Evaluation Of Online Learning
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Evaluation Of Online Learning as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,379
- Pages: 54
Sultan Qaboos University Collage of Education Department of Instructional and Learning Technologies
Report on
Evaluation of Online Learning
Submitted for: Dr.Alaa Sadik Submitted by: Athra AlYazeedi (61542) Fatma AlNaabi (66754)
Introduction: Most educational institutions shifted their trends toward the student is the center of educational process. Therefore, Students' performance has been considered as a major concern of today's education. According to this shift tools that used to evaluate students' performance has been expanded from just focusing on quizzes and tests tools to more authentic and innovative ways like projects, discussion, assignments and ..etc. This expansion is appeared due to the importance of assessing students' performance that perceived by educational institutions which provide their education either in traditional or online learning environments. As online learning environments have been emerged beside traditional classrooms, more traditional strategies have been transferred to be online. Online Interaction is one of those important strategies in which students' performance can be emerged. Many different tools either synchronous and a synchronous can reflects the interaction of students during online learning environments and discussion forum is one of those. Discussion forum is a synchronous tool that can represent three types of interactions: 1)student-content in which student can summarize, critique and paraphrasing the information, student2)teacher in which student can teacher questions and negotiate meaning with him and 3)student-student interactions in which student can reviews other students' works, negotiate meaning with them and collaborate in projects with them. Due to the importance of discussion forum, it has been used by many of educational institutions that offers online or blended courses and SQU in the Sultanate of Oman is one of those. Most of the courses in SQU that used discussion forum used a moodel learning management system as a platform for providing this interactive tool. Although many SQU subjects have been supported by this tool, the usage of this tool has been differ from one subject to another and that is why this report was conducted. Purpose: The report aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the discussion forum in representing students' performance through teachers' perception. Research questions: 1. To what extent does the Degree of participation in discussion forum represent students' performance? 2. To what extent does the Interaction in discussion forum represent students' performance? 3. To what extent do the content related posts in discussion forum represent students' performance? Research methodology: Sample: The sample of this report is consisted of 8 faculty members at Sultan Qaboos University. Six of them are from Instructional and learning technology department, one from educational psychology department and the other one is from foundation of education department. All of those Faculty members use discussion in their courses.
Measure: To answer the research questions, survey was build and distributed to the research population. This questioner focused on three areas to examine effectiveness of discussion forum in representing students' performance. These areas are: Degree of participation, Interaction and content related posts. Degree of participation concentrated on the number and length of students posts. Interaction focused on the students' participation in discussion forum like: Students’ statements that comment in another message and Responding to the tutor's views or advises. Content related posts discuss the following items: The ideas that students posted, students' clarification, The relevance of students posting and Drawing conclusion. See a copy of the survey on appendix A Survey procedures: 1. A significant amount of time is devoted to construct an effective questionnaire as the main instrument of the study. 2. The surveys administered to participants electronically via Survey console website. 3. Statistical analysis of the participants’ responses conducted by Survey console website was then obtained. 4. Results gained from the analysis is then discussed and interrupted. Findings and Discussion Total of 8 surveys were completed and returned; a completion rate of 100%. The survey statistical analysis was then obtained from Survey Console website (see appendix B ) and interpreted as following: 1. Degree of Participation The results showed that 80% of faculty members disagreed with all the statements on this part where 57% of the members disagree with the statement “The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course” and the other 43% agreed with. In the other hand 40% of faculty members disagreed and other 40% agreed with the statements “The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed.” And “Number of statements directly related to learning per student.” These results indicate that the degree of participation in the discussion forum is perceived by the faculty members as secondary aspect that indicates the students’ performance truthfully. This may due to the awareness of faculty members in that the students shouldn’t be evaluated by just counting the number and the length of their posts on the forum. The evaluation process should goes away beyond that to measure the effect of other factors on student performance.
2. Interaction In controversy with the abovementioned point (Degree of Participation) almost all the participants agreed on the statements under this section. 80% of them viewed Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging for peer collaboration, reducing students’ tension and anxiety, reflecting students’ proficiency level and indicate students possession of social skills and represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge. These responses should indicate that interaction in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance because if the students interaction (as perceived by the faculty members) encourage peer collaboration and reduce students tension and anxiety, indicate students possession of social skills and represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge it will assist for sure their achievement since learning is a social process and without interacting with its members students learning can be affected. Moreover, being comfortable and not worried in the learning environment will empower the students to perform their bests as they motivated to. And thus interaction should be considered as a key element on evaluating students’ performance. 3. Content related posts In this section also almost all the participants agreed on its statements. 85% of them see that content related posts indicate students understanding for the content, represent their critical thinking ability and their achievement of the course objectives. So as a result, if the interaction reflecting students’ proficiency level, indicates students understanding for the content, represent their critical thinking ability and their achievement of the course objectives then directly it reflected the students’ performance. And thus for hence, Content related posts is reflecting students’ performance and should be used to evaluate it in an online environment.
