Invention on Demand A TRIZ Perspective
Dr. Andrei Cernasov
Definitions • •
•
• •
Invention: Any new article, machine, composition, or process or new use developed by humans. Patent: Grant from a government that confers to the inventor exclusive rights to make, use, sell, or offer for sale the rights to an invention for a fixed period of time. Patentable Invention: A new, non-obvious and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof. Innovation: “The process of equipping in new improved capabilities, or increased utility”, Peter, F. Drucker. Innovation: “Invention + Capital”, Joseph Schumpeter.
USPTO Building, Washington, DC
History of Patents •
•
• • •
•
1449 - King Henry VI of England awards “John of Utynam” a patent for a method of manufacturing stained glass. 1787 - US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8, the “Intellectual Property Clause”. 1790 - The Patent Act of 1790, Thomas Jefferson. 1793 - The Patent Act of 1793, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. 1836 - The Patent Act of 1836 establishes the Patent Office as part of Department of State. 1975 - The US Patent Office becomes the US Patent and Trademark Office under the Department of Commerce
King Henry VI
Famous Patents Patent No 0000001: Locomotive steam engine for rail and other roads
Patent No 0821393: Flying Machine
Patent No 1102653: Rocket Apparatus
Patent No 0001582: Camera Apparatus
Patent No 0223898: Electric Bulb
Patent No 0644077: Aspirin
Patent No 2139296: Cathode Ray Tube
Smart Inventions? Dumb Inventions? Patent No 6796396: Personal Transporter
Patent No 5071161: Air Bag Restraining System with Venting Means
Patent No 5071161: Air Bag Restraining System with Venting Means
Patent No 4773863: Amusement Device for a Toilet bowl or Urinal
Patent No 4773863: Amusement Device for a Toilet bowl or Urinal
Talking toilet orders men to sit down Latest Updated by 2004-05-27 11:42:35 A GERMAN inventor who developed a gadget that berates men if they try to use the toilet standing up has sold more than 1.6 million devices, his business manager said on Tuesday. German women fed up with a man with a poor aim can turn to the ghost-shaped gadget, which lurks under the toilet rim and, if the seat is lifted, declares in a stern female tone: "Hello, what are you up to? Put the seat back down right away, you are definitely not to pee standing up ... you will make a big mess..." Alex Benkhardt, 46, invented the "WC Ghost" and its creators are in negotiations to market it in Britain, Canada and Italy.
Patent No 5280371: Directional Diffuser for a Liquid Crystal Display
TMO Reports - Honeywell Sues Apple, 33 Others Over LCD Patent by Brad Gibson Brad Gibson, 7:10 PM EDT, October 6th, 2004
A spokesman for Honeywell told The Mac Observer that the United States patent in question is number 5,280,371, filed in July of 1992 and granted in January of 1994. Defendants named in Honeywell's lawsuit besides Apple include Argus, Audiovox, Casio Computer, Casio, Concord Cameras, Dell, Eastman Kodak, Fuji Photo Film, Fuji Photo Film, Fujitsu, Fujitsu America, Fujitsu Computer Products, Kyocera Wireless, Matsushita Electrical, Matsushita Electrical Corp. of America, Navman NZ, Navman U.S.A., Nikon USA, Nikon Inc., Nokia, Nokia Americas, Olympus, Olympus America, Pentax, Pentax U.S.A., Sanyo Electric, Sanyo North America, Sony, Sony Corporation Of America, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (U.S.A.) Inc., Toshiba, and Toshiba America.
