The lost millions: miscarriage of census 2007 By Tibibir Yilemlim [March 6, 2009] 1. THE
CENSUSES OF MAY 1984, OCTOBER 1994 AND MAY 2007
Ethiopia has had three population and housing censuses over the last 25 years: that of May 1984 was during the military regime; it was the least obsessed with divisive issues like ethnicity, and government leaders were least involved. Next came that of October 1994 , three years after TPLF guerrilla fighters grabbed power by force, and took over Minilik Palace, all the time singing about ethnicity and intoxicated with anti-Amara propaganda. To make matters worse, the census commission was chaired by Meles Zenawi, the chief architect of ethnicity and divide-and-rule. The last one came in May 2007, chaired by Deputy Chairman of EPRDF and Chairman of ANDM, the ruler of Amara region over the last 17 years. One may, therefore, say that the censuses of 1994 and 2007 were highly politicized, the census secretariat taking orders from the all-powerful census commission chairmen. An opposition that is always divided has not been able to do anything about it. In any country and census, census populations have some common characteristics: almost fixed sex and age structures, and ethnic compositions that change very little over several peaceful decades, the length of the period depending on the speed of social and economic development. If the country develops fast, as in the Tigers of south-east Asia, then some of these characteristics may change slightly faster. In Ethiopia’s ethnic regions, migration is effectively prohibited even within the same region; the issue of in-migration from other lands is unthinkable, except possibly from our neighbors, and even that is insignificant compared to the sizes of the ethnic groups that may have such incoming kith and kin. If there were significant in-migration or out-migration after 1984, then its effect would be to change the 1984 ethnic composition. However, Ethiopia has not had any significant inmigration of Oromos or former residents of Oromia, or Sidamas or former residents of SNNP from any neighboring states, or from other countries, and there has not been any mass exodus of Amaras either. Hence, the dramatic increase in Oromos or Sidamas, or the equally dramatic decrease in Amaras in the 2007 population census cannot be rationally explained.. Another possible explanation for the unusually sharp decline in the percent share of the Amara is if only Amaras had died in huge numbers between 1994 and 2007, but that has not been reported through formal or informal channels.
1
A scientific explanation for the vastly different rates of growth reported in the 2007 census is one where there are significant differences in mortality and fertility, leading to definite differences in the rates of natural increase; when significant in-migration is added on, the increase of the in-migrating ethnic group can be larger. However, there is no evidence of such developments either. The last possibility for a dramatic change in ethnic composition is if there has been a systematic process of intentionally miscounting or misreporting the Amara, or otherwise throwing away census records before and during data processing; this may be the only possible explanation. However, no amount of record review can undo such damage, and this is what Addisu Legesse’s Census Commission wants to do to cover up work that is very badly done ! If none of the above scenarios had applied - and they did not - the ethnic composition of 1984 should have remained almost the same after the censuses of 1994 and 2007, and that would still keep the Oromo as the largest ethnic group with about 29.1% of the population. Amaras would be the second largest ethnic group with about 28.3% of the population, a difference of only 0.8%, and not one of 7.6%, as given in the census of May 2007, shown in Table 1 below. If the ethnic structure had remained about the same as that of 1984, which is normal in censuses of countries like Ethiopia, the difference in population sizes between Oromo and Amara should have been about 600,000 in the population census of May 2007, and not over 5,000,000. Likewise, the population of Amara region should have been larger by at least 3,000,000. However, it is interesting to note that in the census of 1994, the population counts by mother tongue gave those whose mother tongue as Amharic as the largest, and those with Oromigna as a mother tongue as the second largest group. Hence, one wonders which one of the two ethnic groups is the largest. The Sidama’s percent share should have also remained around 2.96%, the level of 1984, but it, too, has shot up to 4.02% in 2007, as shown in Table 1 below.. Table 1: Share of selected regions and ethnic groups in Ethiopia’s census populations
Region/ethni c groups
May 1984 Census
Ethiopia
(Millio ns) 42.62
REGIONS Amara
…
(%) 100. 0 ….
