A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Stents vs. Bare Metal Stents During Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction – One Year Results – Gregg W. Stone MD For the HORIZONS-AMI Investigators
Background
No consensus exists regarding the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents in pts with STEMI undergoing primary PCI – TLR and restenosis rates tend to be lower in STEMI vs. elective PCI patients because of less plaque burden and non viable myocardium – The safety of implanting DES in ruptured plaques with thrombus has been questioned
Outcomes from registry studies of DES vs. BMS in STEMI have been conflicting, and no large-scale randomized trials have been performed
Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in AMI
3602 pts with STEMI with symptom onset ≤12 hours Aspirin, thienopyridine
R 1:1
UFH + GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab or eptifibatide)
Bivalirudin monotherapy (± provisional GP IIb/IIIa)
Emergent angiography, followed by triage to…
CABG – Primary PCI – Medical Rx 3000 pts eligible for stent randomization
Paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent
R 3:1
Bare metal EXPRESS stent
Clinical FU at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and then yearly through 5 years; angio FU at 13 months
Stent Randomization Hypotheses
In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI, the use of paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents rather than bare metal EXPRESS stents will be: – Efficacious, as evidenced by reduced rates of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 1-year and angiographic binary restenosis at 13 months; and – Safe, with non-inferior rates of the composite measure of death, reinfarction, stent thrombosis or stroke at 1-year
Clinical Inclusion Criteria
STEMI >20 mins and <12 hours in duration – ST-segment elevation of ≥1 mm in ≥2 contiguous leads; or – Presumably new left bundle branch block; or – True posterior MI with ST depression of ≥1 mm in ≥2 contiguous anterior leads – Patients with cardiogenic shock, left main disease, etc., were not excluded
Age ≥18 years
Written, informed consent
Principal Clinical Exclusion Criteria
Contraindication to any of the study medications
Prior administration of thrombolytic therapy, bivalirudin, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, LMWH or fondaparinux for the present admission (prior UFH allowed)
Current use of coumadin
History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including HIT), or will refuse blood transfusions
History of intracerebral mass, aneurysm, AVM, or hemorrhagic stroke; stroke or TIA within 6 months or any permanent neurologic deficit; GI or GU bleed within 2 months, or major surgery within 6 weeks; recent or known platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or hgb <10 g/dL
Planned elective surgical procedure that would necessitate interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrollment
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
The presence of least 1 acute infarct artery target vessel* in which: – a) ALL significant lesions are eligible for stenting with study stents, and – b) ALL such lesions have a visually estimated reference diameter ≥2.25 mm and ≤4.0 mm
Expected ability to deliver the stent(s) to all culprit lesions (absence of excessive proximal tortuosity or severe calcification)
