Computer Modeling Of Plasma Focus Discharges

  • May 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Computer Modeling Of Plasma Focus Discharges as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 391
  • Pages: 39
Computer modeling of plasma focus discharges V.V.Vikhrev RRC Kurchatov Institute, Moscow, Russia

Three models are constructed for description of plasma focus dynamics: 1) two-dimensional snow-plough model, 2) two-dimensional MHD model of fully ionized plasma 3) One-dimensional three-fluids MHD-model.

 2I  H e cR

Two dimensional snow-plough model

H2 pmf  8  H2  f  2 R l n 8

M R  cm R Vn  t 

Using snow-plough model for Mather type plasma focus..

Using snow-plough model for Filippov type plasma focus..

Circuit t

d 1 ( LI )  R0 I  U Ñ  U 0   I dt dt C0 L – inductance, C –capacity, R0 – resistance of the circuit, I – current, U0 – initial voltage,  dL 1 R   Vn d dt R 

Two-dimensional MНD model of fully ionized plasma Is used fully ionised hydrogen plasma under the assumption of axially symmetric discharge development.

n  div(nV )  0 t

B  rot[V  B]  0 t

 nV 2 1  div(nV V )   grad (nT )  [rotB  B] t mi 4 mi

3   nT   div(nTV )   nTdiv(V )  2 t 

n is the plasma density, T is temperature V is the hydrodynamic velocity, B is the magnetic field strength, mi is mass of ions

Using 2-D MHD for Mather type plasma focus

Using 2-D MHD for Mather type plasma focus

Using 2-D MHD for Mather type plasma focus

One-dimensional three-fluids MHD-model • Is consider plasma from atoms, electrons and ions • ne = ni = n • Ti = Ta = T • Ver = Vi

Equation for electron temperature of plasma

Equation for ions and atoms temperature of plasma

Comperision with experiment

Comperision with expeiment, p=0.2 torr

Comperision with experiment, p=0.6 torr

Comperision with experiment, p=1 torr

Conclusions – Snow-plough model and 2D MHD model predicts current shape in time and current sheath motion. Results of simulation are well matched with experimental results. – 3 fluid model predicts the amount of gas, which is not captured by current sheath, leakage of current near isolator. Analysis has shown a good coincidence of numerical results with magnetic probe measurements. Model predicts that almost all the current flows within the current sheath.

Related Documents