October 1994 May 2007 census census (Million s) 53.13
13.83
(%) 100. 0 26.0 2
(million s) 73.92
(%) 100.0
Annual growth Rates (%) 1984- 19942007 2007 2.394 2.64
17.21
23.3
…
1.75
Oromia SNNP Tigray Somali Affar Benishagul Gambela Harari
… … … … … … … …
… … … … … … … …
18.47 10.37 3.14 3.14 1.05 0.46 0.16 0.13
34.8 19.5 5.9 5.9 2.0 0.9 0.3 0.2
27.16 15.04 4.31 4.44 1.41 0.67 0.31 0.18
36.7 20.3 5.8 6.0 1.9 0.9 0.4 0.2
12.055 28.2 16.01 30.1 19.87 26.89 9 3 Oromo 12.388 29.0 17.08 32.1 25.49 34.48 7 5 Kembata 0.433 1.02 0.500 0.94 0.63 0.85 Haditya 0.644 1.51 0.93 1.75 1.28 1.73 Sidama 1.262 2.96 1.84 3.47 2.97 4.02 Welayita 1.093 2.56 1.27 2.39 1.71 2.31 Source: Population and Housing Reports of 1984, 1994 and 2007. Amara
… … … … … … … …
3.08 2.97 2.53 2.77 2.36 3.01 5.29 2.60
1.75
2.173
3.08
3.139
1.85 2.99 3.03 1.22
1.630 2.986 3.721 1.954
A brief look at the data for the Amara, Oromo and Sidama, and therespective regions in Table 1 shows the following strange features for the period 1994-2007: The percent share of the Amara in the census population has gone down by 1.4% from 28.3% in 1984 to 26.9% in 2007, whereas that for Oromo has gone up by 5.4% from 29.1% in 1984 to 34.5% in 2007. Where did the additional 4,000,000 Oromos come from in the census count of May 2007, and where did the Amara go ? Likewise, the Sidama have consistently made huge jumps in 1994 and 2007. Why do we have so much percent change in the ethnic structure of a country that has been peaceful, does not encourage free movement from one ethnic region to another, does not have significant in-migration of kith and kin from abroad, and has no fertility and mortality experiences that vary significantly over different ethnic groups or regions ? The average annual population growth rate for the period 1994-2007 in Amara region was reported as 1.75%, which is much lower than the national average, but that for Oromia was 3.08%. The demographic, social and economic experience over the period 1984 to 2007 indicates that the population growth rate of Oromia cannot be larger than that for the Amara region, but the census counts appear to say that Oromia grew almost twice as fast. This does not make sense. SNNP grew annually at 2.97% , which is not too far from that of Oromia, and the determinants for population growth in Ethiopia during 1994-2007 cannot justify
3
such growth rates; this growth presumably happened in the Sidama group, but not in the Kembata, Welayita and Hadiya ethnic groups, and that is also incredible. After the census of 1994, the difference between the percent shares of the Amara region and that of Oromia in the census populations was 8.8%, but that difference jumped to 13.4% after the May 2007 census. How and why did the Amara region contract so drastically, and how did Oromia explode so incredibly ? TPLF/EPRDF came into Addis Ababa loaded with poisonous ethnic propaganda and designs: it oversaw the redrawing of the political map of the regions, oversaw the dismemberment of Ethiopia, acted it out during Amara mass murders at Arbagugu, Wotter, Eastern Wellega and Assebot, supervised the delivery of a nation of 83 ethnic groups to the mercy of only 9 of them, giving each absolute power over farmland, and even life and death ; it closely controlled the censuses of 1994 and 2007, possibly “doctoring” census reports to give the abnormal ethnic compositions in 1994 and 2007. There is quite a lot of evidence on the Amara and the Oromia regions to show that the huge growth rate for Oromia and the huge decline in Amara region are pure fabrications; they are not supported by any mortality, fertility and migration experiences of both regions over the last two and one-half decades. Table 1 includes all regions and only 6 ethnic groups: Kembata, Hadiya, Sidama, Welayita, Oromo and Amara. Tthe six ethnic groups accounted for 65% of the population of Ethiopia in the 1984. census, but their collective share in the 2007 census population was over 70%, which cannot be explained since it has gone up by some 5%. Under normal conditions when the statistics are clean, population structure remains almost constant, and that is borne out for Kembata, Hadiya, and Welayita in Table 1. Apparently, this also suggests that the total census population count in May 2007 is, perhaps, not too far from 74 million. Among other regions, Tigray had an artificial growth in 1994, compared to 1984, by annexing sizable Amara populations in Alamata and Korem in North Wollo, and Simen in north-east Begemidir and Simen. However, it did stabilize in 2007 since it had stopped grabbing new fertile lands from neighboring regions. . The erratic composition for Somali region is understandable; Afar, Benishangul, Gambela and Harari have percent shares that are about the same in 1984, 1994 and 2007, as expected, in spite of erratic developments in Amara, Oromo, Sidama, Amara region, SNNP and Oromia. 2. The Picture in Urban Ethiopia Another problem area is urban Ethiopia where Addis Ababa is reported to have 2.74 million inhabitants in May 2007. Table 2 below shows the reported growth of our urban population:
4
Table 2. Growth of Urban Population, 1984-2007 May 1984
October 1994
May 2007 (millions)
Growth rate per year (%) 1984-2007
Growth rate per year (%) 1994-2007
Population Sector
(millions)
(millions)
Ethiopia
4.87
7.32
11.96
3.90641
3.63672
Urban Addis Ababa 1.42
2.11
2.74
2.85783
1.93533
Ethiopia less 3.45 5.21 9.22 4.27392 Addis Ababa Source: Population and Housing Reports of 1984, 1994 and 2007.
