Paul Christian P. Santos U-Pang PEN BSN IV-P18/07-2409/2010 Lesson 6 Theories of Leadership 1. Great Man Theory Earliest approach Identify great person from masses Certain traits - success/effectiveness Aristotelian philosophy – some people are born to be leaders while others to be led 2. Charismatic Theory
3. Trait Theories Assume some people have certain characteristics or traits that make them better leaders than others Studied great leaders throughout history Power and situations were ignored Contemporary theories said that leadership is a skill and can be developed Not inborn 4. Situational Theory
Notes in NCM 104 Nursing Management and Leadership Prelims Leader behaviors Directive Supportive Achievement-oriented Participative SITUATIONAL FACTORS Characteristics of subordinates Locus of control Experience Perceived ability Characteristics of environment Task structure Formal authority system Work group 6. 1 Path-Goal Leadership Styles Directive ➢ Lets subordinates know what is expected ➢ Plans and schedules work to be done ➢ Gives specific guidance – what should be done and how it should be done ➢ Maintains clear standards of performance Supportive ➢ Shows concern for well-being of subordinates ➢ Treats members as equals ➢ Does little things to make the work more pleasant ➢ Friendly and approachable Achievement-oriented ➢ Sets challenges goals ➢ Expects subordinates to perform at the highest level ➢ Seeks improvement in performance, while showing confidence in workers Participative ➢ Consults with subordinates ➢ Solicits suggestions ➢ Takes suggestions seriously into consideration before making decisions
5. Contingency Theory Fiedler’s Leadership Reinforced contingency approach Group effectiveness depends on appropriate match bet. leader’s style and the demands of the situation Situational control Least preferred coworker Important variables Leader/member relations, task structure, position power Fiedler’s Contingency Model Suggests that no one leadership style is the best for every situation. There are three (3) dimensions that influence leadership style: Leader-staff relations Task structure Position power 6. Path-goal Theory Rooted in Expectancy Theory
7. Situational Leadership Theory No single best way to lead Focus on maturity or readiness of followers Ability and willingness Adjust emphasis on task and relationship behaviors according to the readiness of followers to perform their tasks Mary Follet social system of contingencies Need for “integration” Leadership Styles Telling: low readiness, untrained and inexperienced employees Selling: low/moderate readiness, trained but inexperienced employees Participating: moderate/high readiness, able but unwilling, employees skeptical Delegating: high readiness, employees ready and willing to take responsibility Hersey and Blanchard
Disclaimer The author cannot accept any responsibility for any error or omission and disclaims any liability, loss, or damage as a consequence, directly or indirectly, to the use and application of any of the contents of this work.
Paul Christian P. Santos U-Pang PEN BSN IV-P18/07-2409/2010
Notes in NCM 104 Nursing Management and Leadership Prelims
Developed situational approach Effectiveness of leader is based on level of maturity of followers As followers mature = less task focus for leader CRITICAL LEADERSHIP SKILLS Diagnosing Adapting Communicating Blake & Mouton’s Management Grid The foundation of this theory is that management should have concern for both human relations and completion of work tasks. The two scales range from 1 to 9 with 9 being a higher concern. Five (5) management styles are identified: Impoverished Management – low concern for both people and tasks Country Club Management – high concern for people and low concern for tasks Organizational Man Management – adequate performance is accomplished by balancing staff morale and getting work done Authority Obedience – high concern for tasks and low concern for people Team Management – high concern for both people and accomplishment of tacks
Manager who is committed, has a
Situational Leadership (Tannenbaum and Schmidt) Managers need a mixture of autocratic and democraric leadership behaviors or styles Style depends on nature of situation, skill of manager and abilities of members 8. Transactional Leadership Exchanges rewards for services Management by exception (Watches for deviations) Keeps the system operating smoothly Uses reward and coercive power bases Recognizes what workers want and tries to deliver it Rewards according to worker effort Responsive to worker self-interests Transactional leadership Style • Contingent Reward • Management by Exception • Laissez Faire
vision, and empowers others with vision is termed as transformational leader Inspirational, idea-oriented, visionary Dramatic, arouses intense feelings Communicates high expectations and a need for a change Unpredictable Relies on referent or charismatic power Raises level of awareness and commitment Gets followers to transcend their self-interests Requires trust and belief in the vision presented Transformational leadership • Individualised consideration • Charisma • Inspiration • Intellectual stimulation Transformational leaders concentrate on motivating and developing staff members so the organisation and its staff achieve a shared vision. Key stakeholders within the organisation are empowered to build a culture that supports this vision.” (Dixon 1997) Transactional leader VS. Transformational leader Transactional leader Focuses on management tasks Is a caretaker Uses trade-offs to meet goals Does not identify shared values Examines causes Uses contingency reward Transformational leader Identifies common values Is committed Inspires others with vision Has long-term vision Looks at effects Empowers others
9. Transformational Leadership Burns (1978) Both leader and followers have the ability to raise each other to higher levels of motivation and morality Traditional manager – concerned with day-to-day operations termed as transactional leader
Disclaimer The author cannot accept any responsibility for any error or omission and disclaims any liability, loss, or damage as a consequence, directly or indirectly, to the use and application of any of the contents of this work.