Famous Inventors
Innovation Targets Post-Industrial Age Business structure
Customer service
• •
• • •
Alliances Capital formation
Service process Communication Financial tools
Administration • • •
Information flow Automation Insourcing/outsourcing services
Organization • • • • • • • •
Structure type Facilities infrastructure IT infrastructure Employee/contractor mix Employee experience Decision making processes Facilities effectiveness Process improvements
Customer experience • • • • •
Communication Customer relationship management Brand/image Advertising Feedback
Supply chain • • •
Distribution system Manufacturing Communication
Product • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Product offering Product availability Technology (invisible) Technology (visible) Manufacturing R&D User interface Packaging Functionality Life cycle model Sales model Sustainability After-sale service Distribution
Classic Invention Methods Specific Design Problem
Specific Design Solution Classic Invention Methods
Brainstorming
Matrix Search Methods
• • • • •
• • •
•
Multidisciplinary idea generation team All ideas recorded No criticism or sanity checks during session All ideas ranked by a separate analysis team Selected ideas presented for second stage brainstorming Process continued from problem stage to manufacturing stage
Analogy • • •
Specific problem reduced to abstract Similar problems in nature or other industries are studied and analogies are drawn Analogous solutions are developed
Empathy • • •
Become the problem object Apply local laws Solve problem from the object point of view
Identify desired function Identify relevant variables Apply all possible combinations of variables until acceptable solution is found
Analysis and Synthesis • • • •
Specific problem reduced to abstract Find desired transfer function Use system type synthesis tools to find abstract solution Reduce abstract solution to specific design
Darwinian Evolution • • • •
Current system exposed to new conditions Small changes are made to each variable (perturbations) Is output function moving in the right direction? If yes keep the change and continue to next variable. If not discard.
TRIZ The Theory of Inventive Problems Solving • • • • •
Genrich Altshuller
• • • •
Method of inventing based on the analysis of over 200,000 mechanically oriented Russian patents. Describes problems in terms of 39 interrelated physical or operational “features”. The uniqueness of each problem is embodies in contradictions among different features. The uniqueness of each inventive solution is identified as a subset of 40 TRIZ “inventive principles”. A 39X39 TRIZ “Contradiction Matrix” summarizes the solution space of the 200,000 patents studied and offers the most effective subset of TRIZ inventive principles to be used by the would be inventor. Leverages the knowledge of thousands of inventors. Convergent. Addresses known problems (Not a Blue-Sky method). The “Nostradamus Effect”
TRIZ Method
Thousands of Problems
General TRIZ Problem
Thousands of Inventors
TRIZ Method
Thousands of Problems
General TRIZ Solution Problem Translation
Problem Translation
Specific Design Problem
Specific Design Solution Classic Invention Methods
TRIZ Ideal Machine
•
Products and systems that repair themselves instantly
•
Products and services that market themselves to customers
•
Products and systems that do not require energy
• •
Products that take no space Zero pollution products
•
Infinite or zero bandwidth communication links
•
Instantaneous auto insurance rating changes, based on speed and location of a car
•
Prescription drugs that automatically adjust their effectiveness based on body chemistry encountered after ingestion
•
Medical insurance claims paid when service is provided
•
Inventory that replenishes itself
TRIZ Problem Features • • • • •
Substance • • • •
Weight of moving object Weight of stationary object Loss of substance Quantity of substance
Structure • • • •
Stability of composition Manufacturing precision Ease of manufacture Device complexity
Space • •
Length of moving object Length of stationary object
Area of moving object Area of stationary object Volume of moving object Volume of stationary object Shape
Time • • • • •
Speed Duration of action of moving object Duration of action of stationary object Loss of time Productivity
Energy • • • • • • •
Force (intensity) Stress or pressure Strength Temperature Illumination intensity Use of energy by moving object
TRIZ Problem Features • • •
Use of energy by stationary object Power Loss of energy
Information • • • • • • • • • •
