Fy2003 Approved Budget (242 Pages)

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Fy2003 Approved Budget (242 Pages) as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 46,667
  • Pages: 242
Washington ,............-.. . . . . . Metropolitan Area Transit Authority m ro

M

APPROVED FISCAL 2003 ANNUAL BUDGET

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED ANNUAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Annual Budget Summary Organization and Staffing Departmental Budgets

1 3 7 11

Operating Budget Ridership and Revenue Metrobus Financial Tables Statistics Regional/Non-Regional Costs Metrorail Financial Tables Statistics Parking Metro Access Debt Service Professional and Technical Services Union Statistics Fringe Benefits

17 27 33 36 38 43 51 54 56 64 67 73 77 81 85

Reimbursable Operating Projects Financial Summary

89 91

Capital Improvement Program Overview Financial Tables Project Descriptions

97 99 102 108

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction Operating Capital Improvement Program

157 159 162

Resolutions of the Board of Directors

171

This Page Not Used

ANNUAL BUDGET SUMMARY

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Summary

Page 1

This Page Not Used

Summary Page 2

WMATA Budget Fiscal 2003 Approved: $1.41 Billion Where it Comes From

Federal I Other $588.7 Revenues $445.7

Gross Subsidy $376.9

Where it Goes Rail Construction $26.8

Reimbursable Projects $12.2

Capital Improvement Program $522.3

Debt Service $27.5 Operations $822.5

$ Millions

Summary Page 3

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

(Dollars in Millions) REVENUE AND FEDERAL / NON-FEDERAL FUNDING FISCAL 2001 Budget

FISCAL 2002 Budget

FISCAL 2003 Budget

OPERATING BUDGET· Revenue Local Operating SUbsidy Local Debt Service Payment

$389.6 $338.8

$436.1 $359.8

$445.7 $376.9

$728.4 $27.5

$795.9 $27.5

$822.5 $27.5

$755.9

$823.3

$850.0

$7.1 $1.0

$7.1 $1.0

$7.1 $1.0

$8.1

$8.1

$8.1

$44.7 $78.8 $30.9

$48.7 $84.5 $33.3

$95.1 $58.1 $68.2

$154.3

$166.5

$221.4

$33.6

$29.3

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) Flexible Funding Federal Funding Non-Federal Assistance Section 5307 & 5309 Federal Funding 5307 Federal Funding 5309 Non-Federal Assistance

Other * Financing (TIFIA)

$123.1 *

$113.8 $317.7 ($17.1) $300.6

$22.8 $375.4

System Access/Capacity Program (SAP) Federal and Non-Federal **

$208.4

$115.9

System Expansion Program (SEP) Federal and Non·Federal **

$551.5

$31.0

$677.3

$1,060.5

$522.3

$0.0 $0.0

$0.0 $0.0

$0.0 $0.0

$0.0

$0.0

$0.0

$80.0

$71.4

$26.8

$80.0

$71.4

$26.8

$481.3 $677.3

Transferred to SAP IRP Total

$677.3

CIP Total

$375.4

RAIL CONSTRUCTION 103 Mile System: Federal Funding Local Assistance Construction In Progress

89.5 Mile System

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS & EXPANSION

TOTAL REVENUE & FUNDING

**

$4.8

$0.0

$0.0

$84.8

$71.4

$26.8

$11.7

$14.3

$12.2

$229.9

$0.0

$0.0

$1,759.6

$1,969.5

$1,411.3

Note: Reimbursable Projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001.

* FY03 includes $107.5 million in federal funding for safety and security items Included in Reimbursable Projects or System Improvement & Expansion Program Rounding may cause some precision differences.

H

Summary Page 4

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET (Dollars in Millions) MULTI YEAR BUDGET SUMMARY FISCAL 2001 Budget

FISCAL 2002 Budget

FISCAL 2003 Budget

DEBT SERVICE Operating Total

$297.1 406.7 24.6 $728.4 27.5 $755.9

$314.0 457.3 24.6 $795.9 27.5 $823.3

$321.3 473.0 28.2 $822.5 27.5 $850.0

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) Rolling Stock including Preventive Maintenance Passenger and Maintenance Facilities Track and Structures Systems Safety and Security Other IRP Total

$489.8 109.7 13.4 37.2 0.0 27.2 $677.3

$68.6 138.4 22.1 39.6 0.0 31.9 $300.6

$96.2 90.6 12.3 32.9 107.5 35.9 $375.4

0.0

208.4

115.9

0.0 $677.3

551.5 $1,060.5

31.0 $522.3

$5.1 55.1 12.6 6.9 $79.7

$1.0 24.4 28.0 18.0 $71.4

$0.0 8.5 11.8 6.5 $26.8

4.8 $84.5

0.0 $71.4

0.0 $26.8

11.7

14.3

12.2

OPERATING BUDGET Metrobus Metrorail Metro Access

System Access\Capacity Program (SAP) * System Expansion Program (SEP) * CIP Total

RAIL CONSTRUCTION 103 Mile System: Inner Green Line Outer Green Line Branch Ave. Yard Rail Cars 103 Mile Total 89.5 Mile System

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT & EXPANSION TOTAL BUDGET

229.9 *

$1,759.3

0.0 *

$1,969.5

0.0

$1,411.3

Note: Operating Budget is accrued expenses; CIP and Rail Construction budgets are obligations. Reimbursable projects were included in System Improvements & Expansion prior to FY 2001 * Included in Reimbursable Projects or System Improvement & Expansion Program Rounding may cause some precision differences.

Summary

Page 5

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET (Dollars in Millions) REGIONAL FUNDING SUMMARY

District of Columbia Maryland Montgomery County Prince George's County

Operating Inc. Debt Service $158.8

System Infrastructure Access/Capacity Renewal Program Program $0.4 $30.9

System Expansion Program $2.9

Rail Construction $0.0

Total Fiscal 2003 $193.0

$69.1 $74.5 $143.7

$13.9 $14.9 $28.8

$0.2 $0.2 $0.4

$5.6 $18.9 $24.5

$0.0 $0.0 $0.0

$88.8 $108.5 $197.4

Virginia Alexandria Arlington County Fairfax County Fairfax City Falls Church Total

$17.6 $29.5 $52.8 $0.9 $1.1 $101.9

$3.8 $7.1 $11.1 $0.2 $0.2 $22.4

$2.9 $3.6 $12.1 $0.0 $0.0 $18.6

$0.1 $0.3 $3.2 $0.0 $0.0 $3.6

$0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $0.0

$24.4 $40.5 $79.2 $1.1 $1.3 $146.5

Total Regional Assistance

$404.4

$82.1

$19.4

$31.0

$0.0

$536.9

Note: revenue, federal funding matches, and financing make up the remaining funding. Rounding may cause some precision differences.

Summary Page 6

ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Summary -- Organization

Page 7

This Page Not Used

Summary -- Organization Page 8

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Cf)

c

3 3

Richard A. White General Manager / Chief Executive Officer

0> """I

3110

o

Jim Gallagher Deputy General Manager QDerations

-< """I

CO

0> ::J

7100

r-+

o

::J

Cheryl Burke General Counsel

I

N

0>

1400

Harold Bartlett Secretary & Chief of Staff

Polly Hanson Chief Metro Transit Police Department

I

I

2110

4100

5100

Fred Goodine AGM System Safety & Risk Protection

Peter Benjamin AGM Chief Financial Officer

P. Takis Salpeas AGM Capital Projects Manaoement

William Scott AGM Workforce Dev. & Diversitv Prooram~

1820

1720

2200

Vacant Field Operations Bureau

Ronald Keele Passenger, Veh. & Fire Safety

Kathy Smith Comptroller Accounting

3330

3420

Benjamin Bake Rail Car Maintenance

Terry Consavage Rail System Engineering

5400 Human Resources

Mgt.& Planning

2400

4400

5500

Alvin Doehring Treasurer

Richard Spatz Systems

Cynthia Myers Civil Rights

6300 Ray Feldmann Media Relations

3340

3440

Vacant Rail Transportation

Ralph Lusher Engineering Support

3350

3450

3120

Sean Burgess Systems Maintenance

Robert Golden Bus Vehicle Engineering

8400 Don McCanless Information Tech. & Service

1750

4500

5600

6800

Vacant Quality Enhance & Analysis

John Donahue, Jr

Vacant Labor Relations

Vacant Regional Fare System

-

Avom Mackel Metro Access 3130

3360

3460

-

Bea Hicks Operations Liaison

Don Painter Track & Structures

Joan LeLacheu Environmental Services

-

Paul Gillum Plant Maintenance

-

James Hughes Oper Planning §. Admin Suppo~

3150 4600

Denton Kent Property Dev. & Mgt

Nancy Grzesik Administration

7400

4700

James A. Zingale Procurement & Materials

David Couch Infrastructure Renewal Prog.

Intergovernmental Relations

3230 Phillip Wallace Bus Maintenance

6500

7200

CD

8300 Rick Stevens Business lPlanning & Dev.

Karen Lamb Customer Service

James Stewart Auditor General

7500

Patrick Pozillo Chief Engineer

3220

Katrina Wiggins

Deborah Lipman

Lemuel Proctor COO Rail Services

~herman Rame Bus Transportation

4300

CD

Jack Requa COO Bus Services

8200

Harry Lupia Engineering & Architecture

Major Capital Projects

3410

Frank McCarron Capital Program Oversight

2300

1740

Edward Thomas AGM Planning & Strateoic Proorams

I 3310

6200

Burt Bouldry Financial Management

arlos Pearman Loss Control & Workers Compo

I 3210

Murray Bond Strategic Mktg & Communications

1730

1840

Leona Agouridis AGM Communications

I 8100

5300

Kevin Lyons Indust., Const. & Env. Safety

Daniel Hall Protective Service Bureau

6100

Richard Plante Organizational Development

1830

0>

co

4200 John Elkins Construction

David Shaw Field Service Bureau

7300

"U

I

I 1710

lllUU

3160

Note: the following positions have a "dotted line" reporting relationship to the Chief Executive Officer: Auditor General, Director of the Intergovernmental Relations, Director of Business Planning &

Development

3170 --1

4800 Ike Pyo Hong Extension

3470 Jane Morrissey Facilities Services

Glenn Millis ADA& Paratransit

3180 '--

ames G. MoorE Elevators & Escalators

July I, 2002

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED STAFFING STAFFING SUMMARY BY OFFICE Positions

Office

Operating

FY 2002 FY 2003 Full-Time Net Amended Approved Change Equiv.

Para~

Bus

Rail

General Manager General Counsel Metro Transit Police Independent Offices

2 71 470 543

2 71 470 543

2.00 70.00 470.00 542.00

0.80 31.53 86.34 118.67

0.80 28.41 383.66 412.87

Secretary - Chief of Staff

6 25 7 31 185 254

6 25 7 31 185 254

6.00 25.00 7.00 30.50 185.00 253.50

2.37 5.40 0.50 0.81 67.28 76.36

3.03 9.05 5.45 24.44 93.91 135.88

3 18 12 14 35 82

3 18 12 14 35 82

3.00 18.00 12.00 14.00 35.00 82.00

1.50 5.55 4.50 4.95 2.55 19.05

1.50 11.45 5.80 5.95 32.45 57.15

Chief Finance Officer Accounting Financial Management Treasurer Finance

11 73 28 132 244

11 73 28 132 244

11.00 73.00 28.00 130.50 242.50

4.07 26.86 8.35 23.47 62.75

4.62 30.01 10.57 100.87 146.Q7

Deputy General Manager - Operations

4 10 749 385 8 132

4.00 10.00 749.00 384.00 5.00 133.00 5.00 1,290.00

1.60 0.20 116.25 209.23

1.60 2.80 547.65 173.77

1,288

4 10 749 384 5 133 5 1,290

6 2,660 918 3,584

6 2,701 926 3,633

3 875 1,159 800 353 3,190

3 875 1,158 800 353 3,189

2 52 39 6 7 17 123

2 52 39 6 7 17 123

8,185

8,235

4 47 43 57 81 32 16 43 323

4 28 38 57 85 33 20 43 308

Organizational Development Workforce Development and Diversity Programs

12 65 32 15 124

12 65 36 15 128

AGM Communications Customer Service Media Relations Strategic Marketing and Communication Communications

9 91 5 92 197

9 91 5 92 197

AGM - Planning and Strategic Programs

2 9 7 123 141

9 13 8 123 12 165

24

10,093

10,156

63

Auditor General Intergovernmental Relations

Property Development & Mgmt Procurement and Materiels

Secretary and Chief of Staff AGM - System Safety and Risk Protection Quality Enhancement and Analysis Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Safety Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety Loss Control and Workers Compensation

System Safety and Risk Protection

Operations Liaison Plant Maintenance Operations Planning and Administrative Support Americans With Disabilities Act Escalator & Elevator MetroAccess Services Operations

Chief Operating Officer - Bus Bus Transportation Bus Maintenance Bus Service

Chief Operating Officer - Rail Rail Car Maintenance Rail Transportation Rail Systems Maintenance Track and Structures Rail Service Chief Engineer Operations Engineering

Operation Support Bus Vehicle Engineering Environmental Services Facility Services

Chief Engineer Operations

Asst General Manager - CAPM Construction Engineering and Architecture

Systems Major Capital Projects Administration - CAPM Infrastructure Renewal Program Extensions

Capital Projects Management Asst General Manager - WDOP Human Resource & Mgmt Planning

Labor Relations

M

Business Planning & Project Development Capital Programming and Oversight Information Technology and Services Information Technology Renewal Program Planning and Strategic Programs

Authority Total

Summary Page 10

--

Organization

-1 -3 1

41 8 49

-1

-1

50

-19 -5 4 1 4 -15

4 4

7 4 1

transit

~

0.34

0.19

5.99

0.40 3.54

0.34

0.19

5.99

3.94

1.00 1.00

7.55 1.00 1.16 8.25 17.96

3.00

1.08 14.46 19.14

0.20 0.20

0.30 1.15

0.40 0.20

1.00 0.80 1.55

0.40

1.45

0.60

3.35

0.15 0.62 0.10

1.02 6.48 2.00 1.47 10.97

1.00

1.14 8.68 5.78 4.07 19.67

0.05 0.10 0.15

0.35 0.20 0.62 1.17

0.87

0.60 3.00 3.00

1.00

0.40 2.10

CIP

3.10 0.10

0.80

0.40 1.00 85.00

3.20

0.80

93.05

1.00 5.00

126.35 327.28

852.17

6.00 2.95 2,522.50 2,393.83 926.00 844.93 3,454.50 3,241.71

0.05 5.67 24.35 30.07

3.00 875.00 1,140.00 800.00 353.00 3,171.00

0.50 47.27 0.50 48.32

2.92 859.00 1,139.50 730.68 238.50 2,970.60

2.00 52.00 39.00 6.00 7.00 17.00 123.00

0.60 0.95 4.45 2.80 2.90 4.83 16.53

1.40 23.77 32.80 1.85 4.10 10.37 74.29

0.05

8,038.50 3,633.84 3,927.13 4.00 29.50 38.00 57.00 85.00 33.00 20.00 43.00 308.50

Capital Rail CapitaIC"nstr.

Reimb. Reimb.

6.65 5.00 10.40

3.10 3.00 115.00 56.72 174.72

8.00 8.00 0.03 16.00 0.05 0.05

0.35 0.80

0.07 0.07 10.47 177.82

0.10

5.99

4.78 278.47

3.09 15.70 15.95 23.84 61.23 21.21

0.10 0.26

4.44 0.65

1.67

27.48

43.00 14.25 184.02

12.00 65.00 36.00 15.00 128.00

5.48 28.49 11.67 6.35 51.99

5.44 27.84 20.32 7.35 60.95

0.54 3.46 0.94 0.55 5.49

9.00 91.00 5.00 85.00 190.00

2.90 43.85 2.00 29.07 77.82

3.15 44.10 3.00 47.02 97.27

9.00 13.00 8.00 123.00 12.00 165.00

0.50 0.50

1.60 8.50

1.00

0.05 2.15

6.00 7.00 1.00

0.35 12.65 1.33 9.50 1.95

25.78

0.14 25.42

0.46 1.15 9.08 11.70 9.52 5.30 19.09 56.30 0.54 5.21 3.07 0.75 9.57

0.51

0.05

2.34

0.08 0.59

0.05

2.78 5.12

16.27

1.10 4.00 1.00 17.10 12.00 35.20

14.78 202.53 248.73

35.21 430.76

38.98

61.95

0.50

39.98

72.05

0.50

9,951.00 4,082.13 4,936.85

22.98 0.95 1.35

3.95

1.31

0.05 2.05

3.95

1.59 2.74

11.64 10.65 14.25

22.00 114.00 0.03 152.00

4.80 7.00 4.47

1.00

DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Departmental Budgets Page 11

This Page Not Used

Departmental Budgets Page 12

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY COST DISTRIBUTION BY OFFICE· ALL MODES (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

Actual

Actual

Approved

Approved

Change

General Manager General Counsel Metro Transit Police Independent Offices

611.2 3,266.9 29,066.2 $32,944.3

6702 5,208.2 32,157.6 $38,036.0

6023 6,609.6 35,498.3 $42,710.2

8797 7,730.9 39,417.0 $48,027.6

2774 1,121.3 3,918.7 $5,317.4

Secretary - Chief of Staff Auditor General Property Development & Mgmt Procurement and Materiels Intergovernmental Relations Secretary and Chief of Staff

689.8 2,343.5 5,160.3 13,461.3 641.6 $22,296.5

860.1 2,2545 5,2776 13,263.8 994.0 $22,650.1

887.9 2.361.1 5,326.1 15.557.5 982.5 $25,115.2

988.2 2.520.9 6.267.8 15.510.7 1.075.3 $26,363.0

100.3 1598 941.8 -46.8 92.7 $1,247.8

2,602.6

6.852.8 1.839.6 $11,295.1

1.211.0 1,079.4 869.4 6,770.1 1,939.7 $11,869.6

1.161.8 1,184.3 1,598.8 5,403.3 1,461.2 $10,809.4

-492 105.0 729.4 -1.366.8 -478.5 ·$1,060.2

AGM - System Safety and Risk Protection Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Safety Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety Loss Control and Workers Compensation Quality Enhancement and Analysis System Safety and Risk Protection

1.855.5 $1,855.5 366.6 3.930.8 3.079.4 9.294.4 20,450.3 $37,121.5

13,848.0 4.886.7 3.180.2 10,932.9

11.089.1 5.619.7 3.768.7 10.934.0

3.972.9 5,466.6 2.854.7 12.552.0

-7,116.2 -133.1 -914.0 1,618.0

$32,847.8

$31,411.5

$24,866.3

-$6,545.2

1,481.9

623.9

551.2

47,950.2 9,520.4 17,678.6 14,443.4 $91,074.5

23.9 50,339.5 13,0567 20,475.3 15,508.8 $100,028.0

783.5 55,281.2 18,560.6 24,118.1 17,635.9 $116,930.4

5612 27.170.3 719.1 55,862.8 22,201.3 577.4 19,261.6 $126,353.7

10.0 27.170.3 -64.4 581.6 3,640.8 -23,540.7 1,625.6 $9,423.2

Chief Operating Officer - Bus Bus Transportation Bus Maintenance Bus Service

353.4 143.412.6 86,491.4 $230,257.4

532.3 154,4722 95,301.1 $250,305.6

308.2 168.222.4 105,306.2 $273,836.7

912.2 171.831.5 101.545.0 $274,288.7

604.0 3,609.1 -3.761.1 $452.0

Chief Operating Officer - Rail Rail Car Maintenance Rail Transportation Rail Systems Maintenance Track and Structures Rail Service

336.9 67,249.3 76.957.0 59,856.8 21,689.8 $226,089.8

398.1 65,271.3 84,639.9 63,493.2 23.633.3 $237,435.7

3274 67,425.8 86,571.4 68,0347 23,342.1 $245,701.5

482.0 69,940.1 89,921.4 66,695.6 26,001.4 $253,040.6

1546 2,514.3 3.350.0 -1,339.1 2.659.3 $7,339.1

213.0 5,277.3 54.653.4 779.0 2,492.6 4,100.3 $67,515.6

-1671 439.3 2,599.8 291.4 -157.3 -1.489.5 $1,516.5

Chief Finance Officer Accounting Financial Management Treasurer Risk Management

Finance Deputy General Manager ~ Operations MetroAccess Ser\lices Operations Liaison Plant Maintenance Operations Planning and Administrative Support Americans With Disabilities Act Escalator & Elevator Operations

Chief Engineer Operations Engineering Operation Support Bus Vehicle Engineering Environmental Services Facility Services Chief Engineer

169.2 6,110.6 45,426.7

274.9 6,266.8 47,657.2

3,469.0 $55,175.5

4774 3,700.0 $58,376.4

380.2 4,838.0 52.053.7 487.6 2,649.9 5,589.8 $65,999.1

Asst General Manager - CAPM Construction Engineering and Architecture Systems Major Capital Projects Administration - CAPM Infrastructure Renewal Program Extensions Capital Projects Management

413.4 13.851.7 3,5516 934.9 3,094.2 1,580.9 1,217.2 1.672.8 $26,316.7

406.3 9,884.5 3,576.7 1,274.9 3.912.6 1,685.3 1.385.5 2.610.5 $24,736.3

562.2 4,171.8 4,800.7 4,529.8 5,997.0 2,5773 1.273.9 3.536.2 $27,448,8

467.3 3,165.2 3,661.5 6.114.4 6.177.6 3,390.1 2.214.8 4,531.4 $29,722.4

-94.9 -1,006.6 -1,139.1 1,584.6 180.6 812.9 941.0 995.2 $2,273.6

994.2

1,249.3 2.972.5 7,036.7 2,594.0 $13,852.4

1,029.1 4.243.7 6,946.6 3,304.7 $15,524.2

869.7 4,771.3 6,713.8 4,380.6 $16,735,4

-159.4 5275 -232.7 1.0759 $1,211.3

Asst General Manager - WDDP Organizational Development Human Resource & Mgmt Planning Labor Relations Workforce Development and Diversity Programs

8,086.4 2.114.7 $11,195.3

AGM • Communications Strategic Marketing and Communication Media Relations Customer Service Regional Fare Policy Communications

652.9 91.7 455.5 5.833.4 5,111.0 $12,144.5

514.3 6,790.2 467.5 5,242.2

592.5 7,932.9 575.7 6,417.4

1,439.2 9,867.3 659.5 6,626.9

846.8 1,934.4 83.8 2095

$13,014.1

$15,518.5

$18,593.0

$3,074.5

120.7

189.7

1,166,4 12,777.9

1,571.6 14.584.6

$14,065.0

$16,345.9

346.4 399.0 1,496.7 16,392.2 468.8 $19,103.1

990.1 9562 1,528.7 16,707,4 1,420.4 $21,602.8

643.7 557.2 32.0 315.2 9515 $2,499.6

$760,536.6

$818,923.4

$891,169.0

$917,918.5

$26,749.5

AGM - Planning and Strategic Programs Capita! Programming and Oversight Business Planning & Project Development Information Technology and Services lnforrnation Technology Renewal Program Planning and Strategic Programs TOTAL COST

Departmental Budgets Page 13

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY COST DISTRIBUTION BY OFFICE - OPERATING MODES (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

General Manager General Counsel Metro Transit Police Independent Offices

546.7 2,239.4 28,944.5 $31,730,6

593.0 4,3100 31,728.9 $36,631.9

525.7 5,217.3 35,498.3 $41,241,3

792.6 6,576.1 39,417.0 $46,785,7

266.9 1,358.8 3,918.7 $5,544.4

Secretary - Chief of Staff Auditor Generai Property Development & Mgmt Procurement and Materiels Intergovemmental Relations Secretary and Chief of Staff

637.3 1,329.1 4,706.5 10,479.8 641.6 $17,794.4

806.5 1,297.0 4,584.4 10,251.2 976.0 $17,915.0

818.1 1,324.6 4,708.0 11,812.0 927.8 $19,590.4

907.4 1,439.8 5,688.3 13,214.4 1,011.5 $22,261.4

893 115.2 980.3 1,402.5 83.6 $2,670.9

2,332.5

6,841.9 1,807.3 $10,981.7

1,203.4 1,041.4 577.9 6,756.8 1,869.6 $11,449.2

1,154.2 1,043.3 1,298.6 5,403.3 1,402.4 $10,301.9

-49.2 1.9 720.7 -1,353.5 -467.1 .$1,147.3

AGM - System Safety and Risk Protection Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Safety Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety Loss Control and Workers Compensation Quality Enhancement and Analysis System Safety and Risk Protection

1,853.5 $1,853.5 222.3 3,097.5 2,230.9 8,884.0 20,1018 $34,536.5

13,370.0 4,024.0 2,354.9 10,552.9

10,644.8 4,319.4 2,687.6 10,518.5

3,489.8 4,168.6 1,942.0 12,077.6

-7,155.0 -150.8 -745.6 1,559.1

$30,301,8

$28,170.3

$21,678,0

-$6,492.3

1,463.5

619.3

522.5

42,955.8 9,505.7 17,678.6 14,416.2 $86,019.9

15.8 44,420.4 13,0521 20,4753 15,269.3 $93,852.3

430.7 50,022.7 18,486.7 24,118.1 16,906.2 $110,486,9

513.5 27,170.3 263.0 50,032.8 22,201.3 577.4 16,631.6 $119,389.9

-9.0 27,170.3 -167.7 10.1 3,714.6 -23,540.7 1,725.4 $8,903.0

Chief Operating Officer - Bus Bus Transportation Bus Maintenance Bus Service

335.5 139,744.0 81,947.1 $222,026.6

277.0 150,274.2 90,832.0 $241,383.1

305.2 161,465.4 97,521.1 $259,291.7

352.6 165,502.9 95,721.8 $261,577.4

47.5 4,037.5 -1,799.3 $2,285.7

Chief Operating Officer - Rail Rail Car Maintenance Rail Transportation Rail Systems Maintenance Track and Structures Rail Service

333.5 66,672.7 76,126.2 55,866.4 17,175.6 $216,174.4

396.7 61,952.9 83,017.9 59,474.1 17,583.4 $222,425.1

319.9 66,263.9 86,571.4 65,359.0 18,269.5 $236,783,7

476.5 68,731.7 89,921.4 64,971.3 19,316.0 $243,416.9

156.7 2,467.7 3,350.0 -387.6 1,046.5 $6,633,2

166.9 5,297.3 44,909.8

273.9 5,050.8 46,9926

3,151.1 $53,525.1

477.4 3,521.6 $56,316.2

223.7 2,781.7 51,587.8 361.3 2,646.4 5,227.5 $62,828.4

209.3 2,633.7 54,164.7 629.2 2,492.6 3,772.3 $63,901,7

-14.5 -147.9 2,576.9 267.8 -153.8 -1,455.2 $1,073.3

112.3 463.6 7402 389.8 558.5 126.7 220.0 100.8 $2,712.1

53.5 227.6 611.9 155.0 33.8 175.8 17.2 695 $1,344,4

12.6 21.9 659.0 356.4

15.4 942.5 1,081.3

2.8 -21.9 283.5 724.8

976

459.2

3616

$1,147,5

$2,498,3

$1,350,8

967.7

1,235.6 2,867.6 6,741.9 2,398.4 $13,243.5

998.3 3,967.8 6,146.0 2,910.6 $14,022.7

785.2 4,520.1 5,881.5 3,984.1 $15,170.9

-213.1 552.3 -264.6 1,073.5 $1,148.1

Chief Finance Officer Accounting Financial Management Treasurer Risk Management Finance Deputy General Manager ~ Operations MetroAccess Services Operations Liaison Plant Maintenance Operations Planning and Administrative Support Americans With Disabilities Act Escalator & Elevator Operations

Chief Engineer Operations Engineering Operation Support Bus Vehicle Engineering Environmental Services Facility Services Chief Engineer Asst General Manager - CAPM Construction Engineering and Architecture Systems Major Capital Projects Administration - CAPM Infrastructure Renewal Program Extensions Capital Projects Management Asst General Manager - WDDP Organizational Development Human Resource & Mgmt Planning Labor Relations Workforce Development and Diversity Programs

7,381.6 1,908.9 $10,258,3

AGM - Communications Strategic Marketing and Communication Media Relations Customer Service Regional Fare Policy Communications

645.5 91.7 441.3 5,833.4 5,102.4 $12,114.3

514.3 6,773.1 464.3 5,242.2

577.4 7,581.0 568.5 6,417.4

1,0934 9,625.2 659.5 6,626.9

516.1 2,044.2 91.0 209.5

$12,993,9

$15,144.3

$18,005.1

$2,860.8

120.7

169.7

292.9

273.7

-19.3

1,166.4 12,514.5

1,566.4 14,4402

1,435.8 14,967.6

1,118.5 14,667.9

-317.3 -299.8

$13,801.5

$16,196.3

$16,696.4

$16,060,0

-$636.4

$702,547.2

$753,585.3

$816,852.8

$841,047.2

$24,194.4

AGM - Planning and Strategic Programs Capital Programming and Oversight Business Planning & Project Development Infonn8tion Technology and Services Information.Technology Renewal Program Planning and Strategic Programs TOTAL COST

Departmental Budgets Page 14

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED, DISTRIBUTION BY MODE AND OFFICE (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

General Manager General Counsel Metro Transit Police Independent Offices

Bus 3578 3,247.4 6,777.1 $10,382.4

Rail Paratransit 434.8 3,288.2 40.6 32,639.9 $36,362.8 $40.6

Total Operating 792.6 6,576.1 39,417.0 $46,785.7

Secretary - Chief of Staff Auditor General Procurement and Materiels Property Development & Mgmt Intergovernmental Relations Secretary and Chief of Staff

311.5 540.1 5,349.2 78.2 123.4 $6,402.4

595.9 899.7 7,845.0 5,610.1 882.5 $15,833.1

AGM - System Safety and Risk Protection Industrial Construction and Environmental Safety Quality Enhancement and Analysis Passenger Vehicle Fire Life Safety Loss Control and Workers Compensation System Safety and Risk Protection

411.0 5626 575.0 462.2 1,999.3 $4,010.1

743.2 736.0 827.5 581.1 3,404.1 $6,291.8

Chief Finance Officer Financial Management Accounting

1,406.9 891.5 1,854.6 2,473.7 $6,626.7

2,082.9 1,032.3 2,284.8 9,557.3 $14,957.3

212.0 9,246.2 12,045.0 31.2 26.9 40.8 $21,602.2

246.3 21.2 40,786.5 10,156.3 231.8 50.0 18,590.8 $70,083.0

Chief Operating Officer - Bus Bus Transportation Bus Maintenance Bus Service

3438 165,063.2 91,800.0 $257,207.0

8.9 439.7 3,921.8 $4,370.4

352.6 165,502.9 95,721.8 $261,577.4

Chief Operating Officer - Rail Rail Car Maintenance Track and Structures Rail Transportation Rail Systems Maintenance Rail Service

9.0 15.7 55.5 42.8 4,980.5 $5,103.5

467.5 68,716.0 19,260.4 89,878.6 59,965.5 $238,288.1

476.5 68,731.7 19,316.0 89,921.4 64,971.3 $243,416.9

Chief Engineer Bus Vehicle Engineering Environmental Services Operation Support Operations Engineering Facility Services Chief Engineer

62.7 444.6 1,778.0 4,432.1 139.7 938.8 $7,795.9

1466 184.6 714.6 49,695.2 2,494.0 2,788.5 $56,023.4

8.0

15.4 451.2 942.5

144.7

936.4

Treasurer Finance Deputy General Manager - Operations Americans With Disabilities Act Plant Maintenance Operations Planning and Administrative Support Operations Liaison MetroAccess Services Escalator & Elevator Operations

Asst General Manager - CAPM Administration - CAPM Engineering and Architecture Extensions Systems Infrastructure Renewal Program Major Capital Projects Construction Capital Projects Management

18.2 29.2 46.6 $94.0 55.2 556.2

27,093.3 $27,704.7

25.4 $25.4

37.4 45.0 $82.4

~

907.4 1,439.8 13,214.4 5,688.3 1,011.5 $22,261.4

Asst General Manager - WDDP Organizational Development Human Resource & Mgmt Planning Labor Relations Workforce Development and Diversity Program

443.8 1,788.7 2,719.5 1,351.6 $6,303.6

341.4 2,731.4 3,162.0 2,632.5 $8,867.2

AGM - Communications Customer Service Media Relations Strategic Marketing and Communication Communications

496.7 2,944.8 281.0 4,148.9 $7,871.5

592.1 3,542.4 378.5 5,441.4 $9,954.5

81.7 5,747.9 58.1

192.0 8,867.5 1,060.4

$0.1

4.5 139.7 34.9 $179.2

52.4

745.0

2.5

$745.0

$2.5

$494.4

$1,241.9

Total Cost 879.7 7,730.9 39,417.0 $48,027.6 988.2 2,520.9 15,510.7 6,267.8 1,075.3 $26,363.0

756.3 792.9 165.7 63.8 $1,778.7

303.6

80.8 324.8 1,503.4 110.3

$303.6

$2,019.4

80.8 1,081.1 2,296.3 579.6 63.8 $4,101.6

5.1 120.7

19.6

7.6 300.2 58.8 141.0

28.5

39.1

2.5 159.9 58.8 73.4

$154.3

$58.6

$294.6

$507.5

1,161.8 1,598.8 1,461.2 1,184.3 5,403.3 $10,809.4

3,489.8 1,942.0 4,168.6 12,077.6 $21,678.0

187.8 191.9 522.0 118.2 $1,020.0

126.4 98.1

168.9 622.8 719.1 351.0 $1,861.9

483.1 912.8 1,318.0 474.5 $3,188.3

3,972.9 2,854.7 5,486.6 12,552.0 $24,866.3

47.8

47.8

5,825.4

5,830.0

76.8 $76.8

513.5 577.4 50,032.8 22,201.3 263.0 27,170.3 18,631.6 $119,389.9 559.5 5,964.7 5,351.5 $11,875.8

292.8

83.2

80.0

456.0

$297.5

$83.2

629.9 $6,583.1

629.9 $6,963.8

561.2 577.4 55,862.8 22,201.3 719.1 27,170.3 19,261.6 $126,353.7

363.8 316.5 $680.3

559.5 6,328.5 5,823.3 $12,711.3

912.2 171,831.5 101,545.0 $274,288.7

1,208.4 6,685.5

5.4 1,208.4 6,685.5

1,719.6 $9,613.5

1,724.3 $9,623.6

482.0 69,940.1 26,001.4 89,921.4 66,695.6 $253,040.6

3.8 149.8

3.8 149.8

$509.2

314.8 2,206.1 108.5 $2,783.0

488.8 2,643.6 328.0 $3,613.9

213.0 779.0 2,492.6 54,653.4 5,277.3 4,100.3 $67,515.6 467.3 3,390.1 3,661.5 4,531.4 6,114.4 2,214.8 6,177.6 3,165.2 $29,722.4

155.2 $155.2 5.4

4.7 $4.7

65.7 36.5 219.5 $321.7

32.5

1,081.3

$2,498.3

5.2 $229.6

4.7

209.3 629.2 2,492.6 54,164.7 2,633.7 3,772.3 $63,901.7 15.4 459.2 942.5

0.1

$1,270.7

$5.4

108.3 400.9

348.2 2,150.1 1,601.1 4,163.9 2,781.1

54.0 209.6 208.9

49.7 538.8 909.1

994.1

4,361.6 1,777.2 $17,183.2

1,267.5 $2,734.1

1,257.9 2,214.8 945.2 120.5 $6,036.1

451.9 2,931.0 2,719.1 4,531.4 5,033.1 2,214.8 6,177.6 3,165.2 $27,224.1

42.0 137.4 467.9 322.2 $969.4

84.5 251.2 832.4 396.5 $1,564.6

869.7 4,771.3 6,713.8 4,380.6 $16,735.4

785.2 4,520.1 5,881.5 3,984.1 $15,170.9

42.5 113.8 364.5 74.3 $595.2

1,093.4 6,626.9 659.5 9,625.2 $18,005.1

59.1

5.7

281.1

345.8

7.3 $66.4

$5.7

234.8 $515.9

242.1 $587.9

1,439.2 6,626.9 659.5 9,867.3 $18,593.0

189.6 1,599.5 410.2 102.6 1,420.4 $3,722.3

716.4 2,039.6 410.2 956.2 1,420.4 $5,542.8

990.1 16,707.4 1,528.7 956.2 1,420.4 $21,602.8

$35,573.7

$76,871,3

$917,918.5

273.7 14,667.9 1,118.5

526.8 440.0 853.7

$5,887.7

$10,119.9

$52.4

$16,060.0

$339,345.8

$473,496.9

$28,204.5

$841,047.2

Departmental Budgets

Total Capital 87.1 1,154.8

IRP 87.1 407.3

Construction

1,154.2 1,298.6 1,402.4 1,043.3 5,403.3 $10,301.9

870.7 $2,345.5

TOTAL COST

5.6 $25.8

Reimb.

~

367.5

$152.8

AGM - Planning and Strategic Programs Information Technology and Services Business Planning & Project Development Capital Programming and Oversight Information Technology Renewal Program Planning and Strategic Programs

20.2

Reimb.

