Da Responses. Then On To The K. Then Onto The
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Da Responses. Then On To The K. Then Onto The as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 420
- Pages: 10
DA responses. Then on to the K. Then onto the counter K. Then onto murdering nuking the CP’s
The 3 DA’s. Impact turn: Impact: EXTINCTION. Well, actually – we’re clarifying our plan now. We abolish the environment and nuke the world in strategic places. Basically, we Nuke Antarctica, the Arctic, North Korea, Iran (durrrrrr), Brazil (except for the rainforests), and China. Therefore we don’t cause extinction because we Nuke all the countries that could case nuclear war. So we’re awesome and all VOTE FOR US CUZ WE KILL ALL THE BAD GOVERNMENTS IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The K – We agree with the K – everything does come down to LOLWUT. Look.
LOLWUT?!?! Basically, our case is totally based on LOLWUT?!?!?!
The counter K – They never accknowlege thert more lolcats exist than lolwuts. They also commit the fallacy that all kats kan’t spell as evidenced here.
The alt – vote against their LOLWUT is everything K.
The Advantages – -- GLOBAL COOLING
WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?
i=3579019
Nuclear radiation from the war probably would not affect the U.S., Europe, Russia or areas outside of the two warring countries. But smoke would cause colder temperatures than the world has experienced in 1,000 years, the pair said in a presentation on Capitol Hill on June 13.
MULTIPLE COMPUTER MODELS SUGGEST GLOBAL COOLING FROM NUCLEAR WAR WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?
i=3579019
Toon of the University of Colorado, and Robock of Rutgers University, used new, more capable computer models of the atmosphere to calculate the effects of a regional nuclear war in which two countries attacked each other with 50 nuclear weapons. Based on their climate modeling, temperatures worldwide would decline by an average of about two degrees Fahrenheit in the year after the nuclear war.
If we nuke the terrorists – we get rid of people kats like dis.
If we nuke the terrorists, we get rid of this … LOLWUT???
CP responses. The Perm. We’re perming the CP because it’s topical and we the affirmative team have the power to perm any counterplan we want to. So now, the negative team is going to automatically drop this CP making us be the only team that solves the DA’s and avoids the K. One change in the mandates during the perm. Instead of firing the Brazilian missile technicians, we’re going to shoot them. DON”T FIRE THEM – JUST SHOOT THEM. Geez
So… vote aff… and if you do, you’ll get moor PuRpLe PoNiEs
The 3 DA’s. Impact turn: Impact: EXTINCTION. Well, actually – we’re clarifying our plan now. We abolish the environment and nuke the world in strategic places. Basically, we Nuke Antarctica, the Arctic, North Korea, Iran (durrrrrr), Brazil (except for the rainforests), and China. Therefore we don’t cause extinction because we Nuke all the countries that could case nuclear war. So we’re awesome and all VOTE FOR US CUZ WE KILL ALL THE BAD GOVERNMENTS IN THE WORLD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The K – We agree with the K – everything does come down to LOLWUT. Look.
LOLWUT?!?! Basically, our case is totally based on LOLWUT?!?!?!
The counter K – They never accknowlege thert more lolcats exist than lolwuts. They also commit the fallacy that all kats kan’t spell as evidenced here.
The alt – vote against their LOLWUT is everything K.
The Advantages – -- GLOBAL COOLING
WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?
i=3579019
Nuclear radiation from the war probably would not affect the U.S., Europe, Russia or areas outside of the two warring countries. But smoke would cause colder temperatures than the world has experienced in 1,000 years, the pair said in a presentation on Capitol Hill on June 13.
MULTIPLE COMPUTER MODELS SUGGEST GLOBAL COOLING FROM NUCLEAR WAR WILLIAM MATTHEWS 13 Jun 17:05 EDT (21:05 GMT) http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?
i=3579019
Toon of the University of Colorado, and Robock of Rutgers University, used new, more capable computer models of the atmosphere to calculate the effects of a regional nuclear war in which two countries attacked each other with 50 nuclear weapons. Based on their climate modeling, temperatures worldwide would decline by an average of about two degrees Fahrenheit in the year after the nuclear war.
If we nuke the terrorists – we get rid of people kats like dis.
If we nuke the terrorists, we get rid of this … LOLWUT???
CP responses. The Perm. We’re perming the CP because it’s topical and we the affirmative team have the power to perm any counterplan we want to. So now, the negative team is going to automatically drop this CP making us be the only team that solves the DA’s and avoids the K. One change in the mandates during the perm. Instead of firing the Brazilian missile technicians, we’re going to shoot them. DON”T FIRE THEM – JUST SHOOT THEM. Geez
So… vote aff… and if you do, you’ll get moor PuRpLe PoNiEs
Related Documents
Da Responses. Then On To The K. Then Onto The
June 2020 1
And Then..
May 2020 8
For Then
May 2020 6
Ecb Cuts, Then Shuffles To The Sideline
December 2019 22
If, Then
November 2019 11