Loss of information Reliability Measurement accuracy Object-affected harmful factors Object-generated harmful factors Adaptability or versatility Difficulty of detecting and measuring Extent of automation Ease of operation Ease of repair
TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles 1
Segmentation
2
Taking out
3
Local quality
4
Asymmetry
5
Merging
6
Universality
7
Nested dolls (Matrioshka)
8
Anti-weight
9
Preliminary anti-action
10
Preliminary action
11
Beforehand cushioning
12
Equipontentiality
13
The other way around
14
Spheroidality - Curvature
15
Dynamics
TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles 16
Partial or excessive actions
17
Another dimension
18
Mechanical Vibration
19
Periodic action
20
Continuity of useful sction
21
Skipping
22
Blessing in disguise
23
Feedback
24
Intermediary
25
Self-service
26
Copying
27
Cheap short-living objects
28
Mechanics substitution
29
Pneumatics and hydraulics
30
Flexible shells and thin films
TRIZ 40 Inventive Principles 31
Porous materials
32
Color changes
33
Homogeneity
34
Discarding and recovering
35
Parameter changes
36
Phase transitions
37
Thermal expansion
38
Strong oxidants
39
Inert atmosphere
40
Composite materials
The Contradiction Matrix Improving Feature
Worsening Feature
1
Weight of moving object
2
Weight of stationary object
3
Length of moving object
4
Length of stationary object
5
Area of moving object
6
Area of stationary object
7
Volume of moving object
8
Volume of stationary object
Weight of moving object
Weight of stationary object
Length of moving object
Length of stationary object
Area of moving object
Area of stationary object
Volume of moving object
Volume of stationar y object
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
15, 8, 29,34
+
10, 1, 29, 35
+ 8, 15, 29, 34
29, 17, 38, 34
+ 35, 28, 40, 29
2, 17, 29, 4
35, 10, 19, 14
17, 7, 10, 40
26, 7, 9, 39
19, 14
+
1, 7, 4, 17 35, 8, 2, 14
35, 8, 2,14
7, 14, 17, 4
+
1, 7, 4, 35
5, 35, 14, 2 7, 17, 4, 35
15, 17, 4
14, 15, 18, 4
2, 26, 29, 40
35, 30, 13, 2
+
30, 2, 14, 18
29, 2, 40, 28
+
+
Example 1
Problem:
Standard sanders generate excessive amounts of dust
Relevant Features Improving: 26 - Quantity of substance Worsening: 36 – Device complexity TRIZ Principles:
3 – Local quality 13 – The other way around 27 – Cheap short living objects 10 – Preliminary action
Example 1
Example 2 Problem:
Rain sensors are integrated in or on the glass of the windshield
Relevant Features Improving: 32 – Ease of manufacture Worsening: 35 – Adaptability or versatility TRIZ Principles:
2 – Taking out 13 – The other way around 15 - Dynamics
Example 2
Example 3 Problem:
Luggage with built-in rollers topple over on uneven terrain
Relevant Features Improving: 10 – Force (intensity) Worsening: 3 – Length of moving object TRIZ Principles:
17 – Another dimension 19 – Periodic action 9 – Universality 36 – Phase transitions
Example 3
TRIZ Levels of Inventiveness
Level
Degree of Inventiveness
% of solutions
Source of Knowledge
Approximate Number of Solutions to Consider
1
Apparent Solution
32%
Personal Knowledge
10
2
Minor Improvement
45%
Knowledge within Company
100
3
Major Improvement
18%
Knowledge within the Industry
1000 100,000 1,000,000
4
New Concept
4%
Knowledge Outside the Industry
5
Discovery
1%
All that is Knowable
ARIZ - Algorithm of Inventive Problems Solving (Алгоритм решения изобретательских задач)
ARIZ Choosing the Problem 1.
Determine the Desired Outcome a. What is the technical goal? b. What parameters are fixed? c. What are the business goals? d. What is the cost bracket of the solution? e. What is the main technical/business parameter that needs improvement?
2.
Is a more general by-pass solution available, desirable or possible?
3.
Select which problem to solve (original or by-pass) a. Compare the original problem with trends within the given industry b. Compare the original problem with trends within a leading industry c. Compare the by-pass problem with trends within the given industry d. Compare the by-pass problem with trends within a leading industry e. Compare the original problem with the by-pass problem and select
ARIZ 4.
Define the quantitative characteristics of the solution
5.
Apply time-correction to the quantitative characteristics
6.
Define the environment of the solution a. Manufacturing b. Future scale
Breaking Down the Problem 1.
Use patent information a. How are similar problems solved by other inventors? b. How are similar problems solved in leading industries? c. How are opposite problems solved?
2.
Use Operator STC (Size, Time, Cost) a. Let Size go to zero. Does it solve the problem? How? b. Let Size go to infinity. Does it solve the problem? How? c. Let Time (Speed) go to zero. Does it solve the problem? How?