Expected ability to fully expand the stent(s) at all culprit lesions (absence of marked calcification)
*Arteries containing multiple lesions may be randomized if all lesions are study stent eligible; multiple vessels may be randomized if all lesions in each vessel are study stent eligible
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria
Bifurcation lesion definitely requiring implantation of stents in both the main vessel + side branch
Infarct related artery is an unprotected left main
>100 mm of study stent length anticipated
Infarction due to stent thrombosis, or infarct lesion at the site of a previously implanted stent
High likelihood of CABG within 30 days anticipated
2 Primary Stent Endpoints (at 12 Months) 1) Ischemia-driven TLR* and
2) Composite Safety MACE = All
cause death, reinfarction, stent thrombosis (ARC definite or probable)**, or stroke
Major Secondary Endpoint (at 13 Months) Binary angiographic restenosis * Related to randomized stent lesions (whether study or non study stents were implanted); ** In randomized stent lesions with ≥1 stent implanted (whether study or non study stents)
Statistical Methodology
Second randomization stratification i. Results from the first randomization ii. Presence of medically treated diabetes mellitus iii. Presence of any lesion >26 mm in length (requiring overlapping stents by protocol) iv. U.S. vs. non-U.S. site
Primary analysis conducted in the ITT cohort using Kaplan-Meier methodology, with the groups compared by log-rank
1-sided α=0.025 for NI; 2-sided α=0.05 for Sup
Power Analysis With 2,850 pts randomized 3:1* Assumed event rates Test
EXPRESS
TAXUS
δ
Power
Ischemic TLR
Superiority
9.0%
5.0%
-
95%
Composite Safety MACE
Noninferiority
7.5%
7.5%
3.0%
80%
One Year
With angiographic FU in 1,125 randomized pts (analyzable) Assumed event rates 13 Months
Test
EXPRESS
TAXUS
δ
Power
Restenosis
Superiority
26.0%
15.6%
-
96%
* Assumed 5% withdrew or lost to FU at 1 year → 3000 randomized
Study Organization
Sponsor:
The Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Grant Support:
Boston Scientific Corporation The Medicines Company
Principal Investigator:
Gregg W. Stone MD
Steering Committee:
Gregg W. Stone (Chair), Bruce R. Brodie, David A. Cox, Cindy L. Grines, Barry D. Rutherford
European Steering Committee:
H Bonnier, A Colombo, Eulogio Garcia, E Grube, G Guagliumi, A Kastrati, P Serruys, H Suryapranata
Additional Country Leaders:
Y Almagor, A Banning, J Belardi, D Dudek, L Grinfeld, K Huber, D Nilsen, G Olivecrona, L Rasmussen
Pharmacology Committee:
Deepak Bhatt, George Dangas, Fred Feit, Magnus Ohman
(unrestricted)
Study Organization
Data Management:
CRF, Roxana Mehran (Director), Lynn Vandertie, Louise Gambone (Ops), Allison Kellock (Programming), Helen Parise (Stats)
Clinical Events Committee:
CRF, S. Chiu Wong (Chair)
Site and Data Monitoring:
J. Tyson and Associates (USA), Premier (Europe), Tango (S.A.)
Angiographic Core Lab:
CRF, Alexandra Lansky (Director), Ecaterina Cristea (Ops)
ECG Core Lab:
CRF, James Reiffel (Director)
IVUS Core lab:
CRF, Akiko Maehara (Director)
DSMB:
Bernhard Gersh (Chair), David Faxon, Spencer King, Stuart Pocock, David Williams
Sponsored by CRF
The Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF) HORIZONS-AMI Team
