Columbia

  • Uploaded by: anon-170196
  • 0
  • 0
  • December 2019
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Columbia as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 3,231
  • Pages: 64
Rockonomics: Economics & Public Policy in the Rock & Roll Industry Alan B. Krueger • Economics of Ticket Pricing • Industry Trends • Long-Run Explanations Superstar Model Baumol & Bowen’s Disease Wealth Effects • Short-Run Explanations Concentration Complimentary Goods Under Priced Asset

“Somebody said to me, ‘But the Beatles were timaterialistic.’ That’s a huge myth. John and I literally ed to sit down and say, ‘Now, let’s write a wimming pool.” -- Paul McCartney “[I]n some fashion, I help people hold on to their own humanity, if I'm doing my job right.” -- Bruce Springsteen “I don’t see how carving out the best seats and charging a lot more for them has anything to do with rock & roll.” -- Tom Petty

• To maximize short run profit  “Price Discriminate” • Charge more to those who are less “price sensitive” • Extreme example is variation in prices for airline seats • Don’t go overboard because of tie-in sales & fan loyalty

Seven Lessons from Super Bowl Sunday New York Times • List price was $325 in 2000; market price was around $2,500 • Secondary market develops if price too low, but its size can be exaggerated (20%) • Endowment effect • NFL could raise short-run profit by raising prices • But NFL wants to reward loyal fans to build enterprise • Besides, 60% of $4 billion of football revenue from TV • “Gift Exchange”

Figure 1: Average P ric e per Tic ket and Overall Inf lation Rate, 1981- 2003

60

50

40

Avg. Price

30

CPI 20

10 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Figure 1: Average P ric e per Tic ket, High and Low P ric e Tic kets, and Overall Inf lation Rate, 1981- 2003

60

50

40

Avg. Price

30

CPI 20

10 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Ticket Prices Soared Relative to Overall Price Inflation the Last 5 Years Proportionate Price Growth 0.700 0.620 0.600

Proportionate Growth

0.500

0.400 Avg. Ticket 0.301

CPI

0.300

0.255

0.243 0.207

0.206 0.200

0.152 0.128

0.100

0.000 1981-86

1986-91

1991-96 Per i od

1996-01

© Alan B. Krueger, 2002.

Prices are Growing Faster at the Top Price of the 90th, 50th, and 10th Percentile - All Artists 80

Price

60

40

20

0 1981

1986

1991 year

1996

2001 2003

Further Analysis • October 2001 edition of Rolling Stone’s Encyclopedia of Rock and Roll • Consistent universe of artists • 1,786 artists, from Abba to ZZ Top; 1,274 in Pollstar database • Responsible for 75% of ticket sales, 1981-2003. • Merged on additional data: year formed; gender; genre; prominence (mm)

Average Price Increase Understates Rise for a Consistent Set of Artists Average Price for Artists Listed in Rolling Stone Encyclopedia 55 50

Encyclopedia Bands

45 40 35

Average

30 25 20 15

Grow at CPI

10 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Source: Alan Krueger’s computations based on Pollstar and BLS data.

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

95

94

01

00

99

98

97

96

19

19

19

92

91

93

19

19

19

19

90

89

88

19

19

19

87

86

85

84

19

19

19

19

83

82

81

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Year 20

20

19

19

01

00

99

98

97

96

95

94

19

19

19

19

93

92

91

90

89

19 19

87

86

88

19

19

19

19

19

84

85

19

19

82

81

83

19

19

19

19

Ticket Price

Average Concert Ticket Price, Selected Artists

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Portland Tacoma St. Louis Kansas City Nashville Louisville Austin Houston Charlotte Raleigh Pittsburgh Cincinnati Hartford Anaheim Salt Lake City Atlanta New York

Ticket Price

The Boss Hardly Varies His Price Across Cities Low, High and Average Ticket Price Bruce Springsteen & E Street Band, April-J une 2000

