Protein Delivery from Mechanical Devices Challenges and Opportunities Bill Van Antwerp and Poonam Gulati The Protein Formulation and Testing Group Medtronic Minimed
FDA Workshop July 2003
Why Protein Drugs in Devices • Protein/peptide drugs are
increasingly important • Diabetes (Insulin, Symlin, Exendin, Somatokine) • Cancer (Interferon, Monoclonal Antibodies, Vaccines) • Cardiovascular Drugs (Natrecor, GPIIB receptor, Protein G receptor)
• Inflammation (TNF-a, IL1-RA) • HIV/AIDS (Somatostatin, T20, T1249, IL-2, Interferon)
FDA Workshop July 2003
Why Use Pumps? • Proteins and peptides need delivery • Poor oral bioavailability • Protein denaturation in the digestive system • Acid hydrolysis in the stomach • Enzymatic degradation • Poor adsorption due to size • Poor adsorption due to polar/charge distribution
FDA Workshop July 2003
Advantages of Continuous Infusion for Protein Drugs
Plasma Drug Concentration
6
Side Effects
5
Enzyme Activation P450 Activation
Wasted Drug 14 x CSI
4
3
2
1
0
FDA Workshop July 2003
Therapeutic Range 0
4
Bolus Injection Continuous Infusion
8
12
Time (hours)
16
20
24
Parenteral Delivery Today • IV administration • Subcutaneous injection • Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion
(Pumps) • Continuous Intraperitoneal Infusion • Subcutaneous Depot (leuprolide etc) • PLGA microspheres • PEG attached peptides • Microemulsions
• Intrathecal, Intraparenchymal
FDA Workshop July 2003
Pump Challenges, Old and New • Formulation • Chemical Stability • Clearance • Physical Stability • PK/PD Therapeutic Range and
Toxicity (localized site reactions) FDA Workshop July 2003
Regulatory Hurdles Let’s Not Re-invent the Wheel • Device Physics • Drug Chemistry • Drug Packaging • Pump/Drug Interactions (in-vitro) • Drug Physical Stability (in-vitro)
FDA Workshop July 2003
Stability in Pumps • Chemical and physical stability can
determine clinical efficacy • Physical stability is difficult to measure • Wide variety of measurements • • • •
FDA Workshop July 2003
Turbidity Concentration Changes Fluorescence CD/Microcalorimetry/Denaturation Kinetics
Chemical Stability • Chemical stability is
determined by the molecule and by the formulation • Relatively simple formulation changes can affect stability • Pump chemical stability, in general, is the same as in primary packaging FDA Workshop July 2003
Physical Interactions • Protein physical stability in devices • Materials of contact • Teflon/Titanium/Polyolefin/Silicone Oil • Pumping mechanism physics, shear and
compliance can lead to denaturation • Agitation in device • Body temperature storage
FDA Workshop July 2003
Physical Interactions with Devices • Protein adsorption to the device • Protein denaturation after adsorption • Partially unfolded intermediates
dominate physical stability of protein formulations • Protein aggregation on surface • Protein aggregation in solution
Uversky, V. N. Lee , H. J., Li, J., Fink, A. L. & Lee, S. J. (2001) Stabilization of Partially Folded Conformation During a-Synuclein Oligomerization in Both Purified and Cytosolic Preparations. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43495-43498.
FDA Workshop July 2003
Proposed Aggregation Mechanism Surface P 2P surf
P2
Psurfden
Partially
Unfolded Intermediate
autocatalytic Pagg P = Protein
I + Pagg
P surf = surface bound protein P surfden = surface bound denatured protein
FDA Workshop July 2003
Psoln.den. P soln.den.
= denatured protein in solution
P agg = Protein aggregates
Curve Fit Results to Autocatalytic Model 800 700 600 500
m1 m2 m3 Chisq R
Value 734.57 1.6383 0.00016847 4.5331e+05 0.99755
400 300 200 100 0 -20
0
20
40 Time (hr)
FDA Workshop July 2003
60
80
100
Effect of Contact Material on Aggregation Rate (Insulin/Tris) 150
Glass
% survival
Titanium Polyethylene Teflon
100
50
0 0
50
100
150
Time to Fixed Fluorescence FDA Workshop July 2003
200
Formulation and Drug Substance Effects GLP-1
% survival
100
75
Standard Drug Substance 50
Standard Sub. Low pH New Drug Substance
25
New Drug Low pH 0 0
25
50
75
100
125
Time to Reach Fixed Fluorescence FDA Workshop July 2003
150
Proteins in Pumps • Formulation is the beginning of successful
drug delivery • Multiple potential interactions between the protein and the pump • Control of the material interface is most important • Device design and formulation need to work together and be regulated together
FDA Workshop July 2003
FDA Workshop July 2003
Conclusions • Pump/Drug interactions need to be
managed and understood • Formulation and pump design need to work together • Combination product components can be evaluated separately and historical data used for regulatory approval with proper attention to drug/device interactions FDA Workshop July 2003
FDA Workshop July 2003