L2 Evolution Of Mcs

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View L2 Evolution Of Mcs as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 305
  • Pages: 6
Evolution of Mgt. Control System MCS is highly influenced by BEHAVIOR of the people involved in it. Organizational Structure & Style Leadership Style Organizational Behavior Organization’s Strategy Hence MCS evolved simultaneously along with developments in these areas.

October 17, 2008

[email protected], VIM Pune

1

Evolution of Mgt. Control System Phase 1 • Functional set up of organization –for reasons of economies of scale . • Difficulty in measuring the performance - attributing the individual functional department’s performance to overall goal.

• Lead to difficulty in control.

• Planning and controlling concentrated at top. October 17, 2008

[email protected], VIM Pune

2

Evolution of Mgt. Control System Phase 2 • Evolution of Business Unit structure. SBU • Planning & control decentralized. • Focus of control became more specific. • Though BU’s functional departments remained under its operational control October 17, 2008

[email protected], VIM Pune

3

Evolution of Mgt. Control System BU control benefited from autonomy granted by top mgt. Thereby Control System got improved – on account of … ….  Speed, Quality of decision improved.  Top mgt. now can concentrate on broader issues.  Enhanced profit consciousness  Provided training ground in General management.  BU mgr is relieved of constraints.  Performance of BU become easier to evaluate by top mgt.  Lead to competitive pressure on BU mgr. October 17, 2008

[email protected], VIM Pune

4

Evolution of Mgt. Control System But BU simultaneously it posed following problems  Top mgt. may feel it as loosing control.  Availability of competent BU mgrs.  Co operation among BU’s become difficulty.  Friction among BU’s – e.g. transfer price.  More emphasis on short term/BU goal.  Additional cost of operation due to duplication of activity at

October 17, 2008

various BUs’.

[email protected], VIM Pune

5

Thank You.

October 17, 2008

[email protected], VIM Pune

6

Related Documents

L2 Evolution Of Mcs
November 2019 10
Mcs
June 2020 14
L2
December 2019 19
L2
August 2019 29
L2
June 2020 20