Outline Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnostics Methods and Architectures
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
●
Maintenance philosophies
●
Architecture for condition based maintenance
●
Methods for Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI)
●
Examples
Marko Mattila, 2005
Maintenance Philosophies
AutomationIT
Corrective Maintenance
●
Corrective maintenance
●
Run to failure
●
Preventive maintenance
●
The maintenance is done after some part breaks.
●
Condition based maintenance
●
Maintenance costs are low.
●
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Operating costs are high because of the downtime and damages.
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Preventive Maintenance ● ●
●
●
Condition Based Maintenance
Scheduled maintenance action. Schedule is created from lifetime statistics of similar machines. High maintenance costs due unnecessary maintenance actions. Possibility to equipment failures.
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
●
Maintenance when required
●
Unnecessary maintenance is avoided.
●
Availability of the equipment is guaranteed
●
Overall cost of maintenance is reduced
●
Monitoring creates costs.
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Architecture for condition based maintenance
Total Cost of Maintenance ●
●
Open System Architecture for Condition Based Maintenance (OSA-CBM) ISO 13374-1&2 Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines – Data processing, communication and presentation
Lebold et al. 2003]
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
MIMOSA & OSA-CBM ●
Machinery Information Management Open Systems Alliance (MIMOSA) –
●
OSA-CBM ●
Database schema to define all information needed in maintenance management (Common Relational Information Schema, CRIS)
●
MIMOSA OpenO&M standards: – –
OSA-EAI for ERP and operations management defines interfaces to CRIS repositories OSA-CBM for software component interfaces, behavior and structure of their data
Marko Mattila, 2005
●
AutomationIT
Industry led team developed and demonstrated Open System Architecture for Condition Based Maintenance. Boeing, Caterpillar, Rockwell Automation, Rockwell Scientific, Newport news, Oceana Sensor technologies. Partly funded by U.S. Navy Active development from 1999 to 2003.
Marko Mattila, 2005
OSA-CBM Architecture
ISO 13374
• Functional CBM components • Component behavior • Standard interfaces (AIDL) – – – –
●
●
Request Data Get Data Get Explanation Get Config
●
• Data structures
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
AutomationIT
ISO Standard Prepared by technical Committee ISO/TC 108, mechanical vibration and shock, Subcommittee SC5, Condition monitotoring and diagnostics of machines. ISO 13374 consist of four parts –
Part 1: General guidelines (ready)
–
Part 2: Data-processing requirements (draft)
–
Part 3: Communication requirements (?)
–
Part 4: Presentation requirements (?)
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
ISO 13374 Architecture
Fault Detection and Isolation (FDI)
[Chieng et al, Data-driven techniques for fault detection and diagnosis in chemical processes]
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
FDI methods ●
– ●
Based on data measured from the model Statistical Process Control (SPC), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
●
Straddle Carrier, Research Project
●
X-ray Analyzer, Research Project
Analytical – –
●
Examples
Data-driven –
AutomationIT
Based on detailed mathematical models Parameter estimation, Observers, Parity relations
Knowledge-based – –
Based on qualitative models Causal analysis, Signed directed graph, Expert systems, Case based reasoning, ANN
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Straddle Carrier
Brakes
• Manufactured by Kalmar Industries • Height 16 meters • Weight 68 tons • 20 or 40 feet containers, weight up to 50 tons
Marko Mattila, 2005
OK
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
Difference of desired and measured velocity
Marko Mattila, 2005
Faulty
AutomationIT
Averages of velocity differences
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Signed directed graph of the breaking system
Courier 3SL X-ray Analyzer ●
●
●
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
On-line X-ray fluorescence analyzer for concentrator process Takes samples from up to three sample lines Analyses the concentrations of the elements in the sample slurry
Marko Mattila, 2005
Calibration Validity
Monitoring of Calibration Validity ●
●
●
●
Quality of the analyses is limited by the assay calculation model calibration X-ray measurement data is correlated with the laboratory analyses MLR (Multiple linear regression) model extended with heuristic rules
AutomationIT
●
Ore is not traceable
●
Indicator has to be data-based
●
PCA indicator –
PCA model from the calibration data
–
T2 and Q statistics
Model must be maintained over time
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
AutomationIT
PCA Indicator ●
●
PCA Indicator
T2 statistics measure the variation within the PCA model
50
-50 10/01/00 50
Q statistics measures how well each sample conforms the PCA model. –
Cu error% Mean
0 10/21/00
11/10/00
11/30/00
12/20/00
Predicts the assay calculation error
10/21/00
11/10/00
11/30/00
12/20/00
Reacts when ore drifts outside the calibration time PCA model
0 10/01/00 50
01/29/01
10/21/00
11/10/00
11/30/00
12/20/00
01/09/01
01/29/01
T2 statistics 95% limit 0 10/01/00
Marko Mattila, 2005
01/09/01
Q statistics 95% limit
5
–
01/29/01
Zn error% Mean
0 -50 10/01/00 10
01/09/01
AutomationIT
Marko Mattila, 2005
10/21/00
11/10/00
11/30/00
12/20/00
01/09/01
01/29/01
AutomationIT