5 60 57.7 ** ** ** (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 6 1 16.7 5 1 20.0 15 4 26.7 10 4 40.0 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 8 2 25.0 10 1 10.0 5 2 40.0 ** ** ** 5 1 20.0 8 1 12.5 5 0 0.0 9 3 33.3 10 1 10.0 8 0 0.0 ** ** ** ** ** ** 8 0 0.0 10 2 20.0 9 1 11.1 8 4 50.0 ** ** ** 11 2 18.2 ** ** **
ELL Screened Identified N n % 31 9 29.0 43 6 14.0 10 1 10.0 17 6 35.3 6 1 16.7 20 5 25.0 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 6 3 50.0 6 1 16.7 9 0 0.0 12 4 33.3 ** ** ** 18 5 27.8 5 1 20.0 31 3 9.7 10 0 0.0 7 1 14.3 10 1 10.0 ** ** ** 33 11 33.3 40 12 30.0 30 2 6.7 18 3 16.7 5 1 20.0 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** ** ** **
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
19 Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Elementary School Judith A. Resnik Dr. Sally K. Ride Ritchie Park Rock Creek Forest Rock Creek Valley Rock View Lois P. Rockwell Rolling Terrace Rosemary Hills Rosemont Sequoyah Seven Locks Sherwood Sargent Shriver Sligo Creek Somerset South Lake Stedwick Stone Mill Stonegate Strawberry Knoll Summit Hall Takoma Park Travilah Twinbrook Viers Mill Washington Grove Waters Landing
Screened N 82 87 74 81 57 75 66 109 189 71 66 44 82 88 109 71 76 93 107 66 63 79 137 72 71 74 50 89
FARMS Identified Screened Identified n % N n % 23 28.0 32 3 9.4 35 40.2 22 4 18.2 43 58.1 10 3 30.0 32 39.5 15 3 20.0 22 38.6 17 2 11.8 30 40.0 27 8 29.6 21 31.8 12 0 0.0 53 48.6 68 25 36.8 92 48.7 29 4 13.8 30 42.3 30 6 20.0 23 34.8 31 5 16.1 23 52.3 ** ** ** 38 46.3 7 1 14.3 27 30.7 64 15 23.4 56 51.4 28 6 21.4 50 70.4 5 4 80.0 19 25.0 53 7 13.2 26 28.0 41 5 12.2 54 50.5 6 1 16.7 31 47.0 7 1 14.3 16 25.4 22 1 4.5 14 17.7 59 9 15.3 85 62.0 34 7 20.6 45 62.5 ** ** ** 30 42.3 40 14 35.0 24 32.4 46 9 19.6 23 46.0 21 9 42.9 19 21.3 29 0 0.0 (continued)
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 14 2 14.3 5 2 40.0 8 2 25.0 5 1 20.0 5 1 20.0 11 2 18.2 5 2 40.0 12 1 8.3 8 1 12.5 17 3 17.6 5 2 40.0 12 4 33.3 10 2 20.0 8 1 12.5 5 2 40.0 7 2 28.6 5 2 40.0 5 3 60.0 8 2 25.0 5 1 20.0 11 0 0.0 7 1 14.3 6 1 16.7 8 3 37.5 11 1 9.1 ** ** ** 10 0 0.0
ELL Screened Identified N n % 22 1 4.5 11 1 9.1 9 4 44.4 ** ** ** 16 2 12.5 10 4 40.0 10 0 0.0 43 9 20.9 27 3 11.1 18 2 11.1 19 3 15.8 ** ** ** ** ** ** 44 3 6.8 8 0 0.0 10 5 50.0 20 1 5.0 24 2 8.3 9 2 22.2 ** ** ** 16 0 0.0 33 4 12.1 18 4 22.2 5 1 20.0 27 10 37.0 26 3 11.5 21 4 19.0 19 1 5.3
Office of Shared Accountability
Table 6 Number and Percentage of Grade 2 Students Identified as Gifted and Talented in 2007-2008 by School by Services Provided (** Data not reported as the number of students in subgroup is fewer than 5) All
20
Elementary School Watkins Mill Wayside Weller Road Westbrook Westover Wheaton Woods Whetstone Wood Acres Woodfield Woodlin Wyngate
Screened N 90 94 63 57 38 76 86 104 80 74 97
Identified n % 12 13.3 50 53.2 23 36.5 33 57.9 20 52.6 16 21.1 27 31.4 46 44.2 30 37.5 42 56.8 57 58.8
FARMS Screened Identified N n % 48 3 6.3 5 1 20.0 38 13 34.2 ** ** ** 7 3 42.9 53 9 17.0 44 8 18.2 ** ** ** ** ** ** 15 5 33.3 ** ** **
Special Education Screened Identified N n % 9 0 0.0 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 5 3 60.0 ** ** ** 5 0 0.0 7 3 42.9 ** ** ** 6 2 33.3 6 2 33.3 6 1 16.7
ELL Screened Identified N n % 34 3 8.8 7 2 28.6 36 7 19.4 ** ** ** ** ** ** 29 1 3.4 22 2 9.1 6 2 33.3 ** ** ** 7 0 0.0 ** ** **
Grade 2 Global Screening in Spring 2008
Related Documents
Mcps Gt Global Screening 2008
June 2020 13
Mcps Gt Screening 2005
June 2020 5
Mcps Data-spring 2006 Gt Screening
June 2020 3
Mcps Gt Standards September 2009
June 2020 6
Mcps 2007 Grade 2 Gt Screening Report Spring
June 2020 2
The Mcps Gt Selection Process
December 2019 19More Documents from "Kumar Singam"
051409 Aei Adgenda
June 2020 13
41609 Aei Adgenda
June 2020 15
Gt Data Response Letters
June 2020 7
Parent Letter
May 2020 14