Aircraft Design Day3

  • June 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Aircraft Design Day3 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,687
  • Pages: 42
DAY 3

AIRCRAFT AS SEEN BY DIFFERENT GROUPS Stress group

Aerodynamic group

Production group

FLOW CHART OF AN A/C DESIGN Design Specification Design Criteria Basic Loads Flight Test Data

Airplane Design

Certification Test Program Approved Type Certificate

Laboratory Development Test Data

DESIGN CYCLE OF AN A/C

LOAD FACTOR LOAD FACTOR : A factor which defines load in terms of weight

L+∆ L=W+F

L=W

W ∆L = F = Az g  Az  ∆L + L = W 1 +  g  



A ∆L n =1+ =1+ g W

DESIGN LOAD FACTOR (6 to 8)

(2 to 3)

WING LOAD CASES • CASE A – Large angles of attack corresponding to CLmax while reaching a load factor of nmax (steep climb)

• CASE A’ – Reaching a load factor of nmax at maximum airspeed

• CASE B – Reaching a load factor of 0.5nmax at maximum airspeed with Ailerons deflected

• CASE C – Ailerons deflected at maximum airspeed (dive)

• CASE D & D’ – Acrobatic maneuvers with a negative load factor

WING LOAD REGIONS

Region I : n=nmax Region II : 0≤ n
CONSTRUCTION OF V-n DIAGRAM L = W = C Lmax From (1)

Vs1 =

Vs12 S 296

296 W

S

………….(2)

Vsn2 S 296

………….(3)

C Lmax

nW = C Lmax

………….(1)

From (1) & (3) we get

Vsn = Vs1 n n = C Lmax

Vs2 296 W / S

………….(4)

………….(5)

V-n DIAGRAM

MANEUVERING V-n DIAGRAM

GUST V-n DIAGRAM

LIMITING LOAD FACTOR VALUES S.No

Weight of the airplane

Limiting load factor

1

< 4118

3.8

2

4118 - 50000

3

> 50000

nlim it

24, 000 = 2.1 + ( Wto + 10, 000 )

2.1

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN

PHASES OF AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL DESIGN • • • •

Specification of function and design criteria Determination of basic external loads Calculation of internal element loads Determination of allowable element strengths and margins of safety • Experimental demonstration or subtantiation test program

CLASSIFICATION • CRITICAL – ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES FUSELAGE WING EMPENNAGE AILERON / FLAPS/STABILIZERS

• NEAR CRITICAL PARTS – TRAILING EDGE PANELS OF WINGS & EMPENNAGE – RADOME

• NON-CRITICAL PARTS – FAIRINGS / INTERIOR PANELS

CRITERIA FOR MATERIAL SELECTION • • • • • • • •

Light weight Stiffness Toughness Resistance to corrosion Fatigue Environmental heat Availability Easy to fabricate

MATERIALS • • • •

Aluminum alloy Titanium Steel Composites

SIGN CONVENTIONS

A) AXIAL FORCE

D) TORQUE

B) SHEAR FORCE

E) SHEAR FLOW

C) BENDING MOMENT

F) ANGLE & ROTATION

SIGN CONVENTIONS (REACTION LOADS)

A) AXIAL & SHEAR

B) BENDING MOMENT

C) TORQUE

STRUCTURAL INDEX • STRUCTURAL INDEX OFFERS THE DESIGNER A GUIDE TO DESIGN THE OPTIMUM TYPE OF STRUCTURE • STRUCTURAL INDEX IS USEFUL IN DESIGN WORK BECAUSE IT CONTAINS – THE INTENSITY OF THE LOAD – DIMENSIONS, WHICH LIMIT THE SIZE OF THE STRUCTURE

STRUCTURAL INDEX

A) SHEAR

B) TORSION

E) PANEL

F) TUBE

C) COLUMN

D) WIDE COLUMN

G) WING BOX

SEQUENCE OF STRESS WORK • PRELIMINARY SIZING • PRODUCTION STRESS ANALYSIS • FORMAL STRESS ANALYSIS FOR CERTIFICATION

PRELIMINARY SIZING Step1 : Recognize the function and configuration of the component Step2 : Basic loads (static / fatigue / fail safe / crash) Step3 : Material selection (static / fatigue / fracture toughness) Step4 : Fastener and repairability Step5 : Efficient structure (Fabrication / Configuration / assembly / installation / stiffness) Step6 : Cost ( Manufacturing / assembly/ performance / market)

