Figure

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Figure as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 474
  • Pages: 9
Advanced VOCs Decomposition Method by Gliding Arc Plasma

Antonius Indarto†, Jae-Wook Choi, Hwaung Lee, Hyung Keun Song Korea Institute of Science & Technology, Clean Technology Research Center, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea



Corresponding author: Antonius Indarto; E-mail: [email protected] 1

vent to atmosphere

Data processor

MFC- 1

thermocouple

MFC- 2 Gas chromatography VOCs

Plasma Reactor

Water bath

He

Air

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of experimental set up.

2

6000 0.45

Voltage waveform

Current waveform

0.30

Current (Ampere)

Voltage (Volt)

4000

2000 0

-2000

-4000

0

1e-5

-0.15

before after

-0.45

-6000 -1e -5

0.00

-0.30

before after -2e-5

0.15

2e-5

-2e-5

Time (second)

-1e- 5

0

1e-5

Time (second)

Figure 2. AC voltage and current waveform of the before and after plasma breakdown.

3

2e-5

conversion

0.07

destruction efficiency

Conversion (%)

80

0.06 0.05

60 0.04 40

0.03 0.02

20 0.01 0

benzene

toluene

m-xylene

o-xylene

p-xylene

Destruction efficiency (μmol/J)

0.08

100

0.00

Figure 3. Aromatic VOCs conversion and destruction efficiency. The experiment was conducted at flow rates of 5L/min and VOCs concentration of 0.1-0.5%. The total consumed energy and frequency were 270 Watt and 20 kHz, respectively.

4

Destruction efficiency (μmol/J)

0.050

this work 0.040

Packed bed DBD1 UV/O 3 2

0.030

0.020

0.010

0.000

benzene

toluene

o-xylene

Figure 4. Destruction efficiency comparison between gliding arc plasma and other non-thermal plasmas. 1see ref.: Ogata et al, 2002; 2see ref: Shen and Ku, 1999

5

conversion 80

Conversion (%)

1.40

destruction efficiency 1.20 1.00

60 0.80 40

0.60 0.40

20 0.20 0

Destruction efficiency (μmol/J)

1.60

100

0.00

dichlorocarbon

chloroform

tetrachlorocarbon

Figure 5. Chlorinated VOCs conversion and destruction efficiency. The experiment was conducted at flow rates of 5L/min and VOCs concentration of 3%. The total consumed energy and frequency were 270 Watt and 20 kHz, respectively.

6

Destruction efficiency (μmol/J)

1.600

this work 1.200 4

0.800

0.400

1

2

4

3

0.000

dichloromethane chloroform tetrachlorocarbon

Figure 6. Destruction efficiency comparison between gliding arc plasma and other non-thermal plasmas for chlorinated VOCs. 1Glow discharge, see ref.: Chen et al., 2001; 2Radio frequency, see ref.: Li et al., 1999; 3Silent discharge, see ref: Föglein et al., 2005; 4Gliding arc, see ref.: Krawczyk and Ulejczyk, 2003.

7

Dichloromethane decomposition

CO2

COCl2

Intensity (a.u.)

Cl2

CHCl3

CCl4

Chloroform decomposition

CO and N2

COCl2 Cl2 CHCl3

CCl4

Tetrachlorocarbon decomposition

CO2 COCl2

0

20

40

60

Cl2

CCl4

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

AMU (m/z) Figure 7. QMS spectra of chlorinated VOCs decomposition by glidng arc plasma. The data were obtained at 1% of VOCs in gas flow rate of 3 L/min.

8

Conversion (%)

100

80 60

40 20 dichloromethane 0

15

16

17

chloroform 18

tetrachlorocarbon 19

20

Frequency (kHz)

Figure 8. Effects of frequency variation on the conversion of chlorinated VOCs. The experiment was conducted at fixed flow rate of 5 L/min.

9

Related Documents

Figure
November 2019 22
Figure
November 2019 21
Figure
November 2019 25
Figure
November 2019 23
Figure
June 2020 12
Figure
April 2020 8