Guid.docx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Guid.docx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 1,104
- Pages: 8
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 1 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
e.) Results and Discussions Data Gathering and Analysis Existing Design. (Provide Discussion and figure)
Existing Process. (Provide Discussion and figure)
Problems Encountered in the Existing Design. (you may present defect history or quality result, efficiency, downtime history, no of defects etc. caused by the existing design)
Design In this part present each components and the whole design along with the drawings and computations design. Shaft. (provide discussion about the shaft like specifications, used etc.)
Present the drawing of the part or component
Present the computation design
Over-all Design. Present the over-all design of your study
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 2 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Example: Double Threaded Rod. It is designed as a power screw with single threaded left hand and right hand screw to accurately adjust the opening of the guard and convert a rotational movement to a linear motion. The rod must be rotate manually. Specification: Pitch
Core diameter
Lead Pitch
1mm or 0.04in
Lead
Single thread 2mm or 0.08in
Core diameter (Mean diameter)
10mm or 0.4in
Coefficient of sliding friction
0.58
Coefficient of sliding friction if greased
0.15
Load (weight of the guard )
2.3kg or 5.1lb
Computation: Based on Prime’s Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual. For lead angel:
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 3 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
a = tan -1 (2mm / π 10mm) a = 3.6 degrees
Where: L = lead (mm or in.) Dm = mean diameter (mm or in) a = lead angle (deg.) The adjustable guard must be adjusted by hand so, to compute the total torque require to operate the screw (acme) is the following:
Where: a
= lead angle (deg.)
f = coefficient of friction Dm = mean diameter (in) W = load (lb)
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 4 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Complete Design.
Fabrication of the Prototype Flow chart of the Fabrication Process. (discuss the flow process or flow chart)
Activity Chart. (Present the process with an actual picture)
Bill of Materials. (Present the list of Material and prices, use table)
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 5 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Example Table 4 Bill of Material Components
Complete Specification
Unit
Quantity
Price Plate
Size - 20cm diameter
Machining
Total
price
0
1
500
500
0
1
500
500
Thickness – 30mm Scrap materials carbon steel Base
24cm x 32cm Thickness- 25mm Scrap materials carbon steel
Total 3,500
Testing and Evaluation Testing Result. (Discuss the testing result and use table)
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 6 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Example Table 5 Testing Result Trials
Condition
Result
Remarks
Action taken
1st
Height of the Guard is 60mm
Failed
Change the Guard Height from 60mm to 15mm.
2nd
Height of the Guard is 15mm
Failed
Inspection of big bottle came up good, but during inspection of small bottles, the body of the small container cannot be visualized because the height of the Guard is too high for small containers. It is now good during inspection of the small bottle, but now, during inspection of the big bottle, sometimes the bottle toppling still occurred.
3rd
Two types of Guard is available, the small size 15mm and the big size 60mm
Successful
Running big bottle will use big size guard, and running small bottle will be using a smaller guard.
---
When running big bottle at the line, use the bigger Guard, and when running small bottle, use smaller size of guard.
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 7 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Evaluation Result. (Discuss the evaluation result and use table) Example Table 6 Evaluation Result 5
Frequency 4 3 2
1
6
3
3.8
Agree
8
1
1
4.7
Strongly Agree
1
6
2
3.7
Agree
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device suits for 1 sampling of big and/or small size of bottle. 2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is heavy 4 duty 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device can 7 handle High temperature newly formed glass bottle C. Efficiency
9
4.1
Agree
3.8
Agree
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is easy to use
Criteria
1
Weighted Qualitative Arithmetic Description Mean
A. Functionality
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is user friendly 2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device conserves time during inspection of bottle 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device gives Glass forming personnel a safe environment. B. Effectiveness
1
1
1
4
1
2
1
4.6
Strongly Agree
7
2
3.9
Agree
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 8 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device eliminates incident of ware toppling during inspection 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device uses only 1 device instead of two
2
6
9
1
1
1
3.9
Agree
4.9
Strongly Agree
Summary of Findings Discuss all the result of your findings and present it based on your objectives. There should have 3 Paragraphs (Design Result, Fabrication Result, Testing and Evaluation Result)
Conclusions and Recommendations There should have 3 Conclusions and Recommendations – based on your objectives Conclusion 1. 2. 3.
Recommendations 1. 2. 3.
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 1 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
e.) Results and Discussions Data Gathering and Analysis Existing Design. (Provide Discussion and figure)
Existing Process. (Provide Discussion and figure)
Problems Encountered in the Existing Design. (you may present defect history or quality result, efficiency, downtime history, no of defects etc. caused by the existing design)
Design In this part present each components and the whole design along with the drawings and computations design. Shaft. (provide discussion about the shaft like specifications, used etc.)
