FACTORS OF FLOODING Ill-aligned drains, poor/uncoordinated storm drains
UPPER MIDDLE
LOWER
630
86
112
440
93
107
295
64
79
178
32
99
91
5
7
141
19
34
199
27
53
(A) High intensity rainstorms, prolong rain events (B) Poor waste management (C) Relief/Topography (D) Concrete road median, paved surface, low or zero soil infiltration (E) Poor flood risk assessment, monitory and management (F) Unplanned urbanization, dense roofed development/increased in paved surfaces (G)
METHODOLOGY
This required that three different types of questionnaires were administered, namely; household questionnaire, community group template (used during the FGDs), and biophysical assessment template. Feedbacks were obtained from the enumerators on their field experiences were used to improve the data collection process until the completion of the field exercise. A minimum of two follow-up outings was arranged at the household and community levels to ensure no important data were left out. Although a biophysical study template was used, most biophysical data were obtained from primary data gathering techniques, instrument-aided assessments and measurements, modeling and incorporation of proof-checked existing reports. Multiple sampling techniques were used to confirm or clear gray areas in the biophysical assessments.
Measures were taken through retooling and review to develop statistically-useful sampling frames for the surveys both at community and household levels in order to achieve the objectives outlined in Components 1–4 (Section 1.3). The field survey plan ensured the hiring and training of interviewers to carry out the survey in the project areas with a clear understanding of watershed configurations. A choice was made on the use of the SPSS statistical package because of its wide data management scope.
EFFECT OF FLOODING
UPPER
MIDDLE
LOWER
Inundation of farmlands
289
16
15
251
6
5
126
12
12
(H) Prolonged travel time (I) Destruction of road and public facilities
(J) Settlement relocation
216
41
116
214
39
90
105
18
41
143
32
72
295
96
92
(K) Outbreak of water borne diseases (L) Pollution of water sources (M) Loss of household properties (N) Loss of income(O)
Pair wise Correlation matrix of factor of flooding and effect of flooding in IBB flood catchment area A
B
C
D
E
A
1.000
B
1.000
1.000
C
1.000
1.000
1.000
D
.907
.905
.914
1.000
E
1.000
1.000
.999
.898
1.000
F
.998
.997
.998
.935
.996
F
1.000
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
G
.995
.994
.997
.944
.993
1.000
1.000
H
.999
.999
.998
.887
1.000
.993
.990
1.000
1
.999
.999
.998
.887
1.000
.993
.990
1.000
1.000
J
.999
.999
.998
.889
1.000
.994
.990
1.000
1.000
1.000
K
.921
.919
.927
.999
.913
.947
.955
.903
.903
.904
1.000
L
.970
.969
.974
.982
.965
.985
.989
.958
.958
.959
.988
1.000
M
.977
.975
.980
.976
.972
.990
.993
.966
.966
.967
.983
1.000
1.000
N
.949
.947
.954
.994
.942
.969
.975
.933
.933
.935
.997
.997
.994
1.000
O
.998
.999
.997
.881
.999
.992
.988
1.000
1.000
1.000
.897
.954
.962
.928
Rotated Component Matrixa FACTORS
VARIABLES 1
2
Ill-aligned drains, poor/uncoordinated storm
.817
.576
.821
.571
Poor waste management
.808
.589
Relief /Topography
.499
.867
drains High intensity rainstorms, prolong rain events
1.000
Concrete road median, paved surface, low or zero
.830
.558
.774
.633
.757
.654
inundation of farmlands
.843
.539
prolonged travel time
.843
.538
.841
.541
.529
.849
.653
.757
.675
.738
.593
.805
.850
.527
soil infiltration Poor flood risk assessment, monitory and management Unplanned urbanization, dense roofed development/increased in paved surfaces
destruction of public facilities settlement relocation outbreak of water borne diseases pollution of water sources destruction of household properties loss of income
Total variance explained Factor
Eigen value
Percentage
of Cumulative
variance explained
%age explained
1
14.592
97.280
97.280
11
0.408
2.720
100
Total
15.0
100
100