LAMPIRAN
1. Besar Daya Hambat Sari Bawang Putih Kating dan Bawang Putih Sin Chung Selasa, 19 Juli 2016 Besar daya hambat bakteri Pseudomonas aerogenosa Ulangan I Ulangan II
Kosentrasi 100 % bawang putih kating 100 % bawang putih sin chung
Rata-rata
8,50 mm
8,66 mm
8,58 mm
5,00 mm
5,16 mm
5,08 mm
Kamis, 21 Juli 2016 a. Bawang Putih Kating Konsentrasi bawang putih kating 0% 20 % 40 % 60 %
Besar daya hambat bakteri Pseudomonas aerogenosa Ulangan I Ulangan II Ulangan III 0,00 mm 0,00 mm 0,00 mm 1,50 mm 2,50 mm 0,50 mm 2,50 mm 3,00 mm 2,83 mm 3,00 mm 4,33 mm 4,50 mm
b. Bawang Putih Sin Chung Besar daya hambat bakteri Konsentrasi Pseudomonas aerogenosa bawang putih sin chung Ulangan I Ulangan II Ulangan III 0% 0,00 mm 0,00 mm 0,00 mm 20 % 0,50 mm 0,50 mm 0,33 mm 40 % 1,00 mm 2,83 mm 2,66 mm 60 % 3,33 mm 3,33 mm 3,16 mm
Rata-rata 0,00 mm 1,50 mm 2,77 mm 3,94 mm
Rata-rata 0,00 mm 0,44 mm 2,16 mm 3,27 mm
2. Hasil Analisis Data
a. Oneway Anova 1. Bawang Putih Kating
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating N
12
Normal Parameters
Mean
a,b
2,0550
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
1,63294
Absolute
,191
Positive
,163
Negative
-,191
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
,661
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,775
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Descriptives Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
0%
3
,0000
,00000
,00000
,0000
,0000
,00
,00
20 %
3
1,5000
1,00000
,57735
-,9841
3,9841
,50
2,50
40 %
3
2,7767
,25423
,14678
2,1451
3,4082
2,50
3,00
60 %
3
3,9433
,82136
,47421
1,9030
5,9837
3,00
4,50
Total
12
2,0550
1,63294
,47139
1,0175
3,0925
,00
4,50
Test of Homogeneity of Variances Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating Levene Statistic 3,048
df1
df2 3
Sig. 8
,092
ANOVA Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating Sum of Squares Between Groups
Mean Square
25,853
3
8,618
3,479
8
,435
29,332
11
Within Groups Total
df
F
Sig.
19,819
,000
Post Hoc Tests Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating (I) Jenis
(J) Jenis
Bawang Putih Bawang Kating
(I-J)
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
,53840
,024
-2,7416
-,2584
-2,77667
*
,53840
,001
-4,0182
-1,5351
-3,94333
*
,53840
,000
-5,1849
-2,7018
1,50000
*
,53840
,024
,2584
2,7416
-1,27667
*
,53840
,045
-2,5182
-,0351
-2,44333
*
,53840
,002
-3,6849
-1,2018
2,77667
*
,53840
,001
1,5351
4,0182
20 %
1,27667
*
,53840
,045
,0351
2,5182
60 %
-1,16667
,53840
,062
-2,4082
,0749
3,94333
*
,53840
,000
2,7018
5,1849
20 %
2,44333
*
,53840
,002
1,2018
3,6849
40 %
1,16667
,53840
,062
-,0749
2,4082
40 %
40 % 60 %
LSD 0%
0% 60 %
95% Confidence Interval
*
0%
40 %
Sig.
-1,50000
60 %
20 %
Std. Error
Putih Kating 20 %
0%
Mean Difference
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Kating Jenis Bawang Putih Kating
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05 1
a
Duncan
2
3
0%
3
20 %
3
40 %
3
2,7767
60 %
3
3,9433
Sig. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000.
,0000 1,5000
1,000
1,000
,062
2. Bawang Putih Sin Chung One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung N
12
Normal Parameters
Mean
a,b
1,4700
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
1,44367
Absolute
,249
Positive
,249
Negative
-,212
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
,863
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,446
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Descriptives Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Std. Error
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound
Minimum
Maximum
Upper Bound
0%
3
,0000
,00000
,00000
,0000
,0000
,00
,00
20 %
3
,4433
,09815
,05667
,1995
,6872
,33
,50
40 %
3
2,1633
1,01106
,58373
-,3483
4,6749
1,00
2,83
60 %
3
3,2733
,09815
,05667
3,0295
3,5172
3,16
3,33
Total
12
1,4700
1,44367
,41675
,5527
2,3873
,00
3,33
Test of Homogeneity of Variances Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung Levene Statistic 13,041
df1
df2 3
Sig. 8
,002
ANOVA Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung Sum of Squares Between Groups Within Groups Total
df
Mean Square
20,843
3
6,948
2,083
8
,260
22,926
11
F 26,683
Sig. ,000
Post Hoc Tests Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable: Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung (I) Jenis Bawang
(J) Jenis
Putih Sin Chung
Bawang Putih
Mean Difference
Std. Error
Sig.