Present the drawing of the part or component
Present the computation design
Over-all Design. Present the over-all design of your study
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 2 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Example: Double Threaded Rod. It is designed as a power screw with single threaded left hand and right hand screw to accurately adjust the opening of the guard and convert a rotational movement to a linear motion. The rod must be rotate manually. Specification: Pitch
Core diameter
Lead Pitch
1mm or 0.04in
Lead
Single thread 2mm or 0.08in
Core diameter (Mean diameter)
10mm or 0.4in
Coefficient of sliding friction
0.58
Coefficient of sliding friction if greased
0.15
Load (weight of the guard )
2.3kg or 5.1lb
Computation: Based on Prime’s Mechanical Engineering Reference Manual. For lead angel:
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 3 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
a = tan -1 (2mm / π 10mm) a = 3.6 degrees
Where: L = lead (mm or in.) Dm = mean diameter (mm or in) a = lead angle (deg.) The adjustable guard must be adjusted by hand so, to compute the total torque require to operate the screw (acme) is the following:
Where: a
= lead angle (deg.)
f = coefficient of friction Dm = mean diameter (in) W = load (lb)
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 4 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Complete Design.
Fabrication of the Prototype Flow chart of the Fabrication Process. (discuss the flow process or flow chart)
Activity Chart. (Present the process with an actual picture)
Bill of Materials. (Present the list of Material and prices, use table)
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 5 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Example Table 4 Bill of Material Components
Complete Specification
Unit
Quantity
Price Plate
Size - 20cm diameter
Machining
Total
price
0
1
500
500
0
1
500
500
Thickness – 30mm Scrap materials carbon steel Base
24cm x 32cm Thickness- 25mm Scrap materials carbon steel
Total 3,500
Testing and Evaluation Testing Result. (Discuss the testing result and use table)
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 6 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
Example Table 5 Testing Result Trials
Condition
Result
Remarks
Action taken
1st
Height of the Guard is 60mm
Failed
Change the Guard Height from 60mm to 15mm.
2nd
Height of the Guard is 15mm
Failed
Inspection of big bottle came up good, but during inspection of small bottles, the body of the small container cannot be visualized because the height of the Guard is too high for small containers. It is now good during inspection of the small bottle, but now, during inspection of the big bottle, sometimes the bottle toppling still occurred.
3rd
Two types of Guard is available, the small size 15mm and the big size 60mm
Successful
Running big bottle will use big size guard, and running small bottle will be using a smaller guard.
---
When running big bottle at the line, use the bigger Guard, and when running small bottle, use smaller size of guard.
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 7 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
Evaluation Result. (Discuss the evaluation result and use table) Example Table 6 Evaluation Result 5
Frequency 4 3 2
1
6
3
3.8
Agree
8
1
1
4.7
Strongly Agree
1
6
2
3.7
Agree
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device suits for 1 sampling of big and/or small size of bottle. 2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is heavy 4 duty 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device can 7 handle High temperature newly formed glass bottle C. Efficiency
9
4.1
Agree
3.8
Agree
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is easy to use
Criteria
1
Weighted Qualitative Arithmetic Description Mean
A. Functionality
1. The 2 in 1 Turn table device is user friendly 2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device conserves time during inspection of bottle 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device gives Glass forming personnel a safe environment. B. Effectiveness
1
1
1
4
1
2
1
4.6
Strongly Agree
7
2
3.9
Agree
Document Code: DCAVRKMI-F-PS Document Title: Project Study Page No.: Page 8 of 8 Revision No.: 0 Effectivity Date: August 2017 Prepared by: DCAVRKMI Reviewed by: QMR Approved by: President
MANUEL S. ENVERGA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION Lucena City
An Autonomous University
QUALITY FORM
2. The 2 in 1 Turn table device eliminates incident of ware toppling during inspection 3. The 2 in 1 Turn table device uses only 1 device instead of two
2
6
9
1
1
1
3.9
Agree
4.9
Strongly Agree
Summary of Findings Discuss all the result of your findings and present it based on your objectives. There should have 3 Paragraphs (Design Result, Fabrication Result, Testing and Evaluation Result)
Conclusions and Recommendations There should have 3 Conclusions and Recommendations – based on your objectives Conclusion 1. 2. 3.
Recommendations 1. 2. 3.
More Documents from "Nico Marasigan"
Ducting Alignment.docx
June 2020 9
Okducting.docx
June 2020 4
Ductsss.docx
June 2020 4
Guid.docx
June 2020 5
Ok.docx
June 2020 11