ME 218: SOLID MECHANICS LABORATORY
T E NS IO N T E S T EXPERIMENT NO.7
BATCH: A8 07010042-07010046
TENSION TEST EXPERIME NT NO. 7
AIM
To determine the following in axially loaded Mild steel and Aluminium Specimens. (a) The maximum tensile stress (b) The modulus of elasticity. (c) The percentage reduction in cross section. (d) The percentage elongation in gauge length.
A PPA R A TU S 1. 2. 3. 4.
The Universal Testing Machine Vernier Callipers Mechanical Extensometer Scale WORKI NG FORM UL AE
σ = F/A Y = σ/ε Where, F Load applied on specimen (N) A Area of cross-section (m2) σ Stress (Pa) ε Strain Y Young’s Modulus of Elasticity (ratio of stress and strain in the linear region)
2
SPECIMEN DIAGRAMS
OBSERVATI ON
Aluminium Specimen :Gauge length (average) = 101 mm Total length (average) = 200 mm
Table 7.1:- ( Diameter ) Sl.No Reading (mm)
1
2
3
7.00
7.01
7.00
dave = 7.00 mm
Area of specimen = (π × d2)/4 = (3.14×72)/4×10-6 = 38.465 × 10-6 m2.
3
Table 7.2:-
( Stress and Strain values of Aluminium specimen)
Sl No
Reading of Extensometer (μm)
F (N)
Stress (MPa)
Strain (μm)
1
2
950
24.69778
2
2
4
1293
33.61497
4
3
6
1406
36.55271
6
4
8
1516
39.41245
8
5
10
1915
49.78552
10
6
12
2096
54.4911
12
7
14
2350
61.0945
14
8
16
2659
69.12778
16
9
18
2893
75.21123
18
10
20
3145
81.76264
20
11
22
3426
89.06798
22
12
24
3635
94.50149
24
13
26
3895
101.2609
26
14
28
4053
105.3685
28
15
30
4188
108.8782
30
16
32
4324
112.4139
32
17
34
4772
124.0608
34
18
36
5043
131.1062
36
19
38
5362
139.3995
38
20
40
5548
144.235
40
Mild Steel Specimen :Gauge length (average) = 100.67 mm Total length (average) = 200 mm
4
Table 7.3:- ( Diameter ) Sl.No Reading (mm)
1
2
3
7.00
6.98
7.00
dave = 6.993 mm
Area of specimen = (π × d2)/4 = (3.14×6.992)/4×10-6 = 38.355 × 10-6 m2.
Table 7.4:-
( Stress and Strain values of Mild Steel specimen)
Sl No
Reading of Extensometer (μm)
F (N)
Stress (Pa)
Strain (μm)
1
2
2899
75.58337
2
2
4
3816
99.49159
4
3
6
4416
115.1349
6
4
8
5142
134.0634
8
5
10
6067
158.1802
10
6
12
6611
172.3634
12
7
14
7448
194.1859
14
8
16
8406
219.1631
16
9
18
9041
235.7189
18
10
20
9933
258.9754
20
11
22
10546
274.9576
22
12
24
11259
293.5471
24
13
26
12214
318.4461
26
14
28
12877
335.732
28
15
30
13489
351.6882
30
16
32
14162
369.2348
32
17
34
14700
383.2616
34
18
36
15538
405.1102
36
19
38
16079
419.2152
38
20
40
16523
430.7913
40
5
G R A PH S
Stress(MPa) Vs Strain (μm) 160 140 120 100
80 60 40 20
Stress
0 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Graph for Aluminium
Stress(MPa) Vs Strain (μm) 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100
Strain (μm)
50 0 0
5
10
15
20
25
Graph for Mild Steel
6
30
35
40
45
C A L C U LA TI O N S
Aluminium:For yield stress :F = 8910 N A = 38.465 10-6 m2 Y=F/A=231.64 106 Pa For ultimate tensile stress:F = 9710 N A = 38.465 10-6 m2 Y=F/A=252.43 106 Pa For percentage elongation:Gauge length after breaking =115 mm Elongation = 14.3 mm Percentage elongation = (14.3÷ 101) ×100 = 14.15 % For reduction in area:Final diameter of the specimen = 5.64mm Afinal = (3.14 × 5.642)/4 = 24.97 × 10-6 m2 Ainitial = 38.465 ×10-6 m2 Reduction in area=38.465 ×10-6 m2 - 24.97 × 10-6 m2 = 13.49 ×10-6 m2 Percentage reduction= 35.07 % From graph :Value of Young’s Modulus of Elasticity = slope of the graph = 79.32 GPa
Mild Steel :For yield stress :F = 23,300 N A = 38.355 10-6 m2 Y=F/A=607.48 106 Pa For ultimate tensile stress:F = 26,400 N A = 38.355 10-6 m2 Y=F/A=688.31 106 Pa
7
For percentage elongation:Gauge length after breaking = 105 mm Elongation = 4.33 mm Percentage elongation = (4.33÷100.67) ×100 = 4.3 % For reduction in area:Final diameter of the specimen = 5.32mm Afinal = (3.14 × 5.322)/4 = 22.22 × 10-6 m2 Ainitial = 38.355 ×10-6 m2 Reduction in area=38.355 ×10-6 m2 - 22.22 × 10-6 m2 = 13.165 ×10-6 m2 Percentage reduction= 34.32 % From graph :Value of Young’s Modulus of Elasticity = slope of the graph = 196.19 GPa
I N FE R E NC E
The following inferences can be drawn :
Specimen
% Reduction in area of cross-section
% Elongation in
Tensile Stress Max
Modulus of Elasticity
Aluminium
252.43 MPa
79.32 GPa
35.07%
14.15%
Mild Steel
688.31 MPa
196.19 GPa
34.32%
4.3%
gauge length
The obtained values of Moduli of Elasticity of Aluminium and Mild Steel are found to be in close agreement with standard values.
SO U RC E S O F ER ROR
1. There is slight difference while taking down the readings from the Universal Testing Machine and the actual reading, hence the graph is not truly linear. 2. There is experimental error due to the rapidly increasing values of load (F). 3. The material might have internal defects or imperfections that could lead to botched results.
8
D E TA I L S O F STU D EN TS
Table 7.5 ROLL NUMBER
NAME
07010042
Repaka Jyoti Swaroop
07010043
Sharath Chandra Pawar
07010044
Puvvada N V Prudhvi Teja
07010045
J G M V Pramod
07010046
Vishnu Narayanan Suresh
9