(I-J)
95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound
Upper Bound
Sin Chung
0%
20 %
-,44333
,41663
,318
-1,4041
,5174
40 %
-2,16333
*
,41663
,001
-3,1241
-1,2026
-3,27333
*
,41663
,000
-4,2341
-2,3126
,44333
,41663
,318
-,5174
1,4041
-1,72000
*
,41663
,003
-2,6808
-,7592
-2,83000
*
,41663
,000
-3,7908
-1,8692
2,16333
*
,41663
,001
1,2026
3,1241
1,72000
*
,41663
,003
,7592
2,6808
-1,11000
*
,41663
,029
-2,0708
-,1492
3,27333
*
,41663
,000
2,3126
4,2341
2,83000
*
,41663
,000
1,8692
3,7908
1,11000
*
,41663
,029
,1492
2,0708
60 % 0% 20 %
40 % 60 %
LSD 0% 40 %
20 % 60 % 0%
60 %
20 % 40 %
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Homogeneous Subsets Daya Hambat Bawang Putih Sin Chung Jenis Bawang Putih Sin
N
Subset for alpha = 0.05
Chung
a
Duncan
1
2
0%
3
,0000
20 %
3
,4433
40 %
3
60 %
3
Sig. Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 3,000.
3
2,1633 3,2733 ,318
1,000
1,000
b. Independent T-test 1. Bawang Putih Kating dan Sin Chung dengan Konsentrasi 20 %
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Daya hambat N
6
Normal Parameters
Mean
a,b
,9717
Std. Deviation
Most Extreme Differences
,85954
Absolute
,375
Positive
,375
Negative
-,228
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
,919
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,367
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Group Statistics Varietas bawang putih
N
Mean
20 % Bawang putih kating Daya hambat
20 % Bawang putih sin chung
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
3
1,5000
1,00000
,57735
3
,4433
,09815
,05667
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test
t-test for Equality of Means
for Equality of Variances F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2-
Mean
Std. Error
Difference Difference
tailed)
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
Equal variances Daya
assumed
hambat
Equal variances not assumed
3,135
,151
1,821
4
,143
1,05667
,58012
-,55402
2,66735
1,821
2,039
,208
1,05667
,58012 -1,39474
3,50807
2. Bawang Putih Kating dan Sin Chung dengan Konsentrasi 40 %
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Daya hambat N
6
Normal Parameters
a,b
Most Extreme Differences
Mean
2,4700
Std. Deviation
,74000
Absolute
,350
Positive
,237
Negative
-,350
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
,856
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,456
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Group Statistics Varietas bawang putih
N
Mean
40 % Bawang putih kating Daya hambat
40 % Bawang putih sin chung
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
3
2,7767
,25423
,14678
3
2,1633
1,01106
,58373
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test
t-test for Equality of Means
for Equality of Variances F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2tailed)
Mean
Std. Error
Difference Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
Equal variances
7,846
,049
1,019
4
,366
,61333
,60190
-1,05782
2,28449
1,019
2,252
,405
,61333
,60190
-1,71772
2,94438
assumed Daya hambat
Equal variances not assumed
3. Bawang Putih Kating dan Sin Chung dengan Konsentrasi 60 % One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test Daya hambat N
6
Normal Parameters
a,b
Most Extreme Differences
Mean
3,6083
Std. Deviation
,63904
Absolute
,335
Positive
,335
Negative
-,204
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z
,821
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed)
,511
a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data. Group Statistics Varietas bawang putih
N
Mean
60 % Bawang putih kating Daya hambat
60 % Bawang putih sin chung
Std. Deviation
Std. Error Mean
3
3,9433
,82136
,47421
3
3,2733
,09815
,05667
Independent Samples Test Levene's Test
t-test for Equality of Means
for Equality of Variances F
Sig.
t
df
Sig. (2tailed)
Mean
Std. Error
Difference Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower
Upper
Equal variances
11,140
,029
1,403
4
,233
,67000
,47759
-,65599
1,99599
1,403
2,057
,293
,67000
,47759 -1,33118
2,67118
assumed Daya hambat
Equal variances not assumed
3. Dokumentasi
Bawang putih kating
Bawang putih sin chung
Sari bawang putih kating dan sin chung
Kosentrasi sari bawang putih kating dan sin chung 0 %, 20 %, 40 %, 60 %
Penelitian n
Daya hambat sari bawang putih kating dan sin chung dengan konsentrasi 100 %
Daya hambat sari bawang putih kating dengan konsentrasi 0 %, 20 %, 40 %, 60 %
Daya hambat sari bawang putih sin chung dengan konsentrasi 0 %, 20 %, 40 %, 60 %