EQUILIBRIUM OF FORCES • THE FORCE EQUILIBRIUM EQUATIONS ARE

∑F = 0 ∑F = 0 ∑M = 0 X

Y

FREE BODY DIAGRAM L

A STRUCTURE

∑F

x

=0⇒

T = 1200 lb

∑M

B

P

C B 1200 lb 40000 lb-in

T

W=8000 lb

=0 ⇒

1200 * 10 + P * 150 −8000 * 6 = 40000 15P = 7600 P = 506

∑F

Y

=0⇒

L + P = 8000 L = 7494

TRUSS TRUSSES ARE CLASSIFIED AS - STATICALLY DETERMINATE - STATICALLY INDETERMINATE m= Number of members j= Number of joints

m = 2 j −3

m < 2j-3 Structure is unstable m > 2j-3 Structure is statically indeterminate

TRUSSES (Contd…) • Identify whether the structure is statically determinate / indeterminate P

P

C

A

A

B RBH

RAH RAV

RBV

P

P

P

B

C

D

P

ASSUMPTIONS IN TRUSS ANALYSIS • The members of the truss are straight, weightless and lie in one plane • The members of the truss meeting at a point are considered as joined together by a frictionless pin • All the members axis intersect at the centre of the pin • All the external loads are only applied to the joints and in the plane of truss

TRUSS ANALYSIS TRUSSES CAN BE ANALYSED BY - METHOD OF JOINTS FREE BODY DIAGRAM - METHOD OF SECTIONS 4000 lb STRUCTURE C 2000 lb A B A

