2008 Kedah Ppmr Bi Ans

SULIT AUG 2008

PEPERIKSAAN PERCUBAAN PENILAIAN MENENGAH RENDAH 2008 _____________________________________________ MAR K S CHEME BAHASA INGGERIS KERTAS 1 DAN 2 __________________________________________________

Method of determining the overall result:

Paper 1

-

Paper 2

-

50 marks _______________

-

90 marks ________________

Total marks

40 marks

Convert the total marks into percentage as below: Candidate’s marks ___________________ 90

X

100 =

_________ %

PAPER 1

1

C

21

C

2

D

22

D

3

A

23

D

4

C

24

A

5

D

25

B

6

D

26

C

7

C

27

D

8

B

28

B

9

A

29

C

10

D

30

A

11

B

31

B

12

D

32

C

13

C

33

A

14

B

34

B

15

B

35

D

16

A

36

C

17

D

37

A

18

A

1

B

19

B

38

A

20

A

39

C

PAPER 2 MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION A – GUIDED WRITING BAND DESCRIPTORS BAND EXCELLENT

MARKS 25-30

• • • • •

• CREDIT

19-24

• • • • • •

ACHIEVEMENT

13-18

• • • • •

WEAK

7-12

• • • •

VERY WEAK

1-6

• •

DESCRIPTORS Task fulfilled with ideas and details well-developed and well-organised. Language is accurate with few minor errors and first draft slips. Varied sentence structures are used effectively to convey meaning. Vocabulary is apt and widely used. Accurate use of mechanics of writing. Interest of the reader is aroused and sustained. Task fulfilled with ideas and details developed and organised. Language is largely accurate with some serious and minor errors. Simple and compound sentence structures are accurate. Vocabulary is wide enough but lacks precision. Almost always accurate use of spelling, punctuation and paragraphing. Interest of the reader is aroused but not sustained. Task fulfilled with ability to develop some ideas but lacks details, ideas adequately organised. Language is sufficiently accurate with frequent serious errors. Simple and compound sentence structures are attempted. Vocabulary is sufficient to convey meaning. Some errors in mechanics of writing. Task partially fulfilled with ideas less developed; ideas lacking organisation. Language barely accurate with frequent serious errors that hamper reading. Vocabulary is limited. Serious errors in mechanics of writing. Task hardly fulfilled: ideas lack cohesion. High density of errors; meaning is hardly conveyed.

SECTION B: SUMMARY Content : 5 marks Language

: 5 marks

Total

: 10 marks

CONTENT POINTS FOR SUMMARY

1.

comes to his rescue / drove all the way to pick him up when his motorcycle could not start

2.

helpful / he does not mind sending his mother to work even though she is capable of driving herself

3.

patient

4.

great handyman / He does not complain about spending a whole afternoon trying to fix a gadget which is not functioning

5.

runs errands / driving him to the bank

6.

perfect gentleman / he will stand in line and order while his mother and he (they) sit and wait / he even shells the prawns and crabs for them

7.

spends a lot of time with them / watching television together / sharing a bowl of ‘cendol’ together / going grocery shopping together

8.

special friend

* Note Award a maximum of 5 marks for any 5 content points. Penalise only the first point when these words are used: “I”, “me”, “my”, “myself”. Then, award the rest of the points.

MARKING CRITERIA FOR SUMMARY – LANGUAGE BAND DESCRIPTORS BAND

MARKS

EXCELLENT

5

DESCRIPTORS • •

• • • • CREDIT

4

• •

• • • • ACHIEVEMENT

3

• •

• • • WEAK

2

• • • • •

Marked ability to use own words Language is accurate - use of simple and compound sentences - appropriate linkers - use of correct grammar Accurate spelling and punctuation First draft slips No lifting of sentences No irrelevant details

Ability to use own words Language largely accurate - use of simple and compound sentences - appropriate linkers - use of correct grammar Spelling and punctuation largely accurate Some minor errors Almost no lifting of sentences No irrelevant details

Attempts to use own words Language sufficiently accurate - use of simple and compound sentences (majority of simple sentences) - some use of linkers - some serious grammatical errors Some serious errors in spelling and punctuation Selective lifting of sentences Some irrelevant details

No attempts to use own words Frequent serious errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation Linkers hardly used Wholesale lifting of text material Irrelevant details

VERY WEAK

1

• • •

High density of errors – fractured syntax Total lifting of text material i.e transcript Irrelevant details

MARKING CRITERIA FOR SECTION C – NOVEL BAND DESCRIPTORS BAND

MARKS

EXCELLENT

9-10

DESCRIPTORS • • • • • •

CREDIT

7-8

• • • • • •

ACHIEVEMENT

WEAK

5-6

3-4

• •

1-2

Requirements of task fulfilled Ideas and details largely developed, organised and supported with evidence from text Varied sentence structures (simple and compound) Vocabulary wide enough Largely accurate use of language Largely accurate mechanics of writing

• • • • •

Requirements of task fulfilled Ideas and details sufficiently developed with some organisation and supported with some evidence from text Sentence structures lack variety (simple structures dominate) Adequate vocabulary used Sufficiently accurate use of language Fairly accurate mechanics of writing

•

Requirements of task partially fulfilled

•

• • •

Ideas lack development and organisation with minimal textual support – mere narration Sentence structures mostly simple with errors that hamper reading Vocabulary limited Language barely accurate with errors that hamper reading Inconsistent mechanics of writing

• • • •

Requirements of task hardly fulfilled Hardly any development of relevant ideas or textual support High density of errors; blurring evident, lacks cohesion Vocabulary very limited

•

VERY WEAK

Requirements of task fulfilled Ideas and details well-developed, well-organised with evidence from text Varied sentence structures (simple and compound) Wide and apt vocabulary Accurate use of language Accurate mechanics of writing

•

Numerous errors in mechanics of writing