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Figure 4a: Number of Shows Each Year Rolling Stone Encyclopedia Artists 8000

Number of Shows

7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Number of Tkts. Sold (Millions)

Figure 4b: Number of Tickets Sold Each Year Rolling Stone Encyclopedia Artists 40

35

30

25

20

15

10 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Figure 4c: Total Ticket Revenue in 2003 Dollars Rolling Stone Encyclopedia Bands Ticket Revenue (Millions of $)

$1,400

$1,200

$1,000

$800

$600

$400

$200

$0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Scalping and List Prices • Survey at Springsteen “The Rising” Concert, Oct. 6, 2003 in Philadelphia, PA. Every ticket sold for $75. • Stratified random cluster sample of seats. Interviewed 858 people in the 15 minutes before the start of the show. • Short questionnaire on index card. Very high response rate. • 20-25 percent of tickets scalped. Worst seats more likely to be resold. Average resale price was $300. • Springsteen gave away $3 million in consumer surplus

Explanations For Two Key Facts Need To Be Found: • Long run faster growth in concert prices than inflation • Short-run acceleration in prices the last 5 years

The Economics of Superstars • Sherwin Rosen (AER 1981) • If undergoing heart surgery, willing to pay a lot more for the best surgeon over the second best surgeon • Imperfect substitutes  Convex reward function • Plus, size of market  Best can reach more customers • Human capital would not have a linear effect – twice as good paid more than twice as much

Apply to Rock & Roll • Superstars are known to a broader audience because of technology • Improved technology differentiates the best from the rest and permits bigger audience (unlike Ms. Billington) • Demand to hear the very best is higher • Rewards for the best should rise

110.0

100.0

90.0

Price of Consumer Audio Equipment After Adjusting for Inflation (1978=100)

80.0

Price Index

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The Top Artists are Getting a Larger S hare of Total Tic ket Revenue 100% Everybody Else

84%

80%

60%

Top2-5 Percent

62%

56% 40%

26% 20% Top1Percent

Top 1% 14.6%

0% 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Year

Source: Calculated by Alan Krueger based on Pollstar data.

Novel measure of “Star Quality”: Amount written about artist in Rolling Stone’s Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll Measured in millimeters to be scientific

399 mm

The Return to “Star Quality” on Log Price Log Difference in Price for 1 Standard Deviation Change in Star Quality for Encyclopedia Bands 0.140

0.123

Log Difference

0.120 0.100

0.091

0.080 0.060

0.047

0.052

1981-86

1987-91

0.040 0.020 0.000

1992-96

1997-03

Note: Based on multiple regressions of log annual revenue on millimeters of print, year dummies and covariates. Sample consists of 10,043 artist/year observations. See Table 3, col. 4.

The Return to “Star Quality” on Revenue per Show

Log Difference

Effect of 1 SD Change in Star Quality on Log Revenue per Show for All Artists 0.8 0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3

0.698

0.714

1992-96

1997-03

0.618

0.482

1981-86

1987-91

Note: Based on multiple regressions of log annual revenue on millimeters of print, year dummies and no. of support acts. Sample consists of 35,835 artist/year observations. See Table 1, col. 3.

The Return to “Star Quality” on Revenue per Show Effect of 1 SD Change in Star Quality on Log Revenue per Show for Encyclopedia Bands 0.6

Log Difference

0.55 0.5

0.532

0.528

0.492 0.440

0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3

1981-86

1987-91

1992-96

1997-03

Note: Based on multiple regressions of log annual revenue on millimeters of print, year dummies and covariates. Sample consists of 10,043 artist/year observations. \ See Table 3, col. 6.