$1,820.5 $13,223.4

$24,142.3

$3,931.9

Page 15

This Page Not Used

Departmental Budgets Page 16

OPERATING BUDGET

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget Page 17

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget Page 18

Operating Budget Fiscal 2003 Approved: $822.5 Million Where it Comes From Gross Subsidy $376.9

Paratransit $1.3 Bus Revenues $114.9

Where it Goes Personnel $632.8

Other $12.8

Fuel/Propulsion $44.4

Materials $57.6 Services $74.9

S Millions

Operating Budget Page 19

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Total 2003

Metrobus

Metrorail

MetroAccess

REVENUES Passenger Other Passenger Parking Charter Advertising Joint Development Other Employee Parking

$386,997.7 3,000.0 12,915.8 1,634.0 23,200.0 5,042.9 12,767.3 126.4

$92,181.6 2,100.0 0.0 1,634.0 16,223.5 0.0 2,777.1 63.2

$293,470.1 900.0 12,915.8 0.0 6,976.5 5,042.9 9,990.2 63.2

$1,346.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total Revenues

$445,684.1

$114,979.4

$329,358.7

$1,346.0

$632,815.3 74,866.9 57,628.1 44,370.0 23,108.7 2,175.3 3,993.9 2,089.2 -18,500.0

$278,340.4 12,839.0 25,638.8 14,280.3 4,065.8 815.1 1,485.4 1,881.0 -18,000.0

$353,390.3 35,239.1 31,955.1 30,089.6 18,980.1 1,360.2 2,307.8 174.7 -500.0

$1,084.6 26,788.7 34.1 0.1 62.8 0.0 200.7 33.5 0.0

Total Expenses

$822,547.2

$321,345.8

$472,996.9

$28,204.5

GROSS SUBSIDY

$376,863.1

$206,366.3

$143,638.3

$26,858.5

Gross Subsidy Plus: Debt Service Less: Audit Adjustment

$376,863.1 27,484.2 -25,529.8

$206,366.3 0.0 -3,633.0

$143,638.3 27,484.2 -18,032.7

$26,858.5 0.0 -3,864.1

Net Local Subsidy

$378,817.5

$202,733.3

$153,089.7

$22,994.5

54.18%

35.78%

69.63%

4.77%

EXPENSES Personnel Services Materials & Supplies Fuel & Propulsion Power Utilities Casualty & Liability Leases & Rentals Miscellaneous Preventive Maintenance

Cost Recovery Ratio

Operating Budget Page 20

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES DISPLAYED BY MODE (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

REVENUES Bus Operations Rail Operations Paratransit Total Revenues EXPENSES Bus Operations Rail Operations Paratransit Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

Gross Subsidy Plus: Debt Service Less: Audit Adjustment - Bus - Rail - Paratransit Audit Adjustment - Total Net Local Subsidy Cost Recovery Ration

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

$100,019.2 283,927.2 911.8

$110,608.0 308,245.6 1,202.5

$114,484.4 322,569.6 1,346.0

$114,979.4 329,358.7 1,346.0

$495.0 6,789.1

$284,838.9

$309,448.1

$323,915.6

$330,704.7

$6,789.1

$274,521.2 392,056.3 17,596.0

$297,589.4 415,711.9 20,590.7

$313,958.9 459,593.9 24,600.0

$321,345.8 472,996.9 28,204.5

$7,386.9 13,403.0 3,604.5

$684,173.6

$733,892.0

$798,152.8

$822,547.2

$24,394.4

$399,334.6 $424,443.9

$474,237.2

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

$491,842.6 $17,605.3

$399,334.6

$424,443.9

$474,237.2

$491,842.6

27,484.2

27,484.2

27,484.2

27,484.2

-326.0 -12,946.0 2,039.0

-3,923.5 -17,005.5 2,010.0

-3,532.5 -15,367.4 2,881.0

-3,633.0 -18,032.7 -3,864.1

-100.5 -2,665.4 -6,745.1

-$11,233.0

-$18,919.0

-$16,018.9

-$25,529.8

-$9,511.0

$415,585.8

$433,009.1

$485,702.6

$493,796.9

$8,094.4

41.63%

42.17%

40.58%

40.20%

-0.38%

$17,605.3

Operating Budget Page 21

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - OPERATING DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

REVENUES Passenger Other Passenger Parking Charter Advertising Joint Development Other Employee Parking

$332,730.5 2,728.4 9,289.0 2,101.0 10,077.2 4,912.7 10,626.9 118.9

$342,348.0 2,725.9 9,648.4 1,780.7 12,696.5 6,386.3 9,157.7 114.7

$367,690.0 3,197.1 10,432.5 1,535.1 17,018.0 5,498.1 14,562.4 123.0

$384,367.4 3,000.0 9,800.0 1,634.0 20,100.0 5,042.9 14,329.3 126.4

$386,997.7 3,000.0 12,915.8 1,634.0 23,200.0 5,042.9 12,767.3 126.4

$2,630.3 0.0 3,115.8 0.0 3,100.0 0.0 -1,562.0 0.0

Total Revenues

$372,584.5

$384,858.1

$420,056.1

$438,400.0

$445,684.1

$7,284.1

$491,010.6 49,905.3 48,308.8 33,944.8 18,613.0 9,064.2 2,641.8 -443.8

$525,515.9 47,097.9 62,489.7 37,628.4 19,131.5 7,929.9 5,069.1 -103.9 -20,585.0

$564,554.9 53,129.3 58,474.0 40,968.2 21,709.5 8,821.0 3,524.7 2,110.8 -19,400.4

$605,414.9 71,542.8 57,308.9 46,161.5 23,929.8 6,457.8 3,813.9 2,223.3 -18,700.0

$632,815.3 74,866.9 57,628.1 44,370.0 23,108.7 2,175.3 3,993.9 2,089.2 -18,500.0

$27,400.4 3,324.1 319.2 -1,791.5 -821.2 -4,282.5 180.0 -134.0 200.0

$684,173.6

$733,892.0

$798,152.8

$822,547.2

$24,394.4

EXPENSES Personnel Services Materials & Supplies Fuel & Propulsion Power Utilities Casualty & Liability Leases & Rentals Miscellaneous Preventive Maintenance Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

*

$653,044.6

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

$280,460.1 $299,315.5 $313,835.9 $359,752.8 $376,863.1 $17,110.3

Gross Subsidy Plus: Debt Service Less: Audit Adjustment

$280,460.1 27,484.2 13,844.8

$299,315.5 27,484.2 -11,233.0

$313,835.9 27,484.2 -18,919.0

$359,752.8 27,484.2 -16,018.9

$376,863.1 27,484.2 -25,529.8

$17,110.3 0.0 -9,511.0

Net Local Subsidy

$321,789.1

$315,566.7

$322,401.1

$371,218.1

$378,817.5

$7,599.4

57.05%

56.25%

57.24%

54.93%

54.18%

-0.74%

Cost Recovery Ratio

* Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Operating Budget Page 22

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED MODAL DISTRIBUTION (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Total

Bus

Rail

Paratransit

Salaries (Total) Full-Time Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

$142,674.4 139,142.9 205.5 -6,055.1 9,381.2

$43,304.5 43,334.8 89.5 -1,842.6 1,722.8

$98,507.1 94,907.1 116.0 -4,168.6 7,652.6

$862.8 901.0

Wages (Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$360,333.6 175,453.8 177,839.3 288.3 -7,128.3 13,880.5

$177,510.1 118,412.7 57,109.7 144.2 -2,325.3 4,168.9

$182,817.6 57,041.2 120,724.1 144.2 -4,803.0 9,711.2

$5.9

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$503,008.1

$220,814.7

$281,324.7

$868.7

Fringes (Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation

$129,807.2 124,771.6 3,735.5 1,300.0

$57,525.7 55,229.3 1,711.4 585.0

$72,065.6 69,326.4 2,024.1 715.0

$215.9 215.9

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

$632,815.3

$278,340.4

$353,390.3

$1,084.6

Services (Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Custodial Services Paratransit Other

$74,866.9 2,763.0 13,130.6 1,272.2 19,922.8 0.6 26,492.9 11,284.8

$12,839.0

$35,239.1 2,763.0 8,565.2 936.7 16,355.5 0.6

$26,788.7

4,590.1

6,618.0

Materials & Supplies (Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$57,628.1 2,006.9 2,366.2 53,255.0

$25,638.8 1,125.5 2,278.4 22,234.9

$31,955.1 881.3 87.8 30,986.0

$34.1

Fuel & Propulsion (Total) Diesel Fuel Propulsion Power Clean Natural Gas

$44,370.0 13,028.7 30,086.3 1,255.0

$14,280.3 13,025.3

$30,089.6 3.3 30,086.3

$0.1 0.1

Utilities (Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$23,108.7 17,419.7 5,688.9

$4,065.8 2,484.2 1,581.6

$18,980.1 14,899.0 4,081.1

$62.8 36.5 26.3

Casualty & Liability (Total) Insurance Claims

$2,175.3 2,175.3

$815.1 815.1

$1,360.2 1,360.2

Leases (Total) Property Equipment

$3,993.9 1,341.7 2,652.2

$1,485.4 800.3 685.1

$2,307.8 341.4 1,966.5

$200.7 200.0 0.7

Miscellaneous (Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Advertising Other

$5,049.2 465.2 613.0 390.8 814.6 2,198.9 566.6

$1,956.0 162.5 258.9 100.6 326.0 903.2 204.9

$3,059.7 301.2 345.3 288.3 488.7 1,295.7 340.6

$33.5 1.6 8.8 2.0

Reimbursements (Total) Reimbursements

-$2,960.0 -2,960.0

-$75.0 -75.0

-$2,885.0 -2,885.0

$208,232.0 -18,500.0 $822,547.2

$61,005.4 -18,000.0 $321,345.8

$120,106.7 -500.0 $472,996.9

TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST Less Preventive Maintenance TOTAL COST

4,454.8 315.6 3,478.5

-43.9 5.8

5.5 -0.1 0.4

110.5 20.0 88.7 26,492.9 76.6

34.1

1,255.0

21.1

$27,119.9 $28,204.5

Operating Budget Page 23

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Salaries(Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual Actual Actual Approved Approved Change $100,129.8 $109,598.7 $122,068.2 $128,064.8 $142,674.4 $14,609.6 93,552.7 100,672.2 112,603.9 126,398.9 139,142.9 12,744.0 634.7 1,087.6 969.7 127.0 139.0 176.2 150.6 205.5 54.9 -5,166.1 -6,055.1 -889.0 5,815.4 7,700.0 8,318.4 6,681.4 9,381.2 2,699.7

Wages(Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$287,285.4 $310,472.8 $326,231.0 $352,383.5 $360,333.6 147,651.6 152,853.3 161,786.1 171,898.4 175,453.8 123,896.8 137,187.5 146,971.7 173,198.6 177,839.3 288.3 -7,176.5 -7,128.3 15,737.0 20,432.1 17,473.2 14,463.0 13,880.5

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$387,415.2 $420,071.6 $448,299.2 $480,448.3 $503,008.1 $22,559.7

Fringes(Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation

$103,595.5 $105,444.4 $116,255.7 $124,966.5 $129,807.2 91,401.6 94,375.7 105,779.1 116,480.8 124,771.6 3,069.8 3,580.0 3,634.7 3,587.9 3,735.5 9,124.1 7,488.6 6,841.9 4,897.8 1,300.0

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

$491,010.6 $525,515.9 $564,554.9 $605,414.9 $632,815.3 $27,400.4

Services(Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Custodial Services Paratransit Other

$49,905.3 2,194.2 22,256.6 1,027.7 7,630.9

$47,097.9 2,414.3 9,139.0 2,089.6 10,516.7

12,400.2 4,395.7

Materials & Supplies(Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$7,950.1 3,555.4 4,640.6 288.3 48.2 -582.4

$4,840.6 8,290.9 147.6 -3,597,8

16,896,2 6,042.2

$53,129.3 2,330.7 10,194.0 1,477.0 12,186.7 1.0 19,440.4 7,499.5

$71,542.8 2,016.9 15,922.8 1,337.9 19,977.6 0.9 22,892.9 9,393.7

$74,866.9 2,763.0 13,130.6 1,272.2 19,922.8 0.6 26,492.9 11,284.8

$3,324.1 746.1 -2,792.3 -65.7 -54.9 -0.3 3,600.0 1,891.1

$48,308.8 1,003.6 2,143.6 45,161.6

$62,489.7 1,228.9 1,728.7 59,532.1

$58,474.0 1,710.6 1,763.3 55,000.1

$57,308.9 1,683.2 1,872.9 53,752.8

$57,628.1 2,006.9 2,366.2 53,255.0

$319.2 323.6 493.3 -497.8

Fuel & Propulsion(Total) Diesel Fuel Propulsion Power Clean Natural Gas

$33,944.8 6,950.3 26,994.5

$37,628.4 10,406.4 27,221.9

$40,968.2 13,752.7 27,215.5

$46,161.5 17,493.1 28,068.4 600.0

$44,370.0 -$1,791.5 13,028.7 -4,464.4 30,086.3 2,017.9 1,255.0 655.0

Utilities(Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$18,613.0 15,120.8 3,492.2

$19,131.5 15,304.1 3,827.4

$21,709.5 16,733.3 4,976.2

$23,929.8 17,995.4 5,934.4

$23,108.7 17,419.7 5,688.9

Casualty & Liability(Total) Insurance Claims

$9,064.2 1,887.2 7,177.0

$7,929.9 1,685.5 6,244.4

$8,821.0 1,957.4 6,863.6

$6,457.8 2,723.8 3,734.0

$2,175.3 -$4,282.5 -548.5 2,175.3 -3,734.0

Leases(Tota I) Property Equipment

$2,641.8 728.9 1,912.8

$5,069.1 2,796.3 2,272.9

$3,524.7 1,243.3 2,281.4

$3,813.9 1,172.0 2,641.9

$3,993.9 1,341.7 2,652.2

$180.0 169.7 10.3

Miscellaneous(Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Advertising Other

$2,878.9 286.7 121.5 233.5 795.9 1,051.6 389.7

$3,404.7 321.9 211.6 374.3 797.4 1,174.0 525,5

$5,791.4 377.2 225.2 494.8 1,242.4 2,074.9 1,376.9

$5,253.1 377.0 215.9 350.6 942.9 1,885.5 1,481.2

$5,049.2 465.2 613.0 390.8 814.6 2,198.9 566,6

-$203.9 88.3 397.1 40.2 -128.3 313.4 -914.7

-$3,322.7 -3,322.7

-$3,508.6 -3,508.6

-$3,680.6 -3,680.6

-$3,029.8 -3,029.8

-$2,960.0 -2,960.0

$69.8 69.8

Reimbursements(Total) Reimbursements

TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST

-$821.2 -575.7 -245.5

$162,034.0 $179,242.6 $188,737.5 $211,437.9 $208,232.0 -$3,205.9 -20,585.0 -19,400.0 -18,700.0 -18,500.0 200.0 Less: Preventive Maintenance $653,044.6 $684,173.6 $733,892.4 $798,152.8 $822,547.2 $24,394.4 TOTAL OPERATING COST * Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Operating Budget Page 24

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET BY MODE (All modes) DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS Operating Paratransit Rail Bus

Capital Construction

$17,670.2 19,488.0

$16,288.9 16,711.8

$2,775.1 2,880.7

5.1 -2,147.1 3242

3.7 -627.1 200.5

-186.7 81.1

$171.7

44.5

$10,931.1 288.6 9,587.4

-0.5 127.7

-393.1 1,448.2

$8,050.8

$17,841.9

$27,220.0

$2,775.1

$215.9 215.9

$2,140.2 2,140.2

$4,472.4 4,472.3 0.1

$6,834.3 6,823.6 10.8

$695.7 695.7

$353,390.3

$1,084.6

$10,190.9

$22,314.3

$34,054.4

$3,470.7

$35,239.1 2,763.0 8,565.2 936.7 16,355.5 0.6

$26,788.7

$1,016.7

$858.7

$538.9

$81.7

169.7 45.4 213.7 7.7

267.4 27.5 80.6 1.4

11.7 82 29.1 2.8

Salaries (Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

$180,771.3 179,586.1

$43,304.5 43,334.8

$98,507.1 94,907.1

$862.8 901.0

214.3 -9,016.1 9,986.9

89.5 -1,842.6 1,722.8

116.0 -4,168.6 7,652.6

-43.9 5.8

Wages (Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Temporary Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$378,124.5 179,267.2 190,634.4 288.3

$177,510.1 118,412.7 57,109.7 144.2

$182,817.6 57,041.2 120,724.1 144.2

$5.9

-7,521.9 15,456.4

-2,325.3 4,168.9

-4,803.0 9,7112

-0.1 0.4

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$558,895.9

$220,814.7

$281,324.7

$868.7

Fringes (Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation

$143,949.8 138,903.4 3,746.4 1,300.0

$57,525.7 55,229.3 1,711.4 585.0

$72,065.6 69,326.4 2,024.1 715.0

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

$702,845.6

$278,340.4

Services (Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Custodial Services Paratransit Other

$77,362.9 2,763.0 13,579.4 1,353.3 20,246.2 12.5 26,492.9 12,915.7

$12,839.0

4,590.1

6,618.0

Materials & Supplies (Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$59,815.1 2,037.6 2,543.9 55,233.6

$25,638.8 1,125.5 2,278.4 22,234.9

Fuel & Propulsion (Total) Diesel Fuel Propulsion Power Clean Natural Gas

$45,244.6 13.851.2 30,138.4 1,255.0

$14,280.3 13,025.3

Utilities (Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$23,518.1 17,679.8 5,838.3

Casualty & Liability (Total) Insurance Claims

4,454.8 315.6 3,478.5

IRP

5.5

$1,362.7 1,362.7

$6,688.0 3,524.8 3,163.3

110.5 20.0 88.7 26,492.9 76.6

1,016.7

422.2

162.0

30.0

$31,955.1 881.3 87.8 30,986.0

$34.1

$1,193.6

$505.5 18.6

$377.1 2.3

$110.9 9.8

34.1

177.8 1,015.8

486.9

374.8

101.1

$30,089.6 3.3 30,086.3

$0.1 0.1

$822.2 822.2

$0.1 0.1

$0.2 0.2

$52.1

$4,065.8 2,484.2 1,581.6

$18,980.1 14,899.0 4,081.1

$62,8 36.5 26.3

$2,406.4 2,406.4

$815.1 815.1

$1,360.2 1,360.2

Leases (Total) Property Vehicles Equipment

$4,059.7 1,376.6

$1,485.4 800.3

$2,307.8 341.4

2,683.1

685.1

Miscellaneous (Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Tolls Advertising Other

$5,626.0 541.9 662.5 678.5 872.5

52.1

1,255.0 $6.8 3.8 3.0

$344,2 202.7 141.6

$58.5 537 4.8

$87.5 87.5

$15.4 15.4

$128.2 1282

$200.7 200.0

$43.4 17.1

$22.4 17.8

1,966.5

0.7

26.3

4.6

$1,956.0 162.5 258.9 100.6 326.0

$3,059.7 301.2 345.3 288.3 488.7

$33.5 1.6 8.8 2.0

$325,9 47.7 28.3 160.6 27.8

$221,1 24.4 18.4 112.9 29.4

$29.8 4.7 2.8 142 0.7

2,198.9 671.6

903.2 204.9

1,295.7 340.6

21.1

61.5

36.1

7.4

-$2,960.0 -2,960.0

-$75.0 -75.0

-$2,885.0 -2,885.0

TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST

$215,072.8 $917,918.5

$120,106.7 (500.0) $473,496.9

$1,519.4 18,500.0 $35,573.7

$461.1

TOTAL COST

$61,005.4 (18,000.0) $339,345.8

Reimbursements (Total) Reimbursements

$27,119,9

$3,032.5

$1,828.0

$28,204.5

$13,223.4

$24,142.3

$3,931.9

Operating Budget Page 25

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FIVE YEAR COST COMPARISON (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Budget

FY 2003 Budget

Salaries(Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

$129,085.6 $117,491.2 $5,251.3 $129.4

$138,006.2 $124,284.8 $5,351.5 $143.4

$151,546.2 $137,627.7 $4,713.6 $213.9

$164,764.1 $163,832.8

$180,771.3 $179,586.1

$16,007.2 $15,753.3

$6,213.7

$8,226.6

$8,990.9

$160.6 -$6,531.8 $7,302.5

$214.3 -$9,0161 $9,9869

$53.7 -$2,484.3 $2,684.4

Wages(Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Temporary Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$308,028.7 $150,376.2 $138,304.1

$325,237.9 $156,339.8 $144,505.9

$343,495.7 $166,200.1 $155,972.2

$369,894.4 $175,934.3 $184,339.1

$378,124.5 $179,267.2 $190,634.4 $2883

$8,230.2 $3,333.0 $6,295.3 $2883

$19,348.5

$24,392.1

$21,323.5

-$7.528.7 $17,149.7

-$7,521.9 $15,456.4

$6.9 -$1,693.3

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$437,114.3

$463,244.1

$495,041.9

$534,658.5

$558,895.9

$24,237.4

Fringes(Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation

$115,343.1 $102,967.9 $3,205.7 $9,169.5

$114,903.0 $103,710.8 $3.670.6 $7,521.6

$126,707.4 $115,925.3 $3,738.8 $7,043.3

$137,677.8 $129,161.4 $3,616.2 $4,900.2

$143,949.8 $138,903.4 $3.746.4 $1.300.0

$6,272.0 $9,742.0 $1302 -$3,600.2

TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

$552,457.4

$578,147.1

$621,749.2

$672,336.3

$702,845.6

$30,509.4

Services(Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Custodial Services Paratransit Other

$51,412.4 $2,194.2 $22,625.6 $1,108.4 $8,091.5 $29.4 $12,400.2 $4,963.1

$48,249.5 $2,414.3 $9,450.0 $2,199.2 $10,875.6 $26.6 $16,896.2 $6,3876

$53,997.9 $2,330.7 $10,337.8 $1,500.8 $12,460.7 $22.8 $19,440.4 $7,904.6

$72,800.8 $2,016.9 $16,280.7 $1,429.1 $20,333.8 $62.0 $22,892.9 $9,785.4

$77,362.9 $2,763.0 $13,579.4 $1,353.3 $20,2462 $12.5 $26,492.9 $12,915.7

$4,562.1 $746.1 -$2,701.3 -$75.9 -$87.6 -$49.5 $3,600.0 $3,130.3

Materials & Supplies(Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$49,974.6 $1,040.5 $2,246.1 $46,688.0

$64,722.1 $1,267.9 $1,868.9 $61,585.3

$62,926.9 $1,752.6 $1,887.7 $59,286.6

$61,170.9 $1.723.4 $2,022.7 $57,424.8

$59,815.1 $2,037.6 $2,543.9 $55,233.6

-$1,355.8 $314.1 $521.2 -$2,191.2

Fuel & Propulsion(Total) Diesel Fuel Propulsion Power Clean Natural Gas

$34,086.8 $7,066.6 $27,020.2

$38,011.9 $10,740.3 $27,271.6

$41,349.6 $14,048.7 $27,3009

$46,760.2 $18,039.7 $28,120.5 $6000

$45,244.6 $13,851.2 $30,138.4 $1,255.0

-$1,515.6 -$4,188.5 $2,017.9 $655.0

Utilities(Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$19,113.5 $15,416.4 $3,697.2

$19,779.0 $15.6233 $4,1558

$22,367.2 $17,051.1 $5,316.1

$24,295.1 $18,151.2 $6,143.8

$23,518.1 $17,679.8 $5.838.3

-$777.0 -$471.4 -$305.6

Casualty & Liability(Total) Insurance Claims

$9,285.9 $2,018.9 $7,267.0

$8,418.4 $2,078.8 $6,3396

$9,702.6 $2,3276 $7,3751

$7,273.0 $3,267.3 $4,005.7

$2,406.4 $2,406.4

-$4,866.6 -$8609 -$4,005.7

Leases(Total) Property Vehicles Equipment

$2,662.5 $7347

$5,413.7 $3,107.5

$3,823.9 $1,511.1

$3,911.2 $1,244.1

$4,059.7 $1,376.6

$148.6 $132.5

$1.927.7

$2.306.2

$2,312.8

$2,667.1

$2.683.1

$16.0

$3,213.2 $333.9 $136.4 $396.3 $8520

$3,812.4 $3610 $226.1 $547.4 $9401

$6,148.6 $419.6 $248.8 $729.6 $1,255.1

$5,651.4 $449.4 $245.0 $532.1 $991.6

$5,626.0 $541.9 $662.5 $6785 $872.5

-$25.4 $92.6 $417.5 $146.4 -$119.1

-$3,365.8 -$3,365.8

-$3,523.5 -$3,5235

-$3,704.8 -$3,704.8

-$3,029.8 -$3,029.8

-$2,960.0 -$2.960.0

$69.8 $698

TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST

$166,383.1

$184,883.5

$196,611.8

$218,832.7

$215,072.8

-$3,759.9

TOTAL COST

$718,840.5

$763,030,6

$818,361.1

$891,169.0

$917,918.5

$26,749.5

Miscellaneous(Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Tolls Reimbursements(Total) Reimbursements

Operating Budget Page 26

Change

RIDERSHIP AND REVENUE

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues

Page 27

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues Page 28

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 REVENUES

Total operating revenues for Fiscal 2003, as proposed is $445.7 million, comprised of$387.1 million in passenger revenue and $58.6 million in other revenue. The Fiscal 2003 revenues are $7.3 million higher than the approved Fiscal 2002 budget, with passenger revenues increasing by $2.6 million and non-passenger revenues increasing by $4.7 million. Total Metrobus and Metrorail ridership during Fiscal 2003 is expected to reach 154.5 and 187.5 million trips respectively.

Passenger Revenue (Dollars in Thousands)

Approved Fiscal 2002 Base Revenue Adjustment to Base Fiscal 2003 Service Growth Fiscal 2003 Additional Service Conversion of Metrobus 5A Revenue Integration Fiscal 2003 Approved Passenger Revenues Ridership (In Thousands)

METRORAIL

METROBUS

PARATRANSIT

$303,121

$79,900

$1,346.0

(5,000)

(4,000)

9,000

(13,600) $293,500

1,174 1,100 226 13,600 $92,000

$1,346.0

187,509

154,512

688.7

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues Page 29

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 1999 THROUGH FISCAL 2003 RIDERSHIP BY SERVICE

(in thousands)

FY 1999 Actual

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Metrobus Ridership

124,534

138,544

145,540

148,037

154,512

Metrorail Ridership

155,103

163,274

177,268

186,211

187,509

279,637

301,818

322,808

334,248

342,021

TOTAL

Note: Metrobus ridership is based on unlinked trips.

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues Page 30

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 1999 THROUGH FISCAL 2003 REVENUE COMPARSION (Dollars in Thousands) FY 1999 Actual METROBUS Passenger Revenue Other Passenger Charter Advertising Other Employee Parking

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

$85,145.2 1,916.1 2,101.0 6,193.3 3,134.0 59.4 $98,549.1

$85,448.8 1,880.4 1,780.7 8,046.4 2,805.5 57.3 $100,019.2

$91,052.2 1,993.6 1,535.1 11,356.0 4,609.6 61.5 $110,608.0

$93,500.0 2,100.0 1,634.0 14,423.5 2,763.7 63.2 $114,484.4

$92,181.6 2,100.0 1,634.0 16,223.5 2,777.1 63.2 $114,979.4

-$1,318.4 0.0 0.0 1,800.0 13.4 0.0 $495.0

$247,179.3 812.3 9,289.0 3,883.9 4,912.7 7,492.8 59.4 $273,629.4

$255,987.4 845.5 9,648.4 4,650.1 6,386.3 6,352.2 57.3 $283,927.2

$275,435.3 1,203.5 10,432.5 5,662.0 5,498.1 9,952.8 61.5 $308,245.6

$289,521.4 900.0 9,800.0 5,676.5 5,042.9 11,565.6 63.2 $322,569.6

$293,470.1 900.0 12,915.8 6,976.5 5,042.9 9,990.2 63.2 $329,358.7

$3,948.7 0.0 3,115.8 1,300.0 0.0 -1,575.4 0.0 $6,789.1

PARATRANSIT Passenger Revenue

$406.0

$911.8

$1,202.5

$1,346.0

$1,346.0

$0.0

TOTAL Passenger Revenue Other Passenger Parking Charter Advertising Joint Development Other Employee Parking

$332,730.5 2,728.4 9,289.0 2,101.0 10,077.2 4,912.7 10,626.9 118.9

$342,348.0 2,725.9 9,648.4 1,780.7 12,696.5 6,386.3 9,157.7 114.7

$367,690.0 3,197.1 10,432.5 1,535.1 17,018.0 5,498.1 14,562.4 123.0

$384,367.4 3,000.0 9,800.0 1,634.0 20,100.0 5,042.9 14,329.3 126.4

$386,997.7 3,000.0 12,915.8 1,634.0 23,200.0 5,042.9 12,767.3 126.4

$2,630.3 0.0 3,115.8 0.0 3,100.0 0.0 -1,562.0 0.0

Total Revenues

$372,584.5

$384,858.1

$420,056.1

$438,400.0

$445,684.1

$7,284.1

METRORAIL Passenger Revenue Other Passenger Parking Advertising Joint Development Other Employee Parking

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues Page 31

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Ridership and Revenues Page 32

METROBUS

· REVENUE · EXPENSE • STATISTICS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Page 33

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Page 34

MetroBus Service Fiscal 2003 Approved: $321.3 Million Where it Comes From

Revenues $114.9

Gross Subsidy $206.4

Where it Goes Materials & Other $15.9

Fuel $14.3

Personnel $278.3

S Mil/ions

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Page 35

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· METROBUS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

REVENUES Passenger Other Passenger Charter Advertising Other Employee Parking

$85,145.2 1,916.1 2,101.0 6,193.3 3,134.0 59.4

$85,448.8 1,880.4 1,780.7 8,046.4 2,805.5 57.3

$91,052.2 1,993.6 1,535.1 11,356.0 4,609.6 61.5

$93,500.0 2,100.0 1,634.0 14,423.5 2,763.7 63.2

$92,181.6 2,100.0 1,634.0 16,223.5 2,777.1 63.2

-$1,318.4 0.0 0.0 1,800.0 13.4 0.0

Total Revenues

$98,549.1

$100,019.2

$110,608.0

$114,484.4

$114,979.4

$495.0

$217,873.8 15,394.2 19,777.1 6,946.6 3,509.8 6,574.1 1,511.4 988.9 0.0

$233,052.6 11,786.9 24,474.9 10,406.6 3,828.1 5,175.4 2,049.2 1,332.7 -17,585.0

$249,948.1 12,637.7 25,702.4 13,751.3 4,446.3 5,683.9 1,289.6 2,130.1 -18,000.0

$264,869.8 13,102.8 24,695.8 17,997.3 4,538.5 3,400.2 1,292.7 2,061.8 -18,000.0

$278,340.4 $13,470.6 12,839.0 -263.8 25,638.8 943.0 14,280.3 -3,717.0 4,065.8 -472.7 815.1 -2,585.1 1,485.4 192.6 1,881.0 -180.8 -18,000.0 0.0

$272,575.9

$274,521.2

$297,589.4

$313,958.9

$321,345.8

EXPENSES Personnel Services Materials & Supplies Fuel & Propulsion Power Utilities Casualty & Liability Leases & Rentals Miscellaneous Preventive Maintenance Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

$7,386.9

$174,026.8 $174,502.0 $186,981.4 $199,474.5 $206,366.3 $6,891.9

Gross Subsidy Less: Audit Adjustment

$174,026.8 0.0

$174,502.0 -326.0

$186,981.4 -3,923.5

$199,474.5 -3,532.5

$206,366.3 -3,633.0

$6,891.9 -100.5

Net Local Subsidy

$174,026.8

$174,176.0

$183,057.9

$195,942.0

$202,733.3

$6,791.3

36.15%

36.43%

37.17%

36.46%

35.78%

-0.68%

Cost Recovery Ratio

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Financial Tables Page 36

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS BUDGET SUMMARY DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Salaries(Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

FY 2002 Approved $35,904.4 36,333.4

FY 2003 Approved $43,304.5 43,334.8

Change $7,400.1 7,001.4

56.0 -1,507.7 1,022.8

89.5 -1,842.6 1,722.8

33.6 -334.9 700.0

$152,534.4 $161,237.8 $172,501.2 $177,510.1 102,595.8 109,527.7 116,363.8 118,412.7 44,636.4 46,687.0 54,254.6 57,109.7 144.2 -2,744.1 -2,325.3 5,302.3 5,023.1 4,626.8 4,168.9

$5,009.0 2,048.9 2,855.1 144.2 418.8 -457.9

FY 1999 Actual $30,774.9 29,843.4 138.4 73.3

FY 2000 Actual $33,569.3 32,250.6 325.5 62.0

FY 2001 Actual $37,182.7 35,830.6 317.7 95.1

719.8

931.3

939.3

Wages(Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$140,872.4 99,314.1 37,918.0

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$171,647.4 $186,103.8

3,640.3

$198,420.5

$208,405.6

$220,814.7

$12,409.1

$46,226.4 40,072.5 1,692.1 4,461.8

$46,948.8 41,502.0 1,702.5 3,744.3

$51,527.5 46,412.3 1,671.6 3,443.7

$56,464.2 52,010.2 1,617.2 2,836.8

$57,525.7 55,229.3 1,711.4 585.0

$1,061.5 3,219.1 94.2 -2,251.8

$217,873.8

$233,052.6

$249,948.1

$264,869.8

$278,340.4

$13,470.6

Services(Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Other

$15,394.2

$11,786.9

$12,637.7

$13,102.8

$12,839.0

-$263.8

9,964.1 453.8 2,491.1 2,485.3

4,342.8 895.7 3,321.4 3,227.1

4,638.4 526.3 3,981.9 3,491.0

4,923.2 302.3 4,064.7 3,812.7

4,454.8 315.6 3,478.5 4,590.1

-468.4 13.3 -586.2 777.5

Materials & Supplies(Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$19,777.1 683.6 2,090.6 17,002.9

$24,474.9 768.5 1,677.9 22,028.5

$25,702.4 1,098.1 1,734.9 22,869.4

$24,695.8 1,050.6 1,798.3 21,847.0

$25,638.8 1,125.5 2,278.4 22,234.9

$943.0 74.9 480.1 387.9

Fuel & Propulsion(Total) Diesel Fuel Clean Natural Gas

$6,946.6 6,946.6

$10,406.6 10,406.6

$13,751.3 13,751.3

$17,997.3 17,397.3 600.0

$14,280.3 13,025.3 1,255.0

-$3,717.0 -4,372.0 655.0

Utilities(Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$3,509.8 2,236.0 1,273.8

$3,828.1 2,279.4 1,548.7

$4,446.3 2,629.5 1,816.8

$4,538.5 2,492.6 2,045.9

$4,065.8 2,484.2 1,581.6

-$472.7 -8.4 -464.3

Casualty & Liability(Total) Insurance Claims

$6,574.1 994.4 5,579.7

$5,175.4 845.4 4,330.0

$5,683.9 977.8 4,706.1

$3,400.2 1,020.0 2,380.2

$815.1 815.1

-$2,585.1 -204.9 -2,380.2

Leases(Total) Property Equipment

$1,511.4 661.6 849.8

$2,049.2 1,439.8 609.4

$1,289.6 667.2 622.4

$1,292.7 684.9 607.9

$1,485.4 800.3 685.1

$192.6 115.4 77.2

Miscella neous(Tota I) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Advertising Other

$1,297.5 101.2 50.1 72.3 361.3 502.6 2100

$1,682.9 120.2 100.2 135.7 319.3 755.3 252.2

$2,455.7 134.4 93.9 156.0 646.9 956.4 468.1

$2,136.8 135.7 69.8 91.8 372.2 954.2 513.1

$1,956.0 162.5 258.9 100.6 326.0 903.2 204.9

-$180.8 26.8 189.1 8.7 -46.3 -51.0 -308.1

-$308.6 -3086

-$350.2 -350.2

-$325.6 -325.6

-$75.0 -75.0

-$75.0 -75.0

$59,053.6 $65,641.3 -18,000.0 -18,000.0 $274,106.2 $297,589.4

$67,089.1 -18,000.0 $313,958.9

$61,005.4 -18,000.0 $321,345.8

Fringes(Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

Reimbursements(Total) Reimbursements TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST

$54,702.1

Less: Preventive Maintenance

TOTAL METROBUS COST

$272,575.9

0$6,083.8 $7,386.9

, Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Financial Tables Page 37

METROBUS STATISTICS For The Fiscal Years 1999 Through 2003

FY 1999

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

APPROVED

APPROVED

STATISTICS: Total Bus Miles (OOOs)

41,749

42,634

45,004

47,192

48,352

Scheduled (budget) Bus Miles (OOOs)

40,907

42,254

44,573

46,117

47,153

*Total Passengers (OOOs)

124,534

138,544

145,540

148,037

154,512

Bus Fleet Size (Year End)

1,314

1,337

1,430

1,444

1,447

Scheduled Buses (Maximum)

1,141

1,182

1,237

1,249

1,252

Total Passenger Revenue (OOOs) $

87,061

$

87,329

$

93,046

$

95,600

$

94,282

Total Operating Revenue (OOOs) $

98,549

$

100,019

$

110,608

$

114,484

$

114,979

Total Operating Net Expenses (OOOs) $

272,576

$

274,521

$

297,589

$

313,959

$

321,346

Total Operating Assistance (OOOs) $

174,027

$

174,502

$

186,981

$

199,475

$

206,366

RATIOS: Passenger Per Scheduled Bus Mile

3.04

3.28

3.27

3.21

3.28

Passengers Per Scheduled Bus

109,145

117,212

117,656

118,524

123,412

Cost Per Total Bus Mile $

6.53

$

6.44

$

6.61

$

6.65

$

6.65

Garages Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile

n/a

$

0.12

$

0.19

$

0.12

$

0.18

Heavy Overhaul Shop Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile

n/a

$

0.25

$

0.26

$

0.25

$

0.22

Total Bus Parts Cost Per Vehicle Mile $

0.33

$

0.37

$

0.41

$

0.37

$

0.41

Cost Per Passenger $

2.19

$

1.98

$

2.04

$

2.12

$

2.08

**Average Passenger Fare $

0.70

$

0.63

$

0.64

$

0.65

$

0.61

Passenger Revenue Per Scheduled Mile $

2.13

$

2.07

$

2.09

$

2.07

$

2.00

Operating Assistance Per Passenger $

1.40

$

1.26

$

1.28

$

1.35

$

1.34

Operating Assistance Per Bus-Total Fleet $

132,440

$

130,518

$

130,756

$

138,140

$

142,617

Percentage of Operating Assistance to Cost

63.8%

63.6%

62.8%

63.5%

64.2%

Percentage of Passenger Revenue to Cost

31.9%

31.8%

31.3%

30.4%

29.3%

Percentage of Operating Revenue to Cost

36.2%

36.4%

37.2%

36.5%

35.8%

* Bus ridership for fiscal 1999, 2000 and 2001 have been restated to report unlinked trips. With fare simplification and fare integration, a comparison of bus ridership can only be made by reporting total boardings. Total boardings include cash, bus transfer, rail transfer and pass riders. Previously, bus transfers were not included in order to record each rider only once. The implementation of fare simplification provides a regional bus transfer program, regional One Day pass (sold and accepted by all local bus systems) and a flash pass program recognized and accepted by all local bus systems. ** Average is lower than base fare due to transfers and flash pass impact.

