Mccarthy Crisis

  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Mccarthy Crisis as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 834
  • Pages: 15
1/12/2009

UCD School of Economics/Dublin Economics Workshop

Expenditure Control and Fiscal Consolidation Colm McCarthy (School of Economics UCD) ‘Responding to the Crisis’, January 12th. 2009.

1

1/12/2009

Fiscal Consolidation in Context….. • There Th are four f priorities i iti in i macro policy. li • Restore fiscal balance….. • Resolve the banking crisis…. • Restore competitiveness…. • De-leverage the national balance sheet

2

1/12/2009

Managing the Balance Sheet • Th The private i t sector t now owes c. €400 b bn tto th the b banking ki system, one of the highest ratios to GNP in the world. • De-leveraging seems to have commenced • It requires not just an increase in saving but asset disposal to reduce debt • The State is also funding a book of assets, principally the NPRF equity it portfolio tf li and d St State t commercial i l company shares.

3

1/12/2009

Personal Sector Debt Repayments to Income 25% 10% more disposable income eaten up in debt repayments than seven years ago 20%

15%

10%

5%

0% 2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008F

4

1/12/2009

Bank Lending to Property 30%

120000

100000

Lending to construction development and investment up €100bn in seven years

25%

80000 20% 60000 15% 40000

10%

20000

0

5%

Q1 1997 Q1 1998 Q1 1999 Q1 2000 Q1 2001 Q1 2002 Q1 2003 Q1 2004 Q1 2005 Q1 2006 Q1 2007 Q1 2008 Lending to construction and real estate activities (lhs, €m)

% of total private sector credit (rhs)

5

1/12/2009

State Balance Sheet…… • As well as focussing on the GGB and net debt, policy needs to consider measures to deleverage the State balance sheet • There is also a debt-selection issue • For the private sector, it is worth considering whether there are policy actions which would help accelerate the de-leveraging process

6

1/12/2009

The Tiger Checked out 2002 (Assuming zero growth for all aggregates in 2008)

1995 to 2002

• Real GDP • Real GNP • Real GNDI

8.6 7.2 7.0

2002 to 2008

5.5 5.3 3.7

(Adjusted for terms-of-trade)

7

1/12/2009

Quarterly Numbers signalled downturn in ’07…

8

1/12/2009

Property-Related Taxes led the Collapse…. 9000

20%

8000

18% 16%

7000

14%

6000

12% 5000 10% 4000 8% 3000

6%

€6bn drop in direct property-related revenue in three years

2000

4%

1000

2%

0 1997

0% 1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

Property revenue (€m, lhs)

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007F

2008F

2009F

Property revenue % of total tax revenue (rhs)

9

1/12/2009

The Fiscal Deterioration….. ¾ GGB D Deficit fi it c. 10% iin 2009 without ith t policy li changes h ¾ And likely to be 10 to 12% for some years thereafter on the same basis. ¾ GGB Gross debt 41% of GDP at end 2008, heading for c. 50% at end 2009. ¾ Without policy change, and even without bank bail-out costs, t annuall b borrowing i att 10% + b brings i 100% d debt bt iinto t view fairly quickly, the lesson of the 1980s.

10

1/12/2009

Raise Taxes or Cut Spending? • Real Total Exchequer spending rose c. 6.5% in 2008 • Without policy change, will rise c. 6.3% in 2009. • Significant tax increases have already been imposed • Ireland will enjoy the fiscal stimulus packages of our trading partners

11

1/12/2009

Comparisons with 1987… •

F less Far l low-hanging l h i ffruit it b back k th then



Exchequer spending had been tightly controlled in early and mid1980s



Real cuts in 1987 to 1989 were small and mainly capital; current spending never fell in nominal terms. Year 1987 1988 1989 1990

% Chg Current 4.1 1.0 0.8 6.6

% Chg TES 2.7 -1.3 0.5 7.0

CPI 3.1 2.1 4.1 3.3

12

1/12/2009

Total Exchequer Spend as % GNP GNP 2008/9 = ESRI estimates, spend 2009 = Budget trends in government spending 60.0 gross current expendiure

exchequer capital expenditure

total government expenditure

50.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

0.0 1983

per cent of GNP

40.0

13

1/12/2009

Real Growth, Total Exchequer Spending Y Year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008e 2009f

Spend S d % Ch Chg 10.4 16.1 11.0 7 7.7 7 6.2 11.1 10.6 11.9 10 10.7 7 4.3

CPI % 5.6 4.9 4.6 3 3.6 6 2.1 2.5 3.9 4.9 4 4.2 2 -2.0

%R Reall G Growth* th* 4.8 11.2 6.4 4 4.1 1 4.1 8.6 6.7 7.0 6 6.5 5 6.3

* Deflator = CPI; CPI 2008/9 = ESRI; Spend 2009 = Budget

14

1/12/2009

Debt Selection and Balance-Sheet Management

• Ireland has never issued index-linked gilts. There may be sense in doing so over the next few years. • Asset disposals do not help the GGB deficit, but they help de-leverage. Candidates include financial assets, commercial semi-States and real property.

15

Related Documents

Mccarthy Crisis
December 2019 8
Crisis
November 2019 60
Crisis
May 2020 29
Crisis
April 2020 30
Edward W Mccarthy
December 2019 13