Employee Motivation And Morale

  • Uploaded by: rajeshri_16641163
  • 0
  • 0
  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Employee Motivation And Morale as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,278
  • Pages: 47
Employee Motivation and Mor ale

Flow of the presentation • • • • • • •

Introduction Purpose of the Project Why study motivation Approach of the study





Statistical representation : Findings

ü ü ü

Graphs Scatter plots Bar diagrams





Qualitative analysis: findings

• • • • • • • • • •

Areas of improvement A comparative study Recommendation Good practices

Introduction 

Study on Employee Motivation and Morale at PNCP site of Hydrocarbon Mid and Down, E&C Division.

Purpose of the Project •

Identify the factors related to Employee Motivation and Organizational function



• To find out the areas of improvement • • Do a comparative study 

• Recommendations

Motivation ?

Successful motivation involves : q q Getting people to do what you want them to do q q q do q q q q do q q

How much you want them to it

How long you want them to it

q The way you want them to do it q Because they want to do it

Direction

Inten sity

Persistence

Theory of Human motivation / needs = Self Transcendence = Self actualization

Abraham H . Maslow 1908 - 1970

Herzberg`s Two factor theory 1960 High

Maintenance Factors

Low

(Extrinsic motivators – physiological , safety, and social needs – existence and Relatedness needs) Pay, benefits, job security, working conditions, company policies

Not Dissatisfied (with the maintenance factors)

Dissatisfied

Motivator Factors (Intrinsic motivators – esteem and self-actualization needs – growth needs) Work itself, recognition, achievement, increased responsibility, growth

Satisfied

(with job motivator factors) Not Satisfied (Motivated) (Not Motivated)

Employees can be motivated by Clear Goal setting

Rewards & Incentives

Sense of achievement

R E C O G N I T I O N

Team spirit, loyalty & Strong relationships

Ownership + Participative management = Motivated Employees ( Robbins )

Motivation is the key to finishing the race with Success Those who run in a race all run, but one receives the prize. Run in such a way that one may taste the success

Why study motivation? Katz & Kahn (1978):Employees must

be attracted to join and stay with the organisation

dependably carry out their job

To Gain Competitive advantage

transcend dependable performance + engage in creative/ innovative behaviour at work

Approach of the study 

Population = 67 (approx.)

 

Sample size = 40

E&C 80% and others 20%) Technical= 92.5% Non technical= 7.5% 

  

Sampling Method

Multistage Sampling ( stratified + random sampling)

 

Questionnaire formation + pretesting

 

Data collection( quantitative + qualitative)

 

Data analysis

 

Findings

 

Comparative study

 

Questionnaire : rationale behind different parameters   

Quantitative study

• • •

1 = strongly disagree 2 = disagree 3 = neutral 4 = agree strongly agree

5=

Motivation and morale

Job satisfaction

gnitaR

Hygiene Factors

Statemen ts

Performance and rewards

Analysis based on work experiences: Motivation and morale

gnitaR

• • •

Work Experience

Analysis based on work experiences : Inclusiveness

• • •

Work experience

Analysis based on work experiences : Job satisfaction

• •

Work experience

• •

Work experience

Analysis based on work experiences : Performance and rewards

• •

Findings

gni t a R

Low satisfaction among employees having 4 to 8 years of experience and 0 to 2 years of experience

Work experience

Qualitative study

Interview & Observation Roles not as per ones qualification . No fixed working hours

Multiple reporting

Routine and monotonous job

Less assistance from

seniors

in prob

Job dissatisfaction Work overload

Training ( More in house )

stent inequity as compared to the colleagues in being the office No clarity in the task allocation ( reason internal reorganization of HC

.

Unhygienic food loss in executive guest houses leading t o health problems such as fatigue , HSE tiredness , weight etc Conditions

Suggestions

(given by

Employees) qRecreational activities and indoor games such as T . T . table in the office to overcome boredom qAt least two Saturdays in a month should be off . q

qWorking hours to be fixed i . e . max up to 10 hours on the site ( except for urgencies ) q qAppreciation and Encouragement provided to the employees . q qTransparency in terms of Rewards and Recognition q

q q

Continued :qWork Experienced / fresh entrants the teams should be increased q

in

qMorale boosting seminars or gatherings q qOuting every six months q qEmployee assistance program e . g . Counseling q q

Areas of improvement q MBO ( management by objective) q qTask allocation as per one`s back ground and talent q q Information sharing (task + results+ organ.) q q Inequity among the employees(reward & recogn) q qAlign individual goal to the organization`s goal q q Culture of appreciation q q Job enrichment by provision of job challenges q q Check the gap b/w policies and practice ( HSE q q Performance based rewards and recognition q q Transportation

Percentage performance improvement according to different types of O.B. mode Reinforcers Type of Organization

Overall effect

Monetary

Performance Feedback

Social

atten/recog. (1)

(2)

(3) (no studies)

Manufacturing

33%

39%

41%

Service

13%

14%

6%

Type of Organizations Manufacturing Services

Simultaneo us Applicatio n of 1 and 2

Simultaneo us Applicatio n of 2 and 3

15%

Simultaneo us Applicatio n of 1 , 2 and 3

(No studies)

41%

44%

30%

30%

49%

Source – Dr. Zubin R. Mulla , Professor

Research based comparative study Research conducted by department of labor (U.S.A.) on 1500 workers ( white collar) who were asked to rate the job factors. There findings ( Sanzotta 1977) are as follows :-

Most important

Least Important

Least importa nt

(PNCP)

L &T

Research

Most importa nt

Comparative study

Global Employee Engagement Vs PNCP Employment engagement report 2008 (BlessingWhite,Inc.) : Global Findings

Recommendations qAppreciation and Awards qProper feedback should be provided after every goal achieved qSharing of information regarding tasks + results + Organization strategy qMore challenging and responsible task qIncentives ( piecemeal ) based on Individual + Team + Organization`s performance qReview of

HSE conditions

qReview of working

hours and

holidays

Continued:qTask allocation based on employee`s qualification qTransparency in rewards and recognition q qPerformance based rewards

Operant conditioning (1953) :A desired voluntary behavior which leads to reward or prevents a punishment or People learn to associate stimulus and response

B . F . skinner 1904 - 1990

Schedules of reinforcement

Reinforcement scheduled Effect of behavior

Nature of reinforcement

Continuous

Rewards after each Desired behavior

+ve but rapid extinction

Fixed Interval

At fixed time intervals

Variable interval

At variable time

Moderately high + slow extinction

Fixed ratio

At fixed amounts of output

High and stable performance but rapid extinction

Variable ratio

At variable amount of output

average performance +rapid extinction

Very high performance + slow extinction

Variable - ratio schedule : Commissioned salespeople

Number of 6 14

15

7

8

9

1 10

2 11

3

12

4

13

5

Good practices qGood interpersonal relation amongst team members + boss+ subordinates q q Freedom of expression q q Company values new ideas q qSite based job : good learning experience + value add to the skill sets q q High accountability of the job q q More autonomy and less supervision q

References The best of the Gallup Management Geoffrey Brewer and Barb Sanford )

Journal ( edited by

Group processes by Donelson R . Forsyth Applied Human Relations an organizational approach by Jack Halloran Organization Behaviour by Robbins Industrial psychology by Harrel Employee engagement report by BlessingWhite , Inc . , U . S . A .  

Thank you 谢谢

Related Documents