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 38

FISCAL 2003 ACTIVE BUS FLEET

Fiscal 2001 End of Year (Actual) - FY 2003 Budget Guideline Service - Eliminate Ride-On (9/03/01) - Dulles Reverse (11/19/01) - Reduce DC School Service (9/03/01) Fiscal 2003 End of Year

MAXIMUM SCHEDULED FLEET 1,237 26 -8 2 -5

TOTAL ACTIVE FLEET 1,430 30 -10 2 -5

1,252

1,447

BUS FLEET AVERAGE AGE END OF FISCAL YEAR 2003

MANUFACTURER METRO FLXIBLE METRO FLXIBLE METRO FLXIBLE METRO FLXIBLE METRO FLXIBLE ORION METRO FLXIBLE METRO FLXIBLE IKARUS ORION V ORION II ORION II ORION V ORION VI NEW (TAGS) NEW CNG NEOPLAN TOTAL

YEAR 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1992 1993 1994 1995 1997 1999 2000 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003

NUMBER OF BUSES

AVERAGE AGE

73 65 78 35 172 59 85 139 44 263 40 2 132 100 4 164

17 16 15 14 13 11 10 9 8 6 4 3 3 3 2 1 Q

.?1 1,476

8.06

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 39

BUS FLEET SIZE BY GARAGE FISCAL YEARS 2002 AND 2003

FISCAL 2003

FISCAL 2002 MAXIMUM TOTAL SCHEDULED FLEET FLEET Bladensburg Southeastern Northern Western Southern Avenue Annex Arlington Four Mile Run Royal Landover Montgomery

SYSTEM TOTAL

207 83 135 123 89 69 172

73 141 157 1,249

MAXIMUM SCHEDULED FLEET

236 103 164 142 101 78 197 83 159 181 1,444

209 67 129 120 108 69 177

73 138 162 1,252

SPARE RATIO

TOTAL FLEET

237 83 158 138 123 79 201 83 158 187

13.3% 23.8% 22.5% 15.0% 13.8% 14.5% 13.6% 13.7% 14.5% 15.4%

1,447

15.6%

Maximum Scheduled Fleet Includes 25 Strategic Buses

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 40

COMPARISON OF BUS MILES OPERATED FISCAL YEARS 2002 THROUGH 2003

Regular Route Scheduled Contract Tyson's Corner Reverse (11/19/01) Service Guideline (12/30/01) Ride-On 7/01/01 to 9/30/01 TOTAL SCHEDULED Strategic Charter Special Service Change-Offs Yard Work Missed Trips TOTAL UNSCHEDULED TOTAL MILES Estimated Articulated Bus included in above

FY 2002 APPROVED 45,442,144 25,953 158,178 361,893 128,583

FY 2003 APPROVED 47,153,224

46,116,751

47,153,224

201,696 179,000 100,000 275,000 434,906 (115,000)

* ** **

340,000 150,000 100,000 275,000 448,277 (115,000)

1,075,602

1,198,277

47,192,353

48,351,501

2,597,410

2,597,410

* Scheduled Contract (Lorton Service Eliminated Nov. 17,2001) ** Included in the Regular Route

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 41

DEPARTMENT OF BUS SERVICE FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET BUS OPERATORS' PAY HOURS

FY 2001 ACTUAL SCHEDULED HOURS FULL TIME OPERATORS PART TIME OPERATORS SUBTOTAL-SCHEDULED

UNSCHEDULED HOURS NON-PRODUCTIVE STRATEGIC OVERTIME/EXTRA SERVICE UTILITY STANDING EXTRA SUBCONTRACT CHARTER MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING/INSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL-UNSCHEDULED

HOURS FOR PAID LEAVE VACATION SICK HOLIDAY FUNERAL/OTHER SUBTOTAL-PAID LEAVE

TOTAL PAY HOURS

FY 2002 BUDGET

FY 2003 BUDGET

3,853,885

3,822,686 24,216 4,226,012

4,372,104 27,149 4,399,253

** ** 751,591 157,193 21,481 26,988 46,642 123,601 1,127,496

41,760 37,791 138,629 116,196 26,657 31,100 50,640 202,243 645,016

47,864 63,632 103,578 115,232 34,125 27,000 58,900 207,340 657,671

373,930 156,302 191,498 10,538 732,268

371,581 155,849 191,884 10,361 729,675

389,616 209,674 207,996 11,230 818,516

5,713,649

5,600,703

5,875,440

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 42

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Fiscal 2003 Budget Summary Regional/Non-Regional Costs

Metrobus service is designated by route as either regional or non-regional. The factors used in detennining whether a route is considered regional or non-regional include: the alignment of inter-jurisdictional routes, routes operating on arterial streets, routes that serve specific regional activity centers, and route cost effectiveness. These criteria effectively allow for a delineation of all Metrobus service into the categories of regional or non-regional routes, and the results are displayed by jurisdiction and by route on the following pages. This splitting of the Metrobus route system into regional and non-regional routes leads in tum to an allocation of Metrobus operating costs into these same categories. The fiscal 2003 budget for Metrobus operating expenses (excluding demonstration and reimbursable bus service) is approved at $321.3 million, which represents the base of costs to be allocated between the categories of regional and non-regional. A marginal cost analysis has been completed whereby those Metrobus costs associated with the production of regional service have been identified and segregated into a regional classification. The remaining costs are there, by definition, non-regional. To measure costs on a unit basis, platfonn hours are divided into the regional and nonregional costs. Platfonn hours are measured from the time a bus leaves a garage until it returns to a garage, and are associated with trips that are regular (in-service) trips and non-revenue (deadhead) trips. The following table identifies the unit costs for bus service as approved in the fiscal 2003 budget.

Hours Regional Non-Regional Total

2,941,939 805,186 3,747,125

Budget

$ $ $

265,358 55,988 321,346

Hour

$ $

90.20 69.53

Note: Figures do not contain platform hours or budgeted costs for demonstration and/or reimbursable bus servIce.

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 43

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Annual Platform Hours

Routes of Regional Significance

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

District of Columbia Maryland Virginia

1,494,497 802,945 640,984

3,514

1,494,497 802,945 644,498

Totals for Regional:

2,938,425

3,514

2,941,939

Non-Regional Routes

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Annual Platform Hours

District of Columbia Maryland Virginia

360,277 329,085 115,824

Totals for Non-Regional:

805,186

Total Service FY2003

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

360,277 329,085 115,824

o

805,186

Annual Platform Hours

Reimbursable Routes

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

District of Columbia Maryland Virginia

12,423 63,112 17,663

Totals for Reimbursable:

93,198

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

12,423 63,112 17,663

o

93,198

Annual Platform Hours

Other Routes

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

District of Columbia Maryland Virginia

21,833 2,642 6,902

Totals for Other:

31,377

Totals for Fiscal Year 2003:

3,868,1861

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

21,833 2,642 6,902

o 1_ _ 3..:..-,5_141

31,377

1

3,871, 700 1

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 44

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Routes of Regional Significance Annual Platform Hours

District of Columbia Route No

Route Name

3032343536 42 525354 5A 6064 62 6668 7071 80 909293 94 9697 A2-8,A42-48 A4A5 A9 B2 D1 D3 D6 D5 E2 E3 E4 G2 G8 H1 H2 H3 H4 L1 L2 L4 N2 N3 N4 N22 S1 S2 S4 U2 V5 V7 V8 V9 W4 W9 X1 X3 X2

PENNSYLVANIA AVE MOUNT PLEASANT 14TH STREET DC-DULLES FT TOTT-PETWORTH TAKOMA-PETWORTH PETWORTH-11TH ST GA AVE-7TH STREET NORTH CAPITOL ST U ST-GARFIELD STANTON ROAD EAST CAP-CARDOZO ANAC-CONG HGTS ANAC-FORT DRUM SOUTH CAPITOL ST BLAD RD-ANACOSTIA SIBLEY-STAD ARM MAC BLVD-GEOTOWN MIL RD-CROSSTOWN P ST-LEDROIT PARK RHODE ISLAND AVE BROOKLAND-POT PK CROSSTOWN CONNECTICUT AVE MASS AVENUE NAVY YARD SHUTTLE 16TH ST-POT PARK SIXTEENTH STREET MINN AVE-ANAC FX VILL-LENF PLAZ MINN AVE-M STREET DEANWOOD-ALAB AVE DEF FAC SHUTTLE BENNING ROAD BENNING RD-H ST

Totals for District of Columbia:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

156,919 60,558 89,630 13,336 19,991 19,237 30,797 91,705 56,364 107,716 12,249 47,998 83,454 22,659 7,713 53,548 66,080 3,833 45,639 24,275 34,150 5,349 50,351 40,181 40,561 16,310 10,113 105,392 11,747 6,011 44,853 41,477 2,939 9,784 61,579

156,919 60,558 89,630 13,336 19,991 19,237 30,797 91,705 56,364 107,716 12,249 47,998 83,454 22,659 7,713 53,548 66,080 3,833 45,639 24,275 34,150 5,349 50,351 40,181 40,561 16,310 10,113 105,392 11,747 6,011 44,853 41,477 2,939 9,784 61,579 1,494,497

Total Service FY2003

o

1,494,497

Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name

14A B 14C 14D 81828386 8485 A11 A12 A15 C11 C13 C12 C14 C2 C4 C7 C9 C8 D12 D13 D14 F1 F2 F4 F6 H11 H12 H13 J1 J2 J3 K11 K12 K13 K6 N11 N13 P12

BETH-TYSONS EXP 14 LKFRST-TYSONS EXP COLLEGE PARK RI AVE-NEW CARR M L KING HIGHWAY CLINTON HILLCREST HEIGHTS GBLT-TWINBROOK GREENBLT-GLENMONT COL PK-WHITE FLNT OXON HILL-SUIT CHILLUM ROAD PR GEO-SIL SPRING MAR HTS-TEMP HILL BETHESDA-SIL SPR FORESTVILLE NEW HAMP AVE-MD BRAN AVE-KING EXP EASTOVER-ADDISON

Base Schedule June 30, 2002 6,594 6,870 49,321 16,657 38,319 4,729 9,797 79,801 8,607 18,661 39,595 22,819 50,437 15,926 55,644 18,723 38,717 21,468 42,597

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 6,594 6,870 49,321 16,657 38,319 4,729 9,797 79,801 8,607 18,661 39,595 22,819 50,437 15,926 55,644 18,723 38,717 21,468 42,597

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 45

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Routes of Regional Significance Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name

P17P18P19

OXON HILL-FT WASH VEIRS MILL RD RIGGS ROAD ANNAPOLIS ROAD DIST HTS-SUITLAND BOCK ROAD INDIAN HEAD HWY GEORGIA AVE-MD FAIRLAND

02 R1 R2 R5 T18 V11 V12 W13 W14 W15 W17 Y6 Y7 Y8 Z8

Totals for Maryland:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 18,647 63,958 24,654 21,870 15,766 11,270 9,789 57,055 34,657

18,647 63,958 24,654 21,870 15,766 11,270 9,789 57,055 34,657 802,945

o

802,945

Annual Platform Hours

Virginia Route No

Route Name

10A 10E 10B 10P 11 P 11Y 13A,B,F,G,M 15K 15L 16A-G,J 16L 16S,U,W,X 16Y 1B,C,D,E,F,Z 22A,B,C,F 23A,B,C,T 24M 24P 25A,F,G,J,P,R 25B 28A 28B 28F 28G 28T 29C,E,G,H,X 29K 29M 29N 2A 2B 2C 2G 2T 38B 3A 3B 3E 3F 3T 4A,B,E,H,S 7A-F,P,W,X 8S 8W 8X 8Z 9A9E

HUNT TOWERS-PENT HUNT TWRS-BALL MT VERN-POTO-CRYS HUNT TWR-POT-CRYS MT VERNON EXPRESS NATL-PENT-WASH CHAIN BRIDGE RD COLUMBIA PIKE ANN-SKY CITY-PENT SHIRLINGTON-PENT COLUMBIA PIKE WILSON BLVD-FFX WALKER CHAP-PENT MCLEAN-CRYS CITY BALLSTON-PENTAGON BALL-BRADLEE-PENT LANDMARK-BALLSTON ALEX-TYSON CORNER SKYLINE CITY TYSONS-WFALLS ANNANDALE ALEX-FAIRFAX WASHINGTON BLVD TYSONS-DUNN LORI BALLSTON-FARR SO LEE HIGHWAY PIMMIT HILLS PERSH DR-ARL BLVD L1NC-N FAIRLNGTON FOXCHASE-SEM VALL RICHMOND HIGHWAY

Totals for Virginia:

Totals for Regional:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 22,805 29,418 7,954 10,060 3,670 16,955 10,733 48,972 1,589 11,144 3,514 38,037 21,957 44,448 7,801 18,686 14,913 37,600 4,372 9,581 20,037 19,020 35,366 13,783 23,928 29,055 16,120 23,079 40,324 12,854 46,721

22,805 29,418 7,954 10,060 3,670 16,955 10,733 48,972 1,589 11,144 3,514 38,037 21,957 44,448 7,801 18,686 14,913 37,600 4,372 9,581 20,037 19,020 35,366 13,783 23,928 29,055 16,120 23,079 40,324 12,854 46,721 640,984

2,938, 425 1

3,514

41 __ 3,_51----J

644,498

I

2,941, 939 1

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 46

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Non-Regional Routes Annual Platform Hours

District of Columbia Route No

Route Name

98 B51 B52 B53 B8 B9 C40 D2 D31,32,33,34 D4 D51 D8 E32 E6 H5,7 H6 H8 H9 K2 M2 M4 M6 M8 M9 N8 P1 P2 P6 S35 S41 U4 U5 U6 U8 W2 W3 W45 W46 W47 W54 W6 W8 X6 X8

ADM MOR-U ST LINK BROOK-BUNK HL SCH FT LINCOLN SHUT CAP HILL CLUSTER GLOV PK-DUP CIRC DEAL JR HI SCH IVY CITY-UN STAT D ELLINGTON H S HOSPITAL CENTER EASTERN HI SCH CHEVY CHASE MT PLEASANT-ADAMS BROOKLAND-FT L1NC PARK RD-BROOKLAND TAKOMA-FT TOTTEN FAIR VILL-NAYL RD NEBRASKA AVENUE FAIRFAX VILLAGE CONG HTS SHUTTLE VAN NESS-WESLEY ANAC-ECKINGTON SOUSA MIDDLE SCH SPINGARN HI SCH SHER RD-RIV TERR MAYFAIR-MARS HGTS CAP HTS-BENN HTS SE COMM HOSP-ANAC WILSON HI SCH WOODSON HIGH SCH GARFELD-ANAC LOOP NATL ARBORETUM MARYLAND AVENUE

Totals for District of Columbia:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 6,165 723 6,102 404 17,538 2,272 16,292 439 29,901 512 5,552 5,479 18,534 23,829 5,984 1,978 10,735 12,143 7,932 11,421 39,631 422 316 11,254 24,304 29,569 35,483 866 402 25,338 912 7,846

6,165 723 6,102 404 17,538 2,272 16,292 439 29,901 512 5,552 5,479 18,534 23,829 5,984 1,978 10,735 12,143 7,932 11,421 39,631 422 316 11,254 24,304 29,569 35,483 866 402 25,338 912 7,846 360,277

o

360,277

Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name

8788 8989M B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B27 C21,22,25,26,29 C28 F12 F13 F14 F8 J11-15 J5 J8 J9 L7 L8 R12 R3 R4 T15T16T17 T2 V14V15 2124

LAUREL EXPRESS LAUREL BOWIE STATE UNIV BOWIE-BELAIR BOWIE-NEW CARROLL CENTRAL AVENUE C POINTER RIDGE ARD IND PK SHUT CHEV-WASH BUS PK SHER RD-CAP HGTS PR GEO-LANGLEY MARLBORO PIKE TWINBROOK-SIL SPG 1-270 EXPRESS CONN AVE-MD KEN AVE-NEW CARR GBLT-FORT TOTTEN QUEENS CHAPEL RD GREENBELT RIVER ROAD DIS HTS-SEAT PLEA GLENMONT-SIL SPRG

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

9,272 7,605 7,271 9,317 3,389 25,582 6,001 6,403 8,639 19,606 16,566 16,237 4,019 7,510 21,900 23,491 14,643 11,894 14,340 19,826 16,454 10,296

9,272 7,605 7,271 9,317 3,389 25,582 6,001 6,403 8,639 19,606 16,566 16,237 4,019 7,510 21,900 23,491 14,643 11,894 14,340 19,826 16,454 10,296

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 47

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Non-Regional Routes Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name

Z11,Z13 Z2 Z3 Z5 Z7, Z17, Z19 Z9,Z29

GRNCASTLE-BRG CHAN COLESVILLE RD COLESVL-FAIRLAND CALV-FAIRLAND EXP LAUREL-BURTONSVILL

Totals for Maryland:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

12,964 15,961 5,753 4,086 10,058 329,085

12,964 15,961 5,753 4,086 10,058

o

329,085

Annual Platform Hours

Virginia Route No

Route Name

12C 12D 12E 12F 12L 12M 12R 12S 17A,B,F,M 17G 17H 17K 18E 18F 18G 18H 18J 18P 18R 18S 20F 20W 20X 21A,B,C,D,F 23 24T 2W 9A9E

CENTREVILLE NORTH CENTREVILLE SOUTH L RKY RUN-VIENNA SULLY STA-VIENNA KINGS PARK KINGS PK EXPRESS SPRINGFIELD ORANGE HUNT BURKE CENTRE CHANT-GREENBRIAR LANDMARK-PENTAGON SHELTER OCCU CTR MCLEAN HAM-E F CH VIENNA-OAKTON RICHMOND HIGHWAY

Totals for Virginia:

Totals for Non-Regional:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

4,551 7,927 4,159 7,688 13,732 21,230 4,310 9,485 17,073 7,046 11,513 75 3,695 2,209 1,132

4,551 7,927 4,159 7,688 13,732 21,230 4,310 9,485 17,073 7,046 11,513 75 3,695 2,209 1,132

115,824

o

115,824

805, 186 1

01

805,1861

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 48

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Reimbursable Routes Annual Platform Hours

District of Columbia Route No

Route Name

5B

DC-TYSONS CORNER

Totals for District of Columbia:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002 12,423 12,423

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 12,423 12,423

o

Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name

B11 B29 B30 C18 G1 J4 N7 W19

BETHESDA REV COMM CROFTON-NEW CARR GREEN BELT-BWI WALDORF-BRANCH AV GBLT PK LOT SHUT COLLEGE PARK-BETHE MONT MALL-FED TRI INDIAN HEAD EXPRES

Totals for Maryland:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 8,298 2,410 17,282 10,773 2,229 9,694 3,389 9,039

8,298 2,410 17,282 10,773 2,229 9,694 3,389 9,039

63,112

o

63,112

Annual Platform Hours

Virginia Route No

Route Name

S80 S81 S82 S91

SPRING CIRCULATOR METRO PK SHUTILE SPRINGFIELD SHUT

Totals for Virginia:

Totals for Reimbursable:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003 10,808 4,264 2,590

10,808 4,264 2,590

17,663

93,1981

o

1..-1_ _ °1

17,663

93, 198 1

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 49

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

METROBUS ROUTE SUMMARY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET

Other Routes Annual Platform Hours

District of Columbia Route No

Route Name

B99

BLAD OPER SHUT FAREBOX - BLAD FAREBOX- SE FARE BOX - NORT FAREBOX - SE FAREBOX - WEST F ST LOT PARKING SO AVE OPER SHUT

S99

Totals for District of Columbia:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

8,086 1,883 2,447 941 628 1,313 502 6,034

21,833

8,086 1,883 2,447 941 628 1,313 502 6,034

o

21,833

Annual Platform Hours

Maryland Route No

Route Name FAREBOX - MONT AS DIRECTED (MG) FAREBOX - LAND

Totals for Maryland:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

1,791 281 570

2,642

1,791 281 570

o

2,642

Annual Platform Hours

Virginia Route No

Route Name FARE BOX - ARL FARE BOX - FMR FMR OPER SHUT F99

Totals for Virginia:

Totals for Other:

Base Schedule June 30, 2002

Additional Service Oct 1, 2002

Total Service FY2003

798 816 5,289

6,902

31,3771

798 816 5,289

o

_ _°Il

6,902

31,3771

Operating Budget -- Metrobus Regional/Non-Regional Costs Page 50

METRORAIL

· REVENUE · EXPENSE • STATISTICS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Page 51

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Page 52

MetroRail Service Fiscal 2003 Approved: $473.0 Million Where it Comes From Revenues $329.4

Gross Subsidy $143.6

Where it Goes Other $22.3 Propulsion $30.1 Materials $32.0

Services $35.2 Personnel $353.4

S Millions

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Page 53

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES· METRORAIL (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

REVENUES Passenger Other Passenger Parking Advertising Joint Development Other Employee Parking

$247,179.3 812.3 9,289.0 3,883.9 4,912.7 7,492.8 59.4

$255,987.4 845.5 9,648.4 4,650.1 6,386.3 6,352.2 57.3

$275,435.3 1,203.5 10,432.5 5,662.0 5,498.1 9,952.8 61.5

$289,521.4 900.0 9,800.0 5,676.5 5,042.9 11,565.6 63.2

$293,470.1 900.0 12,915.8 6,976.5 5,042.9 9,990.2 63.2

$3,948.7 0.0 3,115.8 1,300.0 0.0 -1,575.4 0.0

Total Revenues

$273,629.4

$283,927.2

$308,245.6

$322,569.6

$329,358.7

$6,789.1

$272,703.5 22,014.8 28,481.8 26,998.2 15,099.3 2,490.1 1,130.3 -1,447.7 0.0

$292,117.2 18,125.7 37,975.4 27,221.8 15,299.2 2,753.3 3,012.8 -1,449.0 -3,000.0

$314,055.3 20,761.6 32,753.0 27,216.9 17,257.3 3,137.1 1,964.7 -33.5 -1,400.4

$339,562.9 35,145.5 32,579.1 28,164.1 19,341.3 3,057.7 2,320.5 122.9 -700.0

$353,390.3 35,239.1 31,955.1 30,089.6 18,980.1 1,360.2 2,307.8 174.7 -500.0

$13,827.4 93.6 -623.9 1,925.5 -361.2 -1,697.5 -12.6 51.8 200.0

$367,470.3

$392,056.3

$415,711.9

$459,593.9

$472,996.9 $13,403.0

EXPENSES Personnel Services Materials & Supplies Fuel & Propulsion Power Utilities Casualty & Liability Leases & Rentals Miscellaneous Preventive Maintenance

Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

Gross Subsidy Plus: Debt Service Less: Audit Adjustment Net Local Subsidy Cost Recovery Ratio

$93,840.9 $108,129.2 $107,466.4 $137,024.3 $143,638.3 $6,613.9

$93,840.9 27,484.2 0.0

$108,129.2 27,484.2 -12,946.0

$107,466.4 27,484.2 -17,005.5

$137,024.3 27,484.2 -15,367.4

$143,638.3 27,484.2 -18,032.7

$6,613.9 0.0 -2,665.4

$121,325.1

$122,667.4

$117,945.0

$149,141.2

$153,089.7

$3,948.6

74.46%

72.42%

74.15%

70.19%

69.63%

-0.55%

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Financial Tables Page 54

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METRORAIL BUDGET SUMMARY DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Actual Approved Approved $84,433.5 $91,380.6 $98,507.1 76,335.6 89,255.7 94,907.1 651.4 81.1 94.6 116.0 -3,628.1 -4,168.6 7,365.4 5,658.5 7,652.6

FY 1999 Actual $69,037.6 63,401.0 496.2 53.8

FY 2000 Actual $75,749.9 68,154.3 761.9 77.0

5,086.5

6,756.7

Wages(Total) Operator Wages Full Time Wages Part Time Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages

$146,380.2 48,337.5 85,968.2

$157,934.7 50,257.5 92,547.5

$164,992.6 52,258.4 100,284.1

$179,876.8 55,534.6 118,938.9

12,074.5

15,129.8

12,450.2

TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES

$215,417.8

$233,684.6

$57,285.8 51,245.8 1,377.6 4,662.3

Salaries(Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Part Time Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries

Change $7,126.4 5,651.4 21.4 -540.4 1,994.1

-4,432.4 9,835.7

$182,817.6 57,041.2 120,724.1 144.2 -4,803.0 9,711.2

$2,940.8 1,506.6 1,785.2 144.2 -370.5 -124.6

$249,426.1

$271,257.4

$281,324.7

$10,067.3

$58,432.6 52,810.8 1,877.5 3,744.3

$64,629.2 59,267.9 1,963.1 3,398.2

$68,305.5 64,273.7 1,970.7 2,061.1

$72,065.6 69,326.4 2,024.1 715.0

$3,760.1 5,052.7 53.4 -1,346.1

$272,703.5

$292,117.2

$314,055.3

$339,562.9

$353,390.3

$13,827.4

Services(Total) Management Fee Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Custodial Services Other

$22,014.8 2,194.2 12,243.8 573.9 5,114.7

$18,125.7 2,414.3 4,785.5 1,189.3 6,950.8

1,888.2

2,785.8

$20,761.6 2,330.7 5,487.5 927.5 8,026.3 1.0 3,988.5

$35,145.5 2,016.9 10,798.6 1,015.7 15,824.2 0.9 5,489.2

$35,239.1 2,763.0 8,565.2 936.7 16,355.5 0.6 6,618.0

$93.6 746.1 -2,233.4 -79.0 531.3 -0.3 1,128.8

Materials & Supplies(Total) Fuel and Lubricants Tires Other

$28,481.8 320.0 53.0 28,108.8

$37,975.4 460.4 50.8 37,464.2

$32,753.0 612.6 28.4 32,112.0

$32,579.1 632.6 74.6 31,871.8

$31,955.1 881.3 87.8 30,986.0

-$623.9 248.7 13.2 -885.8

Fuel & Propulsion(Total) Diesel Fuel Propulsion Power Clean Natural Gas

$26,998.2 3.7 26,994.5

$27,221.8 -0.1 27,221.9

$27,216.9 1.4 27,215.5

$28,164.1 95.7 28,068.4

$30,089.6 3.3 30,086.3

$1,925.5 -92.4 2,017.9

Utilities(Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

$15,099.3 12,884.8 2,214.4

$15,299.2 13,024.7 2,274.5

$17,257.3 14,103.8 3,153.5

$19,341.3 15,466.3 3,874.9

$18,980.1 14,899.0 4,081.1

-$361.2 -567.3 206.1

Casualty & Liability(Total) Insurance Claims

$2,490.1 892.8 1,597.3

$2,753.3 839.0 1,914.4

$3,137.1 979.6 2,157.5

$3,057.7 1,703.9 1,353.8

$1,360.2 1,360.2

-$1,697.5 -343.7 -1,353.8

Leases(Total) Property EqUipment

$1,130.3 67.3 1,063.0

$3,012.8 1,349.3 1,663.5

$1,964.7 305.9 1,658.9

$2,320.5 287.1 2,033.3

$2,307.8 341.4 1,966.5

-$12.6 54.3 -66.9

Miscellaneous(Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Interview & Relocation Advertising Other

$1,566.4 185.0 59.5 160.1 434.6 549.0 178.3

$1,709.4 201.2 102.7 237.8 478.1 418.7 270.9

$3,321.6 242.3 126.2 338.1 595.4 1,118.5 901.1

$3,077.8 239.7 132.3 256.8 570.7 931.3 947.1

$3,059.7 301.2 345.3 288.3 488.7 1,295.7 340.6

-$18.1 61.5 213.0 31.5 -82.0 364.4 -606.5

Reimbursements(Total) Reimbursements

-$3,014.1 -3,014.1

-$3,158.4 -3,158.4

-$3,355.1 -3,355.1

-$2,954.8 -2,954.8

-$2,885.0 -2,885.0

$69.8 69.8

TOTAL NONPERSONNEL COST

$94,766.8

$102,939.1 -3,000.0 $392,056.3

$103,057.0 -1,400.0 $415,712.3

$120,731.0 -700.0 $459,593.9

$120,106.7 -500.0 $472,996.9

-$624.3

Fringes(Total) Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers Compensation TOTAL PERSONNEL COST

Less: Preventive Maintenance

TOTAL METRORAIL COST

$367,470.3

$13,203.0

* Preventive Maintenance Allocated to Expense Items Above

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Financial Tables Page 55

01

METRORAIL STATISTICS

lJ 0>-0

For The Fiscal Years 1997 Through 2002

(QCD

CD

""'I

U1~

m~'1

FY 1997

FY 1998

FY 1999

FY 2000

FY 2001

FY 2002

FY 2003

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

ACTUAL

APPROVED

APPROVED

OJ

gl

STATISTICS: Total Railcar Miles (OOOs)

43,408

48,790

50,394

51,298

56,399

64,890

64,440

Revenue Railcar Miles (OOOs)

41,988

47,190

48,794

49,698

54,799

63,290

63,840

144,052

151,284

155,103

163,274

177,268

186,211

187,509

Total Passenger Revenue (OOOs)

$225,973

$242,129

$247,992

$256,833

$276,639

$290,421

$294,431

=1

Total Operating Revenue (OOOs)

$244,469

$262,025

$273,629

$283,927

$308,246

$320,270

$329,420

~I

Total Operating Net Expensese (OOOs)

$337,512

$353,509

$367,470

$392,056

$415,712

$457,294

$472,747

$93,043

$91,484

$93,841

$108,129

$107,466

$137,024

$143,327

3.43

3.21

3.18

3.29

3.23

2.94

2.94

CD

r-+ I I

1

~I

CD

Total Passengers (OOOs)

r-+ ""'I

01 ""'I

0>

(J)

<

gl gl

Total Opearting Assistance (OOOs)

RATIOS:

(J)

C

31

Passengers Per Revenue Railcar Mile

d·1

Operating Cost Per Total Railcar Mile

$7.78

$7.25

$7.29

$7.64

$7.37

$7.05

$7.34

(J)I

Operating Cost Per Passenger

$2.34

$2.34

$2.37

$2.40

$2.35

$2.46

$2.52

:JI Q.

Operating Subsidy Per Passenger

$0.65

$0.60

$0.61

$0.66

$0.61

$0.74

$0.76

~I

Average Passenger Fare

$1.57

$1.60

$1.60

$1.57

$1.56

$1.56

$1.57

en'l r-+

Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from Passenger Revenues

67.0%

68.5%

67.5%

65.5%

66.5%

63.5%

62.3%

gl

Percentage of Operating Cost Recovered from all Operating Revenues

72.4%

74.1%

74.5%

72.4%

74.1%

70.0%

69.7%

-0

0 :J 0>

0>

r-+

PAYHOURS RAIL OPERATIONS AND STATION MANAGERS FISCAL 2003

Rail Operations FY'03 Payhours Average Hourly Rate

I::stlmated Budget

Subtotal:

Payhours 852,779 63,400 916,179

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

23.35 23.35 26.76 23.35 23.35 23.35 23.35 23.35 23.35

Subtotal:

126,000 800 48,000 60,000 6,000 1,500 105,000 30,000 36,000 413,300

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

2,941,747 18,678 1,284,395 1,400,832 140,083 35,021 2,451,456 700,416 840,499 9,813,127

Total:

1,329,479

$

23.56

$

31,326,873

Subtotal:

Payhours 815,274 33,383 848,657

Category Scheduled Interlocking (New Rail Car Testing)

Overscheduled Standing Extra Utility Traininq/Retraininq Miscelleneous Funeral/Other Vacation Sick Holiday

$ $

23.35 25.26

$ $ $

19,912,389 1,601,357 21,513,746

Station Manager Fy'03 Payhours Category Scheduled FIT Scheduled PIT (1)

Average Hourly Rate

estlmatea Budget

$ $

22.21 23.28

$ $ $

18,105,894 777,156 18,883,050

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

22.62 22.62 25.93 22.62 22.62 22.62 22.62 22.62 22.62

Subtotal:

70,000 800 12,000 25,000 4,000 1,630 98,200 32,970 36,300 280,900

$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

1,583,674 18,099 311,151 565,598 90,496 36,877 2,221,668 745,910 821,248 6,394,721

Total:

1,129,557

$

22.38

$

25,277,771

2_3._19......~ $

56,604,644

Overscheduled Standing Extra Utility Training/Retraining Miscellaneous Funeral/Other Vacation Sick Holiday

Total, Operators & Station Managers: I 2,459,036 ~...;$

I

Notes: 1. Rate is based on maximum 30 hours work week

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 57

RAIL CAR MILES ESTIMATED FISCAL 2003

FISCAL 2002

FISCAL 2003

Red Line

24,720,297

25,107,351

Blue Line

10,509,552

9,755,864

Orange Line

13,423,269

13,289,217

Yellow Line

3,948,272

3,962,801

Green Line

8,158,547

8,188,584

MCI Arena

1,704,635

1,711,283

Ridership Pattern

325,000

325,000

Gap Trains

500,000

500,000

%

%

63,289,572

62,840,100

Start-up/New Rail Car Testing

200,000

200,000

Revenue Collection

700,000

700,000

Other

700,000

700,000

64,889,572

64,440,100*

Deployment of 5000 Series

Sub-Total Revenue Miles

Total Rail Car Miles

FY 2003 rail car mile estimate adjusting mileage for 1 more weekday and 1 less Sunday vs. FY02. Also considers the annualization of the budgeted new rail car deployment scheduled for part year in FY02.

* Reduced (2,085,183) seasonal miles in FY03 % Distributed by line.

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Service Assumptions and Statistics Page 58

o

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAIL SERVICE LEVELS FISCAL YEARS 2000-2003

'"0 CD

'""I

m

r+

:J CO

OJ C

Q.

2000 Year-End RAIL LINES Red Line

2001 Year-End

2002 Year-End

FY 2003

GlenmonUShady Grove Silver Spring/Grosvenor

GlenmonUShady Grove Silver Spring/Grosvenor

GlenmonUShady Grove Silver Spring/Grosvenor

GlenmonUShady Grove Silver Spring/Grosvenor

Blue Line

AddisonRd/FranconiaSpringfield

AddisonRd/FranconiaSpringfield

AddisonRd/FranconiaSpringfield

AddisonRd/FranconiaSpringfield

Orange Line

New CarrolitonNienna

New CarrolitonNienna

New CarrolitonNienna

New CarrolitonNienna

Yellow Line

Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square

Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square

Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square

Huntington/Mt. Vernon Square

Green Line

Anacostia/U StreetCardozo

GreenbelUAnacostia

GreenbelUBranch Ave.

GreenbelUBranch Ave.

CO CD

r+ I I

~

CD

r+ '""I

o '""I

m (f)

CD

'""I

< ()

CD

» en en

c

3

'"0 !:!'.

o

:J

en m

RUSH HOUR TRAINS Red Line Blue Line Orange Line Yellow Line Green Line Greenbelt to Anacostia Greenbelt to Branch Ave.

37 21 31 10

37 21 31 10

44 21 32 10

44 21 32 10

17

19

19

13

:J

Q.

(f)

r+

m r+

en

"'U !:!'.

m()

co en CD

(Jl

co

Gap Start-Up

7 1

7 1

6

1

7 1

TOTAL

120

124

133

134

-00

0>-0

CD (1)

(1) """I

0>

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAIL SERVICE LEVELS FISCAL YEARS 2000-2003

(j) ~.

0:J CD

CO C DCD

~ I

I

:s::

(1)

r-+ """I

o """I

0>

2000 Year-End RUSH HOUR HEADWAYS (MINUTES BETWEEN TRAINS) Red Line Glenmont-Shady Grove 6 3 Silver Spring-Shady Grove 6# Orange Line Blue Line 6 6 Yellow Line Green Line 6 Greenbelt-Anacostia Greenbelt-Branch Ave.

2001 Year-End

2002 Year-End

FY 2003

6 3 6# 6 6

5 2.5 6# 6 6

5 2.5 6# 6 6

6

6#

6#

12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15

12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15 12/12/15

12/12/15

12/12/15

C!) (1) """I

< (')

(1)

:t:-

en en

c

3

-0

r-+

o

:J

NON-RUSH HOUR -- MIDDAY-WEEKDAY/SAT/SUN -- MINUTES BETWEEN TRAINS Red Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 Glenmont-Shady Grove 12/12/15 12/12/15 Silver Spring-Shady Grove 12/12/15 12/12/15 Orange Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 Blue Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 Yellow Line 12/12/15 12/12/15 Green Line Greenbelt-Anacostia 12/12/15 Greenbelt-Branch Ave. 12/12/15

-

en

0>

:J DC!)

r-+

(1) Extended Service New Year's Eve. (2) Saturday Schedule - **Columbus Day, **Veteran's Day, **Martin Luther King's Birthday, **President's Day, 4th of July modified. (3) Sunday Schedule - Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Labor Day

0>

r-+

en r-+ (')

en

# During Times of Observed Peaking in Ridership Tripper Trains Are Operated.

0

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAIL SERVICE LEVELS FISCAL YEARS 2000-2003

"'0 CD

""'I

Q)

.-+

:::l

CO OJ C 0CO CD

.-+ I I

~

CD

.-+

2000 Year-End

2001 Year-End

2002 Year-End

FY 2003

222 92 164 40

222 92 174 48

264 106 184 56

264 106 184 56

-

78

114

114

Gap Start-up Ridership Pattern Adjustment-Fiscal 2001 Ridership Pattern Adjustment-Fiscal 2002

42 4

30 4 10

36 4

36 4

10

10

Total Scheduled Car Requirement Spares (20%) Revenue Collection

616

658

774

774

124 4

132 4

154 4

154 4

Total Car Requirement

744

794

932

932

PEAK SCHEDULED RAIL CARS Red Line Orange Line Blue Line Yellow Line Green Line Greenbelt-Anacostia Greenbelt-Branch Ave.

""'I

~I (J)

CD

""'I

< ()

52

CD

P

C/l C/l

C

3

"'0 ~·I 0 :::l

C/l Q)

:::l

0-

(J) .-+

HOURS OF OPERATION Weekday Saturday Sunday

Q)

18.5 16 16

18.5 18 16

18.5 18 16

18.5 18 16

(1) 252 (2) 57 (3) 57

(1) 250 (2) 58 (3) 57

(1) 250 (2) 57 (3) 58

(1) 251 (2) 57 (3) 57

.-+

-U~ --

Q)

CO~ CD

(J) -"

DAYS OF OPERATION Weekday Saturday Sunday

-00

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAIL SERVICE LEVELS FISCAL YEARS 2000-2003

Q)1J

COco co ""'I Q)

(j) ~.

tv::J

CO OJ C

Q.

CO co r-+ I I

:s:

co r-+

CARS PER TRAIN RUSH HOURS Red Line Blue Line Orange Line Yellow Line Green Line Greenbelt-Anacostia Greenbelt-Branch Ave.

2000 Year-End

2001 Year-End

2002 Year-End

FY 2003

37-6's 17-4's/4-6's 11-4's/20-6's 10-4's

37-6's 15-4's/6-6's 6-4's/25-6's 6-4's/4-6's

44-6's 10-4's/11-6's 4-4's/28-6's 2-4's/8-6's

44-6's 10-4's/11-6's 4-4's/28-6's 2-4's/8-6's

12-4's/5-6's

19-6's

19-6's

6-4's/1-6 1-4

6-6's 1-4

6-6's 1-4

5-2's

5-2's

5-2's

5-2's

5-2's

5-2's

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4

4/4

-

13-4's

""'I

o ""'I

Q)

(J)

CO

""'I

< ()

Gap Start-up Ridership Pattern Adjustment-Fiscal 2001 Ridership Pattern Adjustment-Fiscal 2002

7-6's 1-4

CO

» (J) (J)

c

:3 1J

r-+

o

::J (J)

Q)

::J

CARS PER TRAIN WEEKDAY BASE/NIGHT Red Line (A) 4/4 Blue Line 4/2 Orange Line (A) 4/4 Yellow Line 4/2 Green Line Greenbelt to Anacostia 4/4 Greenbelt to Branch Ave.

