Ib Lab - 01 Murphys Law (pla Plb Dc Dpp Ce)

International Baccalaureate Physics

4/PSOW

Murphy’s Law Aim: Murphy’s Law states that if there are a number of possible outcomes to a situation, the actual outcome will be the worst possible one! One application of this law is breakfast. If you drop your toast, it will always land jam side down. Apparatus : Anything you need to perform the experiment to your plan. Planning: Design a procedure to test Murphy’s Law that includes appropriate use of apparatus for the control, collection and analysis of data. This procedure should include the following sections. Planning (a) • Research question • Variable list • Hypothesis

IB Criteria Assessed Planning (a), Planning (b), Data Collection, Data Processing, Evaluation Criteria assessed

Aspect 1

2

3

Level awarded

Pl (a) Pl (b) DC DPP CE

Planning (b) • Plan for collection of data • Plan for control of variable • Diagram and suitable apparatus

Data Collection: • Show the results for the experiment in a suitable table. Include uncertainties. Data Processing and Presentation: • Analyse your results and present the analysis in a suitable form. Conclusion and Evaluation: • Evaluate the data that you have collected and analysed • Evaluate your own plan, including any modifications you had to make to overcome problems. Include an evaluation the apparatus used. • Suggest ways in which the procedure could be modified in order to improve it for the future.

© 2006 - Mike Dickinson

8266767.doc

International Baccalaureate Physics

4/PSOW

Internal Assessment Marking Form Crit.

Pl(a)

Pl(b)

DC

DPP

CE

Aspects Research Question: Hypothesis: Variables: c. Identifies a focused c. Relates the hypothesis or c. Selects the problem or research prediction directly to the relevant question. research question and independent p. States the problem or explains it, quantitatively and controlled research question, but it where appropriate. variable(s). is unclear or incomplete. p. States the hypothesis or p. Selects some n. Does not state the prediction but does not relevant problem or research explain it. variables. question or repeats the n. Does not state a n. Does not select general aim provided by hypothesis or prediction. any relevant the teacher. variables. Materials / Control of Variables: Collecting Data: Apparatus: c. Describes a method c. Describes a method that c. Selects appropriate that allows for the allows for the collection apparatus or control of the of sufficient relevant materials. variables. data. p. Selects some p. Describes a method p. Describes a method that appropriate that makes some allows for the collection apparatus or attempt to control the of insufficient relevant materials. variables. data. n. Does not select n. Describes a method n. Describes a method that any apparatus or that does not allow for does not allow any materials. the control of the relevant data to be variables. collected. Collecting / Recording Raw Data: Organising / Presenting Raw c. Records appropriate raw data (qualitative Data: and/or quantitative), including units and c. Presents raw data clearly, uncertainties where necessary. allowing for easy p. Records some appropriate raw data. interpretation. n. Does not record any appropriate raw data. p. Presents raw data but does not Aspect 1 includes units, uncertainties, allow for easy interpretation. significant digits n. Does not present raw data or presents it incomprehensibly. Processing Raw Data: Presenting Processed Data: c. Processes the raw c. Presents processed data appropriately, helping data correctly. interpretation and, where relevant, takes into p. Some raw data is account errors and uncertainties. processed correctly. p. Presents processed data appropriately but with some n. No processing of raw errors and/or omissions. data is carried out or n. Presents processed data inappropriately or major errors are made incomprehensibly in processing. Aspect 2 includes uncertainty bars, max / min slopes (HL), axes with labels and units, best fit line drawn Drawing Conclusions: Evaluating procedure(s) Improving the c. Gives a valid and results: investigation: conclusion, based on the c. Evaluates procedure(s) c. Identifies correct interpretation of and results including weaknesses and the results, with an limitations, states realistic explanation and, where weaknesses or errors. suggestions to appropriate, compares p. Evaluates procedure(s) improve the results with literature and results but misses investigation. values. some obvious p. Suggests only p. States a conclusion that limitations or errors. simplistic has some validity. n. The evaluation is improvements. n. Draws a conclusion that superficial or n. Suggests unrealistic misinterprets the results. irrelevant. improvements.

Level ccc 3 ccp 2 ccn 2 cpp 2 ppp 1 cpn 1 cnn 1 ppn 1 pnn 0 nnn 0 ccc 3 ccp 2 ccn 2 cpp 2 ppp 1 cpn 1 cnn 1 ppn 1 pnn 0 nnn 0

cc 3 cp 2 cn 1 pp 1 pn 0 nn 0

cc 3 cp 2 cn 1 pp 1 pn 0 nn 0

ccc 3 ccp 2 ccn 2 cpp 2 ppp 1 cpn 1 cnn 1 ppn 1 pnn 0 nnn 0

Grade