$55.00

Average Price for Selected Characteristics, All Else Equal $55.00

Age of Band

$50.00

Gender

$50.00

$47.69 $45.56 $44.03

$45.00

$41.85

$45.00

$42.79

$42.56

$40.00

$40.00

$35.00

$35.00

$30.00

$38.50

$30.00

5

10

20

30

Male

Female

Mixed

$55.00

Genre $50.01 $50.00

$47.86 $44.09

$45.00

$41.60

$40.62

$41.48

$40.00

$37.98

$38.02 $36.10

$35.13

$35.00

$30.00

Blues

Country & W estern

Folk

Jazz

Other

Pop

Rock

Rhythm & Blues

Reggae

Rap

Note: Based on a multiple regression of log price on millimeters of print, age of band, gender of band, genre of music, foreign vs. U.S. group, and year dummies. Sample consists of 79,375 concerts performed by 1,253 artists. Weighted average price indexed to 2001 average price.

Tina Turner: What’s Age Got to Do With It? As Artists Age, the High-Low Ticket Price Ratio Rises

Ratio of High to Low Price

2.5

2

1.5

1 1982

1986

1991

1996

2000

Baumol and Bowen’s Disease • Takes same amount of time and input to play Free Bird • Concerts are a low productivity growth sector (modular technological change) • Would expect prices in low productivity growth sectors to grow relatively quickly

The Demand for Leisure has Risen with Wealth • As society becomes wealthier people demand more leisure and higher quality leisure activities • Demand for leisure is a “super normal good” – the share of income devoted to leisure rises with income • Price of most leisure activities is growing relatively fast • The demand for leisure is likely to continue to grow

Leisure Hours Per Day 8

6

4

2 1850

1900

1950

Source: Robert Fogel (1999).

2000

2050

C oncert Tickets versus M ovie, Theater, and Sports Tickets C oncert Venue Price Index versus C PI for M ovie, Theater and Sports Events

Proportionate Growth in Price

0.600

0.546

0.500

0.427 0.400

0.358

0.332

Concerts

0.278

0.300

0.252

0.241

0.207

Movies, Sports & Theater

0.200

0.100

0.000 1981-86

1986-91

1991-96 Per i od

1996-01

© Alan B. Krueger, 2002.

What Explains Recent Price Growth? • Production Costs Increased • Consolidation • Decline in Complementary Revenue Source: Record Sales • Undervalued Asset

Industry Consolidation • Vertical Concentration - Venues - Radio - Marketing, etc. • Horizontal Concentration - SFX, Clear Channel Clear Channel

Telecommunications Act of 1996 • Signed Feb. 8, 1996 • Prior to 1996 Act, radio stations could own just 40 stations nationally, and 2 in a market • Cap eliminated nationwide, and raised to 8 in a market • Since 1996, 10,000 radio station transactions worth $100 billion • Further legislation could lead to consolidation with TV and newspapers

The Industry Has Become More Concentrated Recently Percent of Total Revenue Handled by Biggest Four Promoters – All Artists

Percent of Ticket Sales

80

60

40

20 1981

1986

1991

1996 year

2001

2003

Nationally, the Industry Has Become More Concentrated Recently Percent of Total Revenue Handled by Biggest Four Promoters - Top Artists

Percent of Ticket Sales

80

60

41% CC

40

20 1981

1986

1991

1996

2001 2003

Source: Calculated by Alan Krueger based on Pollstar data. Only concerts performed in the U.S. are included in the analysis. Sample consists of artists listed in Rolling Stone Encyclopedia.

Figure 4a: Number of Shows Each Year Rolling Stone Encyclopedia Artists 8000

Number of Shows

7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Figure 5: Proportion of Seats That Are Filled for Concerts held by Artists Listed in Rolling Stone Encyclopedia of Rock & Roll 0.95

Proportion of Seats Filled

0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 0.55 0.50 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Average Within-Market Percent of Revenue Handled by Biggest Four Promoters Average of Percent in Each of the Top 24 Markets

Percent of Ticket Sales

90.5% 80

60

40

© Alan B. Krueger, 2002.

20 1981

1986

1991

1996

2001

Source: Calculated by Alan Krueger based on Pollstar data. Only concerts performed in the U.S. are included in the analysis. Sample consists of artists listed in Rolling Stone Encyclopedia.

