2006-7 Quantum Theory Slides Lecture 8

  • July 2020
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2006-7 Quantum Theory Slides Lecture 8 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 930
  • Pages: 21
Quantum theory and atomic spectroscopy Lecture 8 Many electron atoms

Quantum mechanics is brilliant! • Solve the Schrödinger equation for hydrogen in spherical co-ordinates with a fixed nucleus • Not only do we get the wavefunctions, but we also get the energies of the orbitals too! • So what about the rest of the periodic table….. But it doesn’t really handle SPIN….

Today’s question is…… • Can we solve the Schrödinger equation for many electron atoms, find their wavefunctions and energies and explain the periodic table? Well, no!

The Schrödinger equation for helium • This is a many particle system • If we assume that the nucleus is stationary, we find the Schrödinger equation is 2 2 h h 2 2 Hˆ = − 2 ∇ el1 − 2 ∇ el 2 + V (r1 , r2 , r12 ) 8π me 8π me

2q 2 2q 2 q2 V(r1 , r2 , r12 ) = − − + 4πε 0 r1 4πε 0 r2 4πε 0 r12

Electron correlations • Electrons are not truly independent of one another • This is known as electron correlation and is the result of the repulsive interaction between the electrons • Even this simple 2 electron problem cannot be solved analytically

So introduce APPROXIMATIONS

The orbital approximation • We use the hydrogen wavefunctions as the basis for the manyelectron wavefunction e.g 1s2 • The increased nuclear charge means more “compact” orbitals • But what about the electron correlation?

Ψ (r1 , r2 ,.....rN ) = ϕ(r1 )ϕ(r2 ).....ϕ(rN )

Effective nuclear charge • We introduce simple concepts to deal with the electron-correlation effects and explain relative energies • Shielding effects • Penetration of electron wavefunctions

The two electron atom • Helium is a true two-electron atom, but others can be treated in this way e.g. calcium • In its ground state it has a filled orbital, but in its excited states this is usually no longer true. • What will these wavefunctions be like?

Degenerate wavefunctions • Look at two electrons in just two possible orbitals: 1s and 2s (a two level atom again!) • Remember using quantum mechanics we have four different total energies, where classically we would expect three • Where do we get the extra level?

Superposition Two electrons in two levels leads to four distinct configurations Quantum – four different total energy states (SUPERPOSITION of c2 + c3)

These wavefunctions are indistinguishable! • The simplest two-electron wavefunctions to form would be just products of the orbitals • These two degenerate wavefunctions are for all intents and purposes identical • To see this, just consider ionisation of the helium- which electron has been ionised? • Also, they are not orthogonal ψ 1s (1)ψ 2s (2) • Known as product states

ψ 2s (1)ψ 1s (2 )

Superposition of wavefunctions • The true wavefunction is thus a superposition of the two orbital product wavefunctions ψ 1s (1)ψ 2s (2 )

ψ 2s (1)ψ 1s (2 )

a (ψ 1s (1)ψ 2 s (2 )) + b(ψ 2 s (1)ψ 1s (2 )) • This clearly shows that orbitals really are only an approximation to the real two electron wavefunction

Looks familiar…. • This is very similar to the free particle, where we had two possible solutions

aψ 1s (1)ψ 2s (2 ) + bψ 2s (1)ψ 1s (2 )

ae

ikx

+ be

− ikx

• The adding of wavefunctions in this way is called SUPERPOSITION • This time, however, we have a BOUNDARY CONDITION….

Symmetric and anti-symmetric wavefunctions • Ensure superposition produces orthogonal wavefunctions • There are only two solutions found in this case Do these have the same energy? Let’s look at the wavefunctions…

Ψ+ (1,2 ) = a [ψ 1s (1)ψ 2s (2 ) + ψ 2s (1)ψ 1s (2 )]

Ψ− (1,2 ) = a [ψ 1s (1)ψ 2s (2) − ψ 2s (1)ψ 1s (2 )]

Seeing electron correlation • The two (radial) wavefunctions are very similar, except at very short distances from the nucleus • Notice there is an (anti)-correlation between the electrons

Fermi-heaps and Fermi-holes • The anti-symmetric wavefunction has an decreased probability of finding both electrons near the nucleus. This is a Fermi-hole. • By contrast, the symmetric wavefunction has a Fermi-heap • Both are a result of the superposition of the 1s2s product wavefunctions (configurations)

Energy effect of electron correlation • The increased magnitude of the two-electron wavefunction at the nucleus decreases the stability of the symmetric wavefunction because of the electronelectron repulsion!

• Key here is that the electron repulsion does not “create” the Fermi-hole, but it does effect the final energy of the wavefunctions!

The helium atom again • We seem to have two sets of energy levels • They correspond to different values of total spin • Orthohelium energy levels much lower! • Now, we’ll draw this a slightly different way…

Spatial wavefunctions This time, notice that all singlet terms are symmetric spatial wavefunctions, and the antisymmetric triplet!

• This is due to a fundamental symmetry of quantum objects…. but we’ll leave it till next year!!!

Answers to the earlier questions.. • We cannot solve a Schrödinger equation for many electron atoms analytically • Instead, we introduce some approximations and use numerical techniques to help us • Electron correlations can be revealed in many-electron wavefunctions, such as Fermi heaps and holes • Superposition of product wavefunctions is imposed by the indistinguishability of electrons

To summarise • Quantum mechanics was a marriage between experimental observation and theoretical insights • The key seems to be people willing to think the unthinkable!

Related Documents