4/4

Q.

(J) r-+

Q)

r-+ (J)

r-+ () (J)

(A) During Peak Tourist Season, 6 Car Consist Utilized On Red Line (Shady Grove - Wheaton), Orange Line, Green Line

o

13 CD

'""I

Q.l

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAIL SERVICE LEVELS FISCAL YEARS 2000-2003

r+

:J CO

Q.l

2000 Year-End CARS PER TRAIN SATURDAY/SUNDAY Red Line 4/4 Glenmont - Shady Grove 4/2 Silver Spring - Grosvenor 4/4 Blue Line 4/4 Orange Line (A) 2/2 Yellow Line Green Line 4/4 Greenbelt to Anacostia Greenbelt to Branch Ave.

(J) CD

(A) During Peak Tourist Season, 6 Car Consist Utilized On Red Line (Shady Grove - Wheaton), Orange Line

aJ

c

0-

CO CD

r+ I I

~

CD

r+ '""I

o'""I

<

()

CD

» en en c

3

"S o

:J

en

Q.l

:J

0(J)

r+

Q.l

d.

en

"'U d.

Q.l()

co en CD

0')

W

2001 Year-End

2002 Year-End

FY 2003

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4

4/4

4/4

4/4

-

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES STATION/REGION Montgomery County Grosvenor White Flint Twinbrook Rockville Shady Grove Glenmont Wheaton Forest Glen Prince George's County New Carrollton Landover Cheverly Addison Road Capitol Heights Greenbelt College Park Prince George's Plaza West Hyattsville Southern Avenue Naylor Road Suitland Branch Avenue District of Columbia Deanwood Minnesota Avenue Rhode Island Avenue Fort Totten Anacostia Northern Virginia Huntington West Falls Church Dunn Loring Vienna Franconia-Springfield Van Dorn Street East Falls Church

Grand Total

Average Daily Paid Transactions LAST YEAR CAPACITY THIS YEAR

Total Occupancy THIS YEAR LAST YEAR

642 991 1,098 524 2,251 1,781 977 596 8,860

603 708 940 461 2,030 1,599 744 528 7,613

600 716 873 466 2,241 1,634 669 523 7,722

100% 79% 94% 100% 100% 100% 84% 100% 95%

100% 80% 87% 100% 100% 100% 75% 100% 93%

1,982 1,866 530 1,268 373 3,399 530 1,068 453 1,980 396 1,890 3,100 18,835

1,849 1,638 475 1,079 322 2,901 478 809 335 1,493 332 1,553 2,496 15,760

1,877 1,617 474 1,000 328 2,825 486 699 369 1,003 298 1,444 2,485 14,905

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 83% 100% 83% 100% 100% 100% 97%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 72% 90% 56% 83% 84% 88% 94%

194 333 342 408 808 2,085

166 280 277 345 480 1,548

168 292 302 361 341 1,464

100% 92% 100% 100% 65% 85%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

2,790 1,062 1,319 5,182 3,856 361 422 14,992

2,355 1,029 1,178 4,602 3,442 336 402 13,344

2,385 994 1,195 4,021 3,321 340 420 12,676

93% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%

94% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99%

44,772

38,265

36,767

97%

93%

Comments: 1. Data as of April 2002 2. Shady Grove East Lot #1 has reduced availability of parking spaces, because of ongoing Garage construction on a part of the lot. 700 out of 1,514 spaces are currently unavailable. 3. Huntington South Garage is undergoing rehabilitaion. 300 of the 885 total capacity are unavailable.

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Parking Page 64

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY PARK AND RIDE SURCHARGE AND BASE REVENUE

Station I Region

Capacity

Parking Fee To Customer

Base Revenue To WMATA

Additional Revenue To WMATA

Revenue To Reserve Fund

Montgomery County Grosvenor White Flint Twinbrook Rockville Shady Grove Glenmont Wheaton Forest Glen

642 991 1,098 524 2,251 1,781 977 596

$2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $1.50 $2.25

$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $0.00 $0.25 $1.00

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $2.25 $1.25 $1.25

Prince George's County New Carrollton Landover Cheverly Addison Road Capitol Heights Greenbelt College Park Prince George's Plaza West Hyattsville Southern Avenue Naylor Road Suitland Branch Avenue

1,982 1,866 530 1,268 373 3,399 530 1,068 453 1,980 396 1,890 3,100

$2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00

$1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75

194 333 342 408 808

$2.00 $1.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00

$1.25 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25

$0.75 $0.00 $0.75 $0.75 $0.75

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

2,790 1,062 1,319 5,182 3,856 361 422 44,772

$2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25 $2.25

$1.00 $1.25 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25

$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.50 $0.00

$1.25 $1.00 $1.25 $1.25 $1.25 $0.50 $1.00

District of Columbia Deanwood Minnesota Avenue Rhode Island Avenue Fort Totten Anacostia Northern Virginia Huntington West Falls Church Dunn Loring Vienna Franconia-Springfield Van Dorn Street East Falls Church

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Parking Page 65

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Metrorail Parking Page 66

METRO ACCESS

· REVENUE · EXPENSE • STATISTICS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 67

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 68

WASHINGTON METROPOLITANT AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 BUDGET SUMMARY METROACCESS

MetroAccess, the Americans With Disabilities Act paratransit service for the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, is sponsored by the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), local governments, and the other local fixed-route transit systems. MetroAccess provides curb-to-curb transportation service for eligible riders. The annual operating budget is mainly driven by the following factors: trips requested, trips completed by the contract carrier and the size of the leased fleet of vehicles needed to operate this service. For fiscal 2003, total MetroAccess operating expenses is $28.2 million, a $3.6 million increase from fiscal 2002. Operating costs are partially offset by passenger revenue of $1.3 million resulting in a gross subsidy for fiscal 2003 of $26.9 million.

METROACCESS STATISTICS For the Fiscal Year 1998 Through 2003

FY1998 Actual

FY1999 Actual

FY2000 Actual

FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 Actual Approved Approved

STATISTICS: Total Number of Registrants

10,396

14,610

15,603

17,109

12,400

13,600

Total Registrant Trip Requested

414,986

661,873

784,975

940,759

1,002,505

1,150,112

Contract Carrier Number of Vehicles

62

75

80

138

176

239

Trips Transmitted to Core Carriers

152,619

136,367

124,091

9,624

0

0

Trips Completed by Contract Carriers

262,367

340,802

452,924

557,397

627,117

688,739

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 69

Metro Access Paratransit Service Fiscal 2003 Approved: $28.2 Million Where it Comes From Gross Subsidy $26.9

Revenues $1.3

Where it Goes Services $26.8

Supplies & Other $0.3 Personnel $1.1

S Millions

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 70

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY REVENUE, EXPENSE & FUNDING SOURCES - METRO ACCESS PARATRANSIT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual REVENUES Passenger Total Revenues EXPENSES Personnel Services Materials & Supplies Fuel & PropUlsion Power Utilities Casualty & Liability Leases & Rentals Miscellaneous Total Expenses

GROSS SUBSIDY

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2002 Approved

FY 2003 Approved

Change

$406.0

$911.8

$1,202.5

$1,346.0

$1,346.0

$0.0

$406.0

$911.8

$1,202.5

$1,346.0

$1,346.0

$0.0

$433.3 12,496.3 49.9 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 15.0

$346.1 17,185.4 39.4 0.0 4.3 1.2 7.2 12.5

$551.5 19,730.0 18.7 0.0 5.9 0.0 270.3 14.1

$982.2 23,294.4 34.0 0.1 50.1 0.0 200.7 38.5

$1,084.6 26,788.7 34.1 0.1 62.8 0.0 200.7 33.5

$102.4 3,494.3 0.1 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 -5.0

$12,998.4

$17,596.0

$20,590.7

$24,600.0

$28,204.5

$3,604.5

$12,592.4 $16,684.3 $19,388.2 $23,254.0 $26,858.5 $3,604.5

Gross Subsidy Plus: Debt Service Less: Audit Adjustment

$12,592.4 0.0 0.0

$16,684.3 0.0 2,039.0

$19,388.2 0.0 2,010.0

$23,254.0 0.0 2,881.0

$26,858.5 0.0 -3,864.1

$3,604.5 0.0 -6,745.1

Net Local Subsidy

$12,592.4

$18,723.3

$21,398.2

$26,135.0

$22,994.5

-$3,140.5

3.12%

5.18%

5.84%

5.47%

4.77%

-0.70%

Cost Recovery Ratio

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 71

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY METRO ACCESS TRANSIT BUDGET SUMMARY DISPLAYED BY ACCOUNT (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) FY 1999 Actual Salaries(Total) Full-Time Salaries Temporary Salaries Salary Lapse Overtime Salaries Wages(Total) Full Time Wages Wage Lapse Overtime Wages TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES Fringes(Total) Fringe Benefits

ToTAL PERSONNEL CosT Services(Total) Professional & Technical Temporary Help Contract Maintenance Paratransit Other Materials & Supplies(Total) Other

~7.3

FY 2000 Actual

FY 2001 Actual

FY 2003 Approved $862.8 901.0

Change $83.1 91.2

--W79.5

~52.0

308.2

267.3 0.2

437.7 0.6

9.1

11.9

13.7

-30.2 0.2

-43.9 5.8

-13.7 5.6

$32.7 10.6

$3.7 3.6

$0.6 0.6

$5.6 5.2

$0.3 0.4 -0.1

22.1

0.1

0.4

$5.9 5.5 -0.1 0.4

$350.0

$283.2

$452.6

$785.4

$868.7

$83.3

$83.3 83.2

$63.0 63.0

$98.9 98.9

$196.9 196.9

$215.9 215.9

$19.0 19.0

$433.3

$346.1

$551.5

$982.2

$1,084.6

$102.4

$12,496.3 48.7

$19,730.0 68.1 23.2 178.5 19,440.4 19.9

$23,294.4 201.0 20.0 88.7 22,892.9 91.8

$26,788.7 110.5 20.0 88.7 26,492.9 76.6

$3,494.3 -90.5

25.1 12,400.2 22.2

$17,185.4 10.7 4.5 244.5 16,896.2 29.4

$49.9 49.9

$39.4 39.4

$18.7 18.7

$34.0 34.0

$34.1 34.1

$0.1 0.1

$0.1 0.1

$0.1 0.1 $62.8 36.5 26.3

Fuel & Propulsion(Total) Diesel Fuel Utilities(Total) Electricity and Gas Utilities - Other

FY 2002 Approved $779.8 809.8

$3.9

$4.3

$5.9

3.9

4.3

5.9

$50.1 36.5 13.6

3,600.0 -15.2

$12.7 12.7

Casualty & Liability(Total) Insurance

$1.2 1.2

Leases(Total) Property Equipment

$7.2 7.2

$270.3 270.2 0.2

$200.7 200.0 0.7

$200.7 200.0 0.7

$15.0 0.5 12.0 1.1 1.4

$12.5 0.5 8.7 0.8 2.4

$14.1 0.5 5.1 0.8 7.7

$38.5 1.6 13.8 2.0 21.1

$33.5 1.6 8.8 2.0 21.1

-$5.0

ToTAL NONPERSONNELCosT

$12,565.1

$17,249.9

$20,039.1

$23,617.8

$27,119.9

$3,502.2

TOTAL METRO ACCESS COST

$12,998.4

$17,596.0

$20,590.7

$24,600.0

$28,204.5

$3,604.5

Miscellaneous(Total) Dues And Subscriptions Conferences and Meetings Business Travel/Public Hrg Other

Operating Budget -- Metro Access Page 72

-5.0

DEBT SERVICE

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Debt Service Page 73

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Debt Service Page 74

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUMMARY DEBT SERVICE

In December 1993, WMATA and the Federal government refinanced $997 million of transit revenue bonds issued in the 1970's for construction of the Metrorail Adopted Regional System. The Authority refinanced its one-third share ($332.3 million) of the original bond issue by issuing $334,015,000 of gross revenue transit refunding bonds at varying coupon rates ranging from 2.75% to 6.0%. The terms of the new bond issuance are set forth in the Gross Revenue Transit Bond Refunding Resolution and Official Statement. The bonds are tax exempt and are not subject to the federal guarantee in effect on the original issuance. A bond fund has been established comprised of a principal/sinking fund installment account and a separate interest account. The bond fund is held in the custody of a trustee, Chemical Bank. Deposits of bond interest payments provided by local jurisdictions equal to onefourth of $27,480,922 must be made into the bond fund on the first business day of each quarter. If the bond fund is not whole ten days after the beginning of the quarter, WMATA must make the fund whole by depositing funds from other income sources that are equal to the shortfall. The payments required of the jurisdictions in fiscal 2003 will fund the following:

Due to Bondholders 1/1/2003 Due to Bondholders 7/1/2003

Principal $7,795,000 7,980,000 $15,775,000

Applied to future payments Total jurisdictional debt service requirement

Interest $5,944,526 5,761,343 $11 ,705,869

Total Due $13,739,526 13,741,343 $27,480,869 3,325 $27,484,194

The debt service payments by the jurisdictions are pledged to the gross revenue transit refunding bonds. The Authority's gross revenue receipts are subject to lien if the required payments are not made into the bond fund. The full principal, interest and total annual debt service requirements are displayed in the following table.

Operating Budget -- Debt Service Page 75

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUMMARY DEBT SERVICE Semi-Annual Payment

Annual Amount Due

Payment Date

Principal

Interest

7/1/94

$4,060,000

$11,009,803

$15,069,803

1/1/95 7/1/95 1/1/96 7/1/96 1/1/97 7/1/97 1/1/98 7/1/98 1/1/99 7/1/99 1/1/00 7/1/00 1/1/01 7/1/01 1/1/02 7/1/02 1/1/03 7/1/03 1/1/04 7/1/04 1/1/05 7/1/05 1/1/06 7/1/06 1/1/07 7/1/07 1/1/08 7/1/08 1/1/09 7/1/09 1/1/10 7/1/10 1/1/11 7/1/11 1/1/12 7/1/12 1/1/13 7/1/13 1/1/14 7/1/14

$5,540,000 $5,630,000 $5,725,000 $5,825,000 $5,935,000 $6,050,000 $6,165,000 $6,295,000 $6,485,000 $6,620,000 $6,820,000 $6,970,000 $7,125,000 $7,285,000 $7,450,000 $7,620,000 $7,795,000 $7,980,000 $8,165,000 $8,360,000 $8,570,000 $8,780,000 $8,995,000 $9,220,000 $9,450,000 $9,685,000 $9,980,000 $10,235,000 $10,540,000 $10,810,000 $11,135,000 $11,420,000 $11,765,000 $12,070,000 $12,390,000 $12,715,000 $7,615,000 $7,405,000 $5,660,000 $5,675,000

$8,201,527 $8,111,502 $8,016,496 $7,912,014 $7,805,708 $7,689,976 $7,572,001 $7,445,618 $7,256,768 $7,117,341 $6,918,741 $6,768,701 $6,615,361 $6,455,048 $6,291,136 $6,119,786 $5,944,526 $5,761,343 $5,573,813 $5,377,853 $5,168,853 $4,958,888 $4,743,778 $4,518,903 $4,288,403 $4,052,153 $3,761,603 $3,505,866 $3,198,816 $2,928,728 $2,604,428 $2,319,094 $1,976,494 $1,667,663 $1,350,825 $1,025,588 $691,819 $491,925 $297,544 $148,968

$13,741,527 $13,741,502 $13,741,496 $13,737,014 $13,740,708 $13,739,976 $13,737,001 $13,740,618 $13,741,768 $13,737,341 $13,738,741 $13,738,701 $13,740,361 $13,740,048 $13,741,136 $13,739,786 $13,739,526 $13,741,343 $13,738,813 $13,737,853 $13,738,853 $13,738,888 $13,738,778 $13,738,903 $13,738,403 $13,737,153 $13,741,603 $13,740,866 $13,738,816 $13,738,728 $13,739,428 $13,739,094 $13,741,494 $13,737,663 $13,740,825 $13,740,588 $8,306,819 $7,896,925 $5,957,544 $5,823,968

$11,781,511

$334,015,000

$203,665,397

$537,680,397

$330,253,792

$15,069,803 ($1,330,351 ) $13,739,452 * $27,483,029 $27,478,510 $27,480,684 $27,477,619 $27,479,109 $27,477,442 $27,480,409 $27,480,922 $27,480,869 $27,476,666 $27,477,741 $27,477,681 $27,475,556 $27,482,469 $27,477,544 $27,478,522 $27,479,156 $27,481,412 $16,203,743

Outstanding * Net of $1 ,330,351.14 accrued interest.

Operating Budget -- Debt Service Page 76

PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICES

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Professional and Technical Services Page 77

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Professional and Technical Services Page 78

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 2002

OFFICE I ACCOUNT COUN

FY 2003 PURPOSE

APPROVED APPROVED OPERATING CAPITAL

Special litigation-outside counsel Eng.lArch. consultants

487.6 21.9

600.0 21.9

569.4 30

30.6 18.9

Employment/training Witness & court fees Other consultants

325.5

44.5 321.5 258.0

37.8 304.0 258.0

6.7 17.5

200.0 30.0

11.0 180.0 250.0

11.0 180.0 250.0

70.0 1,136.0 2,257.9

8.8 1,200.0 1,228.4

8.8 1,200.0 1,228.4

87.4

87.4

12.5 201.2

12.5 201.2

Police training. Psychological services for new applicants. Crime analysis, grants/project management services, outside training instructors

8.8 425.0

8.8 425.0

Insurance related technical training. Insurance broker's support.

900

900

Use of outside counsel as needed basis. Adjudication of contract disputes, Army Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals. Court expenses (court reporting, witnesses, etc.). Document imaging services for Third Party Liability.

SAFE Employment/training Transportation consultants Other consultants

Safety experts and safety training. Develop captive insurance program & industrial hygiene and indoor air quality investigations.

LCWC Employment/training Claims adjusters Other consultants

Settlement of worker's compensation claims. Worker's comp and ergonomics support, enterprise RMP.

QUAL Other consultants

Develop quality assurance policy manual and revise quality assurance procedures manual.

MTPD Employment/training Medical consultants Other consultants

353.8 8.0 1.2

CFO Employment/training Other consultants

ACCT Computer Consultants

150.0

Data warehousing for financial reports.

FIMA Employment/training Transportation consultants Computer consultants Other consultants

3.6

3.6

450.0 400.0 260.0

116.4 50.0

116.4 50.0

57.5

119.0

69.0

100.0

44.2

44.2

Operating and maintenance performance studies.

16.0

16.0

Sensitivity training for employees.

175.0 150.0

156.9 45.6

156.9 45.6

190.0

93.5

93.5

Metroaccess management organization study.

27.0

24.8

24.8

Evaluate quality control program.

16.0 4.0

16.0 4.0

16.0 4.0

Spot checkers for bus operations.

800.0

240.8

240.8

Engineering Consulting services.

400.0 70.0

383.4 67.9

383.4 67.9

Adjacent construction engineering evaluations. Energy management system & power rate consultants.

142.4

142.4

Bus Maintenance procedures and engineering.

Strategic Planning consulting services. Maintenance of operating bUdget system. Subsidy allocation study / benchmarking study.

TRES Investment consultants Other consultants

50.0

Financial advice on WMATA financial plan. Bond fiscal agent.

OPER Transportation consultants

MACS Other consultants

OPAS Employee training Transportation consultants

Scarce skilled technical training. Formal technical apprenticeship program.

ADAP Other consultants

BUSV Other consultants

BTRA Employee Training Other consultants

BMNT Employee Training Other consultants

1.0 0.7

OENG Eng.lArch. consultants

ENSP Eng.lArch. consultants Other consultants

BENG Eng.lArch. consultants

Operating Budget

Professional and Technical Services Page 79

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL SERVICE CONTRACTS FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

OFFICE / ACCOUNT QEAS

FY 2002

FY 2003

APPROVED

APPROVED

OPERATING

PURPOSE

CAPITAL

97.5

Quality enhancement and analysis.

FSVC Employee Training Other consultants

16.0 74.1

16.0 71.3

15.6 62.3

0.4 9.0

17.3

50.4

4.2

46.2

1,340.4 280.0 119.7

1,325.5 409.6 600.0

1,221.3 407.9 600.0

104.1 1.7

472.9 786.7

429.9 723.9

389.0 649.4

40.9 74.6

Four part-time physicians, misc. medical services. Actuarial services, performance appraisal, drug testing.

974.5

974.5

930.1

44.4

Labor legal services, arbitration, court reporting. Technical assistance to DBE firms.

380.5

380.5

Specialized training for staff development. Employment services and work life programs.

CAPM Employee Training

Design/Build Contract training for engineers.

ODEV Employment/training Computer service consultants Other consultants

Training for WMATA employees, in-house & outside. Computer consultants for WMATA training needs. Culture change, organization development activities.

HRMP Medical consultants Other consultants

LREL Other consultants

STRK Customer environment survey, Public perceptions of transit tracking stUdy, new market evaluation, MetroAccess customer satisfaction. Customer satisfaction measurement

Transportation consultants Computer service consultants

153.0

Other consultants

251.0

185.0

185.0

2.0

1.0

1.0

80.0

50.0

50.0

$200.0

$200.0

$200.0

350.0

350.0

350.0

318.8 360.0

242.4 128.0

238.6 128.0

175.0

175.0

175.0

Government legislative consultants.

750.0 750.0

289.5 45.0

289.5 45.0

Regional Bus Study, Service expansion plan. Strategic Planning.

192.0 650.0 $16,554.0

172.9 585.3 $13,579.4

172.9 585.3 $13,130.6

Training of staff on various computer system. Specialist support basic ordering agreement.

MREL Employment/training

Media training for senior staff.

CSVC Computer service consultants

Upgrade ARTS & data base.

SECT Acct./Audit. consultants

WMATA annual and management audits.

LAND Real estate consultants

Joint development, appraisal, survey, marketing

PRMT Computer Consultants Other consultants

3.8

Support for PIMS system. Quality control program for quality checks on inventory

GOVR Other consultants

BPAD Transportation consultants Other consultants

ITSV Employee Training Computer service consultants

TOTAL WMATA

$448.8

Operating Budget -- Professional and Technical Services Page 80

UNION STATISTICS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Union Statistics Page 81

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Union Statistics Page 82

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUMMARY UNION STATISTICS The fiscal 2003 budget contains 10,156 authorized positions of which 84.4% or 8,570 are members of the five union locals on the property, representing employees loosely categorized by job function. Two of these locals represent the hourly wage work force, one local represents a portion of the professional and administrative work force, and two other locals cover the police and security positions. The remaining classifications of administrative and management employees are not covered by union contracts. The following terms are widely used to describe the various unions and employees at WMATA: Hourly (Wage) Employee Unions: Local 689 Amalgamated Transit Union, (except Landover hourly). Local 922 Teamsters Union at Landover Bus Garage. Salary Employee Unions: Local 2 Office and Professional Employees International Union. Local 246 Teamsters representing Transit Police Officers. Local2246 Teamsters representing Special Police Officers. Non-Represented Employees (i.e., not represented by a union): Salaried positions in the management, administrative, supervisory or clerical work force that have been exempted from union participation. FY 2003 Positions Union Category Local 689 . 7,133 Local 922 . 368 Union Wage Subtotal .. 7,501

Distribution 70.23% 3.62% 73.85%

Local 2 689 Local 246 305 Local 2246 . . . . . . . . . . . .. 75 Union Salaried Subtotal 1,069

6.78% 3.00% 0.75% 10.53%

Union Subtotal

8,570

84.38%

Non-Union

1,586

15.62%

Total Positions . . . . . . .. 10,156

100%

Operating Budget -- Union Statistics Page 83

Average Pay By Union Category: L-689 & L-922 L-2 L-246 L-2246

$54,100 $65,800 $59,300 $34,800

"Pay" includes all base, progressions, overtime, vacation, sick, holiday, shift and differential pay.

Average Fringe Benefit Cost and Ratios by Position, for each Union: $13,100 per staff year or 25% of pay L-689 & 922 L-2 $16,400 per staff year or 23% of pay L-246 $19,000 per staff year or 32% of pay L-2246 $7,000 per staff year or 23% of pay "Fringe Benefits" include health insurance, retirement, payroll taxes, life and disability insurance.

Annual Average Pay by Job Category: . . . . . . . . .. Without Fringe With Fringe Bus Operator (L-689 & L-922) $67,200 $53,800 $71,900 $57,500 Bus Mechanic (L-689 & L-922) $79,400 Train Operator (L-689) $63,500 $74,400 Station Manager (L-689) $59,500 $71,900 Rail Mechanic (L-689) $57,500 $66,200 * Non-Op (L-689 & L922) $53,000 Salaried (L-2) $65,800 $80,900 $78,300 Police (L-246) $59,300

Hourly Rates of Pay by Job Category: Bus Operator (L689 & L922) Bus Mechanic (L689 & L922) Train Operator (L-689) Station Manager (L-689) Rail Mechanic

New Hire Rate Senior Rate $23.57 $13.15 $26.39 $19.73 $23.57 $13.15 $22.39 $12.50 $26.39 $19.73

These are the hourly pay rates in effect at the beginning of the fiscal year.

* Note: "Op" and "Non-Op" wage positions. The three position classifications of Bus Operator, Train Operator and Station Manager are referred to as Op positions. They are budgeted based on the daily operating schedules for Metrobus and Metrorail. Bus Operator and Station Manager positions can be either fulltime or part-time.

Non-Op refers to any wage position other than Bus Operator, Train Operator or Station Manager. Non-Op positions are budgeted by work location based on shift assignments and work levels at each facility in the Metro system.

Operating Budget -- Union Statistics Page 84

FRINGE BENEFITS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Operating Budget -- Fringe Benefits Page 85

This Page Not Used

Operating Budget -- Fringe Benefits Page 86

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 BUDGET SUMMARY FRINGE BENEFITS

Fringe benefit costs at WMATA comprise the normal business expenses incurred by an employer that are above and beyond the cost of employee pay. WMATA's fringe benefits are comprised of the insurance and retirement plans required to attract and maintain a large professional workforce, plus government mandated costs such as unemployment insurance, workers' compensation coverage and payroll taxes. All fringe benefits at WMATA fall into one of three categories of cost. The first category is allocated fringe benefits, which are calculated on an Authority-wide basis and then charged out to all offices and all modes for reporting purposes. Health insurance, life insurance, and pension costs are all examples of allocated fringe benefits. These fringe benefit expenses are allocated to each office based upon the budgeted payroll per office and then allocated by mode based on the budgeted payroll by mode. The fiscal 2003 total budget for allocated fringe benefits is $138.9 million. Second, unallocated fringe benefits (also referred to as "other" fringe benefits) are budgeted by office in amounts specific to the needs of each office. These "other" fringes are typically things such as meal reimbursements for employees working beyond their regular hours, tool allowances and costs for work uniforms. Detail on the $3.7 million fiscal 2003 total for this expense is made available in each office budget where this cost occurs. The third category of fringe benefit expense is workers' compensation cost. The fiscal 2003 budget requirement of $1.3 million is largely determined by actuarial analysis and governmental requirements. This line item expense is budgeted in the Office of Risk Management. In total for fiscal 2003, fringe benefit costs are: Allocated Fringe Benefits Other Fringe Benefits Workers' Compensation Total Fringe Benefits

$138,903,400 3,746,400 1,300,000 $143,949,800

Operating Budget -- Fringe Benefits Page 87

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 BUDGET SUMMARY PERSONNEL AND FRINGE BENEFITS BY UNION

Local 246 Transit Police

Local 2246 Special Police

SALARY TOTAL

AFL-CIO ATU Local-689

Teamsters

Non-Union

AFL-CIO OPIEU Local-2

Local-922

HOURLY TOTAL

AUTHORITY TOTAL

1,586 0 1,586

683 6 689

305 n/a 305

75 n/a 75

2,649 6 2,655

6,790 343 7,133

304 64 368

7,094 407 7,501

9,743 413 10,156

1,586.00 0.00 1,586.00

684.50 3.00 687.50

305.00 0.00 305.00

75.00 0.00 75.00

2,650.50 3.00 2,653.50

6,790.00 171.50 6,961.50

304.00 32.00 336.00

7,094.00 203.50 7,297.50

9,744.50 206.50 9,951.00

$179,586,147 $214,332 $9,986,913 ($9,016,061 ) $180,771,331

$345,521,161 $7,182,060 $15,132,429 ($7,369,014) $360,466,636

$15,886,730 $1,600,000 $324,019 ($152,860) $17,657,889

$361,407,891 $8,782,060 $15,456,448 ($7,521,874) $378,124,525

$540,994,038 $8,996,392 $25,443,361 ($16,537,935) $558,895,856

$52,217 ,300

$2,334,800

$11,411,200 $63,628,500

$305,400 $2,640,200

$0 $0 $0 $54,552,100 $0 $11,716,600 $66,268,700

$11,508,396 $4,246,122 $943,582 $2,465,500 $54,552,100 $728,600 $15,418,000 $89,862,300

$26,854,800 $0

$1,315,500 $1,032,600

$258,000 $27,112,800

$12,600 $2,360,700

$28,170,300 $1,032,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,600 $29,473,500

$41,535,300 $3,145,600 $2,030,000 $870,700 $1,051,800 $7,700 $400,000 $49,041,100

POSITIONS: Full Time Part Time

FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS: Full Time Part Time

PAYROLL COSTS: Full Time Pay Part Time Pay Overtime Pay Less: Turnover Savings

Budgeted Payroll

ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS Budgeted By Position: CIGNA PPO Kaiser Permanente GW Health Plan Blue Cross Health Trusts Dental Retiree Health

$115,433,876 $1,255,800 ($5,795,300) $110,894,376

$44,228,733 $214,332 $7,541,913 ($2,220,500) $49,764,478

$8,363,653 $2,745,404 $560,969 $246,600

$3,144,743 $1,308,587 $286,929

Health Insurance

$492,300 $2,580,400 $14,989,326

$200,100 $1,121,000 $6,061,359

Budgeted By Payroll: FICA Taxes Defined Benefit Pensions Defined Contrib Pensions Life Insurance Long Term Disability Accident Insurance Unemployment Taxes I Pension I Other

$8,206,200 $0 $1,015,000 $530,800 $717,100 $0 $79,400 $10,548,500

ALLOCATED FRINGE BENEFITS

Unallocated Fringe Benefits Workers' Compensation

$17,656,197

$2,267,341

$1,079,300 ($886,400) $17,849,097

$109,900 ($113,800) $2,263,441

$192,131 $95,684 $2,218,900 $36,200

$11,508,396 $4,246,122 $943,582 $2,465,500 $0 $728,600 $3,701,400 $23,593,600

$2,218,900

$324,015

$3,682,600 $0 $1,015,000 $187,800 $320,900 $0 $35,600 $5,241,900

$1,303,000 $2,113,000

$173,200 $0

$142,800 $1,900 $7,100 $12,800 $3,580,600

$9,300 $11,900 $600 $1,600 $196,600

$13,365,000 $2,113,000 $2,030,000 $870,700 $1,051,800 $7,700 $129,400 $19,567,600

$25,537,826

$11,303,259

$5,799,500

$520,615

$43,161,200

$90,741,300

$5,000,900

$95,742,200

$138,903,400

$585,100 $257,900

$254,200 $115,800

$112,500 $41,500

$27,700 $5,300

$979,500 $420,500

$2,631,300 $838,500

$135,700 $41,100

$2,767,000 $879,600

$3,746,400 $1,300,000

$0

$143,949,800

TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS:

Allocated Fringe Benefits BUdgeting Rates: Average Annual Pay Full Fringe Rate Variable Cost on Payroll Fixed Cost Per F.T.E.

$69,900 23%

$72,400

9.7%

23% 10.8%

$9,500

$8,800

$30,200

$68,100 24%

20.3%

23% 8.9%

$7,300

$4,300

$58,500 32%

Operating Budget -- Fringe Benefits Page 88

11.1% $8,900

$51,800 25%

$52,600 28%

$51,800 25%

$56,200

7.8%

13.6%

8.0%

25% 9.0%

$9,100

$7,900

$9,100

$9,000

REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Reimbursable Operating Projects Page 89

This Page Not Used

Reimbursable Operating Projects Page 90

SUMMARY REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS FISCAL YEAR 2003 (In millions of dollars)

Service

Expense Revenue

Subsidy

FTEs

PRTC

$5.41

$0.00

$5.41

90

DCDPW

$1.30

$0.00

$1.30

12

Greenbelt Shuttle

$0.09

$0.00

$0.09

2

Springfield Circulator

$0.33

$0.00

$0.33

8

Springfield Shuttle

$0.11

$0.00

$0.11

1

Crofton - New Carrollton

$0.17

$0.05

$0.12

3

Van Pools

$0.21

$0.00

$0.21

2

Access-to-Jobs

$0.35

$0.00

$0.35

3

National Aboretum

$0.12

$0.03

$0.08

1

Hybrid-Electric Bus Service

$0.53

$0.00

$0.53

8

Charles County Service

$0.79

$0.04

$0.75

10

Federal Triangle - Montgomery Mall

$0.23

$0.07

$0.16

7

Tyson's Reverse Commute

$0.65

$0.05

$0.60

12

Greenbelt - BWI

$1.15

$0.50

$0.65

9

Waldorf - Branch Avenue

$0.81

$0.12

$0.69

8

Laurel - Burtonsville Express

$0.15

$0.02

$0.13

2

Bethesda Reverse Commute

$0.36

$0.05

$0.30

5

College Park - Bethesda

$0.47

$0.07

$0.40

§

$13.22

$1.02

$12.21

TOTAL

189

Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 91

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 BUDGET REIMBURSABLE OPERATING PROJECTS

The projects budgeted here are for new services or for items that incur operating expenses for which there is a specific funding source other than local operating subsidy. The concept of "New Service" is a direct offshoot of the Regional Mobility Panel's recommendations to stabilize and strengthen Metrobus through a series of initiatives. Through the Panel's efforts, a new spirit reinvigorated Metrobus and provided a nationally recognized system a means to compete in terms of cost effectiveness and efficiency with private carriers. A part of this competitiveness was the acceptance of a New Service Agreement by Local 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, which established new wages and benefits for bus operators operating new service routes. In Fiscal 1999, the Authority established a new budget category to account for New Service being operated by Metrobus. New Service is the portion of bus service not previously performed by either the Authority or directly by a Compact Jurisdiction, and where a separate subsidy payment is made. Thus, these costs and revenues are not included in either the regional or non-regional bus budgets. Examples of new service include the Prince William County Service, and the Greenbelt Shuttle. POTOMAC & RAPPAHANNOCK TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (PRTC). WMATA was awarded a multi-year contract (three year base, with two one-year options) to operate local and express bus service in Prince William County beginning on July 6, 1998. The multi-million dollar annual contract marks the first time that the Authority has competed successfully with private carriers to provide bus service. A staff of 90 Metrobus employees will operate and maintain 75 buses owned by Prince William County, which are located in the County's transportation facility in Dale City, Virginia. The service operates in Woodbridge, Dale City, Manassas and Manassas Park and provides bus service to downtown Washington, and to the Pentagon, Crystal City, Franconia-Springfield and West Falls Church Metro stations, in addition to local routes in Prince William County. The Fiscal year 2003 is the second of the two one-year options with an estimated amount of $5.4 million. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (DC DPW). On November 10, 1999, a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the District of Columbia and the Authority was entered into for the duration of one year with two oneyear options. WMATA will provide technical staff and resources to assist the District's Department of Public Works (DC-DPW) in administering their street, highway, and bridge construction and rehabilitation programs. A staff of 12 limited-duration WMATA employees will be hired for the duration of this MOA. All work associated with the MOA are reimbursed by the DC-DPW. The second option year runs November 2001 through November 2002. The Fiscal 2003 budget annual impact is $1.3 million. GREENBELT SHUTTLE. The Greenbelt parking lot is larger than all other parking lots in the Metro system, with 3,364 parking spaces. Estimated walking time from the station to outlying areas of the parking lot is seven minutes. A shuttle operates throughout the parking lot to transport patrons between five shelters and the station. There is no fee for this shuttle. This project, which began in January 1997, is paid for by the State of

Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 92

Maryland. Two additional part-time operators are required to operate this service. Operating expenses are budgeted at $90,000. The shuttle service will operate as long as funding is available and there is a sufficient demand to justify continuation of the service.

SPRINGFIELD CIRCULATOR SERVICE. Fairfax County, in conjunction with the Transportation Association of Greater Springfield (TAGS), has requested this service be operated to enhance public transportation and decrease traffic congestion. The Authority will purchase and operate 20-passenger buses on weekdays and service five stops, including Franconia-Springfield Metro Station. The Authority will be reimbursed for all operating and capital costs through funding sources provided by Virginia's CMAQ funds ($650,000) and matching funds from Fairfax County and TAGS ($180,000). This service has added an additional 6 operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels. SPRINGFIELD SHUTTLE. As part of the 1-95/ 1-395/ 1-495 Interchange Reconstruction Congestion Mitigation Program, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) has approved funding for the Authority to purchase and operate a 20-passenger bus. This service will provide shuttle service to and from the parking structure at the Franconia-Springfield Metro Station (when garage capacity meets 90%) to a remote lot at Springfield Mall. The service will operate during peak and limited mid-day hours, Monday through Friday. This service requires one bus operator. CROFTON - NEW CARROLLTON SERVICE. The Washington Suburban Transit Commission has requested and the Board of Directors approved expanding the Transit Zone to designated areas within Anne Arundel County, in and around Crofton, Maryland. At the request of the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA), the Authority will operate service for residents of the Crofton area to the New Carrollton Metro Station; provide new service to growing but unserved areas of Bowie, Maryland; and add service to the Bowie Park & Ride lot to alleviate overcrowding. The cost of the service will be reimbursed 100% by Maryland. This service has added an additional 2 operators and 1 mechanic to approved staffing levels. The operating expenses are budgeted at $170,000. VAN POOLS. This program is to assist Northern Virginia and the region in meeting air quality conformity through emission reductions by increasing the utilization of Van Pools and the amount of federal formula funds (Section 5307) allocated to the region and the Authority. The Van Pool incentive program is the only emissions reduction program that will be financially self-sustaining. The Authority has been asked to coordinate and manage the program because it is the only regional agency that can accept and disburse these federal funds. A portion of the funds received will be used to pay the administrative costs of the Authority. The budget for Fiscal 2003 is $210,000, including two additional positions. ACCESS-TO-JOBS. This program has five grant elements and when complete will provide a "One Stop" employment trip information, referral and dispatching center within the Authority, as well as provide trip brokerage services, outreach and reverse commute to the suburban job market. The program will require three reimbursable temporary Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 93

positions, which will remain for the duration of the grant. In Fiscal 2003, WMATA will receive $350, 000 for direct expenses.