Horizons Enrollment - Centers 3,602 pts randomized at 123 centers in 11 countries between March 25th, 2005 and May 7th, 2007 (2) Norway (3) Netherlands (6) UK USA (57) (1) Spain
Argentina (12)
Poland (9) Germany (16) Austria (5) Israel (10) Italy (2)
Top 20 Enrolling Sites 1. B. Witzenbichler, Germany
11. H. Suryapranata, Netherlands
2. G. Guagliumi, Italy
12. K. Huber, Austria
3. J. Peruga, Poland
13. J. Wöehrle, Germany
4. B. Brodie, USA
14. C. Metzger, USA
5. R. Kornowski, Israel
15. M. Desaga, Germany
6. F. Hartmann, Germany
16. K. Zmudka, Poland
7. M. Moeckel, Germany
17. J. Kochman, Poland
8. A. Ochala, Poland
18. D. Nilsen, Norway
9. W. Ruzyllo, Poland
19. D. Dudek, Poland
10. V. Guetta, Israel
20. A. Finkelstein, Israel
Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in AMI Primary Medical Rx Primary CABG Deferred PCI Index PCI, not eligible - PTCA only - Stented
193 62 2 119 220
93.1% of all stented pts were randomized
Randomized
3602 pts with STEMI
UFH + GPI (n=1802) Bivalirudin (n=1800)
3006 pts eligible for stent rand. R 3:1
TAXUS DES N=2257 18 53
1 year FU
R 1:1
N=2186 (96.9%)
EXPRESS BMS N=749 • • • Withdrew • • • • • • Lost to FU • • •
7 27
N=715 (95.5%)
Baseline Characteristics (i) TAXUS (N=2257) Age (years)
EXPRESS (N=749)
59.9 [52.4, 69.4] 59.3 [51.8, 69.2]
Male
77.0%
76.0%
Diabetes
16.1%
15.2%
Hypertension
51.2%
51.9%
Hyperlipidemia
42.2%
41.1%
Current smoking
46.3%
Prior MI
9.1%
Prior PCI
9.5%
7.7%
Prior CABG
2.2%
1.9%
*P=0.009
*
51.9% 10.9%
Baseline Characteristics (ii) TAXUS (N=2257)
EXPRESS (N=749)
80 [71, 90]
80 [71, 90]
Killip class 2-4
8.8%
8.0%
Anterior MI
42.2%
44.7%
50 [44, 59]
50 [43, 58]
3.7 [2.7, 5.5]
3.8 [2.7, 5.8]
Femoral a. access
93.6%
92.9%
Venous access
8.5%
8.0%
Closure device
30.1%
28.8%
Aspiration catheter
11.4%
10.7%
Weight (kg)
LVEF (%), site Symptoms – PCI, hrs
Study Drugs Aspirin at home Aspirin load pre PCI Thienopyridine at home Thienopyridine loading dose - clopidogrel 300 mg - clopidogrel 600 mg - clopidogrel other - ticlopidine UFH pre randomization UFH as the procedural antithrombin Bivalirudin administered GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor administered
TAXUS (N=2257) 22.7%
EXPRESS (N=749) 20.5%
97.0% 2.1%
97.2% 2.5%
98.9% 34.2%
98.3% 35.5%
63.3% 1.2%
61.3% 1.3%
0.5% 65.2%
0.3% 65.8%
49.8% 50.7%
50.1% 50.9%
52.0%
51.5%
Procedural Data (Site Reported) TAXUS (N=2257, L=2495)
EXPRESS (N=749, L=815)
1.1 ± 0.4
1.1 ± 0.4
- ≥ 2 lesions treated
11.1%
9.0%
- ≥ 2 vessels treated
4.5%
3.1%
Direct stenting attempted
30.4%
33.7%
N lesions treated
Stent target lesion: LAD, LCX, RCA, LM, SVG
40.1%, 14.6%, 42.4%, 15.9%, 45.1%, 0.3%, 0.3% 41.3%, 0.4%, 0.4%
N stents implanted
1.5 ± 0.9
Total stent length**
30.8 ± 17.8
* **
1.4 ± 0.7 27.3 ± 14.9
Max balloon dia. (mm)
3.00 [2.75, 3.50]
3.00 [2.90, 3.50]
Max pressure (atm.)
14.0 [12.0, 16.0]
14.0 [12.0, 16.0]
*P=0.002; **P<0.0001
Quantitative Coronary Angiography TAXUS (L=2642, V=2353)
EXPRESS (L=857, V=771)
Pre RVD (mm)
2.89 ± 0.51
2.90 ± 0.50
Pre MLD (mm)
0.35 ± 0.45
0.35 ± 0.45
Pre %DS
87.6 ± 15.4
87.4 ± 15.4
Pre lesion length (mm)
17.5 ± 10.1
Pre TIMI 0/1, 2, 3
†
16.2 ± 8.8
60.6%, 13.6%, 25.7% 57.4%, 15.2%, 27.4%
Post RVD (mm)
2.93 ± 0.51
2.95 ± 0.50
Post MLD (mm)*
2.36 ± 0.55
2.37 ± 0.52
Post %DS*
19.9 ± 11.6
19.5 ± 11.1
Acute gain (mm)**
2.04 ± 0.64
2.05 ± 0.62
Post TIMI 0/1, 2, 3
1.7%, 10.7%, 87.6%
0.9%, 9.3%, 89.8%
