Jmp Output Lucille 2

  • July 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Jmp Output Lucille 2 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 466
  • Pages: 6
4.4)

Whole Model Actual by Predicted Plot

Summary of Fit RSquare RSquare Adj Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations (or Sum Wgts)

0.996125 0.995156 387.1598 4643.147 16

Analysis of Variance Source

DF

Model Error C. Total

3 12 15

Sum of Mean Square Squares 462327889 154109296 1798712 149892.68 464126602

F Ratio 1028.131 Prob > F <.0001

Parameter Estimates Term Intercept Xray BedDays Length

Estimate 1946.802 0.0385771 1.039392 -413.7578

Std Error 504.1819 0.013042 0.067556 98.59828

t Ratio 3.86 2.96 15.39 -4.20

Prob>|t| 0.0023 0.0120 <.0001 0.0012

Effect Tests Source Xray BedDays Length

Nparm

DF

1 1 1

1 1 1

Sum of Squares 1311468 35482722 2639576

F Ratio

Prob > F

8.7494 236.7208 17.6098

0.0120 <.0001 0.0012

Residual by Predicted Plot

4.20)

Bivariate Fit of Months Elapsed (y) By Total assets (x)

Linear Fit Months Elapsed (y) = 36.482113 - 0.0939352*Total assets (x)

Summary of Fit RSquare RSquare Adj Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations (or Sum Wgts)

0.706906 0.690623 5.231489 19.4 20

Analysis of Variance Source

DF

Model Error C. Total

1 18 19

Sum of Mean Square Squares 1188.1674 1188.17 492.6326 27.37 1680.8000

F Ratio 43.4137 Prob > F <.0001

Parameter Estimates Term Intercept Total assets (x) 4.22)

Estimate 36.482113 -0.093935

Std Error 2.844252 0.014257

t Ratio 12.83 -6.59

Prob>|t| <.0001 <.0001

Whole Model Actual by Predicted Plot

Summary of Fit RSquare RSquare Adj Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations (or Sum Wgts)

0.959727 0.951337 0.15028 8.382667 30

Analysis of Variance Source

DF

Model Error C. Total

5 24 29

Sum of Mean Square Squares 12.916568 2.58331 0.542019 0.02258 13.458587

F Ratio 114.3862 Prob > F <.0001

Parameter Estimates Term Intercept Price (x1) Avg Industry Price (x2) Advertising Expense (x3) Price Diff (x4) DB DC

Biased Biased Zeroed

Estimate 8.715414 -2.768024 1.6666921 0.4927425

Std Error 1.584933 0.414437 0.191332 0.080646

t Ratio 5.50 -6.68 8.71 6.11

Prob>|t| <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001

0 0.269496 0.4395621

0 0.06945 0.070335

. 3.88 6.25

. 0.0007 <.0001

Residual by Predicted Plot

Whole Model Actual by Predicted Plot

Summary of Fit RSquare RSquare Adj Root Mean Square Error Mean of Response Observations (or Sum Wgts)

0.893613 0.881338 0.234669 8.382667 30

Analysis of Variance Source

DF

Model Error C. Total

3 26 29

Sum of Mean Square Squares 12.026774 4.00892 1.431813 0.05507 13.458587

F Ratio 72.7973 Prob > F <.0001

Parameter Estimates Term Intercept Price (x1) Avg Industry Price (x2) Advertising Expense (x3) Price Diff (x4)

Biased Biased Zeroed

Estimate 7.5891025 -2.357723 1.6122144 0.5011517

Std Error 2.445021 0.637947 0.295353 0.125874

t Ratio 3.10 -3.70 5.46 3.98

Prob>|t| 0.0046 0.0010 <.0001 0.0005

0

0

.

.

Residual by Predicted Plot

H0= b4=b5=0 Ha= H0 is false F=( (SEER-SSEF/2)/MSEF=((1.4318-.542)/2)/.02258=19.70 DF(2,24) F*=3.4 F>F* therefore we reject H0 in favor of Ha. The dummy variables are valuable in predicting y.

Related Documents

Jmp Output Lucille 2
July 2020 4
Output
May 2020 31
Charlotte Lucille
June 2020 18
Output
June 2020 19
Output
November 2019 27
Output
October 2019 33