NATIONAL ABORETUM (X6). This program provides service between National Arboretum and Columbus Plaza NE (Union Station). The Fiscal 2003 operating expense is budgeted at $120,000. HYBRID-ELECTRIC BUS SERVICE. This is a new experimental service using hybridelectric buses in the City of Falls Church. The agreement is between the Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC), the City of Falls Church and WMATA. The Authority will operate and maintain the buses by providing one additional mechanic and four operators. The Fiscal 2003 budget is estimated at $530,000 and will be fully reimbursed by NVTC. CHARLES COUNTY SERVICE - INDIANA HEAD EXPRESS LINE (ROUTE W19). The Charles County program provides service between the Naval Surface Warfare Center (Charles Co.) to Southern Avenue Station during rush hour, both inbound and outbound service. It requires seven NSA operators and three mechanics at a budgeted cost of $790,000. FEDERAL TRIANGLE - MONTGOMERY MALL (Route N7). This program provides service between Federal Triangle and the Montgomery Mall. The Fiscal 2003 operating expense budget for this program is $230,000 and will be reimbursed by the State of Maryland. TYSON'S REVERSE COMMUTE. The Tyson's reverse commute program provides service between L'Enfant Plaza in downtown Washington, DC and Tysons Corner in Fairfax County, VA for both inbound and outbound service seven days a week. The estimated Fiscal 2003 budget expense to operate this program will be $650,000 and is reimbursable by the District of Columbia. GREENBELT - BWI AIRPORT (Route B30). This program is a two-way non-stop service every 40 minutes between Greenbelt Station and Baltimore-Washington International Airport, seven days a week, from the first train arrival until the last train departure at Greenbelt Station. The Fiscal 2003 estimated expense is budgeted at $1.2 million. WALDORF - BRANCH AVENUE (Route C18). This loop service operates every 30 minutes during the weekday, midday and weekday evenings at times when the MTA contract service between southern Maryland and Washington, DC, via Waldorf is not operating. Service is also provided on Saturdays every 30 minutes between 7:45 AM and 9:30 PM. The Clinton Park and Ride Lot is served on all trips both southbound and northbound. (Initially the Southbound Maryland Hospital Center was also served on all trips both southbound and northbound. Service was discontinued at the request of the owner of the hospital and adjacent properties, who objected to complaints of impacts of bus operation and who rejected all proposals of alternative routings that could serve the

Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 94

hospital). The estimated expense is budgeted at $810,000.

LAUREL - BURTONSVILLE EXPRESS LINE (Routes Z9, Z29). The Laurel Burtonsville Express Line is an extended service between Laurel and Burtonsville added to pre-existing Burtonsville - Silver Spring express service. This two-way operation, rush hour only, with intervals of 15 to 40 minutes on the Burtonsville - Laurel extension. The expected expense budget is $150,000. BETHESDA REVERSE COMMUTE (Route B11). This serves as a one-way rush hour only every 20 minutes between Rosslyn Station and Medical Center Station via Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda Station and Rockville Pike. The service operates northbound in the AM rush and southbound in the PM rush. The Fiscal 2003 projected cost is at $360,000. COLLEGE PARK - BETHESDA (Route J4). This program is a two-way rush hour only servicing every 20 minutes between College Park Station and Bethesda Station via University Blvd., Piney Branch Rd., Wayne Ave., Silver Spring Station and East-West Highway. This serves all stops on the University of Maryland Campus but only selected stops between Adelphi Rd. and Bethesda Station. The estimated expense is budgeted at $470,000.

Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 95

This Page Not Used

Reimbursable Operating Projects -- Financial Summary Page 96

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Capital Improvement Program Page 97

This Page Not Used

Capital Improvement Program Page 98

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 ·2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM

OVERVIEW

The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority maintains and operates the second largest rail and fifth largest bus system in America, measured in terms of ridership. Metro provides intermodal bus and rail transportation for residents of the metropolitan area as well as visitors to the nation's capital from across the country and around the world. A sizable capital investment has been made by Federal, state and local governments to provide such a system and care must be taken to ensure that this investment is maintained to the highest standard so that it continues to provide safe, clean, reliable, and comfortable service. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is based on a comprehensive re-examination of WMATA's 25 year requirements and the need to align resources to adequately rehabilitate the system and grow ridership. The CIP includes the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP), the System Access/Capacity Program (SAP) and the System Expansion Program (SEP). The fiscal 2003-2008 CIP continues a consolidated program by combining: Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP)-to address the rehabilitation requirements of the 103 mile Metrorail system and the Metrobus system, System Access/Capacity Program (SAP)-to address the needs of ridership growth and enhancement of accessibility within the existing system by providing for rolling stock, parking and facilities requirements, and System Expansion Program (SEP)-to address system expansion needs requested by sponsoring agencies.

Funding Levels The funding requirement in the CIP forfiscal2003 totals $522.4 million and the fiscal 20032008 program totals $1,910.7 million. Each program's projects and funding will be discussed below.

Capital Improvement Program -- Overview Page 99

CIP BUDGET SUMMARY $ IN MILLIONS

PROGRAM

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

TOTAL

IRP

375.4

316.9

283.2

216.1

242.6

260.4

1,694.7

SAP

115.9

18.6

7.3

0

0

0

141.8

SEP

31.0

20.1

9.5

7.5

3.0

3.0

74.1

522.4

672.5

300.0

223.6

245.6

263.4

1,910.7

TOTAL

The fiscal 2003 - 2008 IRP has been developed to include system rehabilitation requirements, exclude any system expansion element, and provide for only a limited amount of system enhancements as assets are replaced, thus the name IRP truly reflects the nature of the program. The program is consistent with the Inter-jurisdictional Funding Agreement through fiscal 2003 and Board Guidance. The fiscal 2003 program is approved for implementation and the fiscal 2004-2008 program is approved for planning purposes. The funding requirement of the approved fiscal 2003 IRP is $375.4 million. The program is driven by the need to rehabilitate and replace facilities, track and structures ($102.9 million), which accounts for 27% of the funds required in the approved fiscal 2003 program. Due to the award of the contract to rehabilitate 364 Breda rail cars in 2001, bus and rail rolling stock rehabilitation, including preventive maintenance ($96.2 million), accounts for just 26% of the funds required. Major projects approved in fiscal 2003 include the procurement of CNG buses and the construction of a second CNG fueling facility, escalator overhaul and elevator rehabilitation, the escalator canopy installation, station enhancements, safety and security improvements (subject to approval of federal funds), information technology enhancements, and parking lot rehabilitation. The Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program (ERRP), adopted by the Board on April 22, 1999 continues in it's fourth and final year. The funding for the approved fiscal 2003 - 2008 IRP totals $2,102.9 million, including the use and pay back of a loan guarantee under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998 (TIFIA). The program also includes a funding ramp-up of $40 million, $100 million, and $170 million in fiscal 2006, fiscal 2007, and fiscal 2008 respectively.

Capital Improvement Program -- Overview Page 100

The approved fiscal 2003 - 2008 SAP includes project funding for the DC Convention Center, King Street, Ballston and Clarendon Station Improvements, the Crystal City Canopy, Regional Bike Racks, and parking facilities at Huntington, Franconia-Springfield, West Falls Church/Dunn Loring, College Park and New Carrollton stations. Projects funded under the Core Capacity section of the SAP include buses and an expanded railcar maintenance facility at New Carrollton. The approved fiscal 20003 program is budgeted at $115.9 million. The approved fiscal 2003-2008 budget totals $141 .8 million.

The approved fiscal 2003-2008 SEP has been developed to include reimbursable projects requested by sponsoring agencies. Three projects in the adopted fiscal 2003 program include Project Development, Largo Extension and Parking, Dulles PE/NEPA, Purple Line DEIS and New York Avenue Station. The approved fiscal 2003 program is budgeted at $31 million. The approved fiscal 2003-2008 budget totals $74.1 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Overview Page 101

""Uo CO-o Q)Q)

CD ~: .....l.Q)

FY 2003 Funding and Requirements

0-

!\)3 -0 ~

o

<

CD

3

Funding

Requirements

:J

by Fund Source

by Category

CD

r-+

""U ~

o co

;:;::::::::::;;:;;I;I,ll'l

~

Rolling Stock, Preventive Maint.

m~~~"HO:%J~'. '::::::::::::::::~$~::::::::""

Q)

3

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

,'.,

$96.2

\::iiiii::i::j/\·;
Systems $32.9£

":J

I

Local $82.1

Q)

:J ()

Facilities, Track & Structures $102.9

Q)

--I Q)

afety & Security * $107.5

0CD

(J)

I Total $375.41

I Total $ in millions

* Subject to availability of federal funds

$375.4

I

n

TABLE NO.1 FY 2003 - 2008

Q)

"D r-+

-:3

"D ""'I 0

< CD

:3

TOTAL

ram be ond FY 08 is for information onl TOTAL FY10 FY 11 FY12

TOTAL

FY 03·08

FY 09·12

FY 03·12

JUNE 20, 2002

DESCRIPTION

Q)

FY04

FY03

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

SYSTEMS COMPREHENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM ATC AND POWER SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT UPS/ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION FARE COLLECTION EQUIPMENT REGIONAL FARE INTEGRATION BUS FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

CD

TOTAL

:::J

2,305 18,982 5,860 1,295 3,000

~ ~

0 29,173 7,756 5,891 0 0

0 19,739 7,243 5,903 0 0

0 21,188 8,753 8,168 0 0

0 24,488 10,457 6,909 0 0

4,067 132,779 47,759 28,876 3,000 1,417

~ ~

~

~

41,854

217,898

21,009 2,134

24,987 2,134

109,904 12,804

1,762 19,209 7,690 710 0 0

r-+

"'U ""'I 0

CO

TRACK AND STRUCTURES ROW TRACK AND STRUCTURES REHABILITATION STATION TUNNEL LEAK MITIGATION

""'I

Q)

TOTAL

:3 I I

"

10,203

9,198

33,520 2,134

10,987 2,134

2,134 -- - -2,134 -- ---- - - -

---~

~

11,332

35,654

13,121

23,143

27,121

122,708

~

~

300

300

~

9,900

47,113

~

~

300

300

~

9,900

47,113

11,000 10,000

51,000 59,500

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

:::J

TOTAL

Q)

:::J ()

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT

Q)

-

--l

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~ ~ ~

~

21,000

110,500

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

~

~

~

~

~

20,700

124,200

TOTAL

20,700

~

20,700

~

~

20,700

124,200

TOTAL

0

~

~

0

0

0

8,000

375,424

316,917

283,248

216,119

242,596

260,421

1,694,725

268,400

435,000

435,000

435,000

1,573,400

3,268,125

352,600

320,600

285,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

2,102,900

435,000

435,000

435,000

435,000

1,740,000

3,842,900

108,581

__142,404

174,579

408,175

166,600

0

0

0

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP)

Q)

TOTAL

0-

ml

FINANCING COSTS

GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING

"'U Q)

CO CD ...,\

0

W

(FINANCING) PAYBACK

(22,824)

Notes: 11 SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF FEDERAL FUNDS 2/PAYBACK FOR FY 00-02 N:\FY2003\CIP\TABLE1-FY03-08wilhCNG.QPW

~

~

166,600 2/

574,7752/

IJO

Q)

TABLE NO.1 FY 2003 - 2008

Q)

COu

CD r-t -J,Q)

JUNE 20, 2002

••

FY03

DESCRIPTION

FY04

FY07

FY06

FY05

TOTAL

FY08

U ""'I

0

< CD 3

CD :J

r-t

IJ ""'I 0 CO ""'I

Q)

3

" :J

()

___ •

__

FY 10

0 0 53,975

0 0 55,448

0 0 56,967

123,100 0 218,130

~

~

~

56,967

341,230

0 1,000

0 1,100

~

~

~

0 1,100 814

0 1,100 0

0 1,100 0

2,500 5,900 28,724

~

~

~

~

19,223 3,800 11,432

32,227 3,100 0

29,336 3,200 0

3,858 5,823 20,895

3,306 8,387

3,306 12,664

12,300 2,700 0 4,306 13,079

9,300 2,100 0 5,151 14,800

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

50,000 35,000 WMATA CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN 0 20,000 CHEMICAL SENSORS 1,000 0 BIOLOGICAL SENSORS 2,000 0 DECONTAMINATION 6,000 0 INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS/BUS FACILITIES 7,000 7,000 ADDITIONAL CAMERAS ON BUSES 16,500 15,000 PUBLIC ADDRESS UPGRADE FOR RAIL STATIONS ID CARD ACCESS FOR SENSITIVE FIELD LOCATlONS~ ~

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

~

CNG BUSES AND FACILITY CLEAN FLEET PROGRAM BUS REPLACEMENT TOTAL

_

59,500 0 0

63,600 0 0

59,500

~

2,500 500

0 0 51,740

-1 Q) 0CD (J)

____

."FY11

._ •••••••••

FV12

___ .0

•••

TOTAL

TOTAL

FY09·12

FY 03·12

f---f----

ROLLING STOCK: RAIL EMERGENCY RAIL REHABILITATION RAILCAR ENHANCEMENTS RAIL CAR REHABILITATION TOTAL

-~ - ~

__

37,124

1-----

---

f-----

---

_ . ~ ~ ~ - -

PASSENGER FACILITIES ESCALATOR REHABILITATION/MAINTENANCE ELEVATOR REHABILITATION ESCALATOR CANOPIES STATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PARKING LOT REHABILITATION MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION TOTAL

_

65,031

11,700 2,100 0 4,323 16,900 12,976

114,086 17,000 11,432

~

47,999

328,817

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

85,000 20,000 1,000 2,000 6,000 14,000 31,500 10,000

0

0

0

0

169,500

8,100 5,750 15,330 0 0 4,600

47,689 32,250 82,863 375 500 23,958

33,780

187,635

24,250 71,653 90,396

~---

SAFETY AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS 1/

Q)

-

••

ROLLING STOCK: BUS

Q)

:J

. _ •••

FY03'08

0~3

_

FY09

TOTAL

107,500

MAINTENANCE FACILITIES RAIUBUS STRUCT. FIELD BASES, YARDS & SHOPS 8,287 REPAIRABLES 5,000 BUS/RAIL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT 8,831 SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE 375 NORTHERN BUS GARAGE 500 RAIL WORK EQUIPMENT/LOCOMOTIVES ~

7,719 5,150 13,405 0 0

8,333 5,300 16,277 0 0

7,390 5,450 13,520 0 0

7,860 5,600 15,500 0 0

~

~

~

~

~

~

TOTAL

~

30,565

33,360

- - ---1-----

---

- - - - -

()

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY TABLE NO.2 FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2003·2008 IRP (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

Ql

"'0 r+ Ql

--

~I<

FY 03 (FED 02) TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET

FY 04 (FED 03)

FY 05 (FED 04)

FY 06 (FED 05)

FY 07 (FED 06)

FY 08 (FED 07)

TOTALS

352,600

320,600

~85,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

2,102,900

2,000

0

0

0

0

0

2,000

CD.

TO BE FUNDED BY:

CD. :J

REPROGRAMMED FUNDS

-0 1

SECTION 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS

95,067

90,738

90,738

90,738

90,738

90,738

548,757

20% LOCAL MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS

23,766

22,684

22,684

22,684

22,684

22,684

137,186

SECTION 5309 RAIL MODERNIZATION GRANTS

58,159

70,628

70,628

70,628

70,628

70,628

411,299

20% MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS

14,540

17,657

17,657

17,657

17,657

17,657

102,825

BUS/RAIL REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 11

7,800

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

15,300

LOCAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS

5,000

5,150

5,300

5,450

5,600

5,750

32,250

29,962

42,189

68,439

107,989

168,139

217,989

634,707

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

48,324

DC BUS SIGNAGE

252

0

0

0

0

0

252

DC FUNDING FOR NORTHERN BUS GARAGE

500

0

0

0

0

0

500

FEDERAL FUNDING FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS 2/

107,500

62,000

0

0

0

0

169,500

TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING

352,600

320,600

285,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

~900

(FINANCING)/PAYBACK

(22,824)

3,683

1,752

108,581

142,404

174,579

_ _ 408,175

TOTAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING

375,424

~J7

283,248

. 242,596

260,421

1,694,725

:3

r+ ""'I

c8. ""'I

Ql

:3 I I

11 _. :J Ql

:JI ()

;,

ADDITIONAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS

FEDERAL TEA-21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT)

0-

ml

-0 Ql

CO CD

->

0

01

11 FY 2003 INCLUDES 4,300 REPAIRABLE IGF, 2,000 TAX ADVANTAGE LEASE IGF AND 1,500 BUS AND RAIL IGF. 2/ SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF FEDERAL FUNDS. n.\fy2003\cip\lable2·GMwitllCNG.QPW

~~

""Uo Q)

System Access/Capacity Program Proposed FY 2003 • 2008 Projects

Q)

CD"D

-~~~~~-~--~-----------

JUNE 20,2002

ro ;:;:

DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

o

' " , .'"',,•• "',' ,'.,

~~"~,~~~~I~~

~Q)

~

"D ""'I

o ro<

3

ro

DC CONVENTION CENTER

27,3001

VIENNA PARKING GARAGE

27,100

KING STREET STATION BALLSTON STATION IMPROVEMENTS

2,400

2,400

29,700!

12,300

2,800

2,800

27, 100 1 15,100

10,900

19,600

200

1,000

ROSSLYN 51 ATlON IMPROVEMENTS

350i

300

300)

O:i

o

I

01

120,000

0

WEST FALLS CHURCH BUS BAY

0

0

17,100

2,000

0

01

2,000

0

0

1,000

0

0

:}

VIRGINIA PARKING LOT SIGNAGE

1,000

VIRGINIA BUS WAITING AREA ROOFS

1,562

Glenmont

120

0-

ro en

900 0

3,054

0

1,000

0

1,562

oi'

120

1

I

01

1,6001

1,6°°1

o

Shady Grove (1700 spaces) if

-1 Q)

~I

150 i 1,000! 1,645

0

3,054

Q)

I

1,645

900

DULLES CORRIDOR BUSES

I

150

1,645

VIRGINIA BUS FACILITY EXPANSION

550

120,000

0

17,100

REGIONAL BUS BIKE RACKS

Q)

1,562

550

ARLINGTON CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

PARKING SPACES:

300

1,100,1 291t

1,562

BUSES (50)

VIRGINIA BUS STOP BOXES

01

0'

BUSES FOR DC

:}

350 Or

291

RAIL CARS (50)

()

7,300

1

1,100

SHIRUNGTON BUS TERMINALS

REGIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER

500

,

CRYSTAL CITY CANOPY

ITS COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT

."

PROJECT

FY08

200

""U

3

FY 07

3,100

SILVER SPRING TRANSIT CENTER

""'I

TOTAL

FY06

8001

PENTAGON BUS TERMINALS

Q)

<

8,700

r-+

CD

Proposed"

FY05

CLARENDON STATION IMPROVEMENTS

:}

""'I

',"",

I

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS

0)3

,>, , __~.~

o

Grosvenor (1300 spaces) 1/ Huntington (924 spaces)

19,200

Franconia/Springfield (1000 spaces)

19,200

19,200

1,000

15,800 13,000

West Falls Church/Dunn Loring (600 spaces)

12,000

College Park (1219 spaces)

14,200

14,200

New Carrollton (1776 spaces)

20,400

20,4001

Reimbursable Total

500

7,300

0

0

.. :1···

85,045

CORE CAPACITY Funded Core Capacity BUSES 2f

3,700 o nnni

RAn MAINTENANCE YARDS/SHOPS ~

21, 800

18,100

... "',,,,,,

_ _ _ 'r'_

1

35,000

01 v'

""~-,--

Funded Core Capacity

,

11 BUILT BY OTHERS

2/ FY 2004 PROCUREMENT SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS N:\fy2003\cip\table1-SAP,wb3

0,

24:::::1

329,384

,jo,ruu

IO,'IUU

u

0

0

::>O,OUUI

115,945

18,600

7,300

0

0

141,845

388,184

i

()

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM Proposed FY 2003 - 2008 Projects

Q)

"0 r-+ Q)

3

..-

JUNE 20, 2002

DESCRIPTION

APPROVED

Proposed

FY02 &PRIOR

"0

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

,.,1:>1"\'

FY07

"""I

o

< CD 3

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

7,300

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

406,500

12,800

17,100

6,500

4,500

37,200

3,000

3,000

18,000

25,300

40,900

447,400

2,800

2,800

40,000

0

10,600

10,600

10,600

89,400

1,800

1,800

91,200

CD

::i

r-+

lJ

LARGO EXTENSION AND PARKING

"""I

o co"""I Q)

3 "'Tl ::i

DULLES PEINEPA

PURPLE LINE DEIS 11

Q)

::i () Q)

NEW YORK AVENUE STATION

-l Q)

----------- f---~~---------

0CD

(j)

TOTAL

540,400 --'---._-_.

1/SUBJECT TO FUNDING APPROVAL N:\FY2003\CIP\TABLE1-SEPQPW

lJ

Q)

co CD

~

o -.....J

31,000

20,100

9,500

7,500

3,000

3,000

74,100

614,500

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: CNG Buses and Facility

DESCRIPTION: This project funds the replacement of older buses and will ensure safe and continued service to the Washington Metropolitan Area. Fiscal 2003 funds the first increment of 250 eNG buses (procured with fiscal 2003 and 2004 funds) and the construction of a second refueling facility. JUSTIFICATION: The current average age of the WMATA bus fleet is 7.9 years. FTA's bus procurement guidelines recommend an average bus life of 6 years with a with a bus life expectancy of 12 years. However, a mid-life bus overhaul program is extending the life of Metrobuses to 15 years. This will allow for a reduction in new bus procurements, while maintaining a bus fleet that is efficient and provides a high level of service to customers.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $341,230 $ In Thousands

---~6-3-,6-00---~------------

t

I

FY03

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 108

FY08

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Rail Rehabilitation Program DESCRIPTION:

This project funds acceleration of rail car reliability and major maintenance programs. Included in the program are accelerated major maintenance and interim rehabilitation of rail friction brakes, rail car doors, car bodies, wayside equipment, communications, rail car couplers, HVAC systes, battery systems and propulsion systems. Also included are engineering action teams to focus on resolving rail car problems, accelerating maintenance and rehabilitation activities, supporting resolution of critical ATC issues and identifying and resolving train control vital relay issues. This project will also fund acceleration of the Breda rehabilitation program, consolidation of a seven year floating slab repair program into four years and additional maintenance efforts on escalators. Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of rail car rehabilitation, engineering, and operations support. JUSTIFICATION:

In 1999, operational issues on Metrorail highlighted the need to advance critical maintenance projects that will address performance related problems. The Board directed that the General Manager prepare a plan in response to the current emergency on Metrorail that identified the most urgently needed repairs that could significantly correct and improve the reliability of the rail system. This plan was approved by the Board on April 22, 1999. This plan includes immediate, near-term and longer term elements to maximize rapid implementation in a way that will contribute to tangible and immediate benefits for rail operations while addressing other issues that could affect future system performance.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $2,500

$ In Thousands

I

I I I

FY03

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

._--,o~_J FYOB

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 109

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Enhancements

DESCRIPTION: This project funds the retrofit or replacement of rail car related equipment that will improve the accessibility, safety, diagnostic capability, maintenance, appearance and reliability of the rail car fleet. Fiscal 2003 continues the funding for inter-car barriers.

JUSTIFICATION: Recent technological advances in rail crash worthiness, accessibility and diagnostic capabilities have made it possible to improve the performance of the existing rail car fleet.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I

$ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

Total: $5,900

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 110

FY08

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Rail Car Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION: This project will enhance rail car reliability with the mid-life overhaul of 364 Breda cars including propulsion, brake, door controls, signs, interior, truck, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, lighting, communications, high voltage and control cables systems/equipment. Fiscal 2003 funds project management and engineering. JUSTIFICATION: The Breda car overhaul includes the replacement of the DC propulsion system with an AC drive system which will result in lower maintenance costs for the remaining life of the cars. Substantial power savings may be derived from the regenerative braking system. In addition, the friction brake hydraulic, pneumatic and electronic control systems and door system components are nearing the end of their useful life. This rehabilitation must be performed to avoid the additional maintenance caused by worn out parts and electrical system degradation. BUDGET SCHEDULE I

Total: $28, 724

1

$ In Thousands

13,040

FY03

FY04

FY05

~81

4

FY06

~o~. FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 111

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003- 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Rehabilitation/Maintenance DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following: • •

escalator maintenance, escalator rehabilitation.

These projects will fund the maintenance and the rehabilitation of escalators. The escalator rehabilitation includes the rehabilitation and code upgrade of the Westinghouse modular escalators beginning with the oldest and poorest performing equipment in the highest use stations, the installation of a comb plate, impact detectors, the relocation of emergency stop switches, and the installation of equipment to automatically report all escalator faults to the maintenance control center. Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of the multi-year rehabilitation of escalators, with 41 scheduled for rehabilitation and the continuation of maintenance outsourcing. JUSTIFICATION:

The escalator overhaul/rehabilitation program is the result of a detailed staff investigation, system wide inspection effort and contractor study to identify needed enhancement and rehabilitation to prevent deterioration and to improve the reliability and safety of the escalator system. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $114,086 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 112

FY08

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Elevator Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION: This project funds the rehabilitation/replacement of WMATA elevators. It includes three elements. 1) The rehabilitation ofthe elevators that have exceeded their useful life or have deteriorated beyond economic repair. This element includes: durable stainless steel cabs, enhanced ventilation systems, installation of energy efficient fluorescent light fixtures, refurbished elevator housings and sill structures, and installation of state-of-the-art controllers and motor systems. The integrity of hydraulic pistons and cylinders will be tested and replaced as required. 2) Upgrade of 110 elevators in key stations to bring the units into conformance with current ADA requirements. Fiscal 2003 funds the award of a contract to rehabilitate 19 elevators.

JUSTIFICATION: Normal and abnormal use, as well as vandalism has caused the deterioration of elevators in the rail system. Elevator rehabilitation of major systems must be accomplished because of high failure rates which result in elevator downtime. The modernization effort must also be accomplished to assure that system elevators meet ADA code requirements and that all equipment failures are identified, promptly reported and addressed.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total:$17,OOO I $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 113

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Escalator Canopies

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds design and installation of canopies with lighting at various locations. Included in the project will be waterproofing and repair of structures surrounding exterior escalators. Approximately 53 escalators are exposed to the elements and will be covered by canopies over the next several years. Fiscal 2003 funds the completion of designs, construction for 3 pilot sites, the initiation of designs and construction for the remaining 43 signature sites.

JUSTIFICATION:

Covering outside escalators will reduce maintenance to escalators due to weather damage and minimize customer complaints. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $11,432 $ In Thousands

11,432

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 114

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Station Enhancement Program

DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following: • • • •

DC Signage, Station Enhancements, Which Way Sign Initiative, Customer Communications Initiative.

This project funds the rehabilitation, replacement and installation of concrete structures, granite edge stones, paver quarry tiles, sidewalks, elastomeric roof coatings, metal gratings, stairwells, stairways, platform shelters, doors, hatches, exterior lighting, station signage and graphics. Fiscal 2003 funds 14 major and 14 mini enhancements at 28 rail stations, various sign age improvements and communications. JUSTIFICATION:

The station structures are aging and must be rehabilitated. Vaulted ceiling spalling and deteriorated concrete has to be repaired to maintain structural integrity. Surface station elastomeric roofing replacement is necessary to prevent accelerated deterioration. Station walkways must be maintained to provide an adequate and safe environment for our patrons. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $24,250

I

$ In Thousands

I

l

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 115

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Parking Lot Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the rehabilitation of asphalt pavement, curbs, curbs/gutter, and sidewalks; drainage systems, signage, electrical wiring/conduits, pavement marking/striping, structures, station access roadways/bus bays, and parking lot equipment such as lot full signs and cashier booths. Fiscal 2003 funds the major rehabilitation of Anacostia Parking Garage, Addison Road Parking Garage seal replacement, repaving of various parking lots, rehabilitation of bus Kiss and Ride facilities, and design forthe Vienna Parking Structure rehabilitation. JUSTIFICATION:

The parking facilities are deteriorating due to weathering and normal wear and tear. Some of the facilities have been in operation for over 25 years. The asphalt paving, concrete sidewalks/roadways, and bus loops have deteriorated and require rehabilitation in order to maintain safe and reliable service. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $71,653 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 116

FYOB

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Mechanical Systems Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION: This project provides funding for the following: • • • •

station and tunnel rehabilitation, fire system rehabilitation, station chiller rehabilitation, drainage pumping/sewer rehabilitation.

These projects include rehabilitation and replacement of aging and deteriorated equipment including ventilation equipment, standpipes and sprinklers, air conditioning and underground station and tunnel drainiage/sewage equipment and associated electrical systems. Fiscal 2003 activities include rehabilitation of 20 station and tunnel ventilation systems, replacement of 11 chiller units, 13 cooling towers, 7 station air handling units, 23 drainage pumping stations, and 19 sewage ejector systems.

JUSTIFICATION: It is vital to replace tunnel ventilation systems, meet National fire code mandates requiring installation of new fire suppression systems, and to maintain mechanical systems to ensure that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $90,396 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 117

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Safety and Security Improvements

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds several projects to provide enhanced safety and security to our customers, employees and to the infrastructure. The project which began in fiscal 2002, is 100% federally funded. Fiscal 2003 funds a back-up operations center, sensing equipment, public address enhancements in rail stations, cameras on buses, and security equipment throughout the system.

JUSTIFICATION:

The tragic events of September 11, 2001 have increased the requirements for safety on Metrobus, Metrorail and in all WMATA facilities. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $169,500

$ In Thousands

I

_ _ _-.-:o'---FY03

FY04

FY05

--=--o

-=:o

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 118

--'o"---_J FY08

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Rail/Bus Structures, Field Bases, Yards and Shops DESCRIPTION: This project provides funding for the following: • • • •

MTPD District Police Station, environmental assessment, emergency construction, rail structures, field bases, yards and shops.

These projects include design, installation, replacement and upgrade of equipment to ensure environmental regulatory compliance of bus and rail facilities, the continuation of emergency repairs and other construction/improvements, and a variety of rehabilitation to facilities including masonry, door replacement, sidewalk and roadway repairs, and roof replacement. Fiscal 2003 funds a new police district station, roof repairs at 57 locations, rehabilitation of blow pits at Shady Grove, Alexandria, and West Falls Church, overhead door replacement at Bladensburg, and rehabilitation of overhead cranes and pneudraulic system at Brentwood and numerous environmental projects. JUSTIFICATION: The replacement of equipment is necessary to meet regulatory standards and ensure timely repairs to facility roofs, roadways, and interiors to maintain a safe environment for employees and to protect vital equipment. BUDGET SCHEDULE Total: $47,689 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 119

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Repairables

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the replacement of repairable parts for rail cars, facilities, systems equipment, bus parts and major components which are beyond economic repair and increases in repairable parts inventories when required to support system expansion, increased mileage of the fleets, and effective scheduling of the bus overhaul program. Fiscal 2003 funds the continued support of repairable parts inventories.

JUSTIFICATION:

Repairable parts are vital components of WMATA's bus and rail system. Adequate quantities of parts are required to perform corrective and preventative maintenance, and overhauls. The funding is provided by 100% local jurisdiction contributions.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $32.250 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 120

FY08

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Bus/Rail Support Equipment DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following: • • • • • • •

non-revenue vehicles, miscellaneous support equipment-other offices, misc. bus support equipment, misc. rail support equipment, bus lifts/bus work equipment, bus washer rehabilitation, rail car washer rehabilitation.

Types of equipment to be rehabilitated or replaced include non-revenue vehicles, shop equipment, test equipment, work equipment, major components for buses, overhead cranes, compressors, lifts, jacks, drills, brake testers, brake lathes, chasis washers and dynamometers, and car washing enhancements at all five rail car wash locations. Fiscal 2003 funds the procurement of cleaning equipment, support equipment, and non-revenue vehicles. JUSTIFICATION:

The replacement of support equipment is critical to the day-to-day operating and administrative functions of Metrobus and Metrorail operations. Bus work equipment and bus lift enhancements are needed to maintain the reliability of Metrobus service and provide for an effective maintenance program. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $82, 863 1

$ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 121

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Southeast Bus Garage

DESCRIPTION: This project funds the rehabilitation of the existing, out-dated Southeastern Metrobus Garage which is necessary to provide a bus maintenance, operation and storage facility. The rehabilitation will be completed within site constraints and environmental considerations. A more modern facility will ensure reliable and efficient bus service to the Southeast area of the District of Columbia and Southern Prince George's County_ Fiscal 2003 funds provide for the completion of work to renovate the building. JUSTIFICATION: The existing facility is more than 60 years old and is in poor condition. It has a capacity for 100 buses, although it currently houses 137. Southeastern division is one of the better located garages in relation to the service area and scheduling efficiency. However, the physical condition of the building has deteriorated to a point where it is impacting employee morale and compromising the reliability of service operated from this garage. Rehabilitation will be less costly than replacement.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $375 $ In Thousands

375

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 122

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Northern Bus Garage DESCRIPTION:

This project funds improvements to Northern Bus Garage to improve noise and air pollution quality. Fiscal 2003 funds the installation of sound abatement materials, construction of a ramp canopy and relocation of the fueling and cleaning facility. JUSTIFICATION:

The District of Columbia, in response to requests from the community around Northern Garage, is funding this project to improve noise and air pollution quality.

BUDGET SCHEDULE Total: $500 $ In Thousands i I

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 123

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Rail Work Equipment/Locomotives

DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following: • •

rail work equipment rehabilitation, locomotives and prime movers.

These projects fund the design and rehabilitation of all major shop equipment located in the rail car maintenance shops including overhead cranes, rail train lifts and hoists, industrial shop air compressors, equipment service elevators and hoisting mechanisms, as well as self-propelled rail work equipment and rehabilitation and replacement of locomotives, deicer cars, flat cars and specialty cars. Fiscal 2003 funds the replacement of cranes and overhaul/repair of lifts and the replacement of 2 prime movers.

JUSTIFICATION:

The replacement of shop equipment and heavy work equipment is necessary to maintain rail car service reliability. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total:

$23,958

$ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 124

FY08

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Comprehensive Radio System

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the procurement of a new Comprehensive Radio System to provide WMATA with a complete radio communications system for the police, Bus, Rail and Maintenance functions. The system provides an above ground and below ground radio infrastructure, a radio system and mobile data terminals for the police, radio systems for the Bus and Rail revenue fleets and support vehicles, and a radio system for Maintenance. Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of project management and engineering support for the installation of the radio system.

JUSTIFICATION:

The existing police, Bus, Rail and Maintenance radio systems are outdated and outmoded. The reliability of the systems, especially at the fringes of the WMATA service area, is unacceptable. Communication is essential to the safety and performance of personnel.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total :$4,067

$ In Thousands

1,-----2,30-5~~~~~~

FY03

FY04

I

-

o

o

o

o

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 125

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ATC and Power Systems Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION: This project provides funding for the following: • • • • •

train communications upgrade, public address systems replacement, rehabilitation of ATC equipment, rehabilitation of NC, TPSS and TPS equipment, traction power switchgear rehabilitation, including rectifiers, NC power control system.



These projects include design, procurement and installation of all communications equipment with the systems including stations, yards and shops, and the rehabilitation and replacement of electrical systems, AC and DC circuit breakers, switchgear, and wayside automatic train control equipment. These projects address the need to maintain the infrastructure and replace worn out, obsolete systems with new components utilizing new technology and achieving energy savings. Fiscal 2003 funds replacement of ATC power supply systems at 65 stations, multi-year AC and DC switchgear and rectifier replacements.

JUSTIFICATION: Communications systems and right-of-way systems have been in place for up to 25 years and have been impacted by the elements which include station dust, water, high humidity and corrosion. Equipment must be rehabilitated/replaced to ensure system reliability and integrity.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $132,779

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 126

FY08

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: UPS/Electrical Systems Rehabilitation

DESCRIPTION:

This project provides funding for the following: • •

UPS system replacement, electrical systems rehabilitation.

These projects fund the replacement of UPS systems and battery banks and the rehabilitation, replacement and upgrading of electrical systems including lighting, power cables, power distribution feeds and panels, power transfer switches, motor control centers, voltage regulators, generators and ancillary connected devices. Fiscal 2003 activities include multi-year UPS/battery replacements, and the installation of voltage regulators. JUSTIFICATION:

It is vital to replace and rehabilitate tunnel and passenger station lighting due to the harsh underground environment and to procure battery banks to provide emergency power at stations to ensure that passengers are transported in safe and comfortable conditions.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $47,759

$ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 127

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Fare Collection Equipment DESCRIPTION:

This project funds provides funding for the following: • •

fare collection equipment, station carts.

Fiscal 2003 funds design and installation activities to support upgrading the SMADS units at each station kiosk.

JUSTIFICATION:

This project is need to complete the interface with the fare collection vending machines and fare gates.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $28,876 $ In Thousands

1-

8,168

1,295 FY03

710 FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 128

FY08

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Regional Fare Integration DESCRIPTION: This project funds the development and procurement of services for a regional service center (clearinghouse). Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of the multi-year, multi-operator program and the SmarTrip Regional Customer Service Center.

JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to provide a seamless system for customers of the many mass transit providers in the Metropolitan area to pay fares and for those fares to be accounted for and credited to the proper entity.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $3,000 I

$ In Thousands

I

.~----------

-----,

3,000

I

l

FY03

o

o

o

o

0

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 129

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003- 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Bus Fare Collection System Replacement

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the replacement of the existing bus fare collection system which has exceeded its useful life, with a modern system that will enhance revenue collection by ensuring accurate determination and reporting of fares. Approximately 1,620 buses will be equipped with the new system. The new system will have the capability for integration with other on-board bus systems and with Metrorail and parking lot fare collection equipment. Fiscal 2003 funds project management and engineering support.