Appendix A: Faculty members Survey This survey designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the discussion forum in representing students' performance through teachers' perception. Please take time to answer this questioner candidly. Your responses will be confidential and used for research purposes. Thank you for completing this evaluation forum. Its usefulness depends solely in your cooperation.
Agree Disagr ee Degree of participation 1
The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course. 2 Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed 3 The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed. 4 Number of statements directly related to learning per student. Interaction 5 Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance. 6 Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration 7 Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety 8 Students’ participation in the discussion forum accurately reflecting students’ proficiency level 9 Students’ statements that comment in another message indicate students possession of social skills 10 Responding to the tutor's views or advises represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge. Content related posts The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability. The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content. The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content. The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability. Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value. Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives. Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Neutr al
Appendix B: Survey Statistics
Survey Statistics
Viewed 21 Started 8 Completed 8 Completion Rate 100% Drop Outs (After Starting) 0 •
Average time taken to complete survey : 4 minute(s)
Degree of Participation
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course. 7 1.571
2. Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed 7 1.286
3. The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed. 7 1.714
The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 4 57.14%
2. Agree 2 28.57%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 5 71.43%
2. Agree 2 28.57%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 3 42.86%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Number of statements directly related to learning per student.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 3 42.86%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Interaction
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance. 7 1.857
2. Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration. 7 2.000
3. Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety 7 2.143
4.
Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students’ participation in the discussion forum accurately reflecting students’ proficiency level
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 2 28.57%
2. Agree 4 57.14%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 2 28.57%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 2 28.57%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Content related posts
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability. 7 2.000
2. The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content. 7 1.857
3. The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content. 7 1.857
The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 4 57.14%
3. Neutral 2 28.57%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Analytics Powered by SurveyConsole
Report on
Evaluation of Online Learning
Submitted for: Dr.Alaa Sadik Submitted by: Athra AlYazeedi (61542) Fatma AlNaabi (66754)
Introduction: Most educational institutions shifted their trends toward the student is the center of educational process. Therefore, Students' performance has been considered as a major concern of today's education. According to this shift tools that used to evaluate students' performance has been expanded from just focusing on quizzes and tests tools to more authentic and innovative ways like projects, discussion, assignments and ..etc. This expansion is appeared due to the importance of assessing students' performance that perceived by educational institutions which provide their education either in traditional or online learning environments. As online learning environments have been emerged beside traditional classrooms, more traditional strategies have been transferred to be online. Online Interaction is one of those important strategies in which students' performance can be emerged. Many different tools either synchronous and a synchronous can reflects the interaction of students during online learning environments and discussion forum is one of those. Discussion forum is a synchronous tool that can represent three types of interactions: 1)student-content in which student can summarize, critique and paraphrasing the information, student2)teacher in which student can teacher questions and negotiate meaning with him and 3)student-student interactions in which student can reviews other students' works, negotiate meaning with them and collaborate in projects with them. Due to the importance of discussion forum, it has been used by many of educational institutions that offers online or blended courses and SQU in the Sultanate of Oman is one of those. Most of the courses in SQU that used discussion forum used a moodel learning management system as a platform for providing this interactive tool. Although many SQU subjects have been supported by this tool, the usage of this tool has been differ from one subject to another and that is why this report was conducted. Purpose: The report aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the discussion forum in representing students' performance through teachers' perception. Research questions: 1. To what extent does the Degree of participation in discussion forum represent students' performance? 2. To what extent does the Interaction in discussion forum represent students' performance? 3. To what extent do the content related posts in discussion forum represent students' performance? Research methodology: Sample: The sample of this report is consisted of 8 faculty members at Sultan Qaboos University. Six of them are from Instructional and learning technology department, one from educational psychology department and the other one is from foundation of education department. All of those Faculty members use discussion in their courses.
Measure: To answer the research questions, survey was build and distributed to the research population. This questioner focused on three areas to examine effectiveness of discussion forum in representing students' performance. These areas are: Degree of participation, Interaction and content related posts. Degree of participation concentrated on the number and length of students posts. Interaction focused on the students' participation in discussion forum like: Students’ statements that comment in another message and Responding to the tutor's views or advises. Content related posts discuss the following items: The ideas that students posted, students' clarification, The relevance of students posting and Drawing conclusion. See a copy of the survey on appendix A Survey procedures: 1. A significant amount of time is devoted to construct an effective questionnaire as the main instrument of the study. 2. The surveys administered to participants electronically via Survey console website. 3. Statistical analysis of the participants’ responses conducted by Survey console website was then obtained. 4. Results gained from the analysis is then discussed and interrupted. Findings and Discussion Total of 8 surveys were completed and returned; a completion rate of 100%. The survey statistical analysis was then obtained from Survey Console website (see appendix B ) and interpreted as following: 1. Degree of Participation The results showed that 80% of faculty members disagreed with all the statements on this part where 57% of the members disagree with the statement “The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course” and the other 43% agreed with. In the other hand 40% of faculty members disagreed and other 40% agreed with the statements “The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed.” And “Number of statements directly related to learning per student.” These results indicate that the degree of participation in the discussion forum is perceived by the faculty members as secondary aspect that indicates the students’ performance truthfully. This may due to the awareness of faculty members in that the students shouldn’t be evaluated by just counting the number and the length of their posts on the forum. The evaluation process should goes away beyond that to measure the effect of other factors on student performance.
