Linking Clancey And Rogoff

Linking Clancey and Rogoff My interpretation of what meaning-making entails

   

Perception-conception is a couple Memory is a process like remembering We use tool to mediate understanding of the environment Perception-conception is integral to remembering and comprehending symbol grounding

  

Knowledge is active Meaning is always in construction Trajectory can be highly unpredictable and emerging

 

Perception-conceptual (structural level), social/functional and behavioural levels are a couple and inter-related. This process occurs along all points in the trajectory of meaning making.





Every cycle of perception-conceptual (coupled also with social/functional and behavioral levels) lead to change in participation, roles, identity etc. This occurs even when knowledge or conception is still at pre-linguistic stage.

End of Part 1 For Part 2, let’s think together in terms of how meaningmaking links to the ideas by  Geertz (culture and the development of the ‘mind’),  Bourdieu (habitus and infleunce of cultural capital,  Hayakawa (symbols, language and discourse – conception at linguistic level)  Baktin (Multivoicedness)  Holland (Identity construction) I hope we can have some time to talk about Part 2 to summarize the earlier sessions with regards to how humans make meaning. I look forward to everyone’s inputs (and drawings too :D).

Tyvm!