JUSTIFICATION:

It is believed that WMATA is losing considerable revenue because of the poor reliability of the existing system, the requirement for the operator to monitor and enforce various fares, and the fact that the system cannot recognize flash passes and does not automatically deduct fares. The existing equipment has exceeded its useful life and must be replaced. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I

Total: $1,417

$ In Thousands

1,417

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 130

I

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: ROW Track and Structures Rehabilitation DESCRIPTION: This project provides funding for the following: • • •

ROW structural rehabilitation, ROW floating slab, ROW track rehabilitation.

These projects include the design, construction and rehabilitation of aerial structures and tunnels, the retrofit of floating slabs to maintain proper rail elevations, and the replacement of running rail, rail fasteners, rail switch points, stock rail frogs, restraining rail, cross ties and fences and gates. Fiscal 2003 funds the replacement if third rail insulators on the Red Line, replacement of running rail, installation of seals and bearings, and floating slab work.

JUSTIFICATION: These projects are required to control corrosion and deterioration due to weather, thermal effects, cracks or breaks. Failure to replace these items will effect service reliability and cause system degradation.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I

Total: $109, 904

1

$ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FYOB

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 131

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Station Tunnel Leak Mitigation

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the design and implementation of a program to correct water leaks in stations and tunnels to ensure the structural integrity of the tunnel liners and to prevent corrosion of wayside systems and equipment. Ground water intrusion into stations and tunnels is occurring at numerous stations within Metrorail at cracks and expansion joints. Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of the grouting program, initiation of contract to seal water leaks in elevator shafts, and the rehabilitation of waterproofing and duct system at Dupont station.

JUSTIFICATION:

Groundwater intrusion has caused extensive corrosion to wayside tunnel systems including automatic train control, communications, traction power equipment and cabling. A program is necessary to address this problem. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $12,804 $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 132

FY08

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Information Technology

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds a comprehensive program of replacement of technology systems supporting the Rail Operations Control Center (ROCS), the mainframe computer, and the major financial systems and databases. Fiscal 2003 funds the award of a system integration contract to replace finance and capital program management systems, the bus and rail scheduling and dispatch system, the material and maintenance management system, and a personnel and payroll system.

JUSTIFICATION:

A long term focused approach is needed to address the technological needs of the Authority and to insure a systematic replacement of systems is achieved so that the gathering, processing and storing of data is secure. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $47,113 $ In Thousands

20,413

FY03

FY04

300

300

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 133

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Program Management and Support

DESCRIPTION: This project funds General and Program Administration costs, including outside engineering and consultant costs.

JUSTIFICATION: These costs are necessary to support the management and administration of the IRP and to contract for the expertise necessary to design specific IRP projects.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total:$11 0,500 I $ In Thousands

FY03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 134

FY08

INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008 PROJECT TITLE: Preventive Maintenance

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds a portion of the bus/rail vehicle overhaul/maintenance program which is included in the IRP. Fiscal 2003 funds the continuation of the comprehensive bus/rail overhaul/maintenance program.

JUSTIFICATION:

Capitalizing a portion of the bus/rail overhaul/maintenance costs will ensure high quality bus and rail vehicles. This program will also help to extend bus life to 15 years and will reduce bus replacement costs and relieve the IRP of some financial burden.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $124,200 I $ In Thousands I I

20,700

20,700

20,700

20,700

!

20,700

I

20, 700

I i

i

i I I

FY03

FY04

J FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 135

System Access/Capacity Program

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 136

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: DC Convention Center

DESCRIPTION: This project funds major modifications to the Mt. Vernon Square/UDC Station to accommodate additional customers expected when the new DC Convention Center opens in 2003. Fiscal 2003 funds contract modifications and work to complete the station enhancements. JUSTIFICATION: The new DC Convention Center will be served primarily by the Mt. Vernon Square/UDC Station on the Yellow Line. This station must be modified in anticipation of the opening of the Convention Center in 2003 to accommodate a large capacity of customers. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $2,400* I $ In Thousands

I I

2,400

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

* The total cost of this project is $29.7 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 137

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: King Street Station DESCRIPTION: This project funds the improvements to King Street Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the balance of improvements on the new entrance. JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to address access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total :$2,800*

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

*The total cost of this project is $15.1 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 138

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Ballston Station Improvements

DESCRIPTION: This project funds improvements to Ballston Station including design and construction of an additional mezzanine and entrance, and additional elevators. Fiscal 2003 funds preliminary engineering and general plans for the improvements.

JUSTIFICATION: Arlington County has requested improvements to the Ballston Station to accommodate additional customers. Funding will be provided from a variety of federal, state and Arlington County sources. BUDGET SCHEDULE

I

Total: $10,900*

$ In Thousands

3,100

500 FY03

FY 04

o FY05

FY06

o

o

FY07

FY08

* The total cost of this project is $19.6 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 139

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Clarendon Station Improvements DESCRIPTION: This project funds the improvements to Clarendon Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the balance of improvements to the canopy. JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to address access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE Total :$200*

$ In Thcl100mds

FY03

o

o

o

o

o

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

*The total cost of this project is $1 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 140

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Crystal City Canopy

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds funds the construction of a canopy and associated amenities at the Crystal City Metrorail Station. Fiscal 2003 funds will be provided for the installation. JUSTIFICATION:

Canopies provide customers with an additional amenity and protect escalators from the elements.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $300

$ In Thousands

ri

300

i I

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 141

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Regional Bus Bike Racks

DESCRIPTION: This project funds the purchase and installation of bike racks for all Metrobuses. Fiscal 2003 funds this procurement.

JUSTIFICATION: This project enhances customer service and addresses access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $1,645 I

$ In Thousands 1,645

FY 03

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 142

FY08

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Huntington Parking

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds replacement parking for a 924 space existing surface parking plus 500 additional spaces. Fiscal 2003 funds the award of a design-build contract.

JUSTIFICATION:

The current amount of parking at Huntington cannot accommodate demand. This project enhances customer service and addresses access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $19,200 I $ In Thousands ·~I

i

,

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 143

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Franconia/Springfield Parking DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the construction of a 1000 space parking facility at the Franconia/Springfield Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the balance of the construction project. JUSTIFICATION:

This project is needed to address access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total:$1,000*

$ In ThlPJM1ds

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

*The total cost of this project is $15.8 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 144

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: West Falls Church/Dunn Loring Station Parking

DESCRIPTION: This project funds a parking facility at West Falls Church/ Dunn Loring Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the award of a design-build contract.

JUSTIFICATION: The current amount of parking at West Falls Church/ Dunn Loring cannot ccommodate demand. This project enhances customer service and addresses access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $12,000* I $ In Thousands 12,000

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

*The total cost of this proj ect is $13.0 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 145

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: College Park Parking DESCRIPTION: This project funds the construction of a 1,219 space parking facility at the College Park Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the balance of the construction project.

JUSTIFICATION: This project is needed to address access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Tota I: $14,200 $ In Thousands 14,200

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 146

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: New Carrollton Parking DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the construction of a 1,776space parking facility at the College Park Station. Fiscal 2003 funds the award of the construction project. JUSTIFICATION:

This project is needed to address access/capacity needs.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total:$20,400

