Data

  • November 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Data as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 565
  • Pages: 9
NICK LEACH

5-Oct-05

MAE 244

Sg = 2.110+-.5%

Gage Resistance

R = 120+-.3% Ω

L = 8.00" d = 6.00"

THICKNESS WIDTH

ELASTIC MODULUS WEIGHT

E = 10.4 msi W = 0.12 lb

POISSON'S RATIO

t = .139" b = 0.981" υ = 0.3

APPLIED LOAD (lbs)

AL AXIAL GAGE (µε)

AL TRANSVERSE GAGE (µε)

AL BEAM-TIP DEFLECTION (in)

σ = Mc/I (psi)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

2 116 223 329 442 549

2 35 71 107 142 180

5.85 5.9 5.95 6 6.05 6.1

0 949.67 1899.35 2849.02 3798.69 4748.36

THICKNESS WIDTH

t = 0.097" b = 1.025" υ = 0.0925

CALIBRATION FACTORS Gage Factor

ALUMINUM BEAM : 7075-T6 LENGTH CENTER

COMPOSITE BEAM : AS4/3501-6 GRAPHITE EPOXY LENGTH L = 8.00" CENTER d = 6.00" ELASTIC MODULUS WEIGHT APPLIED LOAD (in) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

E = 16.71 msi W = 0.039 lb

POISSON'S RATIO

COMP AXIAL GAGE COMP TRANSVERSE GAGE COMP BEAM-TIP DEFLECTION (µε) (µε) (in) 0 153 297 440 577

1 16 22 33 49

5.85 5.95 6.05 6.15 6.25

I = 1/12 bt^3 (in^4) 0 c = 1/2 t = .0695

I = 1/12 bt^3 (in^4) 0 c = 1/2 t = .0485

σ = Mc/I (psi) 0 1866.4 3732.8 5599.21 7465.61

2.5

661

62

6.35

9332.01

υ

1 0.3 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.33

υ

0.1 0.07 0.08 0.08

0.09

ALUMINUM BEAM : 7075-T6 P

εL

εT

δ

ε (Theoretical)

σ (=Mc/I)

υ = −εT/εL

(lbs) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

(µε) 0 114 221 327 440 547

(µε) 0 33 69 105 140 178

(in) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

ε=3δcd/L^3 0 0.12 0.24 0.37 0.49 0.61

(ksi) 0 949.67 1899.35 2849.02 3798.7 4748.37

0.29 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33

COMPOSITE BEAM : AS4/3501-6 GRAPHITE EPOXY P

εL

εT

δ

ε (Theoretical)

σ (=Mc/I)

υ = −εT/εL

(lbs) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

(µε) 0 153 297 441 577 661

(µε) 0 15 21 32 48 61

(in) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

ε=3δcd/L^3 0 0.06 0.11 0.17 0.23 0.28

(ksi) 0 311.07 622.14 933.21 1244.28 1555.34

0.1 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.09

υ avg

E calculated

E given

% Diff.

0.33

(msi) 0.13

(msi) 10.4

(%) -0.99

υ avg

E calculated

E given

% Diff.

0.09

(msi) 76.97

(msi) 16.71

(%) 3.61

Young's Modulus for the materials ALUMINUM E calculated E given (msi) (msi) 13.75 10.4

% Diff. (%) 32.21

COMPOSITE BEAM E calculated E given (msi) (msi) 8.7 16.71

% Diff. (%) 47.92

Poisson's Ratio for the materials ALUMINUM υ calculated 0.33

COMPOSITE BEAM υ calculated 0.09 Tip Deflection ALUMINUM

υ given 0.3

υ given 0.09

% Diff. (%) 8.83

% Diff. (%) 6.05

Poisson's Ratio for Aluminum  200

5000

Poisson's Ratio for Composite Beam 4500 4000

150 60 125 50 100 40 75 3050

0

0

3000 10000 2500 9000

Column C Linear regresColumn C sion, Column C Linear regression, Column C

2000 8000 1500 7000 

1000 6000 500 5000

2025 10 0



3500 

 

175 70

0

0 4000 100 200 03000 300 100400 200500 300600 400   2000 200 400 600 800 1000  0

0

200

400 

500

600

600



m



0

Column C Linear regresColumn C sion, Column C Linear regression, Column C

Column F Linear regression, Column F

Column F Linear regression, Column F 500

600

600

800

Related Documents

Data
July 2020 50
Data
May 2020 49
Data
December 2019 77
Data
November 2019 66
Data
June 2020 51
Data
November 2019 71