*Analysis segment, all lesions, whether stented or not; **stented lesions only; †P=0.006
Aspirin and Thienopyridine Use
Antiplatelet agent use (%)
Regular* aspirin use (%) 99.1%
98.5%
98.3%
97.5%
98.6%
98.3%
97.5%
97.1%
*Taken >50% of days since last visit
Regular* thieno. use (%) 99.4%
98.7%
98.9%
97.8%
94.7%
73.1% 87.5%
P<0.001
63.9%
P<0.001
Primary Efficacy Endpoint: Ischemic TLR 10 9
Ischemic TLR (%)
TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
Diff [95%CI] = -3.0% [-5.1, -0.9]
8 7
HR [95%CI] = 0.59 [0.43, 0.83]
6
P=0.002
7.5%
5
4.5%
4 3 2 1 0 0
Number at risk TAXUS DES 2257 EXPRESS BMS 749
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months 2132 697
2098 675
2069 658
1868 603
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint: Ischemic TVR 10 9
Ischemic TVR (%)
TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
Diff [95%CI] = -3.0% [-5.2, -0.7]
8 7
HR [95%CI] = 0.65 [0.48, 0.89]
6
P=0.006
8.7% 5.8%
5 4 3 2 1 0 0
Number at risk TAXUS DES 2257 EXPRESS BMS 749
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months 2119 695
2078 669
2045 650
1848 598
Primary Safety Endpoint: Safety MACE* 10
TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
Safety MACE (%)
9
8.1% 8.0%
8 7 6
Diff [95%CI] = 0.1% [-2.1, 2.4]
5 4
HR [95%CI] = 1.02 [0.76, 1.36]
3
PNI=0.01 PSup=0.92
2 1 0 0
Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months 2257 749
2115 697
2086 683
* Safety MACE = death, reinfarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis
2057 672
1856 619
One-Year All-Cause Mortality 5
TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
Mortality (%)
4
3.5% 3.5%
3
2
HR [95%CI] = 0.99 [0.64,1.55]
1
P=0.98
0 0 Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months 2257 749
2180 716
2161 712
2147 702
1949 648
One-Year Cardiac Mortality Cardiac Mortality (%)
5
TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
4
3
2.7% 2.4%
2
HR [95%CI] = 0.90 [0.54,1.50]
1
P=0.68 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS
2257 749
2180 716
2161 712
2147 702
1949 648
One-Year Death or Reinfarction TAXUS DES (n=2257) EXPRESS BMS (n=749)
8
Death or MI (%)
7
7.0% 6.8%
6 5
HR [95%CI] = 0.97 [0.70,1.32]
4 3
P=0.83
2 1 0 0
Number at risk TAXUS DES EXPRESS BMS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months 2257 749
2140 703
2110 689
2083 678
1882 625
Stent Thrombosis (ARC Definite or Probable) Stent Thrombosis (%)
4
TAXUS DES (n=2238) EXPRESS BMS (n=744)
3.4% 3.1%
3
2
HR [95%CI] = 0.92 [0.58,1.45]
P=0.72
1
0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Time in Months Number at risk TAXUS DES 2238 EXPRESS BMS 744
2122 701
2098 694
2078 683
1884 629
Stent Thrombosis Rates* TAXUS EXPRESS (N=2238) (N=744) Stent thrombosis, ≤30 days
Hazard ratio [95%CI]
P Value
2.3%
2.7%
0.87 [0.52,1.46]
0.60
- ARC definite
1.9%
2.3%
0.83 [0.47,1.45]
0.51
- ARC probable
0.5%
0.4%
1.11 [0.31,4.05]
0.87
1.0%
0.7%
1.39 [0.52,3.68]
0.51
- ARC definite
0.9%
0.7%
1.25 [0.47,3.35]
0.65
- ARC probable
0.1%
0%
-
0.42
3.1%
3.4%
0.92 [0.58,1.45]
0.72
- ARC definite
2.6%
3.0%
0.86 [0.53,1.41]
0.55
- ARC probable
0.5%
0.4%
1.33 [0.38,4.73]
0.65
Stent thrombosis, >30d – 1y
Stent thrombosis, ≤1 year
*Kaplan-Meier estimates
One Year Composite Safety Endpoints* TAXUS EXPRESS (N=2257) (N=749)
HR [95%CI]
P Value
Safety MACE**
8.1%
8.0%
1.02 [0.76,1.36]
0.92
Death, all-cause
3.5%
3.5%
0.99 [0.64,1.55]
0.98
- Cardiac
2.4%
2.7%
0.90 [0.54,1.50]