$ In Thousands

~~~~

I

~-

1

20,400

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 147

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Buses-Core Capacity Funded

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the procurement of buses funded under the Core Capacity Program. Fiscal 2003 funds the CNG procurement. JUSTIFICATION:

Buses must be available to transport customers to rail stations in order to address access/capacity needs in the coming years.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total:$21,800 I $ In Thousands

1·----1~8~,10~O-

FY 03

FY04

o

o

o

o

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 148

SYSTEM ACCESS/CAPACITY PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Rail Maintenance Yards & Shops-Core Capacity Funded

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the design and construction the expansion of a the railcar maintenance yard and shop at New Carrollton. Fiscal 2003 funds the construction contract. JUSTIFICATION:

This project is needed to address access/capacity needs to maintain and store rail cars.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

I Total: $35,000* I

FY 03

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FYOB

*The total cost of this project is $37 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 149

System Expansion Program

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 150

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Project Development

DESCRIPTION: This project funds sketch engineering concepts for new extension or capacity enhancement projects in the District, Maryland and Virginia. Fiscal 2003 funds studies under the Board's Transit Service Expansion Plan, and engineering feasibility studies in coordination with the jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction contributes proportionately to the project. JUSTIFICATION: Advancing selected projects requested by the jurisdictions in accordance with the Board of Directors Transit Expansion Plan as updated, is necessary to provide sketch engineering in advance of funding for design, acquisition, and construction.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $18,000 $ In Thousands

I

3,00'

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

FY 03

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 151

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: LARGO Extension and Parking

DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the extension of the Blue Line from its current terminal at Addison Road to a new terminal at Largo Town Center. Fiscal 2003 funding supports construction activities, project management, insurance, and IAWP support. JUSTIFICATION: This project, funded with State of Maryland and Federal funds, will provide 3.2 miles of additional rail service to customers in Prince George's County.

BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $40,900* $ In Thousands

FY 03

FY04

FY05

_~.'--FY06

_ _----=o FY07

* The total cost of this project is $447.4 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 152

o=----_----' FY08

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Dulles PE/NEPA DESCRIPTION:

This project funds the professional services, environmental assessments and preliminary engineering necessary to provide bus and rail service in the Dulles corridor. Fiscal 2003 continues environmental assessments for Bus Rapid Transit and Metrorail components and preliminary engineering. JUSTIFICATION:

This project addresses the requirements to provide more service in the Dulles corridor including the engineering and environmental work necessary to prepare for rail service in the corridor in the future. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $2,800* $ In Thousands

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FYOB

*The total cost of Dulles PE/NEPA is $40.0 million. Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 153

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: Purple Line DE IS DESCRIPTION: This project funds the completion of a Draft EIS for rail service from New Carrollton to Bethesda. Fiscal 2003 provides the funding from Maryland for the Draft EIS. JUSTIFICATION: This project addresses the requirements to provide more service in Prince George's and Montgomery Counties. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $10,600

$ In Thousands

~

10,600

i

I I

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 154

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM FY 2003 - 2008

PROJECT TITLE: New York Avenue Station DESCRIPTION: This project funds the completion the activities necessary to complete the new station to serve New York Avenue.

Fiscal 2003 provides for project management.

JUSTIFICATION: This project is the first "infill" station in the Metrorail system and will provide service to customers between Union Station and Rhode Island Avenue. BUDGET SCHEDULE

Total: $1,800*

$ In Thousands 1,800

FY 03

o

o

o

o

o

FY 04

FY05

FY06

FY07

FY08

* The total cost of this project is $91.2 million.

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 155

This Page Not Used

Capital Improvement Program -- Project Descriptions Page 156

ALLOCATION OF SUBSIDY BY JURISDICTION

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction Page 157

This Page Not Used

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction Page 158

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

A. OPERATING BUDGET

The operating budget subsidy is allocated to the jurisdictions using six subsidy allocation formulas: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Regional bus subsidy allocation Non-regional bus subsidy allocations Rail base subsidy allocation Rail max fare subsidy allocation Paratransit subsidy allocation Debt Service allocation.

A1 & A2. Bus Subsidy Allocation Formulas: The Metrobus subsidy is allocated using two distribution formulas. All bus routes are classified as being either regional or non-regional based on route characteristics. Regional bus routes generally provide transportation between jurisdictions. Regional bus routes also may include bus routes that serve major activity centers, that operate on major arterial streets and carry high volumes of ridership either in one jurisdiction or in multiple jurisdictions. The following are the specific criteria used by the Regional Mobility Panel to classify bus routes into the regional and non-regional categories. Interjurisdictional routes are defined as regional. Defining characteristics are that interjurisdictional routes: • cross a jurisdictional (independent city, county, state) boundary; and • penetrate at least two jurisdictions by more than one-half mile in each; and • operate "open door" (allows boarding and alighting) over at least a portion of the line in two or more jurisdictions.

If a route does not qualify as regional under the interjurisdictional definition, then it must meet at least two of the following three criteria to be regional: Arterial streets. Operates for a considerable distance on an arterial street and a substantial portion (usually a majority) of riders use stops on the arterial street. Routes which operate for a short distance on an arterial incidental to their service areas are not included. Regional activity center. Serves one or more regional activity centers. A conservative definition of regional activity centers was used, including only those where there is virtually universal agreement as to their regional

Allocation of Subsidy by .Jurisdiction -- Operating Page 159

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

character. (Routes which feed Metrorail stations but which do not directly serve any regional activity center are not considered to be regional.) Cost effectiveness. Annual boardings per annual platform hour greater than 30 applied consistently in all jurisdictions.

Routes which do not meet the criteria described above are classified as nonregional. Regional and non-regional bus subsidy is allocated to the jurisdictions using the following formulas.

A1. Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation The distribution of regional bus subsidy to the jurisdictions is based on a weighted, four factor formula in the following proportions:

1. 2. 3. 4.

density weighted population 25% revenue hours 25% revenue miles 35% average weekday ridership 15%

Density weighted population is determined by taking the urbanized area population distribution for the compact area (50% weighting) and combining that with the weighted population density (urbanized population divided by area). Basically the formula prorates the urbanized population distribution by people per square mile. The revenue hours factor is determined by taking the annual revenue hours assigned to each jurisdiction divided by the total regional revenue hours. The revenue miles factor is determined by taking the annual revenue (end of year schedule) assigned to each jurisdiction divided by the total regional revenue miles. Ridership is determined by taking the average weekday ridership (May sample) for each jurisdiction divided by total average weekday ridership.

A2. Non-Regional Bus Subsidy Allocation The distribution of non-regional bus subsidy to the jurisdictions is computed utilizing the following steps: 1. Identify the costs of all Metrobus service, regional and non-regional. 2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no non-regional bus service were provided. 3. Determine the costs of non-regional service by subtracting the regional Metrobus costs from the costs of all Metrobus service. 4. Divide the costs for non-regional service as computed in step three by total platform hours for non-regional service. 5. Identify the non-regional platform hours for each jurisdiction. 6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Operating Page 160

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

7. Determine the revenue for each jurisdiction. 8. Subtract the revenue as determined in step seven from costs.

A3 & A4 Rail Subsidy Allocation Formulas: The rail subsidy consists of two separate formulas: the rail max fare formula, and the base rail subsidy. The total max fare subsidy is deducted from the total rail subsidy and the result is allocated based on the base subsidy formula A3. Max Fare Subsidy Allocation The max fare portion of the rail formula is designed to recognize the "taper" and "cap" features of the Metrorail fare structure. The taper feature is reflected in the diminishing cost per mile for trips greater than 6 miles, and the cap is reflected in a maximum fare of $3.25. The subsidy for the max fare is calculated as the difference between the regular fare that would have been paid if the taper and cap features of the fare structure were not available and the actual fare paid with the taper and cap.

Once the max fare is calculated, the benefiting jurisdictions are allocated one-half the calculated amount based on the percent of riders from the individual jurisdictions who benefit from the taper and the cap. These amounts are calculated as part of the Metrorail Passenger Survey.

A4. Base Rail Subsidy Allocation The base rail subsidy allocation formula is based on three elements in the following proportions:

1. density weighted population 33% 2. number of rail stations 33% 3. average weekday ridership 33% Density weighted population is determined by taking the urbanized area population distribution for the compact area (50% weighting) and combining that with the weighted population density (urbanized population divided by area). This calculation is the same for regional bus and base rail. The rail stations factor is calculated by taking the number of stations or portions of stations assigned to each jurisdiction divided by the total number of station in the system. Ridership is calculated by taking the system average weekday ridership (May sample) times the jurisdictional ridership distribution as determined in the rail survey. Only residents who reside in the compact area are included in the distribution.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Operating Page 161

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

AS. Paratransit Subsidy Allocation Paratransit subsidy is allocated to the jurisdictions using a two factor formula with sub-allocations used for the Virginia jurisdictions.

1.

Direct costs. The contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation and eligibility charges will be allocated directly to the jurisdictions.

2.

Overhead costs. All other (non-direct) costs of the paratransit program will be allocated in proportion to the direct costs. Virginia sub-allocations of direct costs requires that per trip charges be adjusted to reflect the average time of trips provided for each jurisdiction. Overhead costs assigned to Virginia jurisdictions will be sub-allocated based on the direct cost allocation as calculated above.

AS. Debt Service Allocation Debt service charges are allocated to the jurisdictions based on the rail construction formula for the Adopted Regional System using data developed for the Proposed Financial Plan, August 1978. The local shares remain as set forth in the Ancillary Bond Repayment Agreements and are not revised as the data used for the rail construction formula is updated.

B. CAPITAL BUDGET The capital budget, also referred to as the capital improvement program (CIP), is funded by grants that combine federal funds with local matching contributions provided by the local jurisdictions. The capital budget is comprised of three separate sub-budgets with unique funding arrangements. The three sub-budges of the capital program are:

• Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP) • System Access and Capacity Program (SAP) • System Expansion Program (SEP)

B1. Infrastructure Renewal Program

Metrobus Projects in the IRP The local match for bus capital items is distributed among the jurisdictions using a projection of weekday revenue bus miles by jurisdiction.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Capital Improvement Program Page 162

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

Metrorail Projects in the IRP The local match for rail system items is distributed among the jurisdictions using the past five year average of rail operating assistance percentages. Repairable Parts in the IRP. This capital requirement is funded 100 percent using local jurisdiction funding. The allocation is based on both the Metrobus and Metrorail distributions specified above in accordance with an allocation of bus and rail repairable parts in the program.

B2. System Access and Capacity Program B3. System Expansion Program Projects in both the SAP and SEP are largely reimbursable projects sponsored and fully paid for by a particular jurisdiction. Because of this, these projects do not need subsidy allocation formulas. To the extent there are projects that are regional in nature and require support from all jurisdictions the IRP formulas are applied for allocating the subsidy amounts.

C. RAIL CONSTRUCTION BUDGET

Construction of the 103 mile Metrorail system is now complete and the construction program is in close-out process. Throughout the history of the construction program there have been multiple cost allocation formulas and agreements that divided the funding responsibility between the federal government and local jurisdictions. ICCA-V Interim Capital Contributions Agreement - Five, was the last of the agreed upon formula distribution plans that took construction through final completion and into close out. A final accounting of costs and a final reconciliation is required and in accordance with the process agreed to in ICCA-V these remaining calculations will be prepared by WMATA as soon as all final data is available.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Capital Improvement Program Page 163

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

FEDERAL GRANTS The following is a brief description of the primary federal grants that fund a significant portion of WMATA's annual capital budget.

Section 5307 Funds The primary source of federal funding for capital is the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Section 5307 program. Total funds in the program are allocated on a formula basis and WMATA is the designated recipient. These federal funds come with the requirement of a local match that is allocated by WMATA to the local jurisdictions using the IRP formulas described above.

The Federal share is not to exceed 80 percent of the net project cost. The Federal share may be 90 percent for the cost of vehicle-related equipment attributable to compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act and the Clean Air Act. The Federal share may also be 90 percent for projects or portions of projects related to bicycles. The Federal share may not exceed 50 percent of the net project cost of operating assistance. 5307 funding may be applied to the following purposes: planning, engineering design and evaluation of transit projects and other technical transportationrelated studies; capital investments in bus and bus-related activities such as replacement of buses, overhaul of buses, rebuilding of buses, crime prevention and security equipment and construction of maintenance and passenger

facilities; and capital investments in new and existing fixed guideway systems including rolling stock, overhaul and rebuilding of vehicles, track, signals, communications, and computer hardware and software. All preventive maintenance and some Americans With Disabilities Act complementary paratransit service are considered capital costs.

Section 5309 Funds This federal funding is allocated at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation although Congress fully earmarks all available funding. The matching ratio is 80 percent federal, 20 percent local. Eligible purposes for these funds include: Acquisition of buses for fleet and service expansion, bus maintenance and administrative facilities, transfer facilities, bus malls, transportation centers, intermodal terminals, park-and-ride stations, acquisition of replacement vehicles, bus rebuilds, bus preventive maintenance, passenger amenities such as passenger shelters and bus stop signs, accessory and miscellaneous equipment such as mobile radio units, supervisory vehicles,

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Capital Improvement Program Page 164

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

fareboxes, computers, shop and garage equipment, and costs incurred in arranging innovative financing for eligible projects.

Flexible Funds These funds are certain legislatively specified funds that may be used either for transit or highway purposes. This provision was first included in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1999 (ISTEA) and was continued with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century (TEA-21). The idea of flexible funds is that a local area can choose to use certain Federal surface transportation funds based on local planning priorities, not on a restrictive definition of program eligibility. Flexible funds include Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Urban Formula Funds.

When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA they can be used for a variety of transit improvements such as new fixed guideway projects, bus purchases, construction and rehabilitation of rail stations, maintenance facility construction and renovations, alternatively-fueled bus purchases, bus transfer facilities, multimodal transportation centers, and advanced technology fare collection systems When FHWA funds are transferred to FTA they are transferred to one of the following three programs: Urbanized Area Formula Program (5307), Nonurbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5311 program); Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program (Section 5310 program) Once they are transferred to FTA for a transit project, the funds are administered as FTA funds and take on all the requirements of the FTA program. Transferred funds may use the same non-Federal matching share that the funds would have if they were used for highway purposes and administered by FHWA. The decision on the transfer of flexible funds is made by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The decision to transfer funds should flow from the transportation planning process and the priorities established for an area as part of the planning process.

Other Federal Grants From time to time, new competitive categories are created. Currently, some of the categories are Job Access and Reverse Commute (JARC), Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and System Preservation funds.

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Capital Improvement Program Page 165

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY FISCAL 2003 APPROVED BUDGET SUBSIDY ALLOCATION AND GRANT INFORMATION

Fiscal 2003 Approved Budget Allocation Tables:

1. Fiscal 2003 Summary of State / Local Operating Requirements 2. Fiscal 2001 Operating Budget Audit Adjustment 3. Fiscal 2003 Summary of State / LocaliRP Funding Requirements 4. Fiscal 2003 Summary of State / Local SAP Funding Requirements

Allocation of Subsidy by Jurisdiction -- Capital Improvement Program Page 166

» o()

FISCAL 2003 APPROVED OPERATING BUDGET SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS

Ql

r-+

o :J

o-+.

DISTRICT OF MONTGOMER't COLUMBIA COUNTY

(J)

C

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY

FAIRFAX CITY

FAIRFAX COUNTY

FALLS CHURCH

TOTAL

0-

en

0-

-< 0-< L C ""'I

en

0()

r-+

~

I

METROBUS OPERATING SUBSIDY: REGIONAL SUBSIDY NON-REGIONAL TOTAL BUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE

$75,189,428 $15,816,021 $91,005,449

$25,027,903 $3,840,702 $28,868,605

$26,778,037 $10,772,332 $37,550,369

$8,593,944 $986,995 $9,580,939

$12,770,058 $0 $12,770,058

$211,204 $0 $211,204

$19,636,250 $6,097,894 $25,734,144

$645,644 $0 $645,644

$168,852,468 $37,513,944 $206,366,412

METRORAIL OPERATING SUBSIDY: BASE ALLOCATION MAX FARE SUBSIDY TOTAL RAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE

$50,834,086 $244,659 $51,078,745

$25,004,301 $1,796,547 $26,800,848

$24,216,257 $568,966 $24,785,223

$6,117,360 $74,291 $6,191,651

$13,706,856 $59,290 $13,766,146

$421,919 $37,860 $459,778

$19,367,199 $778,980 $20,146,179

$398,590 $11,072 $409,662

$140,066,568 $3,571,664 $143,638,232

$6,365,305

$8,582,586

$7,306,127

$442,761

$264,893

$169,696

$3,695,446

$31,685

$26,858,499

$10,331,300

$4,867,500

$4,872,900

$1,418,200

$2,740,200

$46,700

$3,168,900

$38,500

$27,484,200

$158,780,800

$69,119,539

$74,514,620

$17,633,550

$29,541,297

$887,379

$52,744,670

$1,125,491

$404,347,344

PARATRANSIT SUBSIDY DEBT SERVICE

()

.g I r-+ Ql

3

"0 ""'I

o

< 3

CD CD

:J

r-+

""'0""'0 Ql

""'I

CDO CD CD ""'I

.....l.Ql

(J)3

"-J

OPERATING SUBSIDY WITHIN GUIDANCE

FISCAL 2001 AUDIT COMPARED TO FISCAL 2001 BILLINGS AND FINAL AUDIT ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS

lJ»

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

0.>=

COO

con -l.o.>

0) r-+ _.

oog

0 -n (f)

C

rr (J) 0-

-< rr -< L C

,

(J)

0-

n r-+

g"1 0

0.>

"'0

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY

FAIRFAX CITY

FAIRFAX COUNTY

FALLS CHURCH

TOTAL

METROBUS OPERATING ASSISTANCE ------------------------------------------------------------

REGIONAL BUDGETED REGIONAL BILLINGS BILLING ADJUSTMENTS NET BILLINGS PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

ALLOCATION OF AUDITED SUBSIDY AUDIT ADJUSTMENT NON-REGIONAL BUDGETED NON-REGIONAL BILLINGS BILLING ADJUSTMENTS NET BILLINGS PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

ALLOCATION OF AUDITED SUBSIDY AUDIT ADJUSTMENT AUDIT ADJUSTMENT - METROBUS

$153,845,066 ($705,460) $153,139,606

$67,320,347 ($225,580) $67,094,767

$22,068,469 ($54,950) $22,013,519

$23,638,515 $124,680 $23,763,195

$8,420,602 ($413,190) $8,007,412

$12,294,727 ($68,910) $12,225,817

$148,542 $0 $148,542

$19,300,412 ($67,050) $19,233,362

$653,452 ($460) $652,992

43.813% $68,173,075 $1,078,308

14.375% $22,367,307 $353,788

15.517% $24,145,103 $381,908

5.229% $8,136,102 $128,690

7.983% $12,422,303 $196,486

0.097%

12.559% $19,542,469 $309,107

0.426%

100.000%

$150,929 $2,387

$663,487 $10,495

$155,600,776 $2,461,170

$15,797,004 $213,649 $16,010,653

$4,490,184 $45,200 $4,535,384

$9,695,353 ($190,199) $9,505,154

$1,026,984 $20,000 $1,046,984

$0 $0 $0

$0 $0 $0

$5,547,988 $175,341 $5,723,329

$0 $0 $0

$36,557,512 $263,991 $36,821,503

43.482% $13,360,789 ($2,649,864)

12.317% $3,784,749 ($750,635)

25.814% $7,931,991 ($1,573,163)

2.843% $873,702 ($173,282)

0.000%

0.000%

100.000%

$0 $0

15.543% $4,776,082 ($947,247)

0.000%

$0 $0

$0 $0

$30,727,312 ($6,094,191 )

($1,571,556)

($396,846)

($1,191,255)

($44,592)

$196,486

$2,387

($638,140)

$10,495

($3,633,021 )

$5,331,952 $66,492 $10,000 $5,408,444

$12,129,556 $53,064 $24,000 $12,206,620

$366,216 $33,884 $1,000 $401,100

9.737% $10,450,719 ($1,755,901 )

0.320%

14.075%

0.282%

100.000%

$343,402 ($57,698)

$15,106,144 ($2,538,093)

$302,403 ($50,809)

$107,326,699 ($18,032,738)

$82,625

$2,550,304

$16,605

$23,252,223

METRORAIL OPERATING ASSISTANCE INCLUDES MAX FARE SUBSIDY ------------------------------------------------- ..

--------

RAIL BUDGETED BASE RAIL BILLINGS MAX FARE BILLINGS BILLING ADJUSTMENTS NET RAIL BILLING

$44,994,088 $218,976 $81,000 $45,294,064

$21,958,016 $1,607,940 $43,000 $23,608,956

$19,957,568 $509,236 ($24,000) $20,442,804

$16,915,037 $697,200 $32,000 $17,644,237

$342,300 $9,912 $1,000 $353,212

$121,994,733 $3,196,704 $168,000 $125,359,437

36.131% $38,778,591 ($6,515,473)

18.833% $20,212,849 ($3,396,107)

$17,502,142 ($2,940,662)

4.314% $4,630,449 ($777,995)

$5,958,261

$9,612,760

$4,582,681

$266,916

$182,071

25.624% $4,968,116 ($990,145)

41.341% $8,015,310 ($1,597,450)

1.148% $222,560 ($44,356)

0.783%

0.355%

10.968%

0.071%

100.000%

$3,821,130 ($761,551)

$151,814 ($30,257)

$68,894 ($13,731)

$2,126,494 ($423,810)

$13,846 ($2,759)

$19,388,164 ($3,864,059)

FISCAL 2001 TOTAL AUDIT ADJUSTMENT _ _($9,077,174)

($5,390,404)

($4,893,467)

($866,943)

. ($1,589,672)

($69,041)

($3,600,043) .... ($43,074)

($25,529,818)

r-+

0.>

31

PERCENT DISTRIBUTION

ALLOCATION OF AUDITED SUBSIDY AUDIT ADJUSTMENT

16.307%

"'0

~I

~I

lJ , 0 CO

,

0.>

3

PARATRANSIT -----------------------

BUDGETED PARATRANSIT BILLINGS PERCENT DISTRIBUT/ON

ALLOCATION OF AUDITED SUBSIDY AUDIT ADJUSTMENT

19.709%

SUBSIDY (REDUCT/ON)/INCREASE

PRIOR YEAR AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS: FY1998, 1999 CARRYOVER

NET AUDIT ADJUSTMENT RESULTS

$911,966

($8,165,208)

$359,053

($5,031,351)

$375,938

($4,517,529)

$107,258

($759,685)

$196,009

($1,393,663)

$4,216

($64,825)

$304,983

($3,295,060)

$7,837

$2,267,260

($35,237)

($23,262,558)

~I

APPROVED BUDGET FOR FISCAL 2003 INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL PROGRAM (1) STATE AND LOCAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS

() Q)

r-+

0

DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY COLUMBIA COUNTY

:J

0 -n (J)

C 0-

en

0-

-< 0-< L C

,

en

0-

()

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

ALEXANDRIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY

FLEXIBLE FUNDING MATCH: BUS PROJECTS FEDERAL LOCAL TOTAL FLEXIBLE FUNDING

2,437.2 609.3 3,046.5

970.4 242.6 1,213.0

1,442.2 360.6 1,802.8

327.6 81.9 409.5

412.1 103.0 515.1

SECTION 9 MATCH: BUS PROJECTS RAIL CATEGORY 2 TOTAL SECTION 9 MATCH

2,113.7 6,645.2 8,758.9

841.6 3,347.3 4,188.9

1,250.8 2,851.5 4,102.3

284.1 816.6 1,100.7

357.4 1,860.1 2,217.4

SECTION 3 MATCH: BUS PROJECTS RAIL CATEGORY 2 TOTAL SECTION 3 MATCH

5,315.0 5,315.0

2,677.3 2,677.3

2,280.7 2,280.7

653.1 653.1

1,487.7 1,487.7

FAIRFAX CITY

FAIRFAX COUNTY

FALLS CHURCH

TOTAL

-

833.7 208.4 1,042.1

20.0 5.0 25.0

6,443.2 1,610.8 8,054.0

55.6 55.6

723.0 2,550.0 3,273.0

17.3 52.8 70.1

5,588.0 18,178.6 23,766.6

44.5 44.5

2,039.5 2,039.5

42.2 42.2

14,539.8 14,539.8

r-+

0

:J

~I

LOCAL ADDITIONAL FUNDS BUSES NORTHERN BUS GARAGE BUS PROJECTS RAIL PROJECTS TOTAL ADDITIONAL FUNDS

252.0 500.0 6,824.2 4,351.1 11,927.3

2,717.1 2,191.8 4,908.9

4,038.2 1,867.1 5,905.3

917.3 534.7 1,452.0

1,153.8 1,217.9 2,371.8

36.4 36.4

2,334.3 1,669.7 4,004.0

56.0 34.6 90.6

252.0 500.0 18.0410 11,903.0 30,696.0

REPAIRABLE PARTS: BUS RAIL TOTAL REPAIRABLE PARTS

1,827.7 1,827.7

920.7 920.7

784.3 784.3

224.6 224.6

511.6 511.6

15.3 15.3

701.4 701.4

14.5 14.5

5.0000 5,000.0

3,430.4 3,839.9 4.7% (791.9 3,048.0

6,588.5 7,103.6 8.7% 1,443.0) 5,660.7

"'0

5r1 3' , 0 co< 3

"'0

co

\J Q)

;1 ,

COo COCO ~m

ffi3

TOTAL LOCAL WIO FLEX. TOTAL LOCAL PLUS FLEX. FY03 ADVANCED FUNDING NET FY03 REQUIREMENTS BUS CAPITAL ONE-TENTH ADJUSTMENT

27,828.9 30,875.4 37.6%

12,695.8 13,908.8 17.0%

13,072.6 14,875.4 18.1%

30,875.4

13,908.8

14,875.4

(470)

(19.8)

0.4

----------------------------- NVTC = 66.4 ---------------------------------

lJ»

FISCAL 2003 APPROVED SYSTEM ACCESS / CAPACITY PROGRAM SUMMARY OF STATE/LOCAL OPERATING REQUIREMENTS

0>=

COO

con

$ Millions (Amounts Less Than $0.1 Million Not Shown)

0>

.....l.r-+

"-J

o'

O:J

DISTRICT OF MONTGOMERY COLUMBIA COUNTY

o-n Cf) C

0-

en

Q.

-< 0-< L C ""'I

en

Q.

n

d,

o

REIMBURSABLE: DC Convention Center Ballston Station Improvements Clarendon Station Improvements King Street Station Crystal City Canopy Regional Bus Bike Racks Parking Structures: New Carrollton College Park Huntington Franconia/Springfield WFC/Ounn Loring

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY

CITY OF ALEXANDRIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY

FAIRFAX CITY

FAIRFAX COUNTY

FALLS CHURCH

OTHER FUNDING

TOTAL

$2.4 (1) $3.1 $0.2 $2.8 $0.1

$0.1

$0.1

$0.0

$0.3 $0.0

$0.0

$0.0

$0.0

$0.1

$0.1

$0.1

$2.8

$3.6

$0.0

$0.0

$0.0

$0.3

$0.1

$0.2

$0.0

$0.1

$0.0

$0.1

$0.0

$0.3

$0.1

$0.2

$0.0

$0.1

$0.0

$0.1

$0.0

$0.4

$0.2

$0.3

$2.8

$3.7

$0.0

$0.1

$0.0

$1.3 (2) $20.4 $14.2 $19.2 $1.0 $12.0 $70.5

(3) (4) (5) (6) (7)

$2.4 $3.1 $0.2 $2.8 $0.3 $1.6 $0.0 $20.4 $14.2 $19.2 $1.0 $12.0 $77.2

:J

o 0>

CORE CAPACITY: Buses Rail Maint Yards & Shops

\J

$3.0 (1) $35.0 (8) $38.0

$3.7 $35.0 $38.7

r-+

0>

TOTAL FUNDED SAP

3

\J

""'I

o co< 3 co :J

r-+

lJ ""'I

o

CO

""'I

0>

3

* Other Funding Notes: (1) Interest Earnings (2) CMAQ (3) MOOT, TIIF, Parking Surcharge (4) MOOT, TIIF, Parking Surcharge (5) TIIF, Parking Surcharge, Developer (6) VA State (7) Rail Construction

$108.5

$115.9

RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 171

This Page Not Used

Resolutions of the Board of Directors

Page 172

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY RESOLUTIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FISCAL 2003 BUDGET

1.

Page 174

Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula (98-27)

2.

Page 178

Non-Regional Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula (98-32)

3.

Page 180

Metrorail Subsidy Allocation Formula (95-14)

4.

Page 184

Paratransit Formula (99-31)

5.

Page 185

Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement (98-38)

6.

Page 187

Operating Budget Reprogramming Policy (99-21)

7.

Page 189

Revised IRP Reprogramming Policy (00-43)

8.

Page 197

Changes to the Procurement Policy Statement (00-42)

9.

Page 198

Accrual Accounting and P&T Carryover (94-35)

10.

Page 199

Reimbursable Project Policy and Project Reserve Funds (99-63)

11.

Page 203

Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services (00-10)

12.

Page 212

Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions (00-41)

13.

Page 214

Revised Policy on Transit Infrastructure Investment Fund (TIIF) (00-50)

14.

Page 217

Labor Contract Settlement Local 2, OPEIU and Amendment to WMATA Retirement Plan (01-37)

16.

Page 221

Approval of FY 2003 Operating Budget and Operating reimbursable Projects (02-30)

17.

Page 224

Approval of FY 2003-2008 Capital Improvement Program (02-31)

18.

Page 231

Board Committee Functions (2002-07)

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 173

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 25, 1998 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF METROBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION FORMULA

#98-27 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, was charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National Capital Region; and WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula and its impact on the future of Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMP concluded the following in regard to the current formula: •

it relies on outdated information and reduces management's ability to implement system cost savings because these actions may result in cost increases in some jurisdictions; and _



jurisdictions that reduce bus service save more than the resulting system savings and jurisdictions that increase bus service pay more than the resulting system increases; and



as Metrobus service is reduced in anyone jurisdiction, the unit costs for all remaining bus service increases resulting in cost increases in jurisdictions that do not change their service; and

WHEREAS, the RMP has recommended, and the Board of Directors has agreed, that a revised Metrobus subsidy allocation formula for regional Metrobus service be implemented beginning in Fiscal 1999; and WHEREAS, the Board anticipates that the Member Jurisdictions will agree that conversion to the new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula will begin in Fiscal 1999 with phased transition limits during the period of Fiscal 1999-2002 (as previously

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 174

adopted by the Regional Mobility Panel) and that the phased non-federal share of funding for the $100 million rehabilitation and replacement shortfall requirements will begin in Fiscal 2000 and continue through Fiscal 2003. Beginning in Fiscal 1999, and in every year thereafter, the benefit to all Member Jurisdictions from the application of phased transition limits in the new Regional Bus Service Operating Subsidy Allocation Formula will be reduced proportionate to the lowest percentage contribution made by any benefitting Member Jurisdiction to the phased non-federal shortfall in the Rehabilitation and Replacement Program, including any state funds attributable to that jurisdiction. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the current Metrobus subsidy allocation formula be revised, as recommended by the RMP and agreed to by the Board of Directors, and that a new Metrobus subsidy allocation formula be implemented through a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts a new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula that: allocates the regional Metrobus subsidy on a regional basis; uses data that can be periodically updated; allocates the Metrobus subsidy based on benefits received in each jurisdiction; and evaluates carefully the mechanisms to implement a ridership incentive factor; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus services shall be adopted based on each jurisdiction's share of the following four factors: •

25 % of Subsidy - a weighted average of urbanized population and population density using 1990 census data and the 1990 population definition of the urbanized area;



15% of Subsidy - weekday ridership on the regional routes by jurisdiction of residence;



35 % of Subsidy - annual revenue miles for the regional routes; and



25 % of Subsidy - annual revenue hours for the regional routes.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts the attached transition limits to be applied to each jurisdiction for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal 2002 as the basis for phasing in the revised Metrobus Regional Subsidy Allocation Formula; and

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 175

""'OJJ Q)

co

CD

(J)

CD 0 ~C

Jurisdiction

-..J ~.

0')0

Annual Regional Metrobus Subsidies With Transition Limit Fiscal 1999 Fiscal 2000 Fiscal 2001 Fiscal 2002

::J (J)

o

~

::::r

District of Columbia

65,136

65,095

65,054

65,013

oQ)

Montgomery County Prince George's County Maryland

17,686 20,350 38,036

18,430 21,241 39,671

19,174 22,132 41,306

19,918 23,023 42,941

Alexandria Arlington County Fairfax City Fairfax County Falls Church Virginia

8,402 13,013 45 18,877 790 41,127

8,084 12,491 90 18,148 719 39,533

7,765 11,970 135 17,420 649 37,938

7,447 11,448 180 16,691 578 36,344

144,298

144,298

144,298

144,298

r-+

CD OJ '""I

0..

o

~

o '""I

CD

(')

r-+

o '""I

(J)

Total

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula, as modified by the transition limits prescribed for Fiscal 1999 through Fiscal 2002 attached hereto, shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shall remain in effect until changed by the Board of Directors; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

J?~ Robert L. PolK General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mrs. Walker and Mr. Kinlow

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 177

PRESENTED: JUNE 25, 1998 ADOPTED; JULY 9, 1998 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF NON-REGIONAL METROBUS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION #98-32 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel (RMP), created in January 1997, was charged with devising a plan to stabilize and enhance bus services in the National Capital Region; and WHEREAS, the RMP recommended a new Metrobus service plan based on the development of regional and non-regional bus routes so that neither the regional bus subsidy nor any individual jurisdiction's subsidy is affected by any change that might occur in non-regional services except for the jurisdiction proposing the change; and WHEREAS, in reviewing the current Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula and its impact on the future of Metrobus services in the National Capital Region, the RMP proposed a new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus services beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002, with specified annual transition limits; and WHEREAS, based on the recommendations of the RMP, the Board of Directors has approved a revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for regional Metrobus service to be implemented through a transition plan beginning in Fiscal 1999 and continuing through Fiscal 2002; and WHEREAS, Metrobus subsidies are determined separately for regional and nonregional Metrobus services; and WHEREAS, as a result of approval by the Board of Directors of a new Metrobus Subsidy Allocation Formula for Regional Metrobus service only, a new subsidy allocation mechanism for non-regional Metrobus services must be approved beginning in Fiscal 1999.

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 178

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Metrobus subsidy for non-regional Metrobus service shall be computed by utilizing the following steps: 1. Identify the costs of all Metrobus service, regional and non-regional; 2. Identify the costs which would accrue for regional Metrobus service if no nonregional bus service were provided; 3. Determine the costs of non-regional service by subtracting the regional Metrobus costs from the costs of all Metrobus service; 4. Divide the costs for non-regional service as computed in step three by total platform hours for non-regional service; 5. Identify the non-regional platform hours for each jurisdiction; 6. Multiply the platform hours for each jurisdiction by the hourly rate. 7. Determine the revenue for each jurisdiction; and 8. Subtract the revenue as determined in step seven from costs. The product from the process, as outlined above, equals subsidy by jurisdiction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised Metrobus Subsidy Allocation process for Non-Regional Metrobus services shall become effective in Fiscal 1999 and shall remain in effect until changed by the Board of Directors; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Robert L. Polk General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mr. Evans

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 179

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 11, 1995 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF SUBSIDY ALLOCATION FORMULAS

#95-14 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, Metrobus, Metrorail and Paratransit operating costs are expected to exceed the respective operating revenues; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, the Budget Committee, the staffs of the local jurisdictions and WMATA staff have over the last several years analyzed the various factors used to distribute Metrobus and Paratransit costs and revenues, and the Metrorail subsidy. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Metrobus and Paratransit costs and revenues and the Metrorail operating assistance shall be allocated among the jurisdictions using the formulas in effect in Fiscal 1995 and as stated in Attachment I of this Resolution commencing with FY 1996 and continuing until changed by the Board of Directors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be effective July 1, 1995.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Robert L. Polk General Counsel

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mrs. Mack, and unanimously approved, as amended. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Wineland, Mrs. Whipple, Mr. Evans, Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Mack, and Mr. Berger

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 180

A TTACHMENT I

I.

METROBUS A cost-revenue formula is used to allocate jurisdiction subsidy for Metrobus operations. Metrobus costs net of subcontract charter are assigned to one of three categories - fixed, mileage, or hourly. Fixed costs, as defined for allocation purposes, include all expenses for overhead, operator training and utility payhours, wages for service vehicle mechanics, general insurance premiums, security, safety, revenue collection, scheduling, residual liabilities, and all supervisory costs except lead mechanic wages and a portion of the salary for the garage shift supervisors. Mileage-related costs include revenue vehicle mechanic wages and overtime, current year expenses for workers' compensation for operators and third party claims, general liability insurance, and all revenue vehicle costs for diesel fuel, tire rental, and parts. Hourlyrelated costs are primarily operator wages and related fringe benefits plus workers' compensation for all personnel other than bus operators. Each allocation cost category is charged to the jurisdictions as follows: (a)

All fixed costs are charged to the District, the two Maryland Counties, and Northern Virginia based on the percent distribution of 1975 peak period buses. Fixed costs are allocated among the Virginia jurisdictions in proportion to the variable cost allocation within Virginia.

(b)

All mileage-related costs are allocated in proportion to each jurisdiction's share of platform miles.

(c)

All hourly-related costs are allocated in proportion to each jurisdiction's share of platform hours.

Platform miles and platform hours are measured from the time a bus leaves a garage until it returns to a garage. This data is compiled for each route and route variation and within each jurisdiction where operated. The platform miles and hours are associated with either a revenue trip (in-service) or a non-revenue trip (deadhead). All revenue trips are assigned, a "dedication" code that specifies (1) which jurisdiction(s) is charged for the miles and hours and (2) for trips serving more than one jurisdiction, how the miles and hours are shared. The miles and hours for all deadhead trips and layover time on a given bus line are prorated among the jurisdictions in accordance with each jurisdiction's share of revenue miles and hours for that line. The sum, by jurisdiction, of all miles and hours scheduled for regular route service is computed for the fiscal year, taking into consideration all scheduled service adjustments and running time adjustments.

Resolutions of the Board of

Directo~s

Page 181

For each revenue bus trip that a jurisdiction pays for (cost), the jurisdiction receives credit for all or a portion of the revenue collected on that trip, based on the dedication code of the trip. The allocated passenger revenues are subtracted from each jurisdiction's allocated cost to determine the jurisdiction bus subsidy. The Authority contracts for a bus passenger survey everyone or two years to determine the appropriate share of revenue for each jurisdiction. The sampling techniques, survey design, and revenue allocation procedures have all been reviewed and validated by the University of Maryland Transportation Department and are incorporated into the scope of services. The accuracy objectives for the survey and revenue allocations are ± 5 percent for each jurisdiction and ± 3 percent for the system with a 95 percent confidence level. This has traditionally required a survey sample of approximately 2,600 weekday and 1,500 weekend revenue trips selected at random within a stratified universe file of 16,000 weekday and weekend trips. The passengers on each sampled trip are asked to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire asks for each passenger's location of boarding and alighting, the method of fare payment, and the passenger ~ype. The passenger response rate is then factored to the total data collected on sampled trips. Revenues are distributed among the jurisdictions using the data collected from the survey, plus passenger revenue computations, garage revenue collections, and flash pass sales. The following revenue allocation rules have been approved by the Board and are applied as follows: •

All farebox revenues from service dedicated to a single jurisdiction are allocated to that jurisdiction, unless a transfer is made to service dedicated to another jurisdiction.



In the District of Columbia and Maryland, the farebox revenues of passengers transferring from service dedicated to one jurisdiction to service dedicated to another jurisdiction are allocated in proportion to the fares which would be charged from origin to the transfer point and from the transfer point to the destination.



Metrobus revenues from interstate non-dedicated service are assigned on the basis of the passenger's miles in each state.



Within Virginia, Metrobus revenues are (a) dedicated to one jurisdiction, or (b) assigned to the boarding jurisdiction, or (c) assigned to the alighting jurisdiction, or (d) joint dedicated to two or more jurisdictions.



MD base flash pass revenues are assigned to Maryland and VA base flash pass revenues to Virginia. DC base flash passes may be used for the base fare in any jurisdiction and revenues are allocated based on Metrobus trip patterns of users of these passes as determined by the passenger survey.

Resolutions of the Board of Directols Page 182

!



Revenues from the interstate flash passes are distributed based on Metrobus trip patterns of the users of these passes as developed from the Bus Passenger Survey.



The intra-Virginia distribution of the revenues from the VA base pass and the intra-Maryland distribution of revenues from the MD base pass also use the results from the Bus Passenger Survey.

The WMATA Board of Directors on May 10, 1984 adopted resolutions regarding the bus transfer arrangement with Ride-On and the bus transfer agreement and acceptance of flash passes by Alexandria Transit Company and the Fairfax Connector. The revenue allocation programs are designed to comply with these resolutions.

II. METRO RAIL Two allocation formulas are used to determine the subsidy for each jurisdiction - the rail subsidy allocation formula and the max fare subsidy formula. (A)

Metrorail Subsidy Each jurisdiction's share is determined as follows:

(B)



One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the relative number of stations in operation in each jurisdiction. This factor includes all stations in the system with the exception of the Arlington Cemetery Station.



One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of a weighted average of urbanized area population and population density using the most current census data and the most current census population definition of the urbanized area.



One-third of the subsidy is distributed on the basis of the weekday Metrorail passengers by jurisdiction of residence. This factor is computed using data from the most recent Metrorail Passenger Survey.

Max Fare Subsidy The max fare subsidy is one-half the revenue differential between what riders travelling more than six composite miles actually pay and what they would have paid without a tapered mileage charge or a fare cap. The max fare subsidy by jurisdiction is determined from the Metrorail passenger survey. The charge to each jurisdiction reflects the residence of the riders receiving the benefit of the reduced peak period fares and the value o~ the benefit received.

Resolutions of the Board of Directots Page 183

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 10, 1999 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARATRANSIT FORMULA'

# 99-31 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Corpmittee has reviewed the current fourtiered formula used to determine each jurisdiction's share of the MetroAccess subsidy and has concluded that a new allocation formula is needed; and WHEREAS, the Board Budget Committee has reviewed and agrees with changes to the MetroAccess formula as proposed by the Regional Paratransit Coordinating Committee; and WHEREAS, the proposed MetroAccess formula more accurately assigns the cost of the MetroAccess service to the jurisdiction served. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that, beginning with fiscal 2000, WMATA's MetroAccess costs will be allocated among the District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince George's Counties in Maryland, and Northern Virginia as an entity, as follows: •

Direct Costs - the contract carriers' actual per trip, reservation, and eligibility charges will be allocated directly to jurisdictions; and



Overhead Costs - all other costs of the paratransit program will be allocated in proportion to the direct costs; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Northern Virginia jurisdictions of Arlington and Fairfax Counties, and the Cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church have determined an appropriate procedure for WMATA to further allocate costs within Northern Virginia: •

Direct Costs - per trip charges will be adjusted to reflect the average time of trips provided for each jurisdiction; and



Overhead Costs - these costs will be allocated within Northern Virginia based on the direct costs as calculated for each jurisdiction; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall become effective for fiscal 2000 and shall remain in effect for subsequent fiscal years unless changed by the Board of Directors; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

l'fIbjoo Ib.t;t i~~5I"6fcttl eeBmcle-di Q:rf~j rairID1lIH'Ts1 an, and unanim ousl y approve d . ;W§!j@ 4~· Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: AUGUST 13, 1998 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF INTERJURISDICTIONAL FUNDING AGREEMENT #98-38 Resolution

of the Board of Directors

of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

WHEREAS, the U.S. Congress, in the 1997 U. S. Department of Transportation Appropriations Act, directed the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to conduct an independent study to analyze how to meet current and future bus transportation needs for the greater Washington metropolitan region through the year 2020; and WHEREAS, the WMATA Board of Directors appointed the Regional Mobility Panel, a group of regional government, business, labor and citizen leaders, in January 1997 and charged that panel with the responsibility of addressing the concerns expressed by Congress concerning the rising costs and fragmentation of regional bus services; and WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel provided its recommendations on improving regional mobility and on transit funding in two reports to the WMATA Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors reviewed the reports and recommendations of the Regional Mobility Panel and accepted them for implementation in cooperation with the local jurisdictions of the Washington metropolitan area; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and Member Jurisdictions have worked to develop an Inter-Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program that will implement the recommendations of the Regional Mobility Panel; and WHEREAS, the Agreement will delineate responsibilities for the planning, funding and service delivery of Regional and Non-Regional Bus Services, establish a new funding formula for Regional Bus Services similar to the regional Metrorail formula, create a Coordinated Service Planning process to provide for the efficient integration of bus services in the Transit Zone, and provide for certain pledges regarding the adequacy of funding and the maintenance of average bus passenger fares and Regional bus subsidies through FY 2002 for the same level of Regional bus service; and WHEREAS, the Agreement establishes a commitment by the Member Jurisdictions to pursue, support and implement necessary legislative and other actions in the Member Jurisdictions, the states, and the federal government to fully fund the average annual $100 million shortfall in the WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program; and

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 185

WHEREAS, the Member Jurisdictions have approved and signed the Inter-Jurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the InterJurisdictional Funding Agreement for Bus Service and WMATA Rehabilitation and Replacement Program and authorizes the Chairman of the Board to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Authority; BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective immediately.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Robert L. Polk, General Counsel

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Wineland, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Barnett, Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Wineland, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mrs. Mason

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 186

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: MAY 13, 1999 SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING POLICY #99-21 RESOLUTION OFTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors approves an annual operating budget by department and by expense category and establishes the total number of authorized positions for the Authority; and WHEREAS, the Authority Board of Directors has approved Resolution #97-31 (Attachment A) establishing procurement procedures and providing thresholds for procurements which require approval of the Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, in approving the Fiscal 1999 Operating Budget (Resolution #97-21, Attachment B), the Authority Board of Directors resolved that expenditures which exceed $25 thousand for programs not defined or provided for in the budget shall require Board approval; and WHEREAS, from time to time approval by the Board of Directors may be required for adjustments to approved staffing and expenditure levels; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following actions affecting the operating budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior to submission to the Board of Directors: •

Any action that requires an increase in the total number of positions Authority-wide; and



Any action that requires a transfer of funds between the personnel and non-personnel categories of expense; and



Any action which meets the threshold for Board approval and results in a cumulative increase of $200,000 in operating funds during the fiscal year: • from other than the category in which it is budgeted; or • from other than the department in which it is budgeted; or • in excess of the amount budgeted for any given category in any department; and



Any professional and technical services contracts over $50,000 and any unbudgeted professional and technical services contracts over $10,000; and

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 187



Any expenditures which exceed $25 thousand for programs not defined or provided for in the budget and/or any new initiative which has out year operating budget impacts; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately. Rev'ewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

,~

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham and Mr. Barnett

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 188

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 22, 2000 SUBJECT: REVISED IRP REPROGRAMMING POLICY

#2000-43 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, beginning in fiscal 2000, the Board of Directors has determined that a quarterly report on the status of the Infrastructure Renewal Program will be presented to the Board Budget Committee; and WHEREAS the Infrastructure Renewal Program includes Internally Generated Funds as a funding source for projects; and WHEREAS from time to time adjustments may be required to approved Infrastructure Renewal Program budgets and project funding levels; and WHEREAS the Board Budget Committee has directed the General Manager to establish a budget amendment and reprogramming policy for the Infrastructure Renewal Program. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following actions affecting the Infrastructure Renewal Program budget shall require approval of the Board Budget Committee prior to submission to the Board of Directors: •

initiation of any new project; or



amendment of any fiscal year's total budget in the approved six-year program; or



any increase in IRP staffing; or



any reprogramming actions over $200,000 on an annual cumulative basis between IRP projects in the current year's budget; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that when the General Manager submits an annual proposed IRP budget, the total amount of IRP Internally Generated Funds available shall be identified, the proposed use of all or part of these funds in the proposed IRP shall be provided, and any use of IRP Internally Generated Funds other than as included in an approved IRP budget shall require approval by the Board Budget Committee prior to submission to the Board of Directors; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any reprogramming actions below the $200,000 threshold will be identified and included in the quarterly report to the Board Budget Committee; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is authorized to approve reprogramming actions exceeding the $200,000 limit on an emergency basis, as defined in the WMATA Procurement Regulations, provided that the Board Budget Committee be immediately notified of such actions; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution supercedes Resolution #99-64 adopted on October 28, 1999 and shall be effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

(!!lud.~ t1~ (//~ Cheryl C. Burke General Counsel

¥mi§e>RY

Ayes: 6 - Mrs.

~~,eCf§p Trotter,

Mack, lv"r.

or

.

Z:jL

XV. Contract Approval Requirements -The Board has delegated approval authority to the

General Manager for certain activities identified below. The General Manager is authorized to delegate the approval of procurement initiation and award activities that the Board has delegated to the General Manager to subordinate officials of the Authority. The General Manager will establish procedures which will provide for timely review and processing of all procurement actions. Board approval is required for the following:

ACTIY1TY REQU1R.D"JG BOARD AFPROY AL E.

DOLLAR THRESHOLD

Initiation of Procurement:

All procurement actions except as listed

1.

Over S100,000

below. 2.

Real Estate Acquisitions

3.

Professional and Technical Services (P&T) a. Operating

b. Capital

F.

Board Approval Not Required

Over S50,000 If Budgeted Over S10,000 If NonBudgeted Over S50.000 If Budgeted Over S10.000 If ~onBudgeted

Contract Awards: Over S100,000 1.

All av,'ards, except as listed below.

7

Real Estate AcqUlsitions

3.

Any award which would represent a change to Board policy.

4.

Professional and Technical Services (P&T)

Over 5250.000

a. Operating

b. Capital

Over S50.000 IS Budgeted Over S10,000 If NonBudgeted Over S50,000 If Budgeted Over 510,000 If NonBudgeted

Revised 5/01/00 Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 190

G. Modifications: l.

All modifications for equipment, supplies, services, constrUction and real estate including exercise of options, except as

A.

noted below.

B.

2.

Any modification exceeding the authorized budget including contingency, if any .

.).

Any budgeted modification to exerClse a contract option when the option was evaluated as part of the basis of award and Board approval was provided as part of the initial award .

.1

Professional and Technical Services (P&T) a. Operating

b. Capital

NOTE 1:

For Board Approved Contracts: 10% of the original approved contract value or S200,000, whichever is low·er. For Non-Board Approved Contracts: The cumulative value of the original contract and all modifications exceeds SI 00.000 Over Budget

Board Approval Not Required.

Over S lO,OOO: Board approval required if modification is greater than S lO.OOO more than funds pre\'iously approved on Staff Summary Sheet. Over S I 0,000; Board approval required if modification is greater than S10,000 more than funds previously approved on Staff Summary Sheet.

Notwithstanding the above, the General Manager has the authority to incur obligations in emergency situations, and will report back to the Board on all emergency procurements within 60 days ofthe action. Emergency is defined as a situation (such as a flood, epidemic, riot, equipment failure, or other reason declared by the General Manager) which creates an immediate threat to the public health, welfare or safety. The existence of an emergency condition creates an immediate need for supplies, services or construction which cannot be met through normal procurement methods, and the lack of which would seriously threaten either the health or safety of any person, the Revised 5/01/00 .

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 191

preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary '.



Authority functions.

NOTE2:

Professional and Technical (P&T) services includes but is not limited to labor and services provided by attorneys, accountants, appraisers, arbiters, auditors, investment bankers, computer service companies, architect/engineering firms, management consultants, and transit industry consultants. Revised 5/01100

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 192

BOARD PROCURF.:MENT ACTION MATRIX Revised 510 1100

JJ CD

(J)

0

';::r-t

~.

flVITY REQlJJJ~ING BOARD PROVAL ~

~ r-t

DOLLAR THRESHOLD - ClJRRENT

DOLLAR THRESHOLD - PROPOSED BY THE GMGR

Initiation of Procurcment

::::r

CD

OJ

l.

All procurement actions except as listed below.

Over $100,000

No Change

2.

Real Estate Acquisitions

Board Approval not Required

No Change

3.

Professional and Technical Services (P&T) a. Operating

Over $50,000 if Budgeted Over $10,000 if Non-Budgeted

No Changc

b. Capital

Over $100,000

Over $50,000 if Budgeted Over $10,000 if Non-Budgeted

0

.,

ill

0..

0

~

.,0 CD

()

r-t

.,0 (J)

J

co

, ) )

D~ flVITY IU:QUJH.ING BOARD ~

DOLLAR THRESHOLD - CURRENT

{J) ~ROVAL

(~ffi.

DOLLAR THRESHOLD - PROPOSED BY THE GMGR

Contract Awards:

:::. 0

:J

(J)

0 -n r-+

:J

1.

All awards except as listed below

Over $100,000

No Change

2.

Real Estate Acquisitions

Over $250,000

No Change

3.

Any award which would represent a change to Board policy e.g. Indemnification

Requires Board Approval

No change

4.

Professional and Technical Services (P&T) Over $50,000 if Budgeted Over $10,000 if Non-Budgeted

No Change

CD

OJ

0

Q.l

""'I

Q.

0 -n

0 ""'I

CD

()

r-+

0

""'I

(J)

a.

h.

Operating

Capital

Over $100,000

Over $50,000 if Budgeted Over $10,000 if Non-budgeted

~ ~ c

C!:t. 0

'IVITY REQUIRING BOARD

DOLLAR

THRI~SHOLD -

CURRENT

~ROVAL

DOLLAR THRESHOLD - PROPOSED BY THE GMGR

Modifications

:J

(J)

1.

All modifications for equipment supplies, services, construction and real estate including exercise of options, except as noted below

Over $200,000

A. For Board Approved Contracts: 10% of the original approved contract value or $200,000, whichever is lower. B. For Non-Board Approved Contracts: The cumulative value of the original contract and all modifications exceeds $100,000.

2.

Any modification exceeding the authorized budget including contingency, if any .

Over Budget

No Change

3.

Any budgeted modification to exercise a contract option when the option was evaluated as part of the basis of award and Board approva I was provided as part of the initial award.

Board Approval not Reqlmed

No Change

4.

Professional and Technical Serviccs

0 -n ~

:::r CD

OJ 0

., Q)

Q.

0 -n

.,0 CD

() r-t

.,0 (J)

~

(~

~

01

a.

Operating

Ovcr $10,000; Board approval required If Modification is greater than $10,000 mOle than funds previously approved on StalT Summary Sheet

No Change

b.

Capital

Over $200,000

Over $10.000: Board approva I required I I' Modi fieatlon is greater than $10,000 more than funds preVIOusly approved on Sta IT Summary Sheet.

"' " -OJ)

~~ CD 0

.....\C

c.o

~. 0)0

:J (J)

o-n r-+

:J" CD

CO

oQ) ""'I

Q.

o-n

o ""'I

CD

(")

r-+

o ""'I

(J)

The General Manager has the authority to incur obligations in emergency situations, and will report hack to the Board on all emergency procurements within 60 days. Emergency is defined as a situation (such as a flood. epidemic, riot, equipment failure, or other reason declared by the General Manager) which creates an immediate threat to the public health, welfare, or safety. The existence of an emergency condItion creates an immediate need for supplies, services or construction which cannot be met through normal procurement methods, and the lack of which would seriously threaten either the health or safety of any person, the preservation or protection of property, or the continuation of necessary Authority functions.

PRESENTED & ADOPTED:

June 8, 2000 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CHANGES TO THE PROCUREMENT POLICY STATEMENT

#2000-42 RESOLUTION OFTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFTHE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors approved specific procurement thresholds on July 24, 1997, and approved the Procurement Policy Statement by Resolution No. 97-31; and WHEREAS, the dynamic nature of Authority procurements require changing the thresholds for designated procurement actions and to elaborate on the emergency authority delegated to the General Manager.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following changes to the Procurement Policy Statement are hereby approved: •