4.22811
The increased urbanization of Ethiopia explains the increased growth in 1984-2007 and 19942007. Table 2 also shows that Addis Ababa grew annually at 1.94 % between the last two censuses, whereas other urban populations in Ethiopia grew annually at 4.23%. Using these latter growth rates which are more compatible with the actual growth of Addis Ababa, the population of Addis Ababa may have been under-reported by about 1,000,000. Addis Ababa’s share of the urban census population went down by 5.5% in May 2007; its share of the total population also went down. Both declines are inconceivable for Addis Ababa. A possible explanation will be offered latter, but first to the fertility and mortality history of Ethiopia since these are the principal determinants for population growth.. 3. THE FERTILITY AND MORTALITY BACKGROUND The fertility and mortality history over the last 15 years comes from three official sources, as shown in Table 3 below: two of them are demographic and health surveys (DHSs) carried out by the Central Statistical Authority and an American survey institution which carries out such surveys all over the world; the other is the 1994 population and housing census. All three official reports give information on the level of fertility and mortality for the various ethnic regions of Ethiopia, as shown in Table 3 hereunder. TABLE 3. ETHIOPIA’S FERTILITY AND MORTALITY EXPERIENCE
5
1994 REGION
POPULATION CENSUS e0 1Q 0
DHS 2000 1Q 0
DHS 2005 TFR
BIRTH RATE
e0 (female)
Affar 118 50.3 129.2 116 50.8 Amara 112.4 118 Oromia 50.4 116.2 128 48.6 SNNP 113.4 123 Tigray 49.6 103.6 96 Somali 54.8 99.4 Benishagul 139 46.8 97.6 99 Gambela 54.2 122.6 113 Harari 51.4 118.3 Source: Population and Housing Reports of
4.9 37.3 50.8 5.9 37.3 56.0 6.4 37.3 55.5 5.9 37.3 53.5 5.8 37.3 54.9 5.7 37.3 55.4 5.4 37.3 51.1 4.5 35.7 58.5 4.4 35.7 54.7 1994,DHS 2000 and DHS 2005.