ARIZ d. Let Time (Speed) go to infinity. Does it solve the problem? How? e. Let Cost go to zero. Does it solve the problem? How? f. Let Cost go to infinity. Does it solve the problem? How? 3.
Translate the problem into a series of statements with the following format: a. “Given a system consisting of… (list of elements)…” b. “…element (state element), under conditions…(state conditions), produces the following undesirable effect…(state effect)”
4.
Reorganize the system elements into two groups: a. Elements that can be changed, redesigned or retuned b. Elements difficult to change
5.
Choose the elements to modify in the order of their ease of change. a. Choose fixed elements over the mobile ones b. Choose unlinked elements over the linked ones c. Include the outside environment as a changeable element
ARIZ Analyzing the Problem 1.
Formulate the Ideal Final Result a. Select an appropriate element b. State its action c. State how it performs this action d. State when it perform this action e. State under what conditions it performs this action (limitations, requirements, etc.)
2.
Visualize the “Initial” and “Ideal” solutions (drawings, block diagrams, flowcharts…)
3.
Mark the elements that cannot perform the required function
4.
Why can’t this element (by itself) perform the function?
5.
What element parameters should be changed (be wild)?
6.
How can these parameters be changed (effectively)?
ARIZ 7. Formulate practical concepts that support the required parameter changes 8. Select the most promising concept and reduce it to design Analyzing the Emerging Concept 1.
What is better and what got worse (list)?
2.
Is there a first-order fix for the “worse” part?
3.
What is the new “worse”?
4.
Compare gains and losses
5.
If Gains > Losses proceed to Synthesis. If not select the next element. If all elements have been analyzed then continue to the Using TRIZ Tools
Using TRIZ Tools 1.
From the Vertical Column of the Contradiction Matrix choose the feature that must be improved.
ARIZ 2.
Find the dominant Improving vs. Worsening feature contradiction a. Improve the feature by known means b. Which feature becomes unacceptable?
3.
On the Horizontal Row of the Contradiction Matrix find the Worsening feature of the dominant contradiction
4.
Using the Matrix find the TRIZ Principles for solving the dominant contradiction
5.
Using known techniques (brainstorming, analogy…) apply the Principles to remove the dominant feature contradiction
6.
Repeat the process and remove the next feature contradiction
Generalizing the Solution 1.
Adapt the environment to the new system
2.
Search for new modes of operation
3.
Use equivalent principles to solve other problems.
TRIZ Feature Balance
Area of Invention: Avionic Boxes
ARIZ
The Environment Avionic boxes are expensive, complex, high reliability, low run electronic systems Avionic boxes are multilevel integrated systems a. Functions integrated on ICs (FPGA firmware, software…) b. ICs integrated into PC boards c. PC boards integrated into box systems d. Communication through connectors, harnesses and the backplane e. Shared infrastructure (mechanical arrangement, power distribution, Relevant Features: Cost, Complexity, heat management, noise…) Reliability, Functionality, Speed, Size (Weight), Avionic boxes are subjected to stresses Heat (Temperature), Noise, Power…)
ARIZ Choosing the Problem 1.
2. 3.
Determine the Desired Outcome a. What is the technical goal? Reduce the operating temperature b. What parameters are fixed? Speed, Size, Power c. What are the business goals? d. What is the cost bracket of the solution? e. What is the main technical/business parameter that needs improvement? Temperature Is a more general by-pass solution available, desirable or possible? Higher temperature rating electronics, displays, etc. Select which problem to solve (original or by-pass) a. Compare the original problem with trends within the given industry b. Compare the original problem with trends within a leading industry c. Compare the by-pass problem with trends within the given industry d. Compare the by-pass problem with trends within a leading industry e. Compare the original problem with the by-pass problem and select
ARIZ 4. 5. 6.
Define the quantitative characteristics of the solution Reduce the operating temperature by at least 10 degrees C Apply time-correction to the quantitative characteristics NA Steady state solution Define the environment of the solution Little or no change in manufacturing process, scalable, reusable
Breaking Down the Problem 1.