Change in Prices vs. Change in Big-Four Concentration Ratio, 1993-94 to 2000-2001; 98 Largest Cities

Proportionate Change in Price

2

r = 0.04

1.5

1

.5

0

-.5 -50

0 50 Change in Big-Four Concentration Ratio

100

Clear Channel’s Share of Concert Revenue versus their Share of Radio Listeners across 98 Largest Radio Markets Share of Concert Revenue, 2000-01

1

r = 0.01 .75

.5

.25

0 0

.1

.2 .3 Share of FM Radio Market, 2002

.4

.5

Herfindahl-Hirschman Index for Venues, 1986-2001 Average Across 24 Largest Cities 6000

Average HHI

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000 1986

1991

1996

2001

Note: Venues that are exclusively used by one promoter in a year in a particular city are pooled together into one conglomerate. An industry with an HHI above 1,8000 is considered highly concentrated according to the Justice Department Merger Guidelines.

Surge in Average Price Per Concert Ticket in Canada is Similar to that in the United States – 67% Nominal Growth from 1996 to 2001 $50

Price (US Dollars)

$40

$30

$20

Avg. Price

Grow at U.S. CPI

$10

$0 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

Alternative Model - Complementary Goods • Dependent Demands with Shift in Record Market • Records and Concerts are complementary goods • Because of new technology, the complementarity is weaker

1.2

Total Albums and Singles Shipped Billions of Units

1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

Source: New York Times, Feb. 25, 2002, p. C1.

Music shipments were down an estimated 9.6 percent last year, after declining 7 percent in 2000. Sales were flat 1994 to 2000.

Bands Produce 2 Complementary Goods with Market Power Good 1: Concert Tickets Good 2: Record Sales

max p1 D1 (p ) + p2 D2 (p ) −C1 (D1 (p ))− C2 (D2 (p )) ∼



' ' p1 −C1 = 1 − (p2 − C2 )D2 ε12 ε11 p1 p1 D1 ε11





“Music itself is going to become like running water or electricity. So it’s like, just take advantage of these last few years because none of this is ever going to happen again. You’d better be prepared for doing a lot of touring because that’s really the only unique situation that’s going to be left. It’s terribly exciting. But on the other hand it doesn’t matter if you think it’s exciting or not; it’s what’s going to happen.” David Bowie The New York Times

June 9, 2002

p1 − C1' = 1 − (p2 − C2' )D2ε12 ε11 p1 p1D1ε11

Monopolistic Price Setting Concerts Only Marginal Cost

P Concert Price

Demand for concerts Marginal Revenue Q

Concerts

Monopolistic Price Setting with Complementary Product: Records

Concert Price

Marginal Cost

P P’

Demand for concerts Marginal Revenue Q Q’ Concerts

Revenue from Complementary Product Falls Because of MP3, etc.

Concert Price

Marginal Cost

P P

Demand for concerts Marginal Revenue Q Q’ Concerts

Price Growth by Genre,1996-2001 74.1%

80% 70% 55.6%

60% 50%

45.0%

47.7%

Reggae & Other

Folk & Country

40% 30%

23.4%

20% 10% 0% Jazz & Blues

Rap & R&B Pop & Rock

450

There’s A Long Way to Go to Catch the Super Bowl!

400

350

Price

300

250

200

150

100

50

Superbowl Concerts

0 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Conclusions • Rising superstar effects, but not accelerating • To understand the market must understand industrial organization and technology • Legal changes that allowed Clear Channel to dominate industry may be overrated • Antitrust action in future? Revised Telecom Act? • Complementarities between concerts and album sales key to market for Rock Stars?

Related Documents

Columbia
December 2019 13
Columbia
June 2020 8
Dudafunk Columbia
November 2019 10
Columbia Casestudy
May 2020 9
Columbia Placements
October 2019 9
Columbia Menu-tapas
October 2019 9