0.68
- Non cardiac
1.1%
0.8%
1.32 [0.54,3.22]
0.55
Reinfarction
3.7%
4.5%
0.81 [0.54,1.21]
0.31
- Q-wave
2.0%
1.9%
1.07 [0.59,1.94]
0.83
- Non Q-wave
1.8%
2.7%
0.68 [0.39,1.17]
0.16
Stent thrombosis†
3.1%
3.4%
0.92 [0.58,1.45]
0.72
- ARC definite
2.6%
3.0%
0.86 [0.53,1.41]
0.55
- ARC probable
0.5%
0.4%
1.33 [0.38,4.73]
0.65
1.0%
0.7%
1.52 [0.58,4.00]
0.39
Stroke
*Kaplan-Meier estimates; **Primary safety endpoint; †ARC definite or probable
Angiographic Follow-up 1800 consecutive eligible pts assigned to 13 month angiographic FU* Randomized
TAXUS DES N=1348
EXPRESS BMS N=452
40 • • • Died before angio FU • • • 11
Eligible
N=1308
N=441 366 • Angio FU not performed • 134
Completed Angio FU
N=942 (72.0%)
N=307 (69.6%)
28 • • Not received/analyzable • • 14 • • • • Out of window • • • • 3 0
Analyzed
N=911
1081 • • • Lesions • • •
332
* Randomized in stent arm; stent procedure successful (DS <10%, TIMI-3 flow, ≤NHLBI type A peri-stent dissection); no stent thrombosis or CABG w/i 30 days
N=293
Follow-up QCA TAXUS EXPRESS P (L=1081, V=964) (L=332, V=302)
value
TIMI flow - 0/1
2.8%
3.6%
0.45
-2
7.0%
5.0%
0.22
-3
90.2%
91.4%
0.55
FU RVD (mm)
2.91 ± 0.49
2.90 ± 0.48
0.97
FU MLD in-stent (mm)
2.36 ± 0.75
1.98 ± 0.82
<0.0001
FU MLD in-segment (mm)
2.08 ± 0.69
1.84 ± 0.76
<0.0001
FU %DS in-stent
18.8 ± 22.9
32.6 ± 24.9
<0.0001
FU %DS in-segment
28.8 ± 19.6
37.4 ± 22.0
<0.0001
Aneurysm
0.5%
0.9%
0.40
Ulcerated
0.5%
0.6%
0.67
Ectasia
0.7%
0.9%
0.73
Binary Analysis Segment Restenosis at 13 Months Patient and Lesion Level Analysis*
RR [95%CI] = 0.44 [0.33, 0.57] P<0.0001
RR [95%CI] = 0.44 [0.33, 0.57] P<0.0001
Major 2° endpoint
* ITT: Includes all stent randomized lesions, whether or not a stent implanted, and whether or not non study stents were placed ** Any lesion with restenosis per pt restenosis
was
Angiographic Late Loss at 13 Month Lesions with Stents Implanted
P<0.0001 P<0.0001
± 0.70
± 0.64
P = 0.07 ± 0.64
P = 0.18 ± 0.56
± 0.50 ± 0.47
± 0.54 ± 0.42
Binary Angiographic Restenosis at 13 Months Lesions with Stents Implanted RR [95%CI] = 0.39 [0.29, 0.52] P<0.0001
P = 0.42
RR [95%CI] = 0.42 [0.32, 0.54] P<0.0001
P = 0.13
Limitations
Open label design – Potential bias was mitigated by high protocol procedure compliance and use of blinded clinical event adjudication committees and core laboratories
Underpowered for stent thrombosis and death – The virtually identical rates of MACE in the TAXUS and EXPRESS groups makes it unlikely that major safety differences exist favoring either stent type at 1-year
Conclusions
In this large-scale, prospective, randomized trial of pts with STEMI undergoing primary stenting, the implantation of paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents compared to bare metal EXPRESS stents resulted in: – A significant 41% reduction in the 1-year primary efficacy endpoint of ischemia-driven TLR, and a significant 56% reduction in the 13 month major secondary efficacy endpoint of binary restenosis – Non inferior rates of the primary composite safety endpoint of all cause death, reinfarction, stent thrombosis or stroke at 1-year
Conclusions
The long-term safety and efficacy profile of paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents compared to bare metal EXPRESS stents in STEMI will be determined by the ongoing 5 year follow-up of patients randomized in the HORIZONS-AMI trial