Use patent information a. How are similar problems solved by other inventors?
ARIZ
ARIZ
2.
b. How are similar problems solved in leading industries? Solid state cooling, forced air, ionic wind, liquid cooling c. How are opposite problems solved? Heaters Use Operator STC (Size, Time, Cost)
3.
Translate the problem into a series of statements with the following format: a. “Given a system consisting of… (list of elements)…” b. “…element (state element), under conditions…(state conditions), produces the following undesirable effect…(state effect)”
Given a system consisting of: …PC board, PC board, PC board…IC, IC, IC…, T,T,T,…heat sink, heat sink…enclosure, …. Element heat sink…produces the following undesirable effect: insufficient removal of heat…Element heat sink…produces the following undesirable effect: insufficient removal of heat…Element heat sink…produces the following undesirable effect: insufficient removal of heat…
ARIZ 4.
Reorganize the system elements into two groups:
5.
a. Elements that can be changed, redesigned or retuned Heat sinks, PC boards, enclosure b. Elements difficult to change ICs, Ts Choose the elements to modify in the order of their ease of change.
Heat sinks, PC boards, enclosure Analyzing the Problem 1.
Formulate the Ideal Final Result a. Select an appropriate element Heat sink, Heat sink system (global) b. State its action Energy transferred from T,IC to Cold Reservoir (enclosure) c. State how it performs this action Energy (heat) is transferred through conduction from T, IC to Sink (input port) then through conduction from Sink to Air (output port), Air motion transports the Energy through convection from Sink to Cold Reservoir
ARIZ
ARIZ d. State when it perform this action e. State under what conditions it performs this action (limitations, requirements, etc.) 2.
Visualize the “Initial” and “Ideal” solutions (drawings, block diagrams, flowcharts…)
ARIZ •
3.
•
4.
•
5.
•
6.
•
7.
•
8.
Mark the elements that cannot perform the required function Heat Sinks Why can’t this element (by itself) perform the function? Does not generate flow (passive), large contact area requires intricate shape that impedes Air flow, cannot direct energy flows along controlled paths What element parameters should be changed (be wild)? Generate flow (become active), do not impede Air flow, guide heat How can these parameters be changed Laminar Flow Formulate practical concepts that support the required parameter changes Shape the system of Heat Sinks and Cold Reservoir to favor laminar flow Select the most promising concept and reduce it to design
ARIZ Analyzing the Emerging Concept 1.
What is better and what got worse (list)?
2.
Is there a first-order fix for the “worse” part?
3.
What is the new “worse”?
4.
Compare gains and losses
5.
If Gains > Losses proceed to Synthesis. If not select the next element. If all elements have been analyzed then continue to the Using TRIZ Tools
Using TRIZ Tools 1.
From the Vertical Column of the Contradiction Matrix choose the feature that must be improved. Loss of Energy, Temperature
ARIZ 2.
Find the dominant Improving vs. Worsening feature contradiction
3.
a. Improve the feature by known means Bigger, more complex heat sink b. Which feature becomes unacceptable? Volume, device complexity, ease of manufacture On the Horizontal Row of the Contradiction Matrix find the Worsening feature of the dominant contradiction Volume Using the Matrix find the TRIZ Principles for solving the dominant contradiction
4.
[7- nested and pass-through object solutions], [4- asymmetry, 6- universality, 35 – parameter changes, flexibility (shape), change operating temperature ] 5.
Using known techniques (brainstorming, analogy…) apply the Principles to remove the dominant feature contradiction 7- Embed the heat sink into the PCB (separate plane with output ports where space allows) 4- Shape the heat sinks for better performance 6- Can the heat sinks be also electrical shields (connectors)? 35- Use long flexible metal strips to connect Ts to Cold Reservoir
EUREKA !!!!!!
Patent Searches Web Resources:
The US Patent and Trademark Office (http://www.uspto.gov/) FreePatentsOnline.com (http://www.freepatentsonline.com/)
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Patent Searches
Communicating Your Idea
“Obviously, your invention works in practice, but there’s one insurmountable problem: It will never work in theory.”