Effect Of Al2o3, Sio2 And Tio2 On Molybdenum Oxide Supported Catalyst In Ethanol Oxidation Into Acetaldehyde

  • Uploaded by: Husni
  • 0
  • 0
  • April 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Effect Of Al2o3, Sio2 And Tio2 On Molybdenum Oxide Supported Catalyst In Ethanol Oxidation Into Acetaldehyde as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,055
  • Pages: 12
Effect of Al2O3, SiO2 and TiO2 on molibdenum oxide supported catalyst in ethanol oxidation into acetaldehyde

Husni Husin Chemical Engineering Department Engineering Faculty Syiah Kuala University Darussalam Banda Aceh Indonesia

Introduction Acetaldehyde: intermediate product raw material: pentaeritrytol and acetic acid production IMPORT ! Reaction : CH≡CH + H2O

2+

CH = CHO H

, H2SO4 ,700−1000 C Ag °C 2 ⎯Hg ⎯⎯ ⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⎯⎯ →,500 ⎯ ⎯⎯ →

CH3CH2OH + ½O2

o

Ag , 500°C ⎯⎯ ⎯⎯→

2+

C2H4O

, H 2 SO4 ,700−1000 C ⎯Hg ⎯⎯ ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯→

CH3CHO + H2O

T = 300 – 575 oC , P = 1 atm Conventional pocess: petrochemical via X < 72, Y < 95 Catalyst : Silver Very Expensive metal

high cost

o

P = 15 psi

Alternative Route Literature Study 1. Viswanath (1982) Catalyst : Fe/Mo/O T = 200-320˚C E T H A N O L

2. Mc Cabe dan Machiels (1983) - Catalyst: mangane, platinum, dan Copper

Reaction: C2H5OH+½ O2 →C2H4O+H2O

3. Filho dan Domingues (1992 ) - Catalyst : Fe/Mo/O komersial

Ethanol Oxidation over MoO3 based Catalyst

- T: 180-243 0C P: atm 4. Zhang dkk (1995) :

Catalyst and Condition ???

- Catalyst : MoO3 syntetis 5.

Husin dkk,. (2002) - Catalyst Fe2O3.MoO3

-This research is objected to evaluate the Influnce of TiO2, Al2O3, SiO2 on MoO3 catalyst in ethanol oxidation into acetaldehyde

Catalyst Preparation Catalyst Preparation (NH4)6Mo724O2.4H2O

Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2

Impregnation Drying Calsination

Characterization

Catalyst Test MoO3/Al2O3, TiO2, SiO2 Catalyst

Reactor set up Vent

buble soap flowmeter

H2O absorber preheate r thermocople

feed injection

detector reactor catalyst

gas product liquid Product

controller condenser

Methanol

nitrogen

nitrogen

oxigen

Gas mixer

RESULT AND DICCUSSION XRD data 4000

4000

50% MoO3/TiO2

25% MoO3/TiO2 x

3000

2000

Intensity (cps)

Intensity (cps)

3000

t

1000

x

x 1000

x

x t x

t

t t

x

2000

x

t

x x

x

t

0

x t

x

t

t

0

10

20

30 40 50 2 Theta (degree)

60

70

10

20

30 40 50 2 Theta (degree)

Figure 3.a Diffractogram of MoO3/TiO2

60

70

XRD data

25% MoO3/Al2O3 x = MoO3 o = Al2O3

6000

x

5000

5000

I n Inte t 4000 nsit e yn (cp s s)i 3000 t y

I n t 4000 Inte e nsit n ys (cp i 3000 s)t y

x

2000

x o

x o

x

30

x o

x

40

50

2 Theta (degree)

70

x o

xx

o

60

x xx o

x o

1000

x

0 20

x

x x

x

10

x o

2000

x x o

1000

50% MoO3/Al2O3 x = MoO3 o = Al2O3

6000

0

10

20

30

40

50

2 Theta (degree)

Figure 3.b Diffractogram of MoO3/Al2O3

60

70

XRD data 6000

6000 25% MoO3/SiO2 x = MoO3 s = SiO2

5000

5000

4000

I n t 00 e n s 2000 i t y

x s

1000

x s

x

s

10

x

x

30

x s x

x

40 2 Theta (degree)

50

60

x

s

70

0

x

s

x

s 20

x s

1000

x

s 0

x

I4000 n t e 00 n s i t2000 y

x

50% MoO3/SiO2 x = MoO3 s = SiO2

10

x

s

20

30

40

50

2 Theta (degree)

Figure 3.c Diffractogram of MoO3/SiO2

60

70

Catalytic Activity Selektivitas Asetaldehida Yield Asetaldehida 2 5 % M o O3 / TiO2

80 60 40 20 0 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 T emperature (oC)

Aktivitas (X, S, Y) %

Aktivitas (X, S, dan Y) %

100

Konversi Etanol Selektivitas Asetaldehida

Konversi Etanol Selektivitas Asetaldehida

Yield Asetaldehida

Yield Asetaldehida

100 2 5 % M o O3 / Al2 O3 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 T emperature (oC)

Aktivitas (X, S, Y) %

Konversi Etanol

100 90 80 2 5 % M o O3 /SiO2 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 325 T emperature (oC)

Figure 4. Conversion, Selectivity, and yield for ethanol oxidation at different temperature over 25% MoO3/Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2

Catalytic Activity 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

K o n v ersi E t an o l Selek t iv it as A set aldeh ida Y ield A set aldeh ida

1 0 0 %M o O3

Aktivitas (X, S, Y) %

Aktvitas (X, S, dan Y) %

K o n v ersi E t an o l Selek t iv it as A set aldeh ida Y ield A set aldeh ida

125 150

175 200 225 250

275 300 325

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

5 0 % M o O 3 / T iO 2

125 150

T em p erat ur (o C)

Konv ersi Et an ol Selekt iv it as Aset aldeh ida Yield Aset aldehida

5 0 % M o O 3 / A l2 O 3

Aktivitas (X, S, Y) %

Aktivitas (X, S, Y) %

Y ield Aset aldeh ida

125 150 175 200

225 250 275 300 325

T em p erat ure (o C)

275 300 325

T em p erat ure (o C)

K o n v ersi E t an o l Selek t iv it as A set aldeh ida 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

175 200 225 250

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

5 0 % M o O 3 / S iO 2

12 5 1 50

17 5 2 00

22 5 2 50 275

3 00 325

T em perat ure (o C)

Figure 4. Conversion, Selectivity, and yield for ethanol oxidation at different temperature over 50% MoO3/Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2

CONCLUSION The catalyst that loading of 50% MoO3 has higher intensity than 25% MoO3 . Both of the conversions and selectivities of MoO3 supported catalyst as a function of molybdenum loading and support. The highest conversion was 83% for the catalyst of 50%MoO3/TiO2, while the highest selectivity of acetaldehyde was 96% for the catalyst of 25%MoO3/SiO2. The highest of acetaldehyde yield was 51% by using MoO3/TiO2 suppoerted catalyst .

Katalis Industri

• Thanks you for your attention!

Related Documents


More Documents from ""