∑M

D

R1

=0⇒

1000 * 30 + 4000 *10 + 2000 *10 = R3 * 20 R3 = 4500 lb

∑F

X

=0⇒

R1 = 2000

1000 lb

∑F

Y

=0⇒

R 2 + R3 = 5000 R 2 = 500 lb

D R2

E

G R3

H

TRUSS ANALYSIS (Contd …) JOINT D

∑F ∑F

X

= 0 ⇒ FDE = 2000

Y

= 0 ⇒ FAD = 500

2000

D

 F = 0 ⇒ F Sin 45 = FAD ∑ Y AE

FAE = 707lb

 F = 0 ⇒ − F Cos 45 + FAB = 2000 ∑ X AE

FAB = 2500 lb

∑F

Y

2000 lb

A



FBE = 500lb  F = 0 ⇒ F Cos 45 + FDE = FEG ∑ X AE

FAB FAE

FAD =500

= 0 ⇒ FAE Sin45 = FBE

FEG = 2500 lb

FDE

500

JOINT A

JOINT E

FAD

FAE =707 FBE FEG

FDE =2000 E

TRUSS ANALYSIS (Contd …) JOINT B ∑F

= 0 ⇒ FBG Sin45 + FBE = 4000 

Y

FBG = 4950lb  F = 0 ⇒ F Cos 45 − FAB = FBC ∑ X BG FBC = 1000 lb

FAB =2500

 F = 0 ⇒ F Cos 45 − FEG = FGH ∑ X BG

Y

G 4500

= 0 ⇒ FBG Sin 45 + FCG = 4500 

FCG = 1000lb

JOINT H

 F = 0 ⇒ F Sin 45 = 1000 ∑ Y CH

FCH = 1414lb

FCG FGH

FEG =2500

FGH = 1000 lb

∑F

FBC

B FBE =500 FBG =4950

JOINT G

4000 lb

FCH

1000 lb

FGH =1000 H

TRUSS ANALYSIS (METHOD OF SECTIONS) 4000 lb 2000 lb A

C

B

1000 lb R1 D

E R2

G

G R3=4500

H

TRUSS ANALYSIS (METHOD OF SECTIONS) ∑M

4000 lb 2000 lb A

B

FBC

G

=0⇒

− 2000 * 10 + 4000 * 10 − 500 * 20 = FBC * 10 FBC = 1000 lb

∑F

Y

FBG R1=2000 lb D R2 =500 lb

E

=0⇒

FBG Sin 45 = 4000 − 500 FBG = 4950 lb

FEG G

∑F

X

=0⇒

FEG = FBGCos 45 − 2000 + 2000 − 1000 FEG = 2500 lb

TRUSS ANALYSIS (METHOD OF SECTIONS) ∑M

B

=0⇒

4500 * 10 − 1000 * 20 = FEG *10 FEG = 2500 lb

∑F

Y

FBG = 4950 lb X

=0⇒

FBC = FBGCos 45 − FEG FBC = 1000 lb

C 1000 lb

=0⇒

FBG Sin 45 = 4500 − 1000

∑F

FBC B FBG

FEG

G R3=4500

H

TRUSS WITH MEMBERS IN BENDING 100 lb A

RAX

200 lb

RBX1

RBY1 =100 lb RAY =100 lb 200 lb RBX1 RCX RBY2 =100 lb

RCY =100 lb

200 lb

100 lb

B

C

E D

TRUSS WITH MEMBERS IN BENDING ∑F

Y

=0⇒

200 lb B F BC FAB

FCE Sin30 = 100

100 lb FCE = 200 lb FBC C

∑F

X

FBC = FCE Cos30

FCE

Y

100 lb FAX

A FAB FAE

∑F

=0⇒

FBE = 200 lb X

FAB = FBC = 173.2 lb

FBE =200 lb FCE =200 lb FAE =200 lb

FBC = 173.2 lb

∑F

=0⇒

Y

FBE

=0⇒

∑F

E

FED

=0⇒

FAE Sin30 = 100

FED = F CE + FAE Cos 60  + FBE Cos 60

FAE = 200 lb

FED = 400 lb

∑F

X

FED

=0⇒

FAX = FAB + FAE Cos 30 FAX = 346.4 lb



FD

D

FD = FED = 400 lb

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD • A GENRALIZED MATHEMATICAL PROCEDURE FOR CONTINUUM PROBLEMS POSED BY MATHEMATICALLY DEFINED STATEMENTS 10 9

11

9 9

7

8

1

5 2

4

5

6

10 11 6 5

3 1

12 7 6

4 2

3

8

TRUSS ELEMENT Y

x1

x2 U1

U2 r=1

r=-1

Natural coordinate system r Global coordinate system X 2

2

X = ∑ hi X i

U = ∑ hiU i

1 h1 = (1 − r ) 2 1 h2 = (1 + r ) 2

1 h1 = (1 − r ) 2 1 h2 = (1 + r ) 2

1

1

X

TRUSS ELEMENT (Contd…) dU dU dr ε= = dX dr dX dU 1 = dr 2 dX 1 L = ( X 2 − X1 ) = dr 2 2 ( U 2 − U1 ) ε= L 1 B = [ − 1 1] L

1

K = ∫ BDBT dX −1

1 1 − 1 K = ∫ [ − 1 1] AE  L L 1 −1 1

 Jdr 

1 − 1  L AE K = 2 ∫ [ − 1 1]  dr  L −1  1  2 - 1 AE 1 K= 1 L - 1

STATIC ANALYSIS KU = F K-STIFFNESS MATRIX U–DISPLACEMENT VECTOR F- FORCE VECTOR SOLUTION METHODS A) SPARSE DECOMPOSITION B) CHOLESKEY FACTORIZATION C) PCG METHOD D) FRONTAL SOLVER

PRACTICEWORK Prob. 1 : Solve the given truss using method of joints, method of sections and compare

PRACTICEWORK 2. Solve the given aircraft structure using method of joints, method of sections and compare

Related Documents

Aircraft Design Day3
June 2020 5
Day3
November 2019 25
Day3
October 2019 25
Aircraft Design Day8
June 2020 3
Aircraft Design Day2
June 2020 4