2. Interaction In controversy with the abovementioned point (Degree of Participation) almost all the participants agreed on the statements under this section. 80% of them viewed Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging for peer collaboration, reducing students’ tension and anxiety, reflecting students’ proficiency level and indicate students possession of social skills and represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge. These responses should indicate that interaction in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance because if the students interaction (as perceived by the faculty members) encourage peer collaboration and reduce students tension and anxiety, indicate students possession of social skills and represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge it will assist for sure their achievement since learning is a social process and without interacting with its members students learning can be affected. Moreover, being comfortable and not worried in the learning environment will empower the students to perform their bests as they motivated to. And thus interaction should be considered as a key element on evaluating students’ performance. 3. Content related posts In this section also almost all the participants agreed on its statements. 85% of them see that content related posts indicate students understanding for the content, represent their critical thinking ability and their achievement of the course objectives. So as a result, if the interaction reflecting students’ proficiency level, indicates students understanding for the content, represent their critical thinking ability and their achievement of the course objectives then directly it reflected the students’ performance. And thus for hence, Content related posts is reflecting students’ performance and should be used to evaluate it in an online environment.
Appendix A: Faculty members Survey This survey designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the discussion forum in representing students' performance through teachers' perception. Please take time to answer this questioner candidly. Your responses will be confidential and used for research purposes. Thank you for completing this evaluation forum. Its usefulness depends solely in your cooperation.
Agree Disagr ee Degree of participation 1
The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course. 2 Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed 3 The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed. 4 Number of statements directly related to learning per student. Interaction 5 Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance. 6 Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration 7 Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety 8 Students’ participation in the discussion forum accurately reflecting students’ proficiency level 9 Students’ statements that comment in another message indicate students possession of social skills 10 Responding to the tutor's views or advises represent student’s ability to share and exchange knowledge. Content related posts The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability. The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content. The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content. The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability. Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value. Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives. Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Neutr al
Appendix B: Survey Statistics
Survey Statistics
Viewed 21 Started 8 Completed 8 Completion Rate 100% Drop Outs (After Starting) 0 •
Average time taken to complete survey : 4 minute(s)
Degree of Participation
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course. 7 1.571
2. Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed 7 1.286
3. The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed. 7 1.714
The number of posts by a particular student reflects its high achievement within the course.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 4 57.14%
2. Agree 2 28.57%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Length of student posts represent his mastery of the topic discussed
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 5 71.43%
2. Agree 2 28.57%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The more messages posted in the discussion forum the more likely the students understand the topics discussed.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 3 42.86%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Number of statements directly related to learning per student.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 3 42.86%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Interaction
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance. 7 1.857
2. Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration. 7 2.000
3. Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety 7 2.143
4.
Students’ participation in the discussion forum provides reliable source of input regarding students’ performance.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students interaction in the discussion forum encouraging peer collaboration.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students interaction in the discussion forum reducing students’ tension and anxiety
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Students’ participation in the discussion forum accurately reflecting students’ proficiency level
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 2 28.57%
2. Agree 4 57.14%
3. Neutral 1 14.29%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 2 28.57%
2. Agree 3 42.86%
3. Neutral 2 28.57%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Content related posts
Overall Matrix Scorecard Question Count Score Disagree Agree Neutral
1. The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability. 7 2.000
2. The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content. 7 1.857
3. The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content. 7 1.857
The ideas that students posted in dissection form really represent their thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The clarification to the points posted reflecting student understanding of the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The relevance of students posting to the discussion topic indicates their understanding for the content.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
The questions asked by students represent their critical thinking ability.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Asking for more clarification represent that students perceived content value.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 6 85.71%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Repeating of the course content through posting in the discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 1 14.29%
2. Agree 4 57.14%
3. Neutral 2 28.57%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Drawing conclusion in discussion forum represent that students' achieved course objectives.
Frequency Analysis Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1. Disagree 0 0.00%
2. Agree 7 100.00%
3. Neutral 0 0.00%
Total 7 100%
Key Analytics
Analytics Powered by SurveyConsole
Related Documents
Evaluation Of Online Learning
May 2020 7
Evaluation Of Online Learning
April 2020 7
Evaluation Of Online Learning
April 2020 5
Online Learning
November 2019 26
Online Learning
May 2020 17