Idealidad En Cstr

  • Uploaded by: assyl_10
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Idealidad En Cstr as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,086
  • Pages: 32
Ideality of a CSTR

Jordan H. Nelson Property of Beehive Engineering

Brief Overview Introduction – General CSTR Information Three Questions Experimental Conclusions

Property of Beehive Engineering

Schematic of the CSTR Item

Description

1

Mixing Point

2

Mixing Point

3

Mixing Point

4

Mixing Points

5

Water Bath Inlet and Outlet

6

Four Wall Mounted Baffles

7

Mixer Drive

8

Marine Type Impeller

9

CSTR Vessel

10

Water Bath Vessel

Property of Beehive Engineering

3 Questions 





?

Where is the best mixing in the CSTR? What is τmean and how does it compare to τideal? What configuration of PFR-CSTR will produce the greatest conversion? Property of Beehive Engineering

Where is the Best Mixing? 

Impeller selection



Food Dye Test



Dead Zones



Impeller Speed Property of Beehive Engineering

Flow Patterns of different impellers Rushton Impeller

Marine Impeller

Property of Beehive Engineering

τMean vs τIdeal  



?

τMean – Measured mean residence time The amount of time a molecule spends in the reactor τIdeal – Ideal residence time is calculated from the following equation

τ ideal

V = νo

Property of Beehive Engineering

Experiment 

 

 

Fill reactor with low concentration salt (baseline) Spike reactor at most ideal mixing Create spike concentration at least one order of magnitude larger than baseline Measure change in conductivity over time Run experiment at different impeller speeds Property of Beehive Engineering

Yikes! Plot of Concentration vs Time with Error 35 30 RPM 15 RPM Concentration NaCl(g/mL)

30

25

20

15

10 0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Time(s)

Property of Beehive Engineering

800

Measured Concentration over time in the CSTR. 26

Concentration NaCl(g/mL)

25 24

30 RPM 15 RPM

23

22 21

20 0

200

400

600

800

Time(s)

Property of Beehive Engineering

RTD Function E(t) 

Measured concentrations are used to create the residence time distribution function

E (t ) =

C (t ) − C (t = 0) t end

∫ [C (t ) − C (t = 0)]dt 0

Property of Beehive Engineering

Plot of an ideal residence time distribution function

Property of Beehive Engineering

Residence time distributions 0.0023 0.0021 0.0019

E(t)

0.0017 0.0015 0.0013 0.0011 Ideal E(t)

0.0009

E(t) Conductivity 15 RPM E(t) Conductivity 30 RPM

0.0007 0.0005 0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Time(s)

Property of Beehive Engineering

Mean Residence Time 

Using E(t) the following equations produce the mean residence time

t mean =

t end

tE ( t ) dt = τ mean ∫ 0

t end

σ = ∫ (t − t m ) E (t )dt 2

0

Property of Beehive Engineering

Comparison of Residence Times RPM

Mean Residence Time

Standard Deviation

Sigma

Sigma/ Tau

15

357.57

11.58

206.87

0.58

30

358.14

11.58

206.35

0.58

466.97

5.90

Ideal CSTR

Property of Beehive Engineering

Loss of Data  

Over an hour of data was lost from Opto 22 Calculation of Reynolds number over 4000 2 (Turbulent)

ND ℜ= υ

 

Equation applies to a baffled CSTR RPM speed of 300 obtained full turbulence Property of Beehive Engineering

CSTR-PFR Configurations ?   





Schematic of arrangements Levenspiel Plot Conduct saponification reaction in the reactor at different RPM’s Use Equimolar flow rates and concentrations of reactants Quench reaction with a HCl and titrate with NaOH Property of Beehive Engineering

Series Reactor with CSTR Before PFR.

Property of Beehive Engineering

Series Reactor with PFR Before CSTR.

Property of Beehive Engineering

Et − Ac + NaOH ↔ NaAc + Et − OH Levenspiel Plot for NaOh+EtOAc 8 Levenspiel Plot for NaOh+EtOAc

-1/ra

6 4 2 0 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Conversion

Property of Beehive Engineering

CSTR-PFR Configurations ?   





Schematic of arrangements Levenspiel Plot Conduct saponification reaction in the reactor at different RPM’s Use Equimolar flow rates and concentrations of reactants Quench reaction with a HCl and titrate with NaOH Property of Beehive Engineering

Measured Conversion for PFR-CSTR Configuration Speed (RPM)

Conversion (%)

Conversion Error (%)

30

19.7

+/-

4.30

60

21.7

+/-

3.91

200

21.2

+/-

4.00

400

24.3

+/-

3.48

875

24.7

+/-

3.41 Property of Beehive Engineering

Measured Conversion for CSTR-PFR Configuration Speed (RPM)

Conversion (%)

Conversion Error (%)

30

21.5

+/-

3.94

60

21.2

+/-

4.00

200

21.4

+/-

3.97

400

20.9

+/-

4.06

875

21.5

+/-

3.94 Property of Beehive Engineering

3 Questions 





?

Where is the best mixing in the CSTR? What is τmean and how does it compare to τideal? What configuration of PFR-CSTR will produce the greatest conversion? Property of Beehive Engineering

Conclusions 







Better mixing for a Rushton impeller is below the impeller The reactor is far from ideal at low impeller speeds The PFR-CSTR arrangement provided better conversions Run the PFR-CSTR reactor at RPM’s of higher than 300 Property of Beehive Engineering

Opportunities 





Run the experiment again to obtain the lost residence time values Run the saponification reaction at higher temperatures Exit sampling stream should be at the bottom of the reactor

Property of Beehive Engineering

Acknowledgements     

Taryn Herrera Robert Bohman Michael Vanderhooft Dr. Francis V. Hanson Dr. Misha Skliar

Property of Beehive Engineering

  







REFEREN CES De Nevers, Noel, Fluid Mechanics, McGraw Hill, New York N.Y. (2005) Fogler, H. Scott, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. (1999) Havorka, R.B., and Kendall H.B. “Tubular Reactor at Low Flow Rates.” Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 56. No. 8 (1960). Ring, Terry A, Choi, Byung S., Wan, Bin., Phyliw, Susan., and Dhanasekharan, Kumar. “Residence Time Distributions in a Stirred Tank-Comparison of CFD Predictions with Experiments.” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. (2003). Ring, Terry A, Choi, Byung S., Wan, Bin., Phyliw, Susan., and Dhanasekharan, Kumar. “Predicting Residence Time Distribution using Fluent” Fluent Magazine. (2003). Property of Beehive Engineering

What to expect from your CSTR.

Property of Beehive Engineering

Question?

Property of Beehive Engineering

Design Equations

b − ra = k * Cao * (1 − X ) * Cbo(Θ b − X ) a

− ra = k * Cao (1 − X ) 2

2

FA 0 X

VCSTR =

2

kC Ao (1 − X )

V PFR = ∫

X

0

2

dX 2

kC A0 (1 − X )

2

Property of Beehive Engineering

Design Equations ∞

−t τ

(t − τ ) σ =∫ * e dt τ 0 2

2

Property of Beehive Engineering

Related Documents

Idealidad En Cstr
June 2020 1
En En
May 2020 41
En En
October 2019 100
En
June 2020 30