Lab 4- Ultrasonic.docx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Lab 4- Ultrasonic.docx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 419
- Pages: 7
FAKULTI TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA
MATERIAL TESTING AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS
BMMP 3573
SEMESTER 2
SESSION 2018/2019
LAB 4: ULTRASONIC TEST THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS & MATRIX NUMBER
1. LEE HUI KEAN
B071610515
2. NURUL’AIN HANIYUN BINTI MOHAMAD FODZI
B071610631
3. MOHD HANIN SHAMIL BIN MOHD FARID
B071610936
4. AMIRUL HAZIM BIN ABDUL RAHMAN
B071610867
COURSE
3 BMMP S 1 /1
DATE
NAME OF INSTRUCTOR
18/3/2019 1. EN. HAIRUL EFFENDY BIN AB MAULOD 2. MR. AZIZUL IKHWAN BIN MOHD VERIFICATION STAMP
TOTAL MARKS RESULTS: DISCUSSION : CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES: QUESTIONS: TOTAL MARKS:
/ / / / /
25 15 10 15 35
/ 100
EXAMINER’S COMMENT
1.0
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
The signal projection as in Figure 3 illustrates the reflections on the following CRT screen display.
FIGURE 3
Result of :
1. Material velocity : 5960 m/s 2. Probe delay: 3. Test range:
TABLE 1 Test
Step Block
Range
Thickness
25
10
20
30
40
50
Beam
B1
9.8
19.9
NA
NA
NA
path
Bn
19.9
19.9
NA
NA
NA
distance
n
2
1
NA
NA
NA
9.95
19.9
NA
NA
NA
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
50
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
29.8
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
49.9
39.9
29.8
39.9
49.9
distance
n
5
2
1
1
1
9.98
19.95
29.8
39.9
49.9
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
100
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
29.9
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
59.9
100.0
89.9
80.0
99.9
distance
n
6
5
3
2
2
9.98
20
29.97
40
49.95
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
250
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
30.3
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
89.9
180.3
180.3
200.4
250.8
distance
n
8
8
7
5
5
11.24
22.54
25.76
40.08
50.16
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
TABLE 2 Test Location
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
N.A
N.A
9.5
N.A
13.9
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
4.6
9.7
N.A
13.8
N.A
N.A
N.A
100
99.8
5.0
9.3
N.A
13.8
90.8
90.8
100.2
250
99.9
4.9
9.9
N.A
13.8
91.3
90.7
99.8
Range 25 50 Thickness
TABLE 3 Test Location
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Thickness
100.3
4.6
9.8
N.A
13.8
90.8
91.2
99.8
Range 150
2.0 OBSERVATION Write your general observation of the results. I.
Deduce your comment on the calibration process of the probe type.
II.
From your observation of the signal projection and number of backwall echoes, discuss the quality of the calibration process.
3.0 DISCUSSION Write your discussions about this experiment (Less than 200 words)
4.0 CONCLUSION Write a conclusion based on the experimental results.
5.0 REFERENCE List at least two references.
MATERIAL TESTING AND FRACTURE ANALYSIS
BMMP 3573
SEMESTER 2
SESSION 2018/2019
LAB 4: ULTRASONIC TEST THICKNESS MEASUREMENT
NAME OF GROUP MEMBERS & MATRIX NUMBER
1. LEE HUI KEAN
B071610515
2. NURUL’AIN HANIYUN BINTI MOHAMAD FODZI
B071610631
3. MOHD HANIN SHAMIL BIN MOHD FARID
B071610936
4. AMIRUL HAZIM BIN ABDUL RAHMAN
B071610867
COURSE
3 BMMP S 1 /1
DATE
NAME OF INSTRUCTOR
18/3/2019 1. EN. HAIRUL EFFENDY BIN AB MAULOD 2. MR. AZIZUL IKHWAN BIN MOHD VERIFICATION STAMP
TOTAL MARKS RESULTS: DISCUSSION : CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES: QUESTIONS: TOTAL MARKS:
/ / / / /
25 15 10 15 35
/ 100
EXAMINER’S COMMENT
1.0
EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
The signal projection as in Figure 3 illustrates the reflections on the following CRT screen display.
FIGURE 3
Result of :
1. Material velocity : 5960 m/s 2. Probe delay: 3. Test range:
TABLE 1 Test
Step Block
Range
Thickness
25
10
20
30
40
50
Beam
B1
9.8
19.9
NA
NA
NA
path
Bn
19.9
19.9
NA
NA
NA
distance
n
2
1
NA
NA
NA
9.95
19.9
NA
NA
NA
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
50
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
29.8
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
49.9
39.9
29.8
39.9
49.9
distance
n
5
2
1
1
1
9.98
19.95
29.8
39.9
49.9
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
100
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
29.9
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
59.9
100.0
89.9
80.0
99.9
distance
n
6
5
3
2
2
9.98
20
29.97
40
49.95
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
250
Beam
B1
9.9
19.9
30.3
39.9
49.9
path
Bn
89.9
180.3
180.3
200.4
250.8
distance
n
8
8
7
5
5
11.24
22.54
25.76
40.08
50.16
Estimated thickness, Bn/n
TABLE 2 Test Location
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
N.A
N.A
9.5
N.A
13.9
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
4.6
9.7
N.A
13.8
N.A
N.A
N.A
100
99.8
5.0
9.3
N.A
13.8
90.8
90.8
100.2
250
99.9
4.9
9.9
N.A
13.8
91.3
90.7
99.8
Range 25 50 Thickness
TABLE 3 Test Location
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Thickness
100.3
4.6
9.8
N.A
13.8
90.8
91.2
99.8
Range 150
2.0 OBSERVATION Write your general observation of the results. I.
Deduce your comment on the calibration process of the probe type.
II.
From your observation of the signal projection and number of backwall echoes, discuss the quality of the calibration process.
3.0 DISCUSSION Write your discussions about this experiment (Less than 200 words)
4.0 CONCLUSION Write a conclusion based on the experimental results.
5.0 REFERENCE List at least two references.
Related Documents
Lab 4
April 2020 9
Lab 4
November 2019 17
Lab 4
June 2020 2
Lab 4
June 2020 2
Lab 4
June 2020 9
Lab 4
December 2019 7More Documents from ""
Lab 4- Ultrasonic.docx
May 2020 3
Data Analysis Survey.docx
May 2020 2
Mate Testing Wei22.docx
May 2020 2
Lab 4 Material.docx
May 2020 2
Lab 4 Material.docx
May 2020 1