e 0 = the number of years a new-born may expect to live if the intensity of mortality at all ages remained unchanged throughout the life of the new-born. 1Q0 = the number of deaths of children under one year old in a year per 1000 live births during the same year. The 1984 census report (See :The 1984 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia: Analytical report at national level, pp.238- 241), which was relatively free from the obsession of ethnicity, gave the general pattern for the level of mortality as shown in Table 4 below: Table 4: State of the Rate of Natural Increase Region
Level of Fertility
Level of mortality
Arssi Bale Illubabor Wellega Keffa Harerghe
High High Average Low High High
High High Average Low High High
Probable level of population growth Low Low Low Low Low Low
Gojjam Gonder Wello Shewa
High Average Low Average
average Low Average Average
Medium Medium Low Low
Gamu Goffa Sidamo
High Average
Average Low
Medium Medium
6
A high birth rate and a low mortality rate give rise to a high rate of population growth, and a low fertility rate with a high morality rate will give a low rate of population growth, if migration is negligible in both cases. Hence, from Table 4, it is not possible to conclude that today’s Oromia or SNNP will have the highest population growths, as suggested to us by the population census of May 2007. In the 1994 census, fertility and mortality were not accurately measurable, as they have always been, and the best that the Central Statistics Authority (CSA)could do to prepare population projections for 1995-2000 was to use a simple approach. It assumed age and sex structure to be fixed for all Ethiopia, and it also assumed that urban Ethiopia will grow at 4.11% annually whereas rural Ethiopia would grow at 2.23 % annually; these were the growth rates used to project populations for 1995-2000 in Volume I, Part V of the Population and Housing Census abridged statistical reports for each of the 9 regions. These assumptions had to be made after the census of October 1994 since CSA had no credible evidence that showed that one region of Ethiopia was growing faster than another. The only additional evidence on mortality and fertility that came up after the 1994 census was that in the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2000 and DHS 2005, and the relevant data are given above in Table 3. DHS 2005 is quoted by the Ministry of Health in its 2006/2007 annual report, entitled Health and Health Indicator, on Page 6, as follows: Fertility is given as 37.3 births per 1000 in Tigray, Afar, Amara, Oromia, Somali, Benishagul-Gumuz, SNNP, and Gambela, and 35.7 in Harari, Dire Dawa and Addis Ababa. Life expectancy, which is a summary of mortality experience of all ages of the entire population, is given as 53.4 years for Amara, 53.0 for Oromia, 51.4 for SNNP and 53.4 for Ethiopia, all for males; that for females was 56.0 for Amara, 55.5 for Oromia, 53.5 for SNNP and 55.4 for Ethiopia. Whereas fertility was the same for Amara and Oromo, there was some variation in mortality: Amara men and women presumably lived longer than any of those in Ormia and SNNP; a larger life expectancy meant a lower overall mortality level; this same picture was also given in the 1994 census analysis where life expectancy in the Amara region was again higher than those for Oromia or SNNP. Hence, on the basis of all available official information, it is possible to conclude that Amara region cannot possibly have a lower population growth rate than Oromia or SNNP, and that is also supported by the earlier data in Table 4. However, the 2007 census gives an average annual growth rate of 1.75% for Amara region , 3.08% for Oromia and 2.97% for SNNP; the average annual growth rate for the Oromo is given as 3.21% and that for Amara as only 1.73% , both growth rates being as incredible as those for the two regions. None of these growth rates is supported by any official data in Ethiopia’s demographic history.
7
Amaras, the Amara region and Addis Ababa have been given highly reduced population sizes that defy information and logic. Perhaps, the explanation may lie in EPRDF’s perception of these people and regions after May 2005, and EPRDF’s possible chances in the elections of May 2010.. 4. WHY DID THE CENSUS OF MAY 2007 GO WRONG AGAIN? The continuing decline of the Amara, the populations of Addis Ababa and the Amara region during the last two EPRDF-controlled censuses have engaged a variety of professionals at home and abroad. Some uninformed observers have gone as far as saying that the Amara living in non-Amara ethnic regions may have chosen to report themselves as either Oromo or Sidama or any other ethnic group in October 1994 and May 2007. On account of the immense political pressure exerted on the Amaras by the Federal Government and local ethnic governments, this is very likely in order to have access to education, health services, farmland and other basic government services in their areas of residence. However, the number is too small to explain the huge decline in Amaras. According to the equally questionable 1994 population census, the Amara population residing in regions other than Amara region and Addis Ababa, where ethnicity has not been