the Board contract approval thresholds for Professional and Technical (P&T) actions is consistent regardless of fund source;



the Board approval threshold for modification of equipment, supplies, services, construction and real estate contracts not funded from P&T funds is changed from $200,000 to: A) for Board approved contracts, 10% of the original approved contract value or $200,000, whichever is lower; and B) for non-Board approved contracts when the cumulative value of the original contract and all modifications will exceed $100,000; and



the Board guidelines for reporting emergency procurements is changed from periodically to within 60 days of the action.

BE IT immediately.

FURTHER

RESOLVED

that

this

Resolution

shall

be

effective

Reviewed as~ sufficiency.

Cheryl C. urke General ounsel

M~Pl~61Ei~r~¥'M~O~q~~~§t1d ullallllflOOSly approveu. Ayes:~ - ~s. riA'aCK, M"f.'tr:e:: Immerman"~. Graham, Mr. Barnett and Mrs. Hanl~ ~age

197

PRESENTED & ADOPTED:



SUBJECT:

JUNE 9, 1994

ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING MODIFICATION

#94-35 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLJTAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

\VHEREAS. under accrual accounting costs are recorded at the time services are received regardless of the fiscal year in which they are budgeted: and WHEREAS. the WMATA Compact requires that funds be identified for the full amount of a contract at time of award: and WHEREAS. this requires the budgetJl1g of all funds for the contract in the fiscal year in which the contract is awarded and additional funds in future fiscal years if sen'ices are not received in the fiscal year in which they are initially budgeted



NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of DIrectors approves a modification to the Authority's accrual accounting procedures to prO\ide for recording the costs of one time. nonrecurring. professional and technical senices contracts at time of contract award: and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall be effective beginning in Fiscal 1995,

ReVIewed as to form and legal sufficiency

Robert 1. Polk General Counsel

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mrs. Pemberton, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Evans, Mrs. Pemberton, Mrs. Whipple, Mr. Rachal, Mr. Barnett, and Mr. Alexander

• Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 198

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 1999 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REIMBURSABLE PROJECT POLICY AND PROJECT RESERVE FUNDS

#99-63 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, from time to time the Authority is called upon to provide assistance and services on behalf of the local jurisdictions, state governments, and other entities; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors encourages staff to support, to the extent possible, requests by the local jurisdictions and state governments that are of benefit to the Authority, provided that such projects do not affect the approved annual operating, capital improvement program or rail construction budgets or subsidies; and WHEREAS, over the past several years, the number and complexity of reimbursable project requests have been increasing so as to require a definitive set of policy guidelines for recommending such requests to the Board Budget Committee for review and to the Board of Directors for approval; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors encourages staff to support, to the extent possible, requests for reimbursable projects by the local jurisdictions and state governments that are beyond the annual operating, capital improvement program and rail construction budgets and subsidies approved by the Board of Directors; and 1.

That a Reimbursable Project, excluding adjacent construction projects, charter bus services, and projects with a full funding grant agreement shall be classified as either Reimbursable Services/Projects or Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts and shall be fully funded (including all direct and indirect costs, insurance, and associated overhead costs), and paid for by the entity requesting the project; and

Page 1 of 4

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 199

2.

That upon request by a local jurisdiction, state government, or other entity, the General Manager shall present to the Board Budget Committee for review and to the Board of Directors for approval, a project description, staffing, funding and duration of each request for a reimbursable project; except the General Manager may approve Reimbursable Projects with participating jurisdictions and state governments, provided that such projects do not require additional positions and do not exceed $200,000; and the Board will be notified in advance of such actions; and

3.

That the General Manager shall ensure that staffing and funding for a Reimbursable Project will be available so as to not require any staff or funds from the operating, capital improvement program or rail capital budgets or subsidies; and

4.

That funding for all Reimbursable Projects shall be available in advance, except those under a Reimbursable Fixed Price Contract which may be paid in arrears; and

5.

That pricing for all Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts with an arrears payment schedule will include the cost of money; and

6.

That either signed arrears payment contracts or funds for advance payments must be in place before work on a project begins; and

7.

That the funds for Reimbursable Projects are payable within 30 days after the billing date, and all accounts that are not paid by the 31 st day after billing are considered delinquent and will be assessed a late payment penalty and interest charge, except that the Authority will be responsible for any billing errors; and

8.

That the Board of Directors will be notified of any Reimbursable Project for which payment is 90 days past due, that the project will cease when payment is 120 days past due, unless the Board of Directors authorizes continuation of the project; however, in no case, without approval of the Board of Directors, will the amount overdue for a project exceed the amount available in the Reimbursable Project Reserve; and

9.

That if a project is discontinued for non-payment or non-adherence to project and funding agreements, the requesting party will be responsible for close-out and termination costs; and

Page 2 of 4 Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 200

10.

That the Board authorizes and directs the use of the $1.0 million new service reserve, established by Resolution #98-14, to establish the Reimbursable Project Reserve; and

11.

That the Reimbursable Project Reserve shall be additionally funded from any savings realized at the completion of any Reimbursable Fixed Price Projects and shall be used to offset potential cost overruns and start-up costs for Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts, delinquent payments from any Reimbursable Project, and to cover ineligible costs for reimbursable services agreements; and

12.

That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the Reimbursable Project Reserve balance is inadequate, to borrow from the Operating Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with interest as reimbursable program funds become available; and

13.

That at the completion of a Reimbursable Services/Project, any savings realized or shortfalls incurred shall be returned or billed, respectively, to the participating jurisdiction; and

14.

That a Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will be established in an amount necessary to provide appropriate insurance coverage and funding for claims up to the deductible with the reserve level reviewed annually by an actuary; and

15.

That the Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve will be funded by each project to provide protection for workers compensation, third party claims, errors and omissions, and property damage; and

16.

That the General Manager is authorized, in the event that the Reimbursable Projects Insurance and Claims Reserve balance is inadequate for insurance deductibles, to borrow from the Operating Claims Reserve, such borrowed funds to be repaid with interest as reimbursable program funds become available; and

17.

That upon completion or termination of a Reimbursable Project, the staffing positions associated with the project will be deleted and removed from the Authority's position authorization; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager will provide to the Board Budget Committee the Policy/Instruction setting forth the procedures for Reimbursable Services/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts;

Page 3 of 4 Resolutions of the Board of Directors

Page 201

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the General Manager shall submit to the Board Budget Committee a quarterly report on the status of the Reimbursable Services/Projects and Reimbursable Fixed Price Contracts; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall be effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Hanley, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Barnett and Mr. Catania

N:\FY 2000\RESO LUTN\reimbursable4. wpd

Page 4 of 4

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 202

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 10, 2000 Subject: Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

#2000-10 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Regional Mobility Panel directed WMATA to take the lead in planning the regional bus network; and WHEREAS, bus ridership has grown as a result of increased demand and the implementation of fare integration measures, necessitating minor changes to the regional bus services; and WHEREAS, in May 1999 the Board of Directors adopted a set of guidelines for adding service to existing regional Metrobus routes; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors instructed staff to develop similar guidelines for reduction of service on existing regional Metrobus routes and for adding new regional Metrobus routes and services; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that it would be beneficial to extend the period of experimental service from one year to two years to enable flexibility to respond to the needs of the developing market; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors adopts the Guidelines for Regional Bus Services dated February 3, 2000, which are the May 1999 guidelines amended to include new guidelines for the reduction of service on existing regional Metrobus lines and for adding new regional Metrobus lines and services; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board-adopted Rules And Regulations for Metrobus Operations dated October 1996 is hereby amended to state that new Metrobus routes and services may be operated for up to 18 months as "experimental service" with the option to extend the period to 24 months at the Board's discretion; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be effective immediately.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency:

Cheryl C. Burke, GeneralJCoun.Jel

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approve<Page Ayes: 4 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, and Mr. Barnett

203

~

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REGIONAL METROBUS SERVICES

February 3, 2000

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 204

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

SECTION

I:

GUIDELINES FOR ADDING NEW LINES AND SERVICES

The regional mobility plan as adopted, identified WMATA as the lead agency to develop a plan for regional bus needs. As the transit needs change within the Washington D.C. region, a guideline is needed to determine when' new regional service may be implemented. Through regional service, Metrobus must meet the needs of emerging markets that can support transit. Identifying markets that can support transit and determining how to serve them is a task that WMATA staff will coordinate with the staff of the jurisdictions. Once a new market is identified, staffwill use passenger demand as the performance measure for implementing new service. Passenger demand is determined by estimating the number of passengers that will utilize the service. Staff will recommend new service as needed as part of the fiscal year service plan during the budget process. Service will be developed in concert with local jurisdictions and presented to the board committees. The recommendation will include cost, subsidy, and performance goals for 6 months, 12 months, and, 18 months. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR INTRODUCING NEW LINES AND SERVICES

• • • •

Determine demand for new service Semi-annual performance goals will be established Evaluate new service recommendation to identify potential success New service will be reviewed every six months to track ridership

One Guideline •

Minimum load factor

Service will be recommended as an experimental line if it has the potential demand to achieve the minimum load factor for its line classification within an 18 month period.

Resolutions of the Board of Directors

February 3, 2000

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus. This load factor differential by line type is as follows: Line Classifications Minimum Load Factor • • •



Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers. Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. generally does not serve urban centers. Express - operates over major travel corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers. Off-peak (all service types)

.65 .55 .50

.50

ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines. • •

Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff. Performance goals will be set and service will be reviewed every six months

~~E~i~EH) of the Board of Directors

Page 2

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

SECTION

II: GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES

INTRODUCTION

When a bus service overcrowding problem is identified, staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate alternatives to determine if a no cost solution is possible. The following no cost alternatives are typically used by staff: • • • • • • • •

integrate headways along a corridor adjust headways replace smaller buses with larger buses have a pull-out or pull-in trip make a revenue trip redistribute running time adjust recovery time short turn trips reroute to avoid congestion

Only after it is determined that a no cost alternative does not exist will additional service be recommended. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR ADDING SERVICE TO EXISTING LINES

• • •

effectively measure service performance evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for entire regional bus network. on a semi-annual basis service changes will be reviewed to track the impact of the changes on the budget and ridership. Four Guidelines 1. 2. 3. 4.

load factor (radial, crosstown and express) running time non-peak productivity standard regional equity optional at the Board's discretion

~M~~Lj~iRJa~ of the Board of Directors

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

1.

Load Factor A service increase is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour exceeds the load factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus (45). For example: 225 passengers divided by 5 trips, divided by 45 seats, yields a load factor of 1.0. This load factor differential by line type is as follows:

Line Classification Load Factors •

Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers. Crosstown - provides service across corridors and generally does not serve urban centers. Express - operates over major travel corridors and includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers. Off-peak (all service types)

• •

• 2.

1.2 1.1 1.0

1.0

Running Time Adjustments Service will be added if running time is insufficient and more than 33% of the trips on a linee within a 30 minute period during the peak and 60 minute period during the off-peak are not able to start their next cycle on-time.

3.

Non-peak Productivity Service will be increased if ridership averages more than 30 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours (at the increased service level).

4.

Regional Equity at The Board's Discretion New service, line extensions or other service enhancements to new areas will be considered as an option to ensure regional equity as determined by relative subsidy contributions. It is at the boards discretion to consider this option.

F!J,Yu~8J~tb~oos of the Board of Directors

f5age

20~

Page 4

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends service improvements, they will first identify any no cost alternatives. If staff cannot identify any no cost alternatives then the guidelines will be applied. • • • •

Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff. The specific changes will be proposed. The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed. The final service change recommendations will be brought to the Board Operations and Budget Committees only if there is a budget implication.

Resolutions zuuu of the Board of Directors

FefJruary-;j,

PaQ.? 5

Page 2u9

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

SECTION

III:

GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES

INTRODUCTION

When a bus service is identified as a candidate for reduction, staff will review existing data or collect additional data to identify the cause of the problem. Then staff will investigate alternatives to determine if a solution is possible. The following alternatives to reducing service are typically used by staff: • • • • • •

Integrate headways along a corridor Adjust headways Adjust trips Replace larger buses with smaller buses Short turn trips Public information

Only after it is determined that an alternative to reducing service does not exist will a reduction of service be recommended. SERVICE GUIDELINES FOR REDUCING SERVICE ON EXISTING LINES

• •

Effectively measure service performance Evaluate service adjustments as necessary to ensure application of guidelines for entire regional bus network. Service changes will be reviewed on a semi-annual basis to track the impact of the changes on the budget and ridership.



Two guidelines 1. 2. 1.

Load factor (radial, crosstown, express and off-peak) Non-peak productivity standard

Load Factor

A service decrease is warranted if the ratio of passengers to seats at the maximum load point during the peak half-hour or non-peak hour does not meet the minimum load factor. The load factor is calculated by determining the number of passengers that pass the maximum load point, the number of trips made during the period, and the number of seats available on a bus. The goal is to maintain a minimum load factor for each line classification. This may require service to be reduced to achieve the minimum goal. The minimum load factor differential by line type is as follows: F~E(D'a9y!l1t~l)bS of the Board of Directors

~age 2fO

Page 6

~

Service Guidelines for Regional Metrobus Services

Line Classification Load Factors • • •

2.

Radial - operates over major arterials and corridors and is oriented toward major urban centers. Crosstown - provides service across corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. generally does not serve urban centers. Express - operates over major travel corridors and. . . . . . . . . . . . .. includes significant non-stop segments oriented toward major centers.

.60 .55 .50

Non-peak Productivity Service may be decreased if ridership averages less than 18 passengers per revenue hour during non-peak hours and staff determines that a decrease in service is warranted based on current performance trends. A reduction of service hours may result in improved performance.

ApPLICATION OF GUIDELINES

As part of the on-going planning process staff will analyze the performance of lines using the proposed guidelines. Before staff recommends a service reduction they will first identify any alternatives to reducing service. If staff cannot identify any alternatives, then the guidelines will be applied. • • •

Specific data will be collected and analyzed with the jurisdictional staff. The changes in service and the financial impact will be analyzed. The final service change recommendations will be brought to the board operations and budget committees only if there is a budget implication.

Resolutions of the Board of Directors

February 3, 2000

Pagef~1

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: SUBJECT:

June 8, 2000

POLICY FOR TRAVEL TO APTA, COMTO & UITP FUNCTIONS #2000-41 RESOLUTION OFTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFTHE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution #98-28 on June 25, 1998, establishing policy on staff participation in activities sponsored by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials (COMTO), and the International Union of Public Transport (UITP); and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors recognizes the benefit to the Authority from Board and staff participation in activities sponsored by APTA, COMTO, and UITP; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that WMATA benefits from staff participation in APTA activities by keeping abreast of the best practices in the transit industry; by receiving professional training and development; by participating in the exchange of ideas, experiences and regulatory/legislative/product improvement updates; and by being represented in functional areas where many transit industry decisions are being made; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors recognizes the importance of being cost conscious in funding travel expenses for staff participation in conferences; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors authorizes the General Manager to designate staff participation at APTA and COMTO conferences, seminars and workshops; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager may attend any APTA, UITP or COMTO events as necessary; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is directed to provide quarterly reports to the Board on staff participation at these functions, to include who traveled, where the function was held, and the purpose of the participation; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that one member of the Board of Directors may represent the Authority at UITP functions; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that attendance by the Board of Directors and senior staff at the APTA Legislative Conference shall be in accordance with the flat fee negotiated between the Authority and APTA;

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 212

SUBJECT: Policy for Travel to APTA, COMTO & UITP Functions

Page 2

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary shall coordinate Board member attendance at APTA and COMTO functions; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that at its discretion and subject to availability of funding, the Board of Directors may approve attendance by any member of the Board or staff at any function not specifically authorized above; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effectively immediately and shall supercede Resolution #98-28. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency:

Motion by Mr. Barnett, seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett, and Mrs. Hanley

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 213

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: August 10, 2000 SUBJECT: Revised Policy on Transit Infrastructure Investment Fund #2000-50 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, provisions of the Transportation Equity Act (TEA-21) allow public transportation agencies to retain all income and proceeds from sale or lease of real estate acquired with Federal assistance and to apply the funds to transit-related expenditures; and WHEREAS, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Compact requirement for a specified, pre-determined funding source has constrained the ability to pursue creative and innovative projects, and to develop new market opportunities that can reduce cost, improve revenue or provide better service to its customers; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Authority will establish and maintain a Transit 'nfrastructure Investment Fund (TIIF) in accordance with the following principles: 1.

Equity capital for the TIIF will be provided from uncommitted proceeds as a result of the sale or long-term lease, as appropriate, of real estate transactions approved under the Joint Development Program, and that all funds to be deposited in the TIIF will be subject to Board approval;

2.

Any balance of funds in the TIIF will be used, with Board approval, and in conformity with Compact requirements, any applicable FTA approvals and other financial documents existing at any given time;

3.

The TIIF program may be used to support Joint Development activities that are consistent with the goals and objectives of the non-recurring, capital investment projects which will provide long-term benefits to the Authority, or to advance approved projects or purchases in the Infrastructure Renewal Program that will strengthen reliability of transit services and meet increased ridership demands;

4.

The first thirty million dollars of funds deposited into TIIF will be allocated for use on a subregional basis in accordance with the rail construction formula in existence at the time the funds are received by the Authority as described in 3 above;

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 214

5.

After the initial allocation of funds as described above, the balance of funds in the TIIF will be allocated to non-operating expenses as approved by the Board.

6.

In reviewing requests for funds allocated as described in 5 above, the Board will consider the following priority expenditures: A)

Primarily to assure the complete funding of the Infrastructure Renewal Program and the anticipated need for additional buses and rail cars to match ridership growth;

B)

Secondarily to promote transit-oriented projects such as the following: •

Projects that generate revenue and provide a pay back to the TIIF Fund shall receive a higher priority than those which provide no pay back to the TIIF; and



Projects that increase rail system access and ridership.



Projects which enable a joint development project to be implemented and enable attainment of the Joint Development Program's goals and objectives;



Projects which enhance design and integration of the project into the community and transit system;

7.

Any pay back revenues generated from a TIIF funded project shall be deposited back into the TIIF;

8.

Specific uses of funds under this policy shall be recommended by the . Development and Expansion Committee to the Board of Directors for its review and action;

9.

The status of the TIIF will be reported to the Board of Directors quarterly through the Development and Expansion Committee; and

Resolutions of the Board of Directors

-2-

Page 215

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution supercedes Resolution 97-39 adopted September 25, 1997; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution be effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Motion by Mr. Graham, seconded by Mr. Trotter, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter, Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett, and Mrs. Hanley

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 216 -3-

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 21, 2001 SUBJECT: LABOR CONTRACT SETTLEMENT LOCAL 2, OPEIU and AMENDMENT TO WMATA RETIREMENT PLAN #2001-37 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, a majority of the Professional, Technical and Clerical/Administrative Personnel of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority are represented for purposes of collective bargaining by Local 2 of the Office and Professional Employees International Union; and WHEREAS, the Labor Agreement covering the wages, hours and working conditions of these employees expired June 30, 2000; and WHEREAS, the settlement with the Union includes certain negotiated improvements in the benefits under the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Retirement Plan. WHEREAS, the Authority desires to extend these negotiated benefit improvements to those non-represented employees and Special Police employees represented by Local 246 who participate in the Retirement Plan. WHEREAS, a settlement of the issues between the parties has been tentatively reached by the Authority staff and the Union; and WHEREAS, the specific provisions of the tentative settlement are described in the attached summary; and WHEREAS, the union membership, following open meetings on May 16, 2001, has ratified the tentative settlement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the tentative settlement reached between the Authority staff and Local 2 of the Office and Professional Employees International Union covering the wages, hours and working conditions of these employees be approved by this Board; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that section 3.02 of the WMATA Retirement Plan be amended to add the following language after subsection (b): For any Participant accruing Credited Service on or after June 29, 2001, the formula for a Normal Retirement Pension described above in subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply. Instead, the annual Normal Retirement Pension shall equal:

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 217

Resolution #2001-37 of the Board of Directors Page 2 of 4

(a)

(b)

For each of the Participant's first twenty (20) years of Credited Service. (i)

one and six-tenths percent (1.6%) of the Participant's Final Average Earnings, up to the Participant's Social Security Breakpoint, plus

(ii)

two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the Participant's Final Average Earnings in excess of his Social Security Breakpoint, plus,

For each of the Participant's years of Credited Service in excess of twenty (20), one and six-tenths percent (1.6%) of the Participant's Final Average Earnings.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that section 4.02 shall be deleted and a new section 4.02 shall be added to the WMATA Retirement Plan and shall read as follows: For any Participant accruing Credited Service on or after June 29, 2001, the amount of an annual Early Retirement Pension, payable in monthly installments for the lifetime of the Participant, shall be: (a)

The amount of the Normal Retirement Pension calculated under section 3.02 to which the Participant would be entitled based on his Credited Service to his Normal Retirement Date and his Final Average Earnings determined at his Actual Retirement Date, multiplied by

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 218

Resolution #2001-37 of the Board of Directors Page 3 of 4

(b)

the ratio of the Participant's Credited Service earned to his Actual Retirement Date and his Credited Service that would have accumulated to his Normal Retirement Date,

such amount to be reduced by 0.166667 % for each month that the Participant's Actual Retirement Date precedes his Full Retirement Date.

For purposes of this Article IV, the Full Retirement Date for a Participant who ends his or her employment with the Authority on or after the end of the month preceding the Participant's Early Retirement Date and who will not reach 83 as computed below at any time before reaching age 65, even if he or she remained employed with the Authority, is the Participant's Normal Retirement Date. For a Participant who ends his or her employment with the Authority on or after the end of the month preceding the Participant's Early Retirement Date and who, if he or she remained employed with the Authority would reach 83 as computed below at some point before reaching age 65, the Participant's Full Retirement Date is the first day of the month following or coinciding with the first date where the sum of the Participant's age (measured in years and complete months) and his Credited Service equals or exceeds eighty-three (83). In no event shall the benefit amount determined in this manner be less than the benefit amount that would have been determined under the Plan as it was in effect before this Restatement, using the amount of the Participant's five (5) year average monthly compensation as it would have been determined on the date of retirement. The benefit amount so determined shall be subject to the annual Consumer Price Index adjustment as provided for under section 3.02.

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 219

Resolution of the Board of Directors Page 4 of 4

For any Plan Participant not accruing Credited Service after June 29, 2001, the amount of that Participant's Early Retirement Pension shall be computed under the terms of Plan section 4.02 as it existed at the last date that the Participant accrued Credited Service in the Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager be authorized to execute the Labor Agreement, covering the period of July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2004; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

Motion by Mr. Kauffman, seconded by Mrs. Mack, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Barnett, Mr. Kauffman, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Davey and Mr. Catania

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 220

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 20, 2002 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2003 OPERATING BUDGET AND OPERATING REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS #2002-30 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the comments of the local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2003 Operating Budget, and; WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received the requests of the local jurisdictions in establishing the Fiscal 2003 Reimbursable Operating Projects, and; WHEREAS, the comments received support adoption of the Fiscal 2003 Operating Budget as distributed to the local jurisdictions, and; WHEREAS, the FY2003 Operating Budget includes: • • • •



• • •

the eighth consecutive year without any fare increase, support for operation of the new 5000-series rail cars placed into service, continued expansion of demand based bus service, approximately $25 million in base cost reductions necessary to offset revenue shortfalls occurring as a direct result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, with the exception of new bus service, implementation of additional operational and maintenance capabilities utilizing existing staff with no increase in budgeted positions, expanded paratransit services to meet increased demand, continued ramp-up of internal staffing for elevator and escalator maintenance services, introduction of a Regional Clearing House to permit multi-operator SmarTrip acceptance;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal 2003 Operating Budget providing for revenues of $445,684,100, operating expenses of $850,031,444, and a operating subsidy requirement of $404,347,344 including the Fiscal 2003 debt service requirement of $27,484,194, as further detailed in the attachment, and approves a staffing level of 10,156 positions;

Resolutions of the Board of Directors 1

Page 221

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 2001 audit adjustment is $25,529,818; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the jurisdictional shares of the Fiscal 2003 gross subsidy and debt service requirement are as fdllows: District of Columbia Montgomery County Prince George's County City of Alexandria Arlington County Fairfax City Fairfax County City of Falls Church Total

$158,780,800 $69,119,539 $74,514,620 $17,633,550 $29,541,297 $887,378 $52,744,670 $1,125.491 $404,347,344

BE IT fURTHER RESOLVED that the Reimbu'rsable Operating Projects that will be undertaken are as follows: Potomac & Rappahannock Trans. . DC DPW Greenbelt Shuttle Springfield Circulator Springfield Shuttle Crofton-New Carrollton Van Pools Access-to-Jobs National Arboretum Hybrid Electric Bus Service Charles County Service Federal Triangle-Montgomery Mall Tyson's Reverse Commute Greenbelt to BWI Waldorf to Branch Avenue Laurel to Silver Spring Bethesda Reverse Commute College Park to Bethesda Total Reimbursements

~ ..

$5,410,000 $1,300,000 $87,000 $331,000 $109,000 $123,000 $210,000 $350,000 $84,000 $530,000 $746,000 $158,000 $600,000 $645,000 $692,000 $129,000 $302,000 $400,000 $12,206,000

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an analysis will be presented in an expedited manner to the appropriate committee of the Board on the feasibility and cost of creating rapid response teams to provide enhanced emergency elevator and escalator repair services; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board approves conversion of Route 5A from a reimbursable route to a regional route and approves use of the adjusted subsidy allocation formula in which revenue hours and miles are weighted by jurisdiction of residence of riders for this route; Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 222 2

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board revises resolution #84-54, adopted on July 26, 1984, which established a claims reserve for workers' compensation and third party liability claims, to also in include provisions for employee claims in the reserve, and to revise the size of the reserve from all outstanding liabilities to only the liability for claims expected to be paid in therr budget year, as well as a sufficient amount to permit the reserve' to pay large claims or foreseeable annual claim variations in any budget year without exceeding the amount available in the reserve, and;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board approves increases in the pay ranges for non-represented job families, effective July 1, 2002, as follows: Executive, 4.5%; Business Operations, 4.2%; Engineering and Construction, 4.1 %; Information Technology, 4.6%; Line Operatrons and Safety, 3.6%; and Police and Security, 6.1 %, and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the carry over of $200,000 in budgeted funds from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003 for the purpose of completing an information technology disaster recovery study and development of a disaster recovery plan, and; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately.

Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency.

U9JIJfY T90vJj~

Cheryl C. ~4/ri<e General Counsel

.

Motion by Mrs. Mack, seconded by Mr. Graham, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Graham, Mr. Barnett, Mr. Kauffman, Mrs. Mack and Mr. Trotter

Resolutions of the Board of Dire<3tors

Page 223

PRESENTED & ADOPTED: JUNE 20, 2002 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FISCAL 2003-2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM #2002-31 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFTHE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and considered comments from the local jurisdictions on the Proposed Fiscal 2003-2008 Capital Improvement Program consisting of the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP), System Access/Capacity Program (SAP), and the System Expansion Program (SEP); and WHEREAS, the Proposed Capital Improvement Program is based on the results of a 25year needs assessment and the requirement to align resources to adequately rehabilitate the system and grow ridership; and WHEREAS, the local jurisdictions have approved an Interjurisdictional Funding Agreement through Fiscal 2003 which includes a commitment of Federal and/or local resources to meet the requirements necessary to maintain system reliability; and WHEREAS, the Infrastructure Renewal Program assumes, for planning purposes only, a $25 million increase in additional Federal or non-federal funding in Fiscal 2004 and Fiscal 2005 to meet the projected requirements of the bus and rail system; and WHEREAS in order to expedite capital investments for critical needs and to ensure that system assets are preserved, consistent with the projected $9.8 billion needs through 25 years, the IRP proposes an additional funding ramp-up of $40 million, $100 million, and $170 million in Fiscal 2006, Fiscal 2007 and Fiscal 2008, respectively; and WHEREAS, in order to meet the funding requirements in Fiscal 2003 and beyond, the proposed program includes the use of a loan guarantee up to $600 million under the Transportation Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act of 1998 (TIFIA); and WHEREAS, the Fiscal 2003 CIP supports the following major initiatives:

• • • • • • • •

The continuation of construction activities for the New York Avenue Station, The continuation of construction activities for the Largo Extension and Parking, The continuation of the environmental and engineering process for the Tysons Dulles / Loudoun extension, The expansion of the CNG bus program, The initiation of environmental activities for the Purple Line in Maryland, The construction of parking garages at New Carrollton, West Falls Church, Franconia-Springfield and College Park, The expansion of the New Carrollton Rail Yard, and The continuation of the investment program to support the rehabilitation of the Metrobus and Metrorail infrastructures; Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 224 1

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors approves the Fiscal 2003 Capital Improvement Program totaling $522,369,000 as follows: 1) the Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $375,424,000, including $107,500,000 for Safety and Security Improvements subject to approval of Federal funds; 2) the System Access/Capacity Program totaling $115,945,000; and 3) the System Expansion Program totaling $31,000,000, all of which are further defined in Attachment A; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 2004 - 2008 Capital Improvement Program totaling $1,388,301,000 which includes the Infrastructure Renewal Program totaling $1,319,301,000, the System Access/Capacity Program totaling $25,900,000 and the System Expansion Program totaling $43,100,000, all of which are further defined in Attachment A, is hereby approved for planning purposes; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fiscal 2009 - 2012 Infrastructure Renewal Program element of the Capital Improvement Program totaling $1,573,400,000, also further defined in Attachment A, is included for information purposes; ,

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reprogrammings made in the Infrastructure Renewal Program to accommodate the costs of the Clean Fleet Program are referred to the Budget Committee for consideration at its next meeting, and that none of those reprogrammings shall be implemented until the review by the Budget Committee is completed; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, in order to implement the elements of the Capital Improvement Program, the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief of Staff has authorization to: 1) conduct public hearings; 2) file and execute grant applications on behalf of the Authority for funds from the Federal government and any other public or private entity consistent with the Capital Improvement Program; and 3) may provide any assurances and other documentation required to implement the Capital Improvement Program. The Chief Financial Officer is authorized to issue revenue anticipation notes, revenue bonds, certificates of participation, and other financial borrowing instruments, subject to Board approval of the final papers for each such financial transaction, in order to finance the Capital Improvement Program; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Infrastructure Renewal Program is the same program as the Capital Improvement Program referenced in the TIFIA Loan Guarantee Agreement and related documentation; BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately. Reviewed as form and legal sufficiency. '\ t~ ",',~i\),r "-4--;; \1 I 11./ A L i 1',' t ' ,\ ." !, I',~' HNi'

I

~;,~v~\ ~Jvv ,

,,"

c,

2

f1

Ii! ' ,

i i~

I

v--

ATTACHMENT A TABLE NO.1 FY 2003 • 2008 2002

DESCRIPTION

'"'0 JJ I

S(1) l0R I I'Ve

fJ5

g",

ROLLING STOCK: BUS CNG BUSES AND FACILITY CLEAN FLEET PROGRAM BUS REPLACEMENT

59,500 0 0

63,600 0 0

0 0 51,740

0 0 53,975

0 0 55,448

0 0 56,967

123,100 0 218,130

59,500

63,600

51,740

53,975

55,448

56,967

341,230

2,500 500 13,040

0 1,000 10,540

0 1,100 4,330

0 1,100 814

0 1,100 0

0 1,100 0

2,500 5,900 28,724

16,040

11,540

5,430

1,914

1,100

1,100

37,124

19,223 3,800 11,432 3,858 5,823 20,895

32,227 3,100 0 3,306 8,387 10,821

29,336 3,200 0 3,306 12,664 21,945

12,300 2,700 0 4,306 13,079 11,274

9,300 2,100 0 5,151 14,800 12,485

11,700 2,100 0 4,323 16,900 12,976

114,086 17,000 11,432 24,250 71,653 90,396

65,031

57,841

70,451

43,659

43,836

47,999

328,817

50,000 20,000 1,000 2,000 6,000 7,000 16,500 5,000

35,000 0 0 0 0 7,000 15,000 5,000

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

85,000 20,000 1,000 2,000 6,000 14,000 31,500 10,000

~500

62,000

0

0

0

0

169,500

8,287 5,000 8,831 375 500

7,719 5,150 13,405 0 0

2,551

3~

8,333 5,300 16,277 0 0 4,243

7,390 5,450 13,520 0 0 4,205

7,860 5,600 15,500 0 0 4,400

8,100 5,750 15,330 0 0 4,600

47,689 32,250 82,863 375 500 23,958

~544

30,233

34,153

30,565

33,360

33,780

187,635

COMPREHENSIVE RADIO SYSTEM ATC AND POWER SYSTEMS REPLACEMENT UPS/ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION FARE COLLECTION EQUIPMENT REGIONAL FARE INTEGRATION BUS FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM REPLACEMENT

2,305 18,982 5,860 1,295 3,000 1,417

1,762 19,209 7,690 710 0 0

0 29,173 7,756 5,891 0 0

0 19,739 7,243 5,903 0 0

0 21,188 8,753 8,168 0 0

0 24,488 10,457 6,909 0 0

4,067 132,779 47,759 28,876 3,000 1,417

TOTAL

32,859

29,371

42,820

32,885

38,109

41,854

217,898

TOTAL

(J)

ROLLING STOCK: RAIL

~I :::r ~,

EMERGENCY RAIL REHABILITATION RAILCAR ENHANCEMENTS RAIL CAR REHABILITATION TOTAL PASSENGER FACILITIES

Q)

"'"I

Q.

0 -n

0

ESCALATOR REHABILITATION/MAINTENANCE ELEVATOR REHABILITATION ESCALATOR CANOPIES STATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM PARKING LOT REHABILITATION MECHANICAL SYSTEMS REHABILITATION

"'"I

~I

TOTAL

r-+

~I

SAFETY AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS 1/ WMATA CONTINUITY OF OPERATIONS PLAN CHEMICAL SENSORS BIOLOGICAL SENSORS DECONTAMINATION INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEMS/BUS FACILITIES ADDITIONAL CAMERAS ON BUSES PUBLIC ADDRESS UPGRADE FOR RAIL STATIONS 10 CARD ACCESS FOR SENSITIVE FIELD LOCATIONS TOTAL MAINTENANCE FACILITIES RAIL/BUS STRUCT. FIELD BASES, YARDS & SHOPS REPAIRABLES BUS/RAIL SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SOUTHEAST BUS GARAGE NORTHERN BUS GARAGE RAIL WORK EQUIPMENT/LOCOMOTIVES TOTAL SYSTEMS

ATTACHMENl

tABLE NO.1

FY 2003 - 2008

JJ,

CD

TRACK AND STRUCTURES

CJ)

-C0

ROW TRACK AND STRUCTURES REHABILITATION STATION TUNNEL LEAK MITIGATION

10,203 2,134

9,198 2,134

33,520 2,134

10,987 2,134

21,009 2,134

24,987 2,134

109,904 12,804

TOTAL

12,337

11,332

35,654

13,121

23,143

27,121

122,708

20,413

9,300

300

300

6,900

9,900

~113

20,413

9,300

300

300

6,900

9,900

47,113

6,000 9,500

7,000 10,000

8,000 10,000

9,000 10,000

10,000 10,000

11,000 10,000

51,000 59,500

TOTAL

15,500

17,000

18,000

19,000

20,000

21,000

---..!.!Q,500

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE

20,700

~700

20,700

20,700

20,700

20,700

124,200

TOTAL

20,700

20,700

20,700

20,700

20,700

20,700

124,200

TOTAL

0

4,000

4,000

0

0

0

8,000

375,424

316,917

283,248

216,119

242,596

260,421

1,694,725

268,400

435,000

435,000

435,000

1,573,400

3,268,125

PROJECTED FUNDING WITHOUT FINANCING

352,600

320,600

285,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

2,102,900

435,000

435,000

435,000

435,000

1,740,000

3,842;900

(FINANCING) PAYBACK

(22,824)

3,683

1,752

108,581

142,404

174,579

408,175

166,600

0

0

0

r-t

0

:J CJ)

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT)

0....,

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

r-t

:::r

TOTAL

CD

OJ,

0

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT & SUPPORT

.....

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION CONSULTANT AND ENGINEERING (IAWP)

Q)

Q.

0....,

0

~I

0

U11

FINANCING COSTS

GRAND TOTAL PROJECTS

Notes: 1/ SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF FEDERAL FUNDS. 2/PAYBACK FOR FY 00·02. N:IFY2003ICIPITABLE1·FY03·08wilhCNG.OPW

-u Q) CO CD

t\) t\)

-..J

166,6002/

574,775 2/

WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY TABLE NO.2 FUNDING PROJECTIONS FOR FISCAL 2003-2008 IRP (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) ""OJ)

" ~ CO (J)

>YO, (FED 02)

>YO, (FED 03)

>YO, (FED 04)

" ' ' '05) (FED

" ' '06) ' (FED

Tom,

'" "' (FED 07)

CD 0 o

352,600

320,600

285,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

2,102,900

2,000

0

0

0

0

0

2,000

SE<:J1~N 5307 FEDERAL GRANTS

95,067

90,738

90,738

90,738

90,738

90,738

548,757

20~
23,766

22,684

22,684

22,684

22,684

22,684

137,186

58,159

70,628

70,628

70,628

70,628

70,628

411,299

14,540

17,657

17,657

17,657

17,657

17,657

102,825

7,800

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

1,500

15,300

5,000

5,150

5,300

5,450

5,600

5,750

32,250

29,962

42,189

68,439

107,989

168,139

217,989

634,707

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

8,054

48,324

SIGNAGE

252

0

0

0

0

0

252

DING FOR NORTHERN BUS GARAGE

500

0

0

0

0

0

500

FEDE AL FUNDING FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY IMPROVEMENTS 2/

107,500

62,000

°

0

0

0

169,500

TOTA PROJECTED FUNDING AVAILABLE WITHOUT FINANCING

352,600

320,600

285,000

324,700

385,000

435,000

2,102,900

(FINA CING)/PAYBACK

(22,824)

3,683_~752

108,581

142,404

174,579

408,175

TOTA PROJECTED AVAILABLE FUNDING WITH FINANCING

375,424

216,119

242,596

260,421

1,694,725

I\)

ROGRAM BUDGET

::!'.

Cfu§= (J)

RE~~GRAMMED

FUNDS

-n r-t

CD

MATCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5307 GRANTS

Q.l SEfi'.N 5309 RAIL MODERNIZATION GRANTS

o

20nl'TCHING CONTRIBUTION FOR SECTION 5309 GRANTS

o BUffiRt\IL REHABILITATION INTERNALLY GENERATED FUNDS 1/

C1

r-t

LOQ\d CONTRIBUTIONS FOR REPAIRABLE PARTS ACCOUNTS ""I

(J)

ADDITioNAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS

AL TEA-21 FLEXIBLE FUNDING (OR EQUIVALENT)

DC F

1/ FY 003 INCLUDES 4,300 REPAIRABLE IGF, 2,000 TAX ADVANTAGE LEASE IGF AND 500 BUS AND RAIL IGF. 2/ SU JECT TO APPROVAL OF FEDERAL FUNDS. n;\1'y2003\ plteble2-GMwilhCNG.QPW JUNE 20, 2002

316,917

283,248

System AccessfCapaclty Program Proposed FY 2003 - 2008 Projects JUNE ,20, 2002

i:~~~~~~

::0I

CD

(j)

o

i &1)4

........ FY03

DC CONVENTION CENTER

27,300

VIENNA PARKING GARAGE

27,100

o

KING STREET STATION

12,300

2,800

8,700

3,100

(j)

CLARENDON STATION IMPROVEMENTS

800

200

o-+l

ROSSLYN STATION IMPROVEMENTS

120

:::l

r+

::r

BALLSTON STATION IMPROVEMENTS

CRYSTAL CITY CANOPY SHIRLINGTON BUS TERMINALS PENTAGON BUS TERMINALS SILVER SPRING TRANSIT CENTER

OJ

ITS COMMUNICATIONS ENHANCEMENT

,

RAIL CARS (50)

0>

Q.

ii &07

&os

;~~1~~ ·i~~~,k

FV06

t~~1~T

~}~i5

REGIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER

BUSES (50) BUSES FOR DC

o -+l

WEST FALLS CHURCH BUS BAY

o

VIRGINIA BUS FACILITY EXPANSION

ARLINGTON CAPITAL PROJECTS PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

REGIONAL BUS BIKE RACKS

2,400

2,400

0

0

29,700

0

0

0

27,100

2,800

0

0

15,100

10,900

0

0

19,600

200

0

0

1,000

0

0

0

120

300

0

0

300

1,100

0

0

0

1,100

291

0

0

0

291

0

0

0

0

0

1,562

0

0

0

1,562

0

CD

o

plt.p;;~Od

&·05 •.••·••

REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS

r+

C

..

500

7,300

300

550

0

0

0

550

120,000

0

0

0

120,000

17,100

0

0

0

17,100

2,000

0

0

0

2,000

150

0

0

0

150

1,000

0

0

0

1,000 1,645

0

1,645

1,645

0

0

900

0

0

0

900

DULLES CORRIDOR BUSES

3,054

0

0

0

3,054

()

VIRGINIA PARKING LOT SIGNAGE

1,000

0

0

0

1,000

o

VIRGINIA BUS WAITING AREA ROOFS

1,562

0

0

0

1,562

120

0

0

0

120

0

0

0

0

1,600

0

0

0

1,600

0

""'I

CD

r+ ""'I

VIRGINIA BUS STOP BOXES

(j)

PARKING SPACES: Glenmont Shady Grove (1700 spac85) 11

0

0

0

0

Grosvenor (1300 spaces) 1/

0

0

0

0

0

Huntington (924 spaces)

0

19,200

0

0

19,200

Franconia/Springfield (1000 spaces)

19,200

14,800

1,000

1,000

0

0

15,800

1,000

12,000

12,000

0

0

13,000

College Park (1219 spaces)

0

14,200

14,200

0

0

14,200

New Carrollton (1776 .paces)

0

20,400

20,400

0

0

20,400

244,109

17,245

500

85,045

0

0

329,154

3,700

18,100

2,000

35,000

2,000

38,700

~

West Falls Church/Dunn LorIng (600 spaces)

ReImbursable Total

7,300

0

0

0

CORE CAPACITY Funded Core Capacity BUSES 21 RAil MAINTENANCE YAROS/SHOPS Funded Core Capacity

18,100

0

0

0

0

21,800

0

0

21,800

35,000

0

0

37,000

56,800

0

0

58,800

I~ GRANO TOTAL SAP 1/ BUILT BY OTHERS 21 FY 2004 PROCUREMENT SUBJECT TO RECEIPT OF FEDERAL FUNDS

\J

Q.l

en

CD

I\) I\)

<.0

N;\fy2003\clp\labfe1-SAP.wb3

246,109

115,945

18,600

7,300

0

0

0

141,845

0

0

387,954

SYSTEM EXPANSION PROGRAM Proposed FY 2003 - 2008 Projects

en en

o C

r-+

o

::J

PBOIJECT DEVELOPMENT

7,300

3,000

3,000

3,000

3,000

406,500

12,800

17,100

6,500

4,500

37,200

3,000

3,000

18,000

25,300

40,900

447,400

2,800

2,800

40,000

o

10,600

10,600

10,600

89,400

1,800

1,800

91,200

540,400

31,000

74,100

614,500

o-n r-+

:r CD

LWtO EXTENSION AND PARKING

o Q) ""'I

0DQ;.lES PEINEPA

o LE LINE DEIS 11

NEW YORK AVENUE STATION

TOTAL

lISUBJI'CT TO FUNDING APPROVAL N:IFY2llJ3ICIPITABLE 1-SEPwb3

20,100

9,500

7,500

3,000

3,000



PRESENTED & ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 21, 2002 SUBJECT: Committee Functions for 2002

#2002-07 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY

WHEREAS, the standing committees of the Board of Directors are the (1) Budget Committee; (2) Operations Committee; (3) Human Resources Committee; (4) Safety Committee; (5) Planning and Development Committee; (6) Salaried Retirement Plan Trustees Committee; and (7) Defined Contribution Plan Trustees Committee; and WHEREAS, there is a continuing need to identify the functional responsibilities of the standing Board Committees;





NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairmen of Board Committees, after consultation with the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer, shall approve appropriate staff support; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE BUDGET COMMITTEE of the WMATA Board of Directors shall be responsible for: (1)

Establishing guidelines for the preparation of the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer's Operating Budget and Capitallmprovement* Program Budget;

(2)

Reviewing the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer's Operating Budget and Infrastructure Renewal Program Budget on a continuing basis and making recommendations, as appropriate, to the Board of Directors. In this regard, the Budget Committee has primary Committee jurisdiction over matters/issues affecting the Capital Improvement Program;

(3)

Overseeing the execution of the annual Operating Budget;

(4)

Overseeing the execution of the Capital Improvement Program;

* The Capital Improvement Program includes the Infrastructure Renewal Program (IRP), the System Expansion Program (SEP) and System Access/Capacity Program (SAP) Budgets.

Resolutions of the Board of Directors -1-

Page 231







(5)

Considering policies and programs for setting fares and creating fare structures/ including fare simplification/ regional integration/ and interchangeability with other providers;

(6)

Receiving and reviewing the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer/s Monthly Performance and Financial Report;

(7)

Reviewing the General Manager/Chief Executive Officer's System Expansion Program (SEP) and System Access/Capacity Program (SAP) Budgets on a continuing basis and recommending Board action as appropriate on Rail Capital Program budget matters;

(8)

Serving as Audit Committee: (a)

Assessing the adequacy of internal controls to assure compliance with laws/ regulations/ policies/ ethical standards and conflict of interest requirements; receiving reports on any significant departures therefrom or on any other significant instances of misconduct/ mismanagement/ waste/ fraud or abuse;

(b)

Reviewing all significant findings and recommendations issued as a result of audits or investigations by the Auditor General into the performance of staff/ consultants or contractors/ and monitoring the status of resolution of those recommendations;

(c)

Evaluating the reliability and integrity of financial and operating information reports as well as the means employed to safeguard and validate the existence of WMATA assets;

(d)

Receiving such reports as necessary to ensure continuation of the independence of WMATA audit activities;

(e)

Overseeing coverage by the External Auditors including reviewing engagement letters/ contract deliverables and Executive Management responses thereto; and monitoring any significant reporting or operational issues effecting WMATA's financial statements;

(f)

Reviewing the Office of the Auditor General Quarterly Report to the Board; conducting further inquiries as necessary;

(g)

Reporting to the Board/ with recommendations as appropriate/ on significant Committee observations with respect to the foregoing;

z

Resolutions of the Board of Director Page 232 - -





BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the OPERATIONS COMMITTEE of the WMATA Board of Directors shall have the following functional responsibilities: (1)

Oversight and monitoring of all rail and bus service planning and delivery issues including the snow emergency plan and Authority-proposed service reconfigurations;

(2)

Review of operational projections and service assumptions as well as the setting of service standards;

(3)

Oversight of the development of new technologies associated with rail, bus, and passenger interface including changes in equipment specifications such as seating configuration, etc.;

(4)

Oversight of the review of existing Authority operational programs and the formulation of recommendations for the implementation of major operational program and policies for Board consideration, as well as oversight of the implementation of major operational programs and policies approved by the Board;

(5)

Oversight of Authority Procurement Regulations;

(6)

In-depth review of Operational Performance Indicators, including: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i)

(7)

procurement

policy

including

review

of

Bus and Rail Service Performance Against Goals Service standards Compliance with Federal/local laws and regulations Environmental issues (operating program) Ridership issues (excluding fare changes) Bus/Rail integration Marketing Program (design and effectiveness) Operational aspects of the Americans with Disabilities Act as it pertains to the Transit Authority and the region; Procurement Policy and Procurement Regulations;

Monitor program implementation to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act;

• Resolutions of the Board of Direct~3~ Page 233



BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE shall function as a subcommittee of the Operations Committee of the WMATA Board of Directors and shall have the following functional responsibilities:

(1)

Act as the Authority's oversight committee on all human resource matters including Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity (AAlEEO) programs; diversity initiatives; and, other related personnel policy and procedures;

(2)

Review the implementation of the Authority's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Small Business Enterprise (SBE) procurement and contracting programs;

(3)

Review the implementation of human resources-related programs such as employee training and development; succession planning; market-based classification and pay system; performance management system; and, organizational culture change process;

(4)

Review work-life initiatives aimed at making WMATA a more employeefriendly workplace;

i





BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the SAFETY COMMITTEE of the WMATA Board of Directors shall have the following functional responsibilities: (1)

Review of policy guidance for implementation of a comprehensive WMATA System Safety Program applicable to both patrons and employees and which includes bus and rail system safety, construction safety, fire protection, and occupational safety and health;

(2)

Periodic review of various safety training programs and management safety practices to determine adequacy;

(3)

Examination of WMATA's safety agreements with local fire and rescue service organizations for the purpose of investigating emergency response capability;

(4)

Review of security and Transit Police matters on behalf of the Board of Directors;

(5)

Receipt and review of a variety of accident and incident reports to be both informed to the status of these incidents and to insure that proper staff corrective actions have been taken to prevent similar future occurrences;

Resolutions of the Board of Directors Page 234 -4-







(6)

Examination of technological reports and innovations to improve system safety in order to determine their effectiveness, which most recently includes improved tunnel ventilation systems; improved common corridor technologies; and enhancements for escalator operations;

(7)

Monitoring of the implementation phases of major safety enhancement programs to ensure completion of recommended safety improvements, such as the common corridor study, and the escalator enhancement program;

(8)

Review of legislation which might impact WMAT A system safety, and make policy recommendations to the Board as appropriate;

(9)

Interface with various external safety organizations, such as COG Fire Chiefs, APTA safety groups, and the UITP, to encourage the exchange of information on safety and fire protection;

(10)

Assess the adequacy of WMAT A life safety systems and identifies matters needing further investigation;

(11)

Review of policies and procedures for informing the public about WMAT A's safety policies and practices;

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE shall have the following responsibilities: (1)

Formulation of policy guidance for the completion of both the 89.5 and 103-mile systems;

(2)

Monitoring program execution throughout the planning, design, and construction phases of projects;

(3)

Monitoring compliance with the provisions of the full-funding agreements with FTA to include consideration of amendments to the agreements as necessary and appropriate;

(4)

Ensuring that time lines and goals associated with New York Avenue and Largo Extension construction are achieved;

(5)

Review of policy for the resolution of contract disputes associated with the construction program, including review and approval of major contract modifications;

(6)

Oversight of the Interim Capital Contributions Agreements associated with the completion of the Adopted Regional System as well as development and administration of the Local Funding Agreements;

Resolutions of the Board of Directo!S_ Page 235

·.





(7)

Review of critical legislative programs to support the Authority's objectives with the Congress and government agencies, and preparation of a strategy for the reauthorization of the Transportation Equity Act;

(8)

Monitoring and oversight of the adopted program for the expansion beyond the 106 mile system and a strategy for achieving same;

(9)

Oversight of the Authority's Joint Development Program, which involves incremental use of WMATA's land for commercial or residential real estate development. This includes construction and ownership of improvements to real property by others than WMAT A, and the long-term leasing of the land to others with WMATA retaining ownership.

(10)

Consideration and recommendation on federal, regional, and local legislative, regulatory and coordination issues on the development of innovative technological and service approaches to enhancement of public transportation, and on the identification of issues which will affect the Authority over the long term;

(11)

Coordinating the WMAT A role in the decision process with the Council of Governments (COG) and the Transportation Planning Board (TPB) to reflect the changed requirements and authorities created by the Intermodal Transportation Efficiency Act of 1990 and the Clean Air Act;

(12)

Projecting long-term service levels, including ridership projections and future fiscal impacts;

(13)

Developing innovative approaches to enhanced services; servIce integration and coordination with other providers; financing; use of human resources; land use; and technology;

(14)

Working with local governments, APT A, and the federal government on transit legislation, regulation and funding, including such issues as increased tax-free employer subsidy of employee transit fares, federal appropriations, and reauthorization of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21 st Century; and

(15)

Coordinating with state and local governments on transportation studies in the region;

• Resolutions of the Board of Direct0'{rPage 236 - -



BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the SALARIED RETIREMENT PLAN TRUSTEES COMMITTEE, appointed from the Board, shall be responsible for the oversight of the WMATA Defined Benefit Plan. This includes both investment and benefit administration; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN TRUSTEES COMMITTEE, appointed from the Board, shall be responsible for the oversight of the WMATA Defined Contribution Plan. This includes both investment and benefit administration; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman also may establish ad hoc committees as needed, with the concurrence of the Board. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall be effective immediately. Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency

Cheryl C. Burke,



Gen~f,wtounddl {j

Motion by Mr. Kauffman, seconded by Mr. Trotter, and unanimously approved. Ayes: 6 - Mr. Zimmerman, Mr. Barnett, Mr. Kauffman, Mrs. Mack, Mr. Trotter and Mr. Catania

• Resolutions of the Board of Directors -7-

Page 237

This Page Not Used

Related Documents