a serious problem, was 2,373,000. Given the fact that migration from one ethnic region to another is forbidden by our ethnic-based laws, if only that Amara population is allowed to grow annually at the rate of 3.14%, which is as large as the fastest growing large ethnic group reported in the May 2007 census, then, using the 1994 census as a baseline, the maximum possible Amara population in all other ethnic regions would be only 3,602,000. The population census of May 2007 has reported that there is an Amra population of 2,835,000 in the various other ethnic regions, excluding Amara region and Addis Ababa. Hence, the maximum possible number of Amaras that may have reported their ethnicity as anything but Amara is, at most, 3,602,000 – 2,835,000 = 767,000 only. However, the missing Amara population, in relation to other major ethnic groups, is well over 5,000,000. Hence, the argument that Amaras may have chosen to report themselves as anything else but Amara in non-Amara regions cannot explain the abnormal and unique decline in the Amara population. Furthermore, the argument of ethnic change due to local political pressure fails totally when we look at the huge decline of over 3,000,000 in the Amara region and another of over 1,000,000 in Addis Ababa where over 47% of that missing population is estimated to be Amara. Contrary to the provision of the Constitution, when Prime Miniser Meles announced the results of the 1994 census in the media, his first remark was that he was surprised that the Amara came to be so large. Evidently, that was a problem that he could not handle very well; he had obviously ignored the 1984 census. The current TPLF/EPRDF leaders are particularly strongly anti-Amara, and EPRDF has been doing everything to weaken or destroy the Amara: Regional boundaries have been redrawn, and the 8
only loser has been the Amara region which has lost fertile parts of north Wollo and north-east Begemidir and Simen to Tigray, west Gojjam and west Begemidir and Simen to Benishangul and to Sudan, and large chunks of northern shoa to Oromia, thereby forcing Amaras to go different ways to ensure survival in such a hostile environment. Most Amaras, like most Ethiopians, have always opposed ethnicity since allowing 9 ethnic groups to impose their will on 74 others is totally unjust and undemocratic. This is good enough for EPRDF to ensure that Addis Ababa, Amaras and Amara region are weakened well before 2010 by reducing their votes, and hence their political representation in the Ethiopian Parliament in 2010. The elections in May 2005 clearly demonstrated that Ethiopians would have dump ed EPRDF if they could. Meles also knows that the youth that flooded Meskel Square and all adjoining areas and streets on May 8, 2005, singing “Tilant lehodachin, zarie lagerachin” , may do exactly the same in May 2010 to achieve a democratic Ethiopia and a brighter future for itself. Hence, EPRDF is busy making preparations for May 2010: Agreements for negotiations reached with imprisoned leaders of Kinijit through the elders have been ignored; census counts are being manipulated to suit EPRDF’s designs; no external observers are allowed in the revised election law; opposition leaders and members of the free press and independent artists are being thrown into jail. EPRDF is making sure that no strong civil society is allowed by the new law; the youth, women, workers and farmers are all being urgently organized for EPRDF; no independent courts, no neutral election board, no independent public mass media, no strong private press, no neutral police and local militia so far; lobbyists are also busy in Europe and America to seek support for another stolen election in 2010. It is all business as usual! Do we need to go to Mandela to tell us how his successful coalition of 26 multi-colored opposition parties (democrats, racists, communists, socialist, regionalists, nationalists, etc.) won the elections in April 1994 ? Their trick was to get together during 1991-1994, and prepare meticulously to ensure free and fair elections. They succeeded without any need for any form of transition. We can win in May 2010 if (i) we come together now, and ensure that the prerequisites for free and fair elections are in place now, (ii) create a strong coalition that will avoid dividing the votes of supporters on voting day in 2010, and (iii) ensure that all ballots are correctly counted and reported, thereby avoiding the deadly errors of the opposition in May 2005.
9
Appendix: Census Counts
Region/Kilil
AMARA ONLY Oct. 1994 May 2007
ALL Oct. 1994
Amara 12,615,160 15,747,800 Oromia 1,684,128 1,961,277 SNNP 312,558 420,243 Tigray 81,297 70,334 Somali 20,951 29486 Afar 46,534 72,507 Benishangul 102,061 142,557 Harari 42,781 41,755 Gambela 12,566 25,856 Addis Ababa 1,019,729 1,288,306 Dire Dawa 69,798 68,887 Amara in Ethiopia by urbanization Rural 12,903,000 15,483,000 Urban 3,105,000 4,388,000 Total 16,008,000 19,871,000 Ethiopian Population by urbanization Rural Urban Total
10
ETHNIC GROUPS
May 2007
13,834,000 18,474,000 10,371,000
1`7,214,000 27,158,000 15,042,000
Growth rate (%) 1.696 3.008 2.902
2,113,000
2,738,000
2.0132
45,816,000 7,316,000 53,132,000
61,962.000 11,956,000 